Connect with us

Editorials

If Looks Could Kill, Then Death Would Be My Name: A Retrospective of George Romero’s ‘Bruiser’

Published

on

Between the years 1993 and 2000, George Romero was not forgotten, though he was on something of an unwanted hiatus at that time. In spite of a few box office flops, Romero didn’t stop trying to get back into the horror scene, but during that hiatus, several projects he was attached to – including Resident Evil, The Mummy and The Stand – were stuck in development hell. Unfortunately for Romero (and for Romero fans), none of these projects came to fruition; instead they went to other directors who had great success with them.

After a few failed attempts to get projects off the ground, Romero returned with another original horror film of his own, but to this day it hasn’t received the recognition it deserves.

Bruiser is a horror story about dignity and pride. Henry Creedlow is a man that doesn’t want to fall short of his expectations. He tries his hardest for his wife, boss, and friends on a consistent basis. Henry is a good guy and people know that. However, they always take advantage of him. One day, Henry wakes up and realizes that his face is gone, replaced with a white canvas. No texture, no structure, just blank white. Nothing. It’s more than his face that’s gone, it’s his identity, too. Henry soon realizes that the only way to regain everything back is to make the wrong things right and finally stand up for himself. Once he does that, he regains his pride, well-being, and his identity. It will just take a few deaths to achieve this status, naturally.

In 2000, Bruiser brought Romero back into the fold but it suffered horribly due to the fact that it lacked promotion and was only released in Canada at the time. By the time it got to the States, it was pirated and being sold illegally at conventions throughout the world. Sadly, by the time it had a wide release, it was too late, marking another failure for Romero. Even when torrenting wasn’t around, bootleg VHS tapes and DVDs were the main source of trading among horror enthusiasts and this is a prime example on how these types of things can harm a film.

In 2002, Bruiser was widely (and legally) released on VHS and DVD and could be found at most retailers and rental stores. But after its official release in the US, the film still suffered, with the majority of horror fans looking at the cover and thinking it was another ripoff of Halloween because of the white mask on the front. The early 2000’s weren’t the best times for DTV (Direct-to-Video) horror flicks anyway, and most big rental stores only received one or two copies on DVD and maybe one copy of a VHS tape.

Long story short, Bruiser was at the wrong place at the wrong time.

A lot of little films like this suffered during this time and didn’t really get noticed until later in life; some even achieved cult status later down the line. We didn’t have Redbox or Netflix, so a ton of little indies just collected dust on shelves. And Bruiser, well, it never did attain much of a following.

But for hardcore Romero fans, Bruiser was in many ways a return to form for the horror master. Just like Night of the Living Dead, Dawn of the Dead and Day of the Dead, Romero had something to say about the world and the people in it with his 2000 return. Bruiser tackles society as a whole and what it can do to a person. It’s not a supernatural aspect when the white face appears on our lead character; there is something to be said about what happens to him and I think a lot of people missed that point and still do. Most of Romero’s films are outstanding, in large part because he knew how to blend real life into horror. Deep down, that’s the real horror; not the zombies, the monkey, the white face, or the wannabe vampire.

With Bruiser, another horror film rich with social commentary, Romero created one of the most memorable and likable “villains” in the genre. When is the last time you truly cared for the killer? Someone that you want to see prevail even when they are murdering their friends and family? Bruiser is one of those films that won’t leave you because it’s so unique. People may look at the film and see it as a revenge slasher, but it’s a lot more than that once you scrape off the surface.

Not only does the film have an interesting plot, but it’s also got original music by The Misfits and a special appearance by them as well. Jason Flemyng is another treat in the film. Jason had been in the industry for a while playing bit parts here and there, never getting that leading man role, and he really let his talents shine with this character and showed that he can carry a film by himself. The surrounding cast is great as well; notably, the detective is played by horror veteran Tom Atkins.

In the year 2000, George Romero made an amazing film that is undervalued even to the most hardcore horror fans and it’s time that Henry Creedlow gets the attention he deserves.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading