Editorials
The Three Faces of ‘Carrie’s’ True Villain, Margaret White
In 1974 Stephen King published not only his first novel, but a story that would weave its way into the tapestry of the horror landscape for all time. There is something that continues to resonate about “Carrie”– the tale of an outsider teenage girl being bullied and exacting revenge on her tormentors. We sympathize with the outcast, Carrie White, and yet we still recoil in horror as she lashes out at the prom attendees after her infamous crowning. Over the course of three film adaptations, the plot has remained more or less constant and unchanging, but one particular element of the story has seen surprisingly different iterations – Carrie’s mother.
Margaret White is one of the most memorable horror movie villains and she plays a vital role in the story of “Carrie.” Carrie’s world is shaped by Margaret’s influence, and it is Margaret to whom she must answer day in and day out. As humiliating as the insults from Chris Hargensen and the other girls are, as horrifying as the falling cascade of pig blood is on prom night, they are nothing compared to what Carrie has to come home and face every single day from her overbearing, religious zealot of a mother.
Margaret is a terrifying woman – harsh and unyielding. Fanatical at times, her faith is the force that drives her and motivates all of her actions. She is controlling and manipulative, ever desiring Carrie to remain close to god and out of the reach of the modern world. Throughout every iteration of this material, though those traits must remain a constant, Margaret is allowed a certain amount of flexibility, and seeing the way in which different filmmakers and actresses bring her to life is fascinating.

Piper Laurie
The role originated with an unforgettable performance from Piper Laurie in Brian De Palma’s 1976 adaptation. She is dominating physical presence – strong and formidable, with a powerful voice. Though she does have the occasional quiet moment at dinner, or singing softly as she sews, her mood can turn on a dime, and a pleasant interaction can quickly become an intimidating one, as Carrie (Sissy Spacek) is ever under her watchful eye.
Laurie’s performance in this film is transcendent, and her interactions with Carrie are profoundly tense. She is a powerful and aggressive character, driven by her belief system and inflexible to the world around her. When Margaret comes home to discover that Carrie had gotten her period, she immediately begins judging and chastising her, demanding that she beg forgiveness for her sins. Even as Carrie sobs and swears that she committed no sin, Margaret continues bellowing scripture and commanding Carrie to repeat the words. When Margaret feels that Carrie is not getting the point, she effortlessly drags her across the room and forces her into her prayer closet, all the while continuing to quote Bible verses as Carrie screams and begs to be let out.
This version of the character emphasizes Margaret’s control over Carrie’s life. Laurie (along with De Palma’s direction) gives Margaret a physical presence that is much larger and more imposing than the actress herself. Margaret towers over Carrie, both physically and emotionally, and her daughter understandably shrinks in her presence. Laurie plays Margaret as a woman not to be trifled with as she physically personifies the fire and brimstone that she preaches to Carrie on a daily basis.

Julianne Moore
In her 2013 adaptation, director Kimberly Peirce cast Julianne Moore in the role, and the result is a version of Margaret that is a bit softer and plays up the maternal angle of her character. In this film, we see Carrie’s birth, and Margaret’s desire to kill the baby since she believes her to be born of sin. But she can’t do it. Margaret’s love for her child overrides her religious instinct this one time, and she lets Carrie live. This moment is alluded to in De Palma’s film, but here, we actually see it happen, and it drives some of the interactions that we see between Mother and Daughter throughout the film.
Moore’s version of Margaret is still incredibly strict and unbending with her religion, but we do see a mother’s love come into play at times. Though she does see Carrie’s (Chloe Grace Moretz) desire to go to the prom as wicked, she also seems genuinely concerned about her daughter’s well-being. Her reaction after the incident in the locker room at the start of the film is fueled by equal parts religious rage at the thought that her daughter’s sins have brought about menstruation, and the protective instinct to keep Carrie safe from the cruelties of the outside world.
She periodically calls Carrie “little girl” and has moments of tenderness, despite her controlling nature. We see more of an actual relationship between these two characters than we do in De Palma’s film. As much as Margaret is driven by the judgment of her religious beliefs, she also has the drive of a mother seeking to protect her daughter. This change ultimately makes Margaret a bit less harsh and terrorizing, but the interactions between Margaret and her daughter are a little more complex. Though this wouldn’t necessarily categorize Margaret as a sympathetic character, we do see that her motivations are fueled, in small part, by her love for Carrie, as well as by her will and her focus on her faith.

Patricia Clarkson
In the 2002 television adaptation (written and produced by Bryan Fuller), Margaret is portrayed by Patricia Clarkson. This version is a bit of a midpoint between Laurie and Moore’s renditions of the character. Though she is still controlling and driven by her strict belief structure, this Margaret has a softness that comes through not as maternal, but more like a teacher to Carrie (played here by genre fave Angela Bettis). As always, Margaret will, of course, turn violent when pushed, but Clarkson seems to be taking the approach of “I’m doing this for your own good” as she rigidly guides Carrie through her faith. She is not nearly as harsh as Laurie is in her performance, but she is uncompromising, all the same. Her softness does not translate to love, as it does in Moore’s portrayal, but more like a distanced concern.
Throughout Carrie’s determination to try to be a part of the world outside her mother’s house, Margaret tries to plead with her and to make her understand the sins and dangers that she believes surround her. When Carrie begins making her prom arrangements, Margaret is resigned and saddened by her decision. She demands her daughter read specific bible verses about unclean and prideful women and when Carrie refuses, Margaret sadly says,
“You’ve gone so far astray, I fear for you.”
She cares about what she perceives to be Carrie’s spiritual well-being and tries to guide her in that regard, but even though her approach is not necessarily as forceful as Laurie’s, she is not guided by the sense of love that Moore’s Margaret exhibits.
When Carrie returns home after the prom, Margaret greets her with a softness, but a softness completely devoid of any warmth.
“I told you your sin would find you.” She says softly, as they kneel down to pray together before Margaret forces Carrie underwater in the bathtub.
And at the center of every great story is a great villain, and Margaret White has more staying power in this tale than perhaps anyone else. Even after Carrie vanquishes everyone at the dance and lays waste to the town (depending on what version you are watching), back at home, her ultimate adversary awaits her. Seeing how different performers can bring out different aspects of the character without changing what lies at her core is a fascinating examination of storytelling and just how we connect with characters in film. Making small changes to how Margaret is portrayed and bringing out different elements in her personality can alter how the story is told, without making any drastic changes to the heart of the story itself.
Editorials
Taking a Closer Look at the ‘Christmas Carol’ Ghosts of Ti West’s ‘Ebenezer’
The trailer for Ti West’s upcoming adaptation of A Christmas Carol raised a lot of eyebrows when it dropped earlier this week. While plenty of folks initially dismissed Ebenezer as a derivative project meant to cash in on the recent wave of unnecessary prequels that expand the backstory of beloved characters (such as 2023’s Wonka), Charles Dickens’ original novel already made a point of exploring Ebenezer Scrooge’s origins in detail – meaning that this new film is likely just a particularly faithful adaptation of the source material under a different name.
Couple that with the fact that the movie is being helmed by a genuine horror auteur and I think it’s safe to say that the latest iteration of the first modern ghost story is in good hands.
That being said, one detail that immediately jumped out at me during the brief teaser (other than a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it nod to Johnny Depp’s iconic bedroom death scene from the original A Nightmare on Elm Street) is the fact that many of Ebenezer’s ghosts appear to have been directly lifted from the iconic John Leech illustrations that accompanied the first edition of Dickens’ novel.
Here are a couple of stills from the trailer compared to the original artwork:

The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’

The Phantoms in ‘A Christmas Carol’ and ‘Ebenezer’

Marley’s Ghost in ‘Ebenezer’ and ‘A Christmas Carol’
Mainly working with old-school wood and steel engravings that would later be transferred to print, Leech was instrumental in crafting the iconic look of history’s most influential phantoms – especially since Dickens is said to have been deeply involved with the creation of these so-called “comic illustrations.”
And since the novel is commonly said to have popularized spiritualism in Victorian England, much of the ghostly iconography that we still see in genre media to this very day (including some of Ti West’s previous films) can be traced back to the author’s partnership with Leech.
Ebenezer won’t be the first A Christmas Carol adaptation to borrow heavily from these designs, but I can appreciate how Ti West is incorporating an important part of horror history into his latest film.
Ebenezer will be available in theaters starting November 13.

You must be logged in to post a comment.