Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

“I Wanna Play a Game”: What if Wes Craven Never Directed ‘Scream’?

Published

on

Scream 20th Anniversary

The Scream franchise is so intertwined with director and horror master Wes Craven that it’s difficult to imagine another film in any other director’s hands, no matter how often the potential for Scream 5 or a reboot comes up. And it does come up quite frequently, even still. Throughout the four films, Craven remained the beating heart of the series, and yet he very nearly passed on directing the first film.

Then titled Scary Movie, Craven initially rejected the offer to direct. The project was shopped around, reluctantly as Craven was always the first choice, but other directors also either passed or producers and screenwriter Kevin Williamson felt they didn’t quite get the project. It wasn’t until Craven learned Drew Barrymore had signed on to star as Sidney Prescott (before she chose to play Casey Becker instead), and a 12-year-old told him that his horror had gone too soft, that he changed his mind.

What if he’d never changed his mind, though? We thought it’d be fun to look back at some of the directors who were approached to helm Scream and speculate on how very different the film could have been…


Sam Raimi

Just about every major horror director was approached to direct Scream, and of course that included the man behind the Evil Dead trilogy. Army of Darkness wrapped up the series years prior, though with a fizzle at the box office, and Sam Raimi had written and directed a Universal horror movie take on the superhero with 1990’s Darkman. By the mid-90s he’d moved outside of the genre space, shifting into producing, writing, and directing comedies, action, and even a western.

Though Raimi never shied away from extreme brutality in his horror, he usually merged it with his life-long love of The Three Stooges, bringing a physical splatstick style of comedy to the horror mix. Army of Darkness marked his last foray into horror until 2009’s Drag Me to Hell, which remained on brand for his usual biting and physical humor with gross-out horror. Well, there is also 2000’s The Gift, which was billed as a supernatural thriller and played it much straighter than usual. All of this to say, it’s very easy to speculate that Raimi would’ve placed a much higher emphasis on the comedic aspects of Williamson’s script. Poor Sidney Prescott would probably have endured a much goofier and more physically grueling battle with Ghostface that left her far more blood-soaked.


George A. Romero

GEORGE A ROMERO

There’s a lot of horror movies George Romero very nearly directed, and Scream was another he was offered. He was more than just the director who changed the way cinema defined zombies, though the major impact of that remains just as prevalent today as it was in 1968 with Night of the Living Dead. His progressive social commentary and subversive take on the zombie apocalypse in his Dead franchise looms large over his legacy, but he was also well versed in Stephen King, with films like The Dark Half and Creepshow, and gave new twists to vampire and witch lore with Martin and Season of the Witch.

Despite having a much wider range in horror than just zombies, it’s still difficult to picture what Romero might have done with Scream. It’s quite plausible that Romero would have dug deeper into Billy Loomis’ memorable line, “Movies don’t create psychos, movies make psychos more creative.” It’s a brilliant minefield of a line, a reflection on current social mindsets that you can bet Romero wouldn’t have left alone.


Danny Boyle

In 1994, Danny Boyle made one impressive debut with Shallow Grave. Based on the film, it’s easy to see why Boyle was approached. Shallow Grave follows three friends that discover their new flatmate has died, leaving behind an unexplained large amount of cash. It’s a suspenseful thriller with tension, surprise twists, and an underlying current of dark humor. The suspense and humor combination sound exactly in line with Scream.

Though tonally Boyle’s version would’ve edged closer to Williamson’s script, blending the horror more seamlessly with the satirical elements, but his distinct style would’ve made for a very different final film. With his frequent use of point-of-view shots, high and low camera angles, vivid colors, and a strong use of surreal and dream sequences, as evidenced in films like The Beach, 28 Days Later, and Sunshine…well, his take may not have resonated as strongly with audiences in the end.


Tom McLoughlin

Tom McLoughlin previously helmed horror movies One Dark Night and Sometimes They Come Back, as well as four episodes of Friday the 13th: The Series. But his most popular horror film is Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives, the very fun final entry in the Tommy Jarvis trilogy. He loved Kevin Williamson’s script, but felt the comedic elements too similar to Jason Lives, so he passed, as revealed in a Facebook chat. Like Craven, he too had changed his mind, but it was too late.

Being that he saw the script for Scream as similar in tone and humor to Jason Lives, it’s easy to imagine that his version of the film would be a lot more playful and comedic. A horror comedy with emphasis on the comedy, and understated on the horror.


Robert Rodriguez

Of all the directors who could’ve possibly directed Scream had Craven not assumed the role, Robert Rodriguez is quite possibly the only one we don’t have to really speculate as to how his vision for the film would’ve played out. Beginning in Scream 2, the sequels featured the Stab slasher series, or fictional movies within the movie based on Sidney Prescott’s life. There are 7 Stab movies scattered throughout the 3 Scream sequels, and one notable director’s name keeps popping up on them: Robert Rodriguez. If he did indeed direct the Stab segments, he’s uncredited in the actual film credits, but I’d like to think that this is precisely what we’d get with Rodriguez at the helm. Just with slightly less camp.


Bonus: Quentin Tarantino

Quentin Tarantino wasn’t actually approached to direct Scream at all. But his good buddy Robert Rodriguez was approached, which likely got Tarantino thinking about how he would’ve handled the project. He infamously maligned Craven’s work on the film, stating in an interview with Vulture, “I actually didn’t care for Wes Craven’s direction of it. I thought he was the iron chain attached to its ankle that kept it earthbound and stopped it from going to the moon.”

Considering that he’d penned From Dusk Till Dawn, which arrived in theaters 12 months earlier than Scream, it’s fair to use that as an example of what kind of approach he would’ve taken to Scream at the time. Especially when paired with his comment about taking it “to the moon.” Meaning, Tarantino’s version of Scream would have amplified the lengthy monologues in Tarantino’s distinctly verbose way and surely gone off the rails in terms of an insane final act. At least in the violence department, anyway. Craven himself ran afoul with the MPAA, with the initial cut of the film receiving an NC-17, so Tarantino likely would’ve had a much bigger battle with his brand of stylized violence.


In any event, we can thank our lucky stars that Wes Craven did indeed direct Scream and its sequels, marking the third decade in a row that he redefined the genre.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon, SeriesFest, and Popcorn Frights Film Fest.

Click to comment

Editorials

Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel

Published

on

Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction

The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.

That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.

It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.

That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.

The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’

For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.

This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.

This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.

Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.

So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.

The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.

Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.

While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.

At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.

After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

Continue Reading