Connect with us

Editorials

[Discussion] What’s the Best Straight-to-Video ‘Hellraiser’ Sequel?

Published

on

The news that Hellraiser is getting another big screen treatment is a real thrill for fans of the franchise, because Hellraiser has been languishing in straight-to-video… well, “hell” for nearly 20 years.

What began as a franchise based on the works of Clive Barker – who also directed the first installment – about a dimension of ghoulish and powerful sadomasochists who torture and pleasure their (sometimes willing) victims, became a series of low budget horror flicks that had almost nothing to do with the demonic Cenobites that made the franchise so iconic in the first place.

Seriously, most of the straight-to-video sequels were based on original screenplays that were rewritten to throw in the Cenobites, and it shows. The haphazardness of the Hellraiser straight-to-video sequels is often clear at a glance, and the changes that were made to the franchise’s premise – seemingly willy-nilly – are significant and, arguably, to the detriment of the franchise.

But there sure were a lot of them! Let’s take a look at the greatly-maligned Hellraiser straight-to-video sequels to see which of them (if any) deserves the distinction of “the best!”


Hellraiser: Inferno (2000)

The first straight-to-video Hellraiser sequel has a better pedigree than the rest. Directed by Scott Derrickson and co-written by Paul Harris Boardman, the team that would later give the world The Exorcism of Emily Rose and Deliver Us From Evil, the film stars Craig Sheffer as a corrupt detective investigating a serial killer – he also starts seeing unholy visions of the Cenobites.

Hellraiser: Inferno boasts a respectable star and decent production values, at least compared to most of the other straight-to-video sequels, but it also hammers the same grim notes over and over again, making the film feel a little monotonous. And the shift from Clive Barker’s concept of the Cenobites’ dimension – from an amoral plane where pain and pleasure are indivisible, to a Roman Catholic-inspired afterlife where Cenobites are the agents of divine punishment – was a hard right turn in the direction of the generic.

Is It The Best?: Maybe, because Sheffer is good and the story is more ambitious than you might expect, but it set the whole Hellraiser franchise on a questionable path. And it’s more of a bummer than it is scary.


Hellraiser: Hellseeker (2002)

The sixth Hellraiser marks the return of Ashley Laurence, who co-starred in the first two films in the series as the heroic Kirsty Cotton. Her story comes to an end in Hellraiser: Hellseeker, but it’s hardly an auspicious one. Kirsty and her husband, played by Dean Winters (the guy from those “Mayhem” commercials), get in a car accident. She goes missing while he suffers a head injury that leaves his memory hazy and his vision full of demonic creatures. The story – right up to the “twist” ending – is pretty thin and frustratingly reminiscent of Hellraiser: Inferno, but Winters and Laurence make the most of their roles… even though Kirsty behaves, debatably, out of character.

Is It The Best?: It’s satisfying to see Ashley Laurence and Doug Bradley, the original Pinhead, share a scene together but the forgettable and familiar A-plot sullies their reunion.


Hellraiser: Deader (2005)

As we’ve already discussed, the majority of the straight-to-video Hellraiser sequels started out as spec scripts that had Cenobites surgically grafted on top them. Hellraiser: Deader is one of the more obvious examples, with a story that would probably work a lot better without any connection to the franchise. Kari Wuhrer stars as a reporter investigating a cult that kills and resurrects its members, all in a weird attempt to take over the Cenobites. She carries the film well, and the scene where she struggles to get a knife out of her back – no easy feat, clearly – is arguably the best and creepiest moment any of these STV sequels have to offer.

Is It The Best?: Well, it’s the best on the list so far. Hellraiser: Deader strains to connect itself to the franchise but the resurrection cult is eerie enough to justify its own film, and Wuhrer does a fine job.


Hellraiser: Hellworld (2005)

Okay, so in Hellraiser: Hellworld, Clive Barker’s series is just a multimedia franchise that inspired a (pretty bad-looking) MMORPG. A group of friends solve the video game’s puzzle and find themselves at a sexy private rave for ultra-cool gamers, but they wander off and get killed one-by-one by the Cenobites. The set-up is beyond strained and the first twist ending is laughable (and the second one makes NO sense), but at least Lance Henriksen is in it. That’s gotta count for something.

Is It The Best?: Only in terms of camp value. The contrived script bends over backwards and then snaps in an ill-conceived attempt to accommodate a Hellraiser connection, and even without the Cenobites it just wouldn’t be a very interesting horror movie.


Hellraiser: Revelations (2011)

Cheap and rough, Hellraiser: Revelations was rushed into production so the studio could keep the rights to the franchise, and yet it’s still the only straight-to-video Hellraiser sequel that feels like it kind of belongs in the same world as the theatrical films. It’s not nearly as good, frankly, but the mythology and the tone are closer to what made Hellraiser work in the first place. A couple of young punks go vacationing in Mexico, pick up a Lament Configuration and do unspeakable things and disappear. One of them suddenly returns a year later with suspicious and creepy intentions for his family, while Pinhead waits in the wings.

Is It The Best?: Hellraiser: Revelations captures some of the prurient violence and sensuality that made this franchise so distinctive in the first place, but the shoddy production values bring the whole thing down. Worse, Revelations is the first film in the franchise without Doug Bradley as Pinhead, and his replacement just can’t match his gravitas.


Hellraiser: Judgment (2018)

The most recent Hellraiser allegedly wasn’t based on another, unrelated screenplay, but it plays like it was. Damon Carney stars as a detective tracking down a serial killer inspired by the Ten Commandments, in a storyline that mirrors Hellraiser: Inferno on multiple levels. The investigation leads him to a house where the Cenobites judge the wicked and determine their torment, a development which returns the franchise to the realm of Western religion after briefly going back to the more ineffable horror-fantasy in Revelation. The film adds some new wrinkles and Cenobites to the mythology, which will either intrigue or frustrate fans, and although Bradley didn’t return, Paul T. Taylor is, at least, a respectable Pinhead.

Is It The Best?: Probably not. If you’re a fan of the idea that the Cenobites work for Hell, punishing sinners as opposed to gifting them with beautiful pain, Judgment might intrigue you. If not, it’ll make you think long and hard about Pinhead doing paperwork, and that’s just silly. And the serial killer story is a bland non-starter either way.


So What’s the Best Straight-to-Video Hellraiser Sequel?

Picking the best straight-to-video Hellraiser isn’t easy, or fun. Even the best of these movies is deeply flawed, and the worst can be a chore. Inferno feels more like a complete, feature film than the others, but it’s also dour to a numbing fault. Hellseeker brings back Ashley Laurence, and the film is all the better for it, but she’s not in it much and the rest of the film is derivative. Hellworld is… definitely not the best, let’s leave it at that, while Revelations comes pretty close to the tone of the originals only to be undone by its sloppy cheapness. And finally Judgment has some impressive Cenobite sequences even though its familiar story and questionable additions to the canon are disappointing.

Which leaves us with Hellraiser: Deader, a film that barely feels like a Hellraiser sequel but mostly works on its own merits and has at least one memorably creepy scene. Deader, like the rest of the straight-to-video sequels, pales in comparison to the theatrically-released Hellraiser films but it stands out more than the rest. It is probably the best straight-to-video Hellraiser sequel, which may be a dubious distinction. But a win is a win, right?

Then again, this is all a matter of taste. Which one of these movies is YOUR favorite, and why?

William Bibbiani writes film criticism in Los Angeles, with bylines at The Wrap, Bloody Disgusting and IGN. He co-hosts three weekly podcasts: Critically Acclaimed (new movie reviews), The Two-Shot (double features of the best/worst movies ever made) and Canceled Too Soon (TV shows that lasted only one season or less). Member LAOFCS, former Movie Trivia Schmoedown World Champion, proud co-parent of two annoying cats.

Editorials

‘Leprechaun Returns’ – The Charm of the Franchise’s Legacy Sequel

Published

on

leprechaun returns

The erratic Leprechaun franchise is not known for sticking with a single concept for too long. The namesake (originally played by Warwick Davis) has gone to L.A., Las Vegas, space, and the ‘hood (not once but twice). And after an eleven-year holiday since the Davis era ended, the character received a drastic makeover in a now-unmentionable reboot. The critical failure of said film would have implied it was time to pack away the green top hat and shillelagh, and say goodbye to the nefarious imp. Instead, the Leprechaun series tried its luck again.

The general consensus for the Leprechaun films was never positive, and the darker yet blander Leprechaun: Origins certainly did not sway opinions. Just because the 2014 installment took itself seriously did not mean viewers would. After all, creator Mark Jones conceived a gruesome horror-comedy back in the early nineties, and that format is what was expected of any future ventures. So as horror legacy sequels (“legacyquels”) became more common in the 2010s, Leprechaun Returns followed suit while also going back to what made the ‘93 film work. This eighth entry echoed Halloween (2018) by ignoring all the previous sequels as well as being a direct continuation of the original. Even ardent fans can surely understand the decision to wipe the slate clean, so to speak.

