Connect with us

Editorials

The Year of Stephen King: Best and Worst Adaptations of 2017

Published

on

*Keep up with our ongoing end of the year coverage here*


With over 60 novels, 200 short stories and counting, 6 non-fiction books, and no signs of slowing down at age 70, it’s not as though Stephen King needed a career boost. Yet, that didn’t stop 2017 from being the year that adaptations of the prolific author’s work exploded everywhere, from the big screen to the small, and streaming services in between.

With such a large body of work to pull from, and the massive successes of certain King adaptations, it’s no surprise that this year is only the beginning. While there’s a long list of projects in development, like new series Castle Rock for Hulu or a new adaptation of Firestarter in development, we look back at the best and worst Stephen King adaptions that 2017 had to offer.


THEATRICAL RELEASES

Worst: The Dark Tower

One of King’s most beloved works is The Dark Towers series, eight or so novels that blend dark fantasy, horror, and western genres and follows Gunslinger Roland Deschain. Critics and audiences alike were extremely disappointed to discover the film adaptation proved to be nothing at all like the book series upon its August theatrical release. Perhaps that’s not so surprising, considering the project has been in development since 2007, going through multiple studios and filmmakers before finally landing at Sony with Nikolaj Arcel at the helm. During its sluggish box office run, The Dark Tower didn’t exactly tank, but it underwhelmed expectations by a vast amount. The only one to seemingly come out unscathed was Idris Elba as Roland. Despite a lackluster showing, Sony is moving ahead with The Dark Tower series, with Glen Mazzara (The Walking Dead) serving as showrunner and Elba expected to reprise his role.

Best: IT

When Cary Fukunaga vacated the director’s seat in 2015 due to disagreements with New Line over the direction of the story, expectations on the pending new adaptation cooled. Enter Andy Muschietti, an upcoming director with only one feature-length directing credit to his name, Mama. Fans still weren’t convinced. Yet, that slowly began to change. First, in February, news broke that this iteration of one of King’s most popular works would be R-rated. The following month, footage of the film shown at SXSW impressed its audience. But it was the record-breaking views upon the trailer’s release at the end of March that would indicate not only Muschietti’s masterful vision, but the record-breaking box office numbers that were still to come. IT earned high praise from critics, and held strong at the box office for weeks, earning over $600 million worldwide. Bill Skarsgard successfully made Pennywise his own, terrifying theatergoers everywhere, but it was the young cast that made up the Losers Club that stole our hearts.


TELEVISION

Worst: “The Mist”

Spike’s first original scripted series, based on Stephen King’s story, seemed like a great idea. While Frank Darabont’s adaptation in 2007 was mostly confined to a grocery store, expanding the concept to a whole town, offering multiple perspectives while the eerie mist wreaked havoc, sounded great on paper. Except the reality was that the 10-episode run wound up feeling like a drag when it consisted of character inconsistencies, plot holes, and terrible VFX. The writing was clumsy and almost seemed to actively work against making any characters likable, throwing in things like date rape and incest without much purpose. Averaging a 0.14 rating in adults 18-49 at about 462,000 viewers per episode, it failed to catch on with viewers, so it’s no surprise that after a lackluster inaugural season, The Mist will not be getting a second season.

Best: “Mr. Mercedes”

Developed by David E. Kelley and executive produced by King himself, this mystery thriller TV series follows along with King’s Bill Hodges trilogy. Running for 10-episodes, and created for AT&T’s Audience network, a second season renewal was announced just ahead of the inaugural season finale in early October and will follow the second novel in the series, Finders Keepers. Harry Treadaway, fresh off of Penny Dreadful, has been great as the psychopathic Brady Hartsfield, but the best reason to tune in is Brendan Gleeson’s take on retired detective Bill Hodges. The cat-and-mouse game between killer and detective is pure King entertainment; King even got in a trademark cameo, only to be served a violent death in episode six.


NETFLIX

Draw: 1922

1922

2017 brought not one, but two Stephen King adaptations for the popular streaming service, the second of which smartly adapted a lesser known King novella. Starring Thomas Jane and Molly Parker, with a great score by Mike Patton, this slow burn horror follows a farmer as he convinces his teenage son to assist in murdering his wife, and the subsequent consequences of guilt. Though mostly critically loved, 1922 is either a winner or loser depending on the viewer. Well shot and well-acted, this one comes down to taste preferences. There are those that will adore Jane’s Wilfred James’ slow descent into madness as guilt and consequences consume him. For others, like me, the horror elements will be too toned down to really enjoy the deliberate, crawling pace of the story. Parker’s vengeful ghost is brilliant, and sorely underutilized. That said, adapting King’s lesser-known works is worth celebrating alone.

Best: Gerald’s Game

Leave it to Mike Flanagan to finally set the record straight that there is no such thing as an unfilmable novel or story as long as the right director is at the helm, which is what Gerald’s Game was always considered due to most of the narrative taking place within protagonist Jesse’s head. Handcuffed to a bed and left for dead when her husband unexpectedly dies during a poor attempt to spice up their marriage, Jesse talks to versions of her husband and her own self in her head, working through her situation and her painful past. Wanting to adapt this novel since he was in college, Flanagan manages to make the material make sense for screen while still honoring the source novel. The Moonlight Man is as creepy as he is on the page, thanks to Carel Struycken’s presence, but boy does Carla Gugino give the performance of her life as the physically, emotionally, and mentally tortured Jesse. Though audiences were left divided by the epilogue, which remained faithful to the novel, everyone was enraptured by the events leading up to it, including that scene with the wrist. You know the one.

Which Stephen King adaptation did you love the most?

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading