Connect with us

Editorials

[We Love ’90s Horror] Gory, Gooey ‘Ticks’ Will Make Your Skin Crawl

Published

on

90s monster movies ticks

The ‘90s often get a bad rap with horror fans. After the numerous successful slashers and creature effects films of the ’80s, the ‘90s offered a different variety of horror fare. Though there were plenty of hits, hidden gems, and misunderstood classics, the ‘90s usually don’t get the kind of love that other decades get when it comes to horror. It’s time to change that.

Animal attack movies are a dime a dozen. It’s a tried-and-true sub-genre that usually delivers on a few base pleasures: fun conceptual structure, gnarly attack scenes, and a decent ensemble of actors (if you’re lucky). Thankfully, Ticks delivers in all three categories. And when it comes to those kill sequences? HOO BOY.

Okay, let’s get the setup out of the way. It’s actually a nifty one. A bunch of teenagers are sent to a wilderness retreat in order to undergo therapy for their various issues. Well, there also happens to be some marijuana farmers out in these woods and they’ve been using steroids to intensify their plants. One particular grower, Jarvis Tanner (genre stalwart Clint Howard), happens to see what those chemicals have done to the local tick population. Spoiler: it ain’t good. In no time at all, giant ticks are infesting the countryside and our ragtag group has to try and survive against them.

Let’s get some of the non-goopy stuff out of the way. The cast in this is surprisingly enjoyable. Part of that has to do with the presence of young stars like Seth Green and Alfonso Ribeiro. There’s always a novelty in seeing notable actors in low budget genre fare and Ticks is no exception. Both Green and Ribeiro showcase their unique brands of charisma and easily stand out from the rest of the cast. It’s also kind of cool to see Clint Howard and his father, Rance Howard, both show up in this. When you become a connoisseur of creature features, it’s always a treat when certain performers get to join in the fun.

It’s also important to highlight director Tony Randel. Horror lovers will best know him as the director of Hellbound: Hellraiser II, but I think we should look to another of his horror sequels to see what he brings to Ticks, and that movie is Amityville 1992: It’s About Time. That flick might end up in this column so I won’t go too in-depth about it, but the relevant comparison lies in Randel’s ability to inject a kinetic style into smaller productions. That’s certainly the case with Ticks. The opening credits sequence displays an excellent talent for establishing mood as the camera glides through all the disgusting machinery that causes the eventual tick mutation. And Randel clearly revels in the gory moments. He gives every bloody gag a good close-up and lingers on the nastiness for as long as he can.

Which brings us to the effects. In all honesty, Ticks is a serviceable little flick when it comes to most of its elements. But, what makes it stand out are the over-the-top and gleeful creature and gore effects. When you have a movie called Ticks, you expect some creepy crawly action, and there is genuine care taken to make the titular beasties come across as real creatures. The effects work by Doug Beswick is admirably gross. There are a few shots of ticks skittering across a floor that actually gave me an icky feeling. For such a low budget production, Ticks delivers on the promise of its title.

The biggest success in that regard is how the ticks infest people (and animals!). We see their skin pulsating like crazy and it’s always effective. And what’s especially great is that the movie builds up to a truly disgusting moment where a body explodes outward to reveal a human-sized tick (watch below!). There is no way this isn’t the best part of the movie. When it comes to absurd awesomeness, this moment takes the cake.

Ticks is a definite win for those of us who love creepy crawler cinema. It’s like a nastier, meaner take on Eight Legged Freaks (which is also great) that revels in all its revolting charms. If you’re in the mood for a gross-out flick, Ticks will scratch that itch.

Shout-out to John Squires (@freddyinspace) and Stephanie Crawford (@scrawfish) for putting this on my radar!

Drew Dietsch has been professionally writing about film and entertainment for over a decade. His bylines include FANDOM -- where he was a founding contributor and Entertainment Editor -- Bloody Disgusting, SYFY WIRE, Atom Insider, CHUD, Crooked Marquee and more. He created and hosts GenreVision, a weekly film discussion show at genrevision.com.

Editorials

‘A Haunted House’ and the Death of the Horror Spoof Movie

Published

on

Due to a complex series of anthropological mishaps, the Wayans Brothers are a huge deal in Brazil. Around these parts, White Chicks is considered a national treasure by a lot of people, so it stands to reason that Brazilian audiences would continue to accompany the Wayans’ comedic output long after North America had stopped taking them seriously as comedic titans.

This is the only reason why I originally watched Michael Tiddes and Marlon Wayans’ 2013 horror spoof A Haunted House – appropriately known as “Paranormal Inactivity” in South America – despite having abandoned this kind of movie shortly after the excellent Scary Movie 3. However, to my complete and utter amazement, I found myself mostly enjoying this unhinged parody of Found Footage films almost as much as the iconic spoofs that spear-headed the genre during the 2000s. And with Paramount having recently announced a reboot of the Scary Movie franchise, I think this is the perfect time to revisit the divisive humor of A Haunted House and maybe figure out why this kind of film hasn’t been popular in a long time.

Before we had memes and internet personalities to make fun of movie tropes for free on the internet, parody movies had been entertaining audiences with meta-humor since the very dawn of cinema. And since the genre attracted large audiences without the need for a serious budget, it made sense for studios to encourage parodies of their own productions – which is precisely what happened with Miramax when they commissioned a parody of the Scream franchise, the original Scary Movie.

The unprecedented success of the spoof (especially overseas) led to a series of sequels, spin-offs and rip-offs that came along throughout the 2000s. While some of these were still quite funny (I have a soft spot for 2008’s Superhero Movie), they ended up flooding the market much like the Guitar Hero games that plagued video game stores during that same timeframe.

You could really confuse someone by editing this scene into Paranormal Activity.

Of course, that didn’t stop Tiddes and Marlon Wayans from wanting to make another spoof meant to lampoon a sub-genre that had been mostly overlooked by the Scary Movie series – namely the second wave of Found Footage films inspired by Paranormal Activity. Wayans actually had an easier time than usual funding the picture due to the project’s Found Footage presentation, with the format allowing for a lower budget without compromising box office appeal.

In the finished film, we’re presented with supposedly real footage recovered from the home of Malcom Johnson (Wayans). The recordings themselves depict a series of unexplainable events that begin to plague his home when Kisha Davis (Essence Atkins) decides to move in, with the couple slowly realizing that the difficulties of a shared life are no match for demonic shenanigans.

In practice, this means that viewers are subjected to a series of familiar scares subverted by wacky hijinks, with the flick featuring everything from a humorous recreation of the iconic fan-camera from Paranormal Activity 3 to bizarre dance numbers replacing Katy’s late-night trances from Oren Peli’s original movie.

Your enjoyment of these antics will obviously depend on how accepting you are of Wayans’ patented brand of crass comedy. From advanced potty humor to some exaggerated racial commentary – including a clever moment where Malcom actually attempts to move out of the titular haunted house because he’s not white enough to deal with the haunting – it’s not all that surprising that the flick wound up with a 10% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite making a killing at the box office.

However, while this isn’t my preferred kind of humor, I think the inherent limitations of Found Footage ended up curtailing the usual excesses present in this kind of parody, with the filmmakers being forced to focus on character-based comedy and a smaller scale story. This is why I mostly appreciate the love-hate rapport between Kisha and Malcom even if it wouldn’t translate to a healthy relationship in real life.

Of course, the jokes themselves can also be pretty entertaining on their own, with cartoony gags like the ghost getting high with the protagonists (complete with smoke-filled invisible lungs) and a series of silly The Exorcist homages towards the end of the movie. The major issue here is that these legitimately funny and genre-specific jokes are often accompanied by repetitive attempts at low-brow humor that you could find in any other cheap comedy.

Not a good idea.

Not only are some of these painfully drawn out “jokes” incredibly unfunny, but they can also be remarkably offensive in some cases. There are some pretty insensitive allusions to sexual assault here, as well as a collection of secondary characters defined by negative racial stereotypes (even though I chuckled heartily when the Latina maid was revealed to have been faking her poor English the entire time).

Cinephiles often claim that increasingly sloppy writing led to audiences giving up on spoof movies, but the fact is that many of the more beloved examples of the genre contain some of the same issues as later films like A Haunted House – it’s just that we as an audience have (mostly) grown up and are now demanding more from our comedy. However, this isn’t the case everywhere, as – much like the Elves from Lord of the Rings – spoof movies never really died, they simply diminished.

A Haunted House made so much money that they immediately started working on a second one that released the following year (to even worse reviews), and the same team would later collaborate once again on yet another spoof, 50 Shades of Black. This kind of film clearly still exists and still makes a lot of money (especially here in Brazil), they just don’t have the same cultural impact that they used to in a pre-social-media-humor world.

At the end of the day, A Haunted House is no comedic masterpiece, failing to live up to the laugh-out-loud thrills of films like Scary Movie 3, but it’s also not the trainwreck that most critics made it out to be back in 2013. Comedy is extremely subjective, and while the raunchy humor behind this flick definitely isn’t for everyone, I still think that this satirical romp is mostly harmless fun that might entertain Found Footage fans that don’t take themselves too seriously.

Continue Reading