Leprechaun Returns “continued the [franchise’s] trend of not being consistent by deciding to be consistent.” The retconning of Steven Kostanski and Suzanne Keilly’s film was met with little to no pushback from the fandom, who had already become accustomed to seeing something new and different with every chapter. Only now the “new and different” was familiar. With the severe route of Origins a mere speck in the rearview mirror, director Kotanski implemented a “back to basics” approach that garnered better reception than Zach Lipovsky’s own undertaking. The one-two punch of preposterous humor and grisly horror was in full force again.

LEPRECHAUN

Pictured: Linden Porco as The Leprechaun in Leprechaun Returns.

With Warwick Davis sitting this film out — his own choice — there was the foremost challenge of finding his replacement. Returns found Davis’ successor in Linden Porco, who admirably filled those blood-stained, buckled shoes. And what would a legacy sequel be without a returning character? Jennifer Aniston obviously did not reprise her final girl role of Tory Redding. So, the film did the next best thing and fetched another of Lubdan’s past victims: Ozzie, the likable oaf played by Mark Holton. Returns also created an extension of Tory’s character by giving her a teenage daughter, Lila (Taylor Spreitler).

It has been twenty-five years since the events of the ‘93 film. The incident is unknown to all but its survivors. Interested in her late mother’s history there in Devil’s Lake, North Dakota, Lila transferred to the local university and pledged a sorority — really the only one on campus — whose few members now reside in Tory Redding’s old home. The farmhouse-turned-sorority-house is still a work in progress; Lila’s fellow Alpha Epsilon sisters were in the midst of renovating the place when a ghost of the past found its way into the present.

The Psycho Goreman and The Void director’s penchant for visceral special effects is noted early on as the Leprechaun tears not only into the modern age, but also through poor Ozzie’s abdomen. The portal from 1993 to 2018 is soaked with blood and guts as the Leprechaun forces his way into the story. Davis’ iconic depiction of the wee antagonist is missed, however, Linden Porco is not simply keeping the seat warm in case his predecessor ever resumes the part. His enthusiastic performance is accentuated by a rotten-looking mug that adds to his innate menace.

LEPRECHAUN RETURNS sequel

Pictured: Taylor Spreitler, Pepi Sonuga, and Sai Bennett as Lila, Katie and Rose in Leprechaun Returns.

The obligatory fodder is mostly young this time around. Apart from one luckless postman and Ozzie — the premature passing of the latter character removed the chance of caring about anyone in the film — the Leprechaun’s potential prey are all college aged. Lila is this story’s token trauma kid with caregiver baggage; her mother thought “monsters were always trying to get her.” Lila’s habit of mentioning Tory’s mental health problem does not make a good first impression with the resident mean girl and apparent alcoholic of the sorority, Meredith (Emily Reid). Then there are the nicer but no less cursorily written of the Alpha Epsilon gals: eco-conscious and ex-obsessive Katie (Pepi Sonuga), and uptight overachiever Rose (Sai Bennett). Rounding out the main cast are a pair of destined-to-die bros (Oliver Llewellyn Jenkins, Ben McGregor). Lila and her peers range from disposable to plain irritating, so rooting for any one of them is next to impossible. Even so, their overstated personalities make their inevitable fates more satisfying.

Where Returns excels is its death sequences. Unlike Jones’ film, this one is not afraid of killing off members of the main cast. Lila, admittedly, wears too much plot armor, yet with her mother’s spirit looming over her and the whole story — comedian Heather McDonald put her bang-on Aniston impersonation to good use as well as provided a surprisingly emotional moment in the film — her immunity can be overlooked. Still, the other characters’ brutal demises make up for Lila’s imperviousness. The Leprechaun’s killer set-pieces also happen to demonstrate the time period, seeing as he uses solar panels and a drone in several supporting characters’ executions. A premortem selfie and the antagonist’s snarky mention of global warming additionally add to this film’s particular timestamp.

Critics were quick to say Leprechaun Returns did not break new ground. Sure, there is no one jetting off to space, or the wacky notion of Lubdan becoming a record producer. This reset, however, is still quite charming and entertaining despite its lack of risk-taking. And with yet another reboot in the works, who knows where the most wicked Leprechaun ever to exist will end up next.


Horror contemplates in great detail how young people handle inordinate situations and all of life’s unexpected challenges. While the genre forces characters of every age to face their fears, it is especially interested in how youths might fare in life-or-death scenarios.

The column Young Blood is dedicated to horror stories for and about teenagers, as well as other young folks on the brink of terror.

Leprechaun Returns movie

Pictured: Linden Porco as The Leprechaun in Leprechaun Returns.

Continue Reading