Connect with us

Editorials

The Curious Case of ‘Fright Night Part 2’: How Setbacks and Real Murders Buried the Sequel

Published

on

I’ve long sung the praises of Fright Night Part 2. It’s one of those rare sequels that still has the spirit of the beloved original that came before it, and it should have been a bona fide classic. Instead, it’s more like an estranged relative who has an endearing quality about them and everyone loves them, they just don’t get invited to the all the formal reunions and get-togethers.

What’s even more peculiar about it is that Fright Night 2 doesn’t seem to be a target for haters of other sequels such as Friday the 13th Part 5 or Halloween 3, even when Halloween 3 and Fright Night 2 share the same director. People just seemed to either quietly love it and accept its obscurity and strange inaccessibility or never even know there was a very faithful sequel to the quintessential vampire horror comedy of the 1980’s in the first place.

With Fright Night 2 (briefly) streaming on Amazon recently, not only was I hopeful that it would make it to the masses proper, but it also got me thinking (again for the umpteenth time) how bad the universe has treated the film. My own experience with discovering the existence of Fright Night 2 was suddenly finding it in the video store with that box art that looked like the inner sleeve of a Prince album. Something just didn’t add up. No theatrical release that I knew of, no television spots, and not even much VHS hype in the new release preview magazines that were free from a pile on the video store counter. At that point in the late 1980’s (about fall of 1989), the original Fright Night had already achieved cult status. Why the sequel slipped under the radar was quietly pondered by horror fans everywhere in a time when social media would’ve come in handy for such a hot-button topic. I never saw it then, but there was a trailer for Fright Night 2.

The real story of why Fright Night 2 is obscure is a complex tale of Hollywood politics, sweet deals that sadly fell through, and even a high profile murder case.

The first Fright Night was a hit. The timing couldn’t have been better. The horror comedy formula had already been proven by Ghostbusters the previous year, and both films were released by Columbia Pictures. The director, Tom Holland, lovingly crafted it even down to personally selecting the songs for the soundtrack. The producers were even ready to start filming the sequel before the original was released. Everyone involved believed in continuing the story as soon as possible. So what happened in those four years until Part 2? The changing of the guard at Columbia Pictures saw new leadership that lacked the enthusiasm for horror films held by their predecessors. The new suits favored more high-brow Oscar worthy fodder such as previous projects like Chariots of Fire.  That extremely bad timing put the kibosh on the immediate sequel everyone was ready to do. The rights to the future of Fright Night ended up with a smaller company called New Century Vista Film Company through original producer Herb Jaffe. (That company name may not ring any bells, but they did have some cred in genre cinema with releases like The Gate and The Wraith.)

When the script for Fright Night 2 was first developed, Evil Ed and Amy were coming back. By the time Tommy Lee Wallace came on board, the script had been re-tooled in a new direction that didn’t include Ed and Amy. Stephen Geoffreys went on to be in Robert Englund’s directorial debut, 976-Evil and Amanda Bearse was starting a very long tenure on “Married With Children:. Tom Holland and Chris Sarandon were also committed to another future franchise, Child’s Play. Tommy Lee Wallace made the best of it and still sought Tom Holland’s input to make it as proper a sequel as possible. He and the New Century Vista staff added the Regine storyline arc along with characters like Belle, Bozworth, and Louie.

The budget was also shaved about a million and a half from the original and when everything was finished, Fright Night Part 2 was rumored to be released internationally in 1988. By the time it made it stateside on May 19, 1989, it opened on a mere 148 screens and barely made a ripple.

Between Fright Night 2’s theatrical release and when I first discovered it in my video store is where things turn both very interesting and very tragic. The head of New Century Vista was a man named Jose Menendez. He was a self-made immigrant from Cuba who worked his way up the Hollywood ladder from humble beginnings and then on to high profile stints at RCA music, and executive vice president at Carolco Pictures. By most accounts, he wasn’t very nice, and not the easiest to deal with. He was, however, open to filming a third Fright Night, even after the lackluster performance of part 2. Tom Holland and Roddy McDowall were in talks with him on the prospect of coming back into the Fright Night fold when on August 20, 1989, he and his wife were fatally shot by their two sons, Lyle and Eric (the Menendez brothers). The trial would have major media coverage and allegations would surface of verbal and physical abuse as motives for them to kill their parents.

Fright Night 2 was then caught up in a panicked regrouping of New Century Vista, and has been in rights hell ever since. It made it quietly to VHS, and then an out of print and really expensive DVD, and finally a Blu-Ray. I’ve always thought that part 2 was a proper sequel to one of mine and everyone else’s most beloved horror films. It was more a victim of circumstance than of its own shortcomings. Maybe one day we won’t have to give every other fan a heads up when it briefly surfaces on any other format besides the bootleg variety.

Here’s hoping.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading