Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Why ‘The Thing’ and ‘The Blob’ Make for a Perfect Horror Remake Double Feature

Published

on

The blob kid metling

According to some, remakes do untold damage to childhoods the world over, leaving nothing but tears, regrets, and crumpled up memories in their wake. Obviously, the idea of redoing a beloved movie is a touchy subject for film fans as the results are sometimes less than stellar. In some cases, they’re not even adequate. But horror remakes fair a little better. Specifically, ones with a creative team with something on their mind or a singular perspective.

Every week in October, I’m suggesting a double feature of remakes for your Halloween viewing pleasures. The movies are connected and never random, even if the connection is not-so-obvious at first sight. Besides the fact we’re all dying for horror to watch during the spooky season, double features are great introductions to movies for the uninitiated. And for seasoned vets, watching two movies back-to-back can sometimes put them in a different light.

So, without further ado, let’s get to the picks.

What Are the Movies?

Four movies were the impetus for this entire endeavor, and these were the top two: John Carpenter’s The Thing and Chuck Russell’s The Blob. Remember last week when I said the 80s is horror’s most hallowed decade? No need to jog your memory; I definitely said it. Anyway, these two movies are quintessential reasons why. 

For the three or four of you reading this site who haven’t seen The Thing, it’s a remake of 1951’s The Thing from Another World. Like last week’s picks, Carpenter applies the basic idea about an alien attacking a group of researchers in Antarctica and creates a brand-new story that speaks to the 80s. Actually, given our current circumstances, it’s talking pretty loudly to 2020 as well. The Thing is about paranoia and distrust due to a shapeshifter that is basically, well, a virus. Coming a year after the AIDS epidemic in the United States began in earnest, it’s easy to see the movie as a parable for real-world issues. 

That’s all well and good, but Rob Bottin’s special effects are the real stars of the show. Pretty sure I’m not going out on a limb when I say the effects work is a big reason the movie doesn’t look or feel even slightly dated. In horror, filmmakers usually keep monsters in the shadows. Why? Because conventional wisdom says nothing they show us is more horrifying than what we conjure in our minds. The Thing is one of, if not the greatest horror movie of all time. One reason is that it throws that conventional wisdom out of every possible window in its vicinity. The creature design goes to places my mind wouldn’t dream of, much less consciously conjure. The beauty of dealing with a shapeshifting alien is it can be anything. The titular “Thing” is a combination of every species on every planet it’s ever assimilated, allowing Bottin and his crew to go nuts. The practical effects are a spoonful of horror sugar to the film’s medicine of nihilism

And then there’s The Blob, which feels like cotton candy confection, even without comparisons to The Thing. Trading in the ’50s Midwest small-town setting for an ’80s west coast small town, the movie is about, big surprise, an amorphous blob come to earth. Rather than make friends, it attacks this sleepy, little California town and rips apart the city’s Americana veneer. Yeah, The Blob satirizes 1950s culture while paying it homage but never forgets to be a scary movie. In what comes as a shock to no one at all, the team responsible for one of the best Freddy Krueger movies understands the perfect balance of humor, horror, and intelligence. 

The movie is called The Blob for a reason, and it delivers. Obviously, the design is simple, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t scary. The creature crushes people, phone booths, people, guns, animals, and of course, more people. The blob idea is more than a little silly, but the special effects team creates something not to be laughed at even a little bit. The Blob grows and can extend tendrils. It can be in one place, like a kitchen, hiding in plain sight. It can be everywhere and nowhere all at once and only has one weakness. No, I’m not telling what the defect is because that wouldn’t be any fun. But in another testament to how well-written the movie is, the blob’s fatal flaw is “set up and payoff” at its finest.

Okay, Why These Two?

Why not these two? They’re both ’80s remakes of ’50s classics and feature some of the best practical effects in the genre, much less the decade. Both films make the ’50s relevant to the ’80s, almost as if they’re on the same wavelength. The Blob lays its more jaded 1980s worldview on top of idealism and nostalgia of the 1950s. The Thing takes a 1950s staple—alien invasions—and turns it into an unseen virus that shines a light on humanity’s worst qualities. And that light is visible even in the darkest of winter nights in the Antarctic. They’re both a lot of fun in their very own ways and stand the test of time as watershed moments.

The Thing and The Blob were dope in the ’80s, and they’re just as good in October 2020.

Maybe even better. 

Click to comment

Editorials

Revisiting ‘The Day the Earth Stood Still’: The Sci-Fi Classic That Warned Us About Ourselves

Published

on

Note: This article contains mild spoilers for Disclosure Day.

In the post-World War II era, Hollywood began to take science fiction seriously. This genre that was once relegated to low-budget serials and dismissed aschildren’s farewas beginning to be understood as a way to tell sophisticated stories while simultaneously making pointed social and political commentary.

Writers and filmmakers became acutely aware that they could discuss whatever issues they wanted—race, nuclear war, class disparities, the effects of mass media, environmental concerns, and much more—just as long as they told a great story along the way and kept audiences entertained. 1951 was a banner year for this new brand of science fiction, with The Thing from Another World, When Worlds Collide, and The Day the Earth Stood Still all hitting the screen.

The Day the Earth Stood Still taps into early 1950’s flying saucer fever while also examining who we are and, more importantly, who we could be. The premise of the film is simple. A flying saucer lands on a baseball field adjacent to the White House in Washington, D.C. A man named Klaatu (Michael Rennie) steps out of the vehicle and declares that he comes in peace but is immediately met by fear and violence. Gort (Lock Martin), the robot that accompanies him, vaporizes the weapons, including tanks and artillery, that the military has brought to surround the ship, a display that forces Klaatu into hiding. When he is finally able to deliver his message, it is a warning.

Klaatu and his people have observed that humanity’s violent tendencies are beginning to reach beyond the confines of planet Earth and threaten its intergalactic neighbors.Your choice is simple,Klaatu declares,join us and live in peace or pursue your present course and face obliteration.

Connections Between The Day the Earth Stood Still and Disclosure Day

In the film, this obliteration would come at the hands, or vaporizing beam, of Gort, a kind of intergalactic enforcer, but in the real world, the threat comes from within. Though the film appears to be athe threat is out therepicture at first blush, it is actually awe are the monstersmovie. It makes this point in several ways, most of which remain shockingly relevant seventy-five years after the film’s original release.

Though The Day the Earth Stood Still was released at the dawn of the television revolution, it was practically prophetic in depicting the ways that mass media would be used and abused in times of uncertainty and crisis. News reports quickly evolve from reporting facts to spreading fear about the visitors and spinning out wild conspiracy theories. Newspapers print images of Gort attacking people as they run screaming, though up to that point, he had only destroyed weapons and left humans unharmed. A radio announcer declares Klaatu to be a monster that must be hunted down like a rabid animal and destroyed. Rumors quickly spread that he, though completely human in appearance, has tentacles and three eyes.

The film’s commentary on mass media personally made me reflect further on my recent viewing of Steven Spielberg’s Disclosure Day (2026) and its depictions of media, which are surprisingly less cynical than those found in The Day the Earth Stood Still. In both films, there is a trust in the information sources, something that was largely true in the early 1950s, but Spielberg’s depiction that people would believe the evidence of their eyes and ears is viewed by some as naïve. I must admit my own reluctance to believe this would be the case in our age of deep-fakes and the barrage of A.I.-generated images that flood social media. I would love to believe that he is right, and the world would literally stand still in rapt attention as a major network reveals such long-hidden secrets, but I am doubtful.

Even in The Day the Earth Stood Still, there is a sense of this cynicism. Klaatu is told by Mr. Harley (Frank Conroy), the President’s special secretary, that gathering the leaders of the countries of the world in one place would be impossible. He produces messages in which the Soviet Premier demands the meeting occur in Moscow, while the Prime Minister of Britain refuses to attend unless it is held in Washington. Though the people of Earth seem to believe that an alien has in fact landed, proving that we are not alone in the universe, they still cannot put aside petty squabbles to hear what Klaatu has to say. I hate to say it, but I believe this still rings true in our increasingly divided nation and world.

In order to gain the attention of the world, Klaatu consults a scientist, Professor Barnhardt (Sam Jaffe), who admits that people are reluctant to listen to scientists, a point that has unfortunately become increasingly true in the ensuing years. Barnhardt suggests that Klaatu perform a display of power that does not hurt any humans to convince influential people from around the world to hear his message. Klaatu devises a plan to literally make the earth stand still by suspending power of all kinds—electrical, mechanical, combustion, etc.—for exactly half an hour at the same time across the entire globe. The exceptions are just as remarkable: hospitals, airplanes in flight, and other vital operations. But still, despite the care he takes not to harm anyone, the fear of Klaatu and Gort only increases.

Klaatu as Science Fiction’s Christ Figure

A powerful detail of The Day the Earth Stood Still is that the first visitor to our planet from another world is very much like us. After Klaatu is injured by a frightened soldier who thinks a gift to the people of the world is a weapon, he is taken for examination at Walter Reed Hospital. This examination reveals that he is essentially human in every way. His organs all function the same as a healthy young man’s, indicating that his planet has a similar atmosphere and pressure. The differences are just as striking. Though he appears to be in his mid-30’s, Klaatu is 78 years old, and his people have a life expectancy of 130 years along with a vastly superior intellect.

He is proof that humans are capable of bettering themselves by living in peace with one another. Rather than expending energy on war, destruction, and the pursuit of money and power, Klaatu’s people have focused on reason, mathematics, and sciences. Though not mentioned in the film, I imagine (or hope) that they also value history, the arts, and all those pursuits that we would callthe humanities.To make this point inescapable, the film depicts Klaatu as an ideal to strive for, even a kind of Christ figure: a teacher of peace who is killed, resurrects, delivers one final message to those gathered to listen, and ascends back into the heavens.

To draw another Spielberg parallel, there are hints of E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) in The Day the Earth Stood Still, including these Christlike parallels. After escaping Walter Reed, Klaatu, posing as Mr. Carpenter (see what they did there?), befriends a young boy, Bobby Benson (Billy Gray), whose father, like Elliot’s in E.T., is absent, in this case, killed in the War. Klaatu eventually reveals who he is to Bobby’s mother, Helen (Patricia Neal), who assists him in escaping back to his ship. Klaatu, worried that Gort will destroy the city or even more if he is harmed, tells Helen to deliver the famous wordsKlaatu Barada Niktoto Gort if anything should happen to him.

Klaatu is shot and taken to a jail cell, where he is declared dead. Gort, sensing Klaatu has been harmed, vaporizes the two soldiers guarding the ship and is about to continue his rampage when Helen, though fearful, is able to deliver the words to stop him (it’s a good thing she wasn’t Ash Williams). Gort brings Helen aboard the ship before retrieving Klaatu’s body from the cell. Back on the ship, Klaatu is revived by a medical device and delivers his ultimatum to the leaders of the world.

Why Klaatu’s Warning Still Matters Today

There has been much discourse about the final word uttered in Disclosure Day by Emily Blunt’s character Margaret Fairchild—Listen.But I believe The Day the Earth Stood Still poses a similar challenge. After giving the option of peace or obliteration, Klaatu says,We shall be waiting for your answer. The decision rests with you,leaving humankind to rest in the conundrum.

Where Disclosure Day requests, The Day the Earth Stood Still demands, but I fear its demand has fallen on deaf ears. We have continued to seek power over peace, wars and rumors of wars have only increased, and as Klaatu says in the film, we have continued tosubstitute fear for reason.

The Day the Earth Stood Still does not come across as a cynical film, though I fear I have painted it as such. There is a great amount of hope in it. It is filled with characters like Bobby, Helen, and Professor Barnhardt who seem to truly believe that a better world can be achieved. But then there is also Tom (Hugh Marlowe), Helen’s fiancé, who believes turning in Klaatu will bring him power and political position. Mr. Harley, and by extension the President of the United States and the political powers of the world, believe that the systems are too entrenched and the problems of the world too complex for peace to ever happen.

Maybe the deeper question of both films is, can we evolve? If faced with the revelation of truth beyond ourselves, or with an ultimatum of peace or oblivion, can we finally believe that it is possible to unite and be one human family?

That is the ultimate power of The Day the Earth Stood Still. Science Fiction and its sister genre, horror (which practically blended into one in the 1950s), have an uncanny ability to, as I said before, show us who we are, but also who we could be. Day asks us if we are willing to make the hard choices to achieve something greater, to become the best version of ourselves. Not to achieve perfection but strive toward that mark as closely as imperfect beings possibly can.

The answers are not simple, and the methods are challenging, even divisive. The process has been and will continue to be long and difficult, but the ultimate goals may not be as disparate from our neighbors as they seem. Perhaps the first step in that process is exactly as Margaret in Disclosure Day says,listen.And even more, to make the conscious choice to listen.

As Klaatu declares, the decision indeed rests with us.

Continue Reading