Editorials
[Butcher Block] ‘The Nightingale’ Uses Graphic Violence as a Weapon
Butcher Block is a weekly series celebrating horror’s most extreme films and the minds behind them. Dedicated to graphic gore and splatter, each week will explore the dark, the disturbed, and the depraved in horror, and the blood and guts involved. For the films that use special effects of gore as an art form, and the fans that revel in the carnage, this series is for you.
Jennifer Kent’s feature debut, The Babadook, is still discussed as one of horror’s most divisive recent releases, even if its eponymous boogeyman has gone on to become a bit of an icon. Her sophomore effort, The Nightingale, has continued that polarizing streak, as evidenced by news of angry walkouts from the film’s Sydney premiere just two months ago. Even when it’s been very well received, it comes with caveats that this film should come with serious trigger warnings. As our own Meredith put it in her review out of Sundance, the film is packed with harrowing, visceral violence that’s “so mind-breakingly brutal that viewers will want to look away.” It’s not the harrowing violence that’s likely the source of the divisiveness, though, but that Kent wields it as a weapon in a historical period thriller.
Set in 1825 Tasmania, Clare (Aisling Franciosi) is an Irish convict indentured to British officer Hawkins (Sam Claflin) to pay off her time. Hawkins has been stationed and tasked with colonizing the area, an order he’s long come to resent. Since Clare is happily married and with a baby, she hopes to convince Hawkins to write her the letter of recommendation he’d promised so that she could finally live as a free woman. But this isn’t a happy movie, and things go catastrophically awry, leading to a devastating chain of events that leaves Clare hellbent on revenge.
Within the first twenty minutes or so, Clare is raped twice; twice by Hawkins, and after the second instance he allows his right hand man Ruse (Mindhunter and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood’s Damon Herriman) to have a turn. It’s this second harrowing scene that provides the inciting event for Clare. The soldiers have invaded her home, and assaulted her while destroying everything she holds dear. It’s graphic and unrelenting, and likely the moment that some viewers decided they’d had enough. They leave her for dead, and when she comes to she hires an Aboriginal tracker, Billy (Baykali Ganambarr), to help her find those soldiers who have set off on a dangerous quest of their own.

Kent isn’t interested in telling the standard rape-revenge story with The Nightingale. Clare is driven by revenge, but this is more about the horrors of Australian colonization. The further into the perilous path Billy and Clare head, the more Kent peels back the layers of trauma. Kent does this by littering the protagonists’ trail with gruesome corpses, explicit violence, more rape, and bloodshed. There’s very little kindness to be found both in the wild or in the civilized world. It’s bleak, and it’s an endurance test at a runtime of a little over two hours.
Because Kent expands the perspective- the injustices of this world exceed far beyond Clare’s small colonized home- justice doesn’t quite play out the same way it does in typical rape-revenge films. If justice exists at all; it never feels like a sure bet here. But this road is paved with violence and pain, including some very cathartic brutality. For all of it, the makeup effects, vfx, and prosthetics team get grisly. Especially with genre notables like Larry Van Duynhoven (Upgrade, The Loved Ones, Lake Mungo), Nikki Gooley (The Matrix, Ghost Ship), Srinivas Janapati (Godzilla, Mad Max: Fury Road), and many more.
Kent takes a story submersed in a dark moment in history and uses extreme genre language to convey the horrors many endured during that period. This means that the gory deaths, suspense, unflinching violence, and waking nightmares will be too much for non-horror fans, and the sprawling, authentic period piece will ostracize traditional horror fans. But for those that are feeling a little more adventurous or don’t mind their horror more rooted in realism, Kent’s sophomore effort is a heady, primal experience.
This one is currently out in limited theaters and expanding on September 6.

Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.
You must be logged in to post a comment.