Connect with us

Editorials

Home is Where the Horror Is: 10 of Horror’s Most Dysfunctional Families

Published

on

Home is where the horror is, or at least it’s where you can most often find horror.

The genre has long explored the home, and its family bonds stretched to their extremes. Horror films have explored fears involving inherited skeletons in the closet, unhealthy relationships between parent and child, or even among siblings, and every terrifying facet of raising a family in a world where dangers lurk at every possible turn, realistically or supernatural. Horror is that fantastical space that brings its fictitious families closer together in opposition of looming threats, or it exposes their worst dysfunction. 

Families like the Freelings use love as a weapon against the supernatural in Poltergeist. Grief and inherited plans of demonic transference expose the flaws of the Graham family in Hereditary, and they unravel quickly. With the twisted sibling relationship of The Turning and the sordid family drama of The Lodge on the near horizon, we’re looking back at some of horror’s most dysfunctional families. These ten families put the fun in dysfunction (more like fear) and their compounded conflicts and emotional issues become a mere starting point for the terror they unleash.


Orphan

The Coleman family is a mess long before the adoption of Esther (Isabelle Fuhrman). Kate (Vera Farmiga) and John’s (Peter Sarsgaard) marriage is under severe strain after a miscarriage. The loss gave Kate nightmares, and she turned to alcohol as a coping mechanism. That alcoholism led to a car accident that left her daughter Max deaf and mute. In other words, it didn’t take much for Esther to effectively turn people against Kate and wreak havoc on their lives. The moral of the story is that a new child won’t fix your problems, and a creepy adult posing as a child will undoubtedly infiltrate and exploit your worst flaws.


Frailty

Bill Paxton’s feature debut is an underrated entry in psychological horror that showcases how dysfunction tends to be cyclical. He also stars as the Meiks family patriarch, a man wholly convinced that he’s been tasked with a divine mission from God to destroy humans masquerading as demons on Earth. He also thinks that it’s a family business and brings his two young sons into the bloody fold. Adam (Jeremy Sumpter) believes his father, while Fenton (Matt O’Leary) thinks dad has cracked. While the truth is eventually revealed, teaching your sons the trade of ax murdering isn’t healthy for anyone’s psyche.


You’re Next

You're Next

At first glance, the Davison family seems relatively normal. Sure, the siblings seem to annoy each other, but what siblings don’t know how to push each other’s buttons? Mom and dad- especially mom- radiate love for their children, so they can’t be that messed up, right? The more we get to know the family, the more their issues become apparent. Mom likes pills, so does the eldest brother’s wife, another sibling’s significant other is aroused by dead bodies, and when a trio of masked killers interrupt dinner, they devolve into bickering over who can run the fastest. Priorities are not their strong suit. Of course, there’s the whole other matter of two family members hiring the killers in the first place, to get a head start on collecting their inheritance.


Seed of Chucky

Up until this point in the series, murderous Good Guy doll Chucky struggled with life in a plastic shell. His driving goal, aside from murder, is to find a new human body to inhabit. A serial killer with an identity crisis and a viciously volatile relationship with lady love Tiffany makes for one of horror’s most dysfunctional couples of all time. Add in a son who’s also navigating the murky waters of identity and a significant aversion to violence, and well, Seed of Chucky makes The War of the Roses look like Disney fare by comparison.


The Woman

This sequel to Offspring switches gears in a big way; a cannibal becomes the protagonist thanks to one messed up family. Patriarch Chris Cleek (Sean Bridgers) captures The Woman (Pollyanna McIntosh) while out hunting and decides the best way to handle her feral nature is to bring her home and domesticate her. Chris’s plucky family man demeanor quickly gives way to depraved violence. A trait his only son has eagerly picked up on. The women in the family tend to live in fear, at best. That doesn’t even touch upon Socket, a secret Cleek daughter. This family, thanks to dear old dad, revels in chaos and evil.


House of 1000 Corpses

The twisted family tree of the Firefly clan is a winding one made even more complicated in that every single branch comes with its own brand of crazy and cruel. It’s clear they all love each other, even when fighting, but it’s all very unhealthy. Poor Tiny’s dad tried to set him ablaze, so they locked him in the catacombs with Dr. Satan’s experiments. Otis Driftwood tends to act as the father figure, but his penchant for necrophilia means he’s not exactly the father of the year type. None of that even scratches the surface of just how much this family loves to torture, maim, and murder.


The People Under the Stairs

The Robeson family is a wealthy but frugal bunch. Or at least Mommy and Daddy are, while their only daughter Alice is the epitome of well-behaved. Until Fool comes along and learns the horrific truth, Mommy and Daddy keep a slew of discarded “sons” in their basement. Boys that have broken the rules and have had their tongues or ears removed as punishment. That they’ve resorted to cannibalism to survive is enough to land the Robesons near the lead of the dysfunctional pack, but they take it a step further with the reveal that Mommy and Daddy are brother and sister.


Hellraiser

After the disappearance of Frank Cotton, his brother Larry moves into his house as an attempt to reconnect with his wife, Julia. Blood from a gash on his hand unwittingly resurrects Frank from the floorboards of the attic, and Julia’s lust along with it. Poor Larry learns of the affair between Frank and Julia the hard way, and Julia learns the cold hard truth about what an unsympathetic user Frank is when a puzzle box opens the doors to another dimension. The love triangle gets even more complicated when Frank kills his brother, then wears his skin to fool Larry’s daughter Kirsty. Under the guise of Larry, he makes sexual advances on her. Incestuous desires, fratricide, and toying with Cenobites equals a family in pressing need of therapy. Lots of it. The Cenobites looked like angels next to the Cottons.


The Texas Chain Saw Massacre

There’s no question that a family of graverobbers with a taste for barbecued human flesh exists at the most dangerous end of dysfunction. None, save for the patriarch and proprietor of the family-owned gas station, seem capable of surviving in a healthy society. Not the loose canon hitchhiking brother, not the barely alive grandfather that suckles blood when offered, and mainly not the hulking mute that uses hand-made masks of human skin to convey his emotions and personality. Leatherface might be the family enforcer, but he’s a cowering softie that bears the brunt of his family’s abuse. This bizarre clan only gets weirder as the franchise progresses.


The Shining

At the opposite end of the spectrum is the Torrance family, a small unit trying hard to overcome their dysfunction. Schoolteacher turned aspiring writer Jack Torrance (Jack Nicholson) pursues a job as a caretaker at the Overlook Hotel as a means of getting his life back on track after alcoholism threatened to derail it altogether. The quiet winter months mean plenty of time to pursue his writing, but it also means quality time spent alone with the family. A necessity considering how physically abusive his drunken state propelled him to be. That’s what makes The Shining so tragic; the evil of the hotel brings out Jack’s worst qualities, taking a chance at redemption and corrupting it to its fullest. It meant his only child, Danny, grew up battling the same exact demons as dear old dad, too, in sequel Doctor Sleep.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading