Connect with us

Editorials

“Pangs”: Revisiting the Thanksgiving Episode of “Buffy the Vampire Slayer”

Published

on

Throughout its seven-season run, Buffy the Vampire Slayer tackled the major holidays. “Amends” gave a twist to It’s a Wonderful Life for Christmas, Halloween was celebrated in at least three episodes over the series’ run, and the show even managed to make a musical event not seem so silly. Any other show would’ve stopped there; their checkboxes for holiday tributes considered completed. Series creator Joss Whedon had been sitting on a Thanksgiving-themed episode idea for a while, though.

In season four, he gathered the Scooby gang together for a Friendsgiving dinner complete with the angry spirits of the holiday. Originally airing on November 23, 1999, “Pangs” remains one of the few Thanksgiving episodes of genre TV and also one of the more controversial.

By season four, Buffy’s (Sarah Michelle Gellar) former flame Angel (David Boreanaz) had departed Sunnydale for his spinoff series, and she’d graduated on to college. Willow (Alyson Hannigan) is mourning the loss of her relationship with Oz (Seth Green), and Xander (Nicholas Brendan) is exploring a new relationship with Anya (Emma Caufield), a reformed demon. Even Giles (Anthony Head) is struggling to find purpose. The major upheaval in their lives finds Buffy desperate for some nostalgic comfort in the form of Thanksgiving, especially with her mom out of town. She convinces the gang to pull together for a makeshift holiday gathering.

“Pangs,” the eighth episode of the season, kicks off its madness with a groundbreaking ceremony for an Anthropology building on Sunnydale’s college campus. Xander happens to be working construction on the groundbreaking, and when the ground shifts, he falls into a forgotten historic site where he accidentally frees a vengeful spirit. The spirit, Hus, is a former Chumash warrior that wants revenge on behalf of his people. As such, he begins hunting and slaughtering any that he deems a leader of current society.

A vengeful spirit slaying people left and right sounds like a black and white definition of evil that must be defeated, right? Except for the first time Buffy battles Hus, she’s caught dead in her tracks when he tells her she must be so thrilled to conquer and snuff out the Chumash once again. It sparks off an episode-long debate between Giles, Willow, Spike (James Marsters), and the gang on historical guilt and past oppression. Whether or not certain types of evil should be allowed to exist. Hus may be killing people in the present day, but his wrath on behalf of his people is understandable. The group spirals into infighting over the matter, and the origins of Thanksgiving itself.

Making things even more complicated, Xander was stricken with magical syphilis. It’s played for laughs in the episode, but Spanish explorers did bring many diseases with them to California centuries ago that decimated Native Americans. Including syphilis. Bringing ethics and race into an episode is always a target for controversy, and trying to balance it out with humor fuels the fire. But twenty years later, these same discussions still feel timely. They always elicit raw feelings and heated debate. There are no easy, comfortable answers. Not then, not now.

The episode climaxes in a major battle over the Thanksgiving dinner table, arrows flung and resurrected warriors battling it out with the Scooby gang. When Buffy proves too formidable for Hus, he shapeshifts into an actual bear. A moment that also offers up some humor. Homicidal spirits must be stopped to prevent further bloodshed. The episode concludes with the friends finally sitting down to eat dinner.

It wasn’t the traditional holiday Buffy envisioned, but it wound up being the one she needed. A makeshift family made up of a Slayer, a neutered vampire, a reformed demon, a father figure, and her two closest friends provided the support they all needed to ease the growing pains. More importantly, it’s a perfect way to demonstrate that sometimes tradition is meant to be bucked.

As a whole, “Pangs” is a complicated episode. It’s trying to set up a crossover event between Angel and Buffy the Vampire Slayer, juggle the various character arcs of the season, move forward the season-long plot, and dig into the meaty origins of Thanksgiving and all its social implications. That it shifts tone between seriousness and humor only complicates it further. Whedon and episode writer Jane Espenson created one ballsy episode. One that still elicits debate among scholars and critics twenty years later.

But through it all, it still serves as a heartfelt holiday reminder that sometimes you need a good meal among those you love to get you through a rough patch.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading