Connect with us

Editorials

“No More Mister Good Guy”: Chucky’s Struggle With Masculinity Throughout the ‘Child’s Play’ Series

Published

on

Chucky is, without a doubt, one of the major modern horror icons. He’s more than earned his place among the likes of Freddy, Jason, Michael, Leatherface and the rest and he has now been given the same remake treatment all of them saw years ago. But there are also some interesting things that separate Chucky from the rest of these icons, especially as his series has gone on. One of them directly leads into the other, and that’s the fact that unlike most franchises—with notable exceptions like Phantasm—Chucky has had one distinctive voice really steering the ship from the beginning. It was Don Mancini who created the concept and wrote the original Child’s Play script, and even though it was heavily rewritten by director Tom Holland, Mancini’s been the one writing every sequel, even going behind the camera to direct the last three installments.

I think having the voice of its creator remain consistent throughout the years has helped the Child’s Play franchise to evolve over time, and it’s also helped to give Chucky the one thing very few long-running horror villains get to have: character development. There’s a great balancing act throughout the series, as each film is always so different from the one before it, but Chucky is always Chucky. At the same time, though, he goes through changes. Even if they’re subtle, even if he retains everything that made us love that character in the first place, the changes are abundantly clear. It’s hard to imagine the Chucky we saw in the original smoking weed on camera or trying to connect with his genderqueer child, but we never question that it’s the same character.

Because of the richness of this character development and the different directions the story has taken over time, there’s a lot of room for the interpretation of themes that continue to pop up in the movies that audience members like myself can’t not see. In particular, there’s been one constant theme throughout Chucky’s evolution as a character from movie to movie, one that begins in the very first Child’s Play and truly comes to a close in Cult of Chucky, and that’s Chucky’s ongoing struggle with the concept of masculinity.

Chucky, in terms of his personality, is one of the most aggressively masculine horror villains we’ve ever seen. He’s not by any stretch asexual like Jason or Michael, nor is he as predatory as Freddy, he’s just an obnoxious, loud-mouthed and misogynistic character pretty much from the moment he starts talking. When Karen Barclay finally gets him to reveal himself and speak with his own voice in the original Child’s Play, one of the first words to come out his mouth is “bitch.” And while this is not unexpected behavior from someone dubbed the Lakeshore Strangler, it’s also—as I think is evidenced throughout the films—largely a front. It’s grandstanding. It’s something Charles Lee Ray needs to do; whatever he can to come off as a man now that he is stuck in the body of an androgynous doll.

That personality is something he tries to play up, something he always tries to showcase, especially in the early movies. In Child’s Play 2, Andy really has two figures battling for the dominant male role model in his life, and both of them happen to hate him. Those are of course Chucky and new foster dad, Phil. Chucky buckles down on this new approach. His misogynistic language is even more explicit than in the first film—“Goddamn women drivers!” particularly comes to mind—but even smaller lines like “How’s it hanging, Phil?” reach the same effect. At the same time, Chucky is even more desperate to get his soul out of the doll’s body and into Andy’s. The two things are directly related, because the overly masculine persona that Chucky tries to project is a direct result of his inability to reconcile with the fact that he is now a doll with no physical illusions of masculinity.

Honestly, Child’s Play 3 might be the movie that deals with these themes best, as it moves them to the forefront. Here, it’s not just Chucky’s struggle, although that ongoing theme is given a tighter focus due to the nature of the sequel in general. Child’s Play 3 is of course set at a military academy and truly the entire film comments on masculinity, tough guy tropes and gender roles in a very interesting way. Because of that, it’s just in general a much smarter and better sequel than it’s given credit for. This is a movie in which the trained, aggressive, over-confident tough guys are the cannon fodder. The most traditionally masculine types are the ones who get cut down, while our actual heroes are the least traditionally masculine characters in the film. Andy’s a struggling, nervous teen famous for playing with his doll. Tyler is still playing with dolls which the Colonel notes are “for girls.” Whitehurst is the most relentlessly picked on character in the whole movie, but gives his life to save not only his friends but the people who constantly bully him as well. And then De Silva, the most capable, confident badass at the school, is a woman.

Chucky’s struggle with masculinity truly becomes a struggle in Child’s Play 3, where it’s impossible to keep up any illusions about being a tough guy when he’s surrounded by guys who embody the trope. That propels his ongoing need to get out of that body and into another, this time Tyler’s. It’s worth pointing out that Chucky doesn’t snap and feel the need to take out the school’s would-be soldiers until De Silva and her friend put lipstick on him and call him pretty. That’s the thing that does it. That’s what leads Chucky to grimace and say, “This means war.”

Child's Play 3

Child’s Play 3 also brings another part of Chucky’s struggle with masculinity to the forefront, something he had been struggling with since the very first film. In a bizarre scene where Andrew Robinson’s Sgt. Botnick tries to give Chucky a “trim,” Chucky kills the barber rather than letting him touch his hair, even though it’s one of the few things that could possibly make the doll look more masculine. This side of Chucky is fascinating because it’s completely at odds with the masculine persona he always tries to convey. It’s never something he tries to acknowledge, but it’s been there the whole time.

While it’s a small detail, one of the biggest things to challenge Chucky’s misogynistic and aggressively masculine demeanor comes right in the original Child’s Play. When they go to investigate his apartment, there is a mural depicting the human Charles Lee Ray kneeling naked and submissive before his mentor, John. Whether this was simply a part of the ritual or there was a sexual relationship between the two men is unclear. It could very well have been both. But to see a painting depicting Ray naked on his knees in front of John is almost beyond suggestive.

If you go by the timeline of flashbacks, then this more private, less traditionally masculine side of Charles Lee Ray goes back even further. As Curse of Chucky reveals, the notion of family had been on his mind long before he got married in Bride. Chucky was obsessed with Nica’s mother and even kidnapped her just before his death, hoping that they would all be one big happy family. It’s an obsessive side we’d never seen from him before, something that could likely only ever come out in private between Ray and his victim. It is, for sure, an obsessive and delusional stalker quality that men often embody, but it’s nonetheless completely removed from the “tough guy” personality that Chucky always tries to adhere to.

Bride of Chucky doesn’t do a ton to further Chucky’s struggle with masculinity except for giving us those quiet moments with Tiffany. Up to that point, it’s for sure the most time we had ever spent with Chucky as a character. And at first, he’s exactly the Chucky we’ve always known him to be; brash and crude and sadistic, killing the woman who repaired him and wanted to marry him. He really doesn’t open up to Tiffany in any way at all until she’s also a doll, literally bringing her down to his level. Part of what could very well have made Chucky take everything Tiffany said to him as a human so personally is of course the fact that here’s a doll who’s been trying to cling to illusions that he’s still the same tough guy he was—even if he may never have been—and here’s someone he can’t possibly keep up that illusion with. When the two dolls embark on their road trip, not only do we see moments of Chucky professing his love, but even moments of genuine apology for all of the ways he’s treated her in the past. In typical Chucky fashion, of course, he still tries to kill her at the end.

Chucky

Seed of Chucky obviously brings this struggle back to the forefront of the franchise in a much clearer way, as Chucky and Tiffany are introduced to their genderfluid child, Glen. At first, Chucky is adamant that Glen is a boy. He tries to concretely presuppose his kid’s gender, trying to bond with “guy” activities like taking the boy hunting, which obviously means murder when your dad is Chucky. By the end, though, Chucky does come to realize that Glen’s identity isn’t theirs to decide.

Not coincidentally, I think, this is literally just about the same time that Chucky finally comes to terms with himself. Finally having the opportunity to rid himself of the Good Guy body once and for all, having just openly accepted Glen’s identity, Chucky finally admits that he enjoys being Chucky. He comes to terms with the fact that he is this androgynous doll and finally embraces this as who he is. Once again, because this is Chucky, this progress is still kind of undone by hacking up both the child and their mother.

The end of Seed of Chucky still showcases huge progress for the character, though. In fact, that progress is evident over the course of the next two movies. Chucky doesn’t stop being the Chucky we all know and love, but there’s a comfort level with simply being Chucky that comes through in both Curse and Cult. Sure, it’s easy to get under his skin by pointing out his male completion anxiety, but the repeated attempts to rid himself of the doll and resume or relive his life as a man are finally out the door. Chucky’s not looking for a permanent way out anymore. Ironically, that also makes the spells easier to perform, apparently, as Chucky in both movies manages to take over other bodies for the sake of momentary convenience.

Seed of Chucky

Although it should not be the last entry and Mancini should still be allowed to continue his vision for these characters he created and has continued to shape for over thirty years, Cult of Chucky nonetheless brings the killer doll’s struggle with masculinity, with this need to cling to an idea of manhood, full circle. By the end of that movie, we find Chucky in Nica’s body, comfortably walking out of the film in a woman’s skin and leaving the weight of masculinity completely behind him.

To be clear, I’m not remotely calling this trans representation. I don’t think there’s ever been any attempt or intent to portray Chucky as trans. But this is a franchise that has taken jabs at gender roles, male archetypes and general ideas of masculinity from the very beginning. This is a series that has constantly questioned and re-evaluated gender. The themes have always been there, and they’ve often been noticed in characters like Glen, Kyle or Andy. As hopefully evidenced, though, this struggle with masculinity, and the questioning of it, have always been extremely central to the core of Chucky himself.

It’s a struggle that proves him to be a horror icon who has gotten to show what so few other franchise villains have ever really gotten to have, and what would seem least likely for the possessed killer doll out of any of them. He has, against all odds and over the course of seven movies, shown genuine growth.

Cult of Chucky

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading