Editorials
A ‘Feast’ of Creature Feature Carnage! [Butcher Block]
Butcher Block is a weekly series celebrating horror’s most extreme films and the minds behind them. Dedicated to graphic gore and splatter, each week will explore the dark, the disturbed, and the depraved in horror, and the blood and guts involved. For the films that use special effects of gore as an art form, and the fans that revel in the carnage, this series is for you.
“Listen to me. A storm of hell’s coming down on this place any second. I don’t know what they are, I don’t know where they came from. All I do know is that these fuckers are fast, nasty, and hungry, and there’s four of ’em. They got claws like Ginsu knives and more teeth than a chainsaw.”
This is how Hero (Eric Dane) introduces both himself and the deadly creatures that descend upon the bar in Feast. Promptly before one of them decapitates him, his blood gushing forth and covering Honey Pie (Jenny Wade) head to toe. The bloodletting, carnage, and revolting body fluid spillage never lets up from there in this gory creature feature.

Feast is the result of season three of Project Greenlight, Matt Damon and Ben Affleck‘s movie-making reality series that aired on HBO. Its third season opened with Damon and the Greenlight team seeking out and hiring Wes Craven to produce a horror film. Of the scripts and teams they had to choose from, they selected director John Gulager and the script by Patrick Melton & Marcus Dunstan, Feast. The nine-episode season chronicled the film’s production, from pre-production to its first test screenings. When it came time to the actual release, though, Feast deserved much better than the extremely limited release it received.
Granted, this particular horror movie isn’t the type that typically appeals to the masses or mainstream critics; it’s lean, mean, and saturated in viscera. The script cleverly bypasses lengthy character introductions by using humorous character cards to let the viewer know each player’s name, role, and survival odds. Then it wastes no time subverting those odds. The Hero? Dispatched first. The Vet, trained for combat and survival? Gone second. An adorable and innocent child? Feast smashes that taboo to smithereens posthaste. At the other end of the spectrum exists the characters that tend to die first in horror, characters like Bartender (the director’s father and notable horror vet Clu Gulager). They outlast.
From the outset, Feast presents an “anything goes” crass and raunchy attitude that doesn’t take itself too seriously. Except when it comes to the gore. For both the excess gore and creature effects, producers immediately sought out special makeup and creature effects designer Gary J. Tunnicliffe. His credits include Piranha 3DD, Scream 4, The Collector, Hellraiser: Bloodline, Halloween: Resurrection, Ginger Snaps, and many, many more. Meaning, you don’t have to look far to notice his expertise in creature design and bloodbaths.
Tunnicliffe’s creature designs were twofold; the skulls and hides that gave a slight insight into the monsters’ age and habitation, and their real faces underneath. Makeup effects artist Michael J. Regan played Papa Beast, while Tunnicliffe portrayed Mama Beast. Puppetry rounded out the rest of the creature effects, namely the baby monster.

The most significant component of the makeup effects for the film was the fake blood. Gallons upon gallons of it. Slime, maggots, and more. Judah Friedlander’s Beer Guy gets vomited on, coated in viscous green goo, pus and worms, and bloodied to a mushy pulp. No character, human or otherwise, has a gentle demise in this creature feature.
Feast delivers a campy creature feature with its tongue firmly in cheek, but with a breakneck speed and emphasis on practical effects and action. It’s a simple and straightforward story that doesn’t reinvent the wheel or do anything new, but it does offer up plenty of goofy fun and a few stomach-churning moments.
Editorials
Before ‘The Blair Witch Project’, ‘Alien Autopsy’ Showed How Real Found Footage Could Feel
The line separating artist from con man is a lot thinner than you might initially believe. While I think we can all agree that lying for the sake of profit is actively malicious behavior, isn’t it also true that the faux documentary aspect of The Blair Witch Project is half the reason why that film became such a cultural phenomenon? After all, if there’s one thing filmmakers have in common with stage magicians, it’s that misleading and misdirecting audiences is simply part of the job.
That’s why I’ve developed a habit of mostly ignoring the moral quandaries behind many of film and television’s biggest “hoaxes” in favor of appreciating the narrative elements that drive productions like Mermaids: The Body Found and even Animal Planet’s highly underrated The Cannibal in the Jungle. However, if there’s a definitive case of a highly publicized broadcast fooling the world into taking it seriously, it has to be Fox’s infamous 1995 TV special Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction.
It’s been over three decades since that eerie footage first haunted television screens right at the peak of the ’90s ufology craze, and in that time, the video has taken on a life of its own. From countless parodies and references in everything from The X-Files to Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater (as well as John Dower’s recently released tell-all documentary The Alien Autopsy Scandal, which I’d highly recommend to genre fans everywhere), there’s no denying the legacy of the Alien Autopsy video. However, I rarely see the tape discussed as what it truly is: a highly convincing found footage film directed by a passionate stage magician and brought to life by masterful practical effects work.
That’s why I’d like to invite readers to join me on a deep dive into one of the most infamous broadcasts of all time in an attempt to reevaluate the footage as a fascinating narrative experience rather than a complete hoax.
The TV Special That Convinced Millions It Was Real

Ray Santilli next to Extraterrestrial replica in ‘The Alien Autopsy Scandal’
For starters, regardless of whether or not you believe that there was in fact an extraterrestrial crash in Roswell during the summer of 1947 and that some form of autopsy was performed on the victims, the producers behind the black & white recordings, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield, insist that their video was a “restoration.” Though I’d argue that the proper word is “remake”of genuine footage that was too damaged to air on television. That’s why the duo went on to recruit filmmaker and eccentric magician Spyros Melaris and sculptor/monster designer John Humphreys to bring their version of the autopsy to life and sell it to the highest bidder.
This is where the story of the Alien Autopsy as a narrative experience really begins. Melaris claims that his approach to the faux recording consisted of striving for extreme period accuracy in both shooting equipment and setting while also planting subtle details that would initially seem like mistakes but could later be revealed to actually fit the time period. That being said, the filmmaker was under the impression that the short would be released for free as a PR stunt, with the team later producing and selling an informative documentary chronicling exactly how the footage was faked and commenting on how easy it is to manipulate public perception with a good old-fashioned magic trick.
This obviously isn’t how things went down, and that’s likely the reason why Melaris has since distanced himself from everyone else involved with the project. Yet, no amount of behind-the-scenes drama can undermine the genuine effort that went into making the short as impressive as it is. From the sourcing of real animal organs from a local butcher to make the organic part of the creature more lifelike to the highly detailed sculpt that made use of a hollowed-out underlayer that could be filled with fake blood and assorted viscera, there’s a reason why so many Hollywood specialists are still impressed with the artistry on display here.
Of course, the believability is only half the story, as I think that the best part of the autopsy is how Melaris builds on the existing tension by obscuring certain details and often embracing the chaos of what a real examination of extraterrestrial life could feel like. The camera often goes out of focus at just the right time to make certain effects hit even harder, and we can only speculate as to what the hazmat-suited doctors are gesticulating about during the operation. There’s a real air of mystery to the whole thing that almost makes it feel like a cosmically terrifying, cursed film containing forbidden knowledge that civilians were never meant to see.
So when Fox’s Fact or Fiction brings in the specialists to comment on the film and its otherworldly subject, it’s no surprise that we end up with one of the most memorable mockumentaries of all time – albeit one where the participants are unaware that the footage they’re commenting on is basically a large-scale practical joke. A joke that the network was obviously in on, as many participants claim that the TV special cut out significant portions where guests point out that they believe the footage to be an elaborate hoax.
The Lasting Impact of the Hoax Turned Cultural Event

Regardless, I remember going to bed terrified after watching reruns of the special and thinking about the respected pathologist who claimed that the body was almost certainly inhuman, with even effects maestro Stan Winston commenting on how difficult it would be to recreate some of these visuals through practical puppetry. That’s not even mentioning Jonathan Frakes’ dramatic hyping up of the disturbing imagery as if he was talking about the tape from The Ring, with his spooky demeanor here likely being responsible for his later role as the host of Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction a few years later.
Personally, I’d argue that the Alien Autopsy phenomenon had just as much of an impact on me as a horror fan as The Blair Witch Project, a film that was almost certainly influenced by the success of this immensely popular hoax (to the point where they even produced their own TV special commenting on Heather’s found footage). Even if Fox didn’t intend to produce a narrative feature about the aftermath of the Roswell crash, the end product still holds up remarkably well as a highly entertaining mockumentary exploring the idea that we may not be alone in the universe.
While neither Santilli nor the rest of the production team has ever commented on this, I also think it’s very likely that the idea of a faux Alien Autopsy could have been influenced by Dean Alioto’s The McPherson Tape/UFO Abduction. I’ve already written about how this granddaddy of found footage was co-opted by rogue ufologists who began selling bootlegs of the tape at conventions as if it were real evidence of a close encounter, so it’s not that much of a stretch to imagine that Santilli and company could have heard about this phenomenon and been inspired to come up with their own highly profitable hoax.
At the end of the day, it’s unlikely that the Alien Autopsy film is recreating any real footage from Roswell, but I can still appreciate the short and the accompanying television event as a standalone horror story that still influences the way we see found footage to this very day.
After all, the possibility that something could be real is often much scarier than finding out for sure – and that’s why I think Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction is still worth revisiting three decades down the line.

You must be logged in to post a comment.