Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Cabin in the Woods’ Proved That Delayed Releases Aren’t Always a Bad Thing

Published

on

Cabin in the Woods

Release date delays happen all the time, and they are usually associated with films that are not exactly the best the genre has to offer. Films like The Green InfernoHansel and Gretel: Witch HuntersThe Wolfman and this year’s absolutely atrocious The Bye Bye Man are all recent(ish) examples of subpar horror films that suffered some rather lengthy delays. So often this happens that whenever a film is pushed back audiences tent to automatically assume that it will be terrible. That is not always the case though. The Cabin in the Woods, which will be celebrating its five-year anniversary today, was pushed back two years after its originally scheduled release date to critical acclaim. 

The Cabin in the Woods got its start in a hotel room where Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard locked themselves up for three days. They wrote one act of the film each day, and turned in their draft later that week. With the film, Whedon and Goddard aimed to resuscitate the slasher genre which they thought had devolved into a quagmire of torture porn. Production on The Cabin in the Woods started on March 9, 2009, seven months before Saw VI came out, making it a rather timely commentary on the genre. Unfortunately, the film wouldn’t see a release until two years after the Saw franchise temporarily concluded in 2010 with Saw: The Final Chapter. This made the commentary that Whedon and Goddard injected in the film a little late to the party, but it still made for an effective film.

Why did it take so long for The Cabin in the Woods to see a release? It certainly wasn’t because it was a bad movie. No, the real reason is a boring one: financial difficulties. Metro-Goldwyn Mayer and United Artists scheduled the film for release on February 5, 2010, but the first delay came when MGM announced that the film would be converted into 3D. They then announced a release date of January 14, 2011. As if that news weren’t bad enough (the 3D post-conversion more so than the delay), audience patience was tested once again on June 17 of that same year when MGM announced that The Cabin in the Woods was delayed indefinitely due to the plethora of financial troubles that they were having.

News on the film was silent for months. Remember when the only image we had scene of the film was the one shown above? I swear I had seen that still a hundred times before the movie actually came out. It wasn’t until ten months later on April 28, 2011 that a distribution sale to Lionsgate was announced. This was a rather ironic announcement, considering that Lionsgate released all of the torture porn films that The Cabin in the Woods was trying to send up. The deal was sealed on July 20th and Lionsgate purchased the distribution rights for the film, eventually scheduling it for release on April 13, 2012.

One has to wonder why Lionsgate didn’t go after a Halloween 2011 release. The only horror movies released that month were Paranormal Activity 4 and Silent Hill: Revelation, but Lionsgate probably thought Paranormal Activity 4 would pose more of a threat to their new film’s box office chances (who could have known it would turn out to be the second-worst entry in that franchise?). The Cabin in the Woods finally saw a release the following April where it grossed $14.7 million it’s opening weekend, landing in the #3 spot behind The Three Stooges (oof) and The Hunger Games, which landed in the #1 spot in its fourth week of release. While not a huge commercial success (it grossed $42 million domestically on a $30 million budget), it was an enormous critical success, earning a 92% on Rotten Tomatoes and a 72 on MetaCritic, making it the best-reviewed mainstream horror film of 2012.

The film has its detractors now (what hugely popular film doesn’t?), but the consensus is that it’s one of the best horror films of the decade. That just goes to show you that delays aren’t always a bad thing, at least not when they’re related to a studio’s financial difficulties, though Red Dawn didn’t fare nearly as well critically or commercially as The Cabin in the Woods. What are your thoughts on the movie? Do you love it? Or are you in the camp that thinks its overrated? Give it a re-watch (or a first-time watch) today on its fifth anniversary and let us know what you think in the comments below!

A journalist for Bloody Disgusting since 2015, Trace writes film reviews and editorials, as well as co-hosts Bloody Disgusting's Horror Queers podcast, which looks at horror films through a queer lens. He has since become dedicated to amplifying queer voices in the horror community, while also injecting his own personal flair into film discourse. Trace lives in Austin, TX with his husband and their two dogs. Find him on Twitter @TracedThurman

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading