Connect with us

Editorials

Flesh is Weak. Wax is Forever: The ‘House of Wax’ Remake Turns 15

Published

on

Dark Castle Entertainment began with a goal to remake William Castle’s films but quickly evolved to producing original content. Their initial slate of films at the turn of the century delivered memorable, beloved fan favorites in horror, but what set them apart wasn’t just a reinvention of classics but impressive production design, set pieces, and terrifying villains worthy of such lavish productions.

1999’s House on Haunted Hill set the bar high right out of the gate with its twisted take on a sprawling, Gothic style psychiatric hospital. 2001’s Thirteen Ghosts upped the ante with a mechanized glass mansion that doubled as a ghostly prison. Ghost Ship followed suit with an elaborate, creepy ocean liner. Yet House of Wax managed to outdo them all with the creation of an entire ghost town with a disturbing wax museum as its centerpiece. It provided the perfect setting for one brutal slasher, slicing up gruesome and memorable kills that would solidify the film as one of Dark Castle’s best, even if it took audiences 15 years to move past stunt casting and embrace its charms.

Very, very loosely based on the 1953 film of the same name, House of Wax was penned by Chad and Carey W. Hayes (The Conjuring). Likely drawing from their bond as twins, this remake centers around two pairs of twins; the homicidal Sinclair brothers (both played by Brian Van Holt) and the protagonist Jones siblings. The dichotomy of good twins versus evil is broken down further between each pair. Formerly conjoined, Vincent hides behind a mask and his extroverted brother due to horrific disfigurement from the surgery that separated them. While Bo might be the more socially normal of the pair, his conventional appearance is a mask for his sadistic nature.

At the other end of the spectrum are Carly (Elisha Cuthbert) and Nick Jones (Chad Michael Murray). Nick is the black sheep of the family, consistently in trouble with authority and armed with a bad attitude to match. It breeds resentment as Carly is the favored child among parents solely for not being the problem child. Those tensions kick off the setup, with Carly less than thrilled that Nick has tagged along with their friends’ trip to an important out of town college football game. One that none of them will ever see because a detour through a rural area leaves them stranded and ultimately plunges them into the Sinclairs’ isolated town they’ve built for themselves. Because this is a slasher, those friends wind up dead one by one, building up to an epic twin battle for survival.

House of Wax

Creative kills are crucial to the slasher, and House of Wax brings the goods. The stunt casting of Paris Hilton unleashed a torrent of vitriol toward both her and the film. Still, her performance as Carly’s friend Paige is perfectly serviceable, and her death delightfully nasty. Nick’s friend Dalton (Jon Abrahams) also meets an unforgettably grisly demise, yet none of the kills in the movie can top the excruciating death of Carly’s boyfriend Wade (Jared Padalecki). Simply for the crime of being too curious, Wade’s Achilles tendons are severed, and he’s subjected to the lengthy process of being prepped for Vincent’s wax museum- he’s burned and coated in hot wax that melds to his skin, leaving him paralyzed and left to die. All of which makes for a cringe-worthy reveal later on when his friends find him posed at the wax museum.

House of Wax marked Jaume Collet-Serra’s (OrphanThe Shallows) directorial feature debut, and the ambitious filmmaker insisted everything was handled as practical as possible. That meant actual and extensive use of wax, practical special effects, and a detailed ghost town built in the middle of nowhere. VFX only to be used when necessary or unavoidable. Graham “Grace” Walker’s excellent production design cannot be praised enough. The climactic showdown between the Sinclair twins and the Jones siblings is enhanced tenfold by the spectacular set-piece in which a fight for life and death occurs during an actual melting house of wax.

As a quick aside, in a genre that loves to overuse Night of the Living Dead as the background film playing on TV or the big screen, it’s refreshing that House of Wax employs Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? for its memorable theater sequence. More variety like this, please.

With a core cast of rising young stars, many of them hailing from The CW network, and a rock soundtrack heavily of its time, this is a classic early aughts horror movie through and through. Yet Collet-Serra’s practical-heavy vision and the incredibly talented crew behind the lens delivered a vicious modern slasher that brought insanely memorable kills set against an equally remarkable setting.

Upon initial theatrical release on May 6, 2005, the film under-performed in comparison to its more substantial budget, though home release proved a bit kinder. House of Wax was nominated for 2005’s Golden Raspberry for Worst Picture, Worst Remake, and Worst Supporting Actress for poor Paris Hilton, who’s casting warded off many stalwart fans. None of it deserved, especially with the context of other 2005 releases like The Fog remake or Alone in the Dark. Like many worthwhile horror movies that endure the test of time, the consensus has turned around. House of Wax only bears faint echoes of the film in which it’s based on, and doesn’t reinvent the slasher. But it is a tremendously entertaining horror movie boasting incredible production design and gory kills that’ll stick with you.

One of the taglines cheekily put it best: The flesh is weak. Wax is forever.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading