Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Bind You From Doing Harm: ‘The Craft’ and Portrayals of the Sinister Side to Magick

Published

on

In his review upon its release, Roger Ebert wrote of The Craft:Here are four girls who could out-gross David Copperfield in Vegas, and they limit their amazing powers to getting even.”

Of course, that’s a bit reductive. The seminal 1996 film that piqued a cultural interest in witchcraft for young viewers everywhere, especially women, is more than that. When four girls quite literally join forces to create their own coven and summon the power of the fictional deity Manon, they’re searching for freedom— freedom from physical and emotional scars, abusive parents, racism, classism, loneliness, grief, assault— topics that were seldom tackled in teen horror movies, let alone ones originally intended for PG-13 ratings.

However, Ebert wasn’t wrong. At its core, Andrew Fleming’s The Craft is a morality tale about finally gaining autonomy before ultimately abusing it— taking magic(k)al gifts meant for empowerment and deducing them for selfish or petty reasons. Like most teenagers, while each of the girls carries heavy loads, all four get caught up in the trivialities of high school life as well— just like how anything and everything feels like the end of the world at that age. Newcomer and naturally powerful Sarah (Robin Tunney) yearns for a peer’s attention (at his expense) after he spreads an embarrassing rumor about her; Bonnie (Neve Campbell) wants outward beauty and desirability after feeling like a “monster” for a large chunk of her life; Rochelle (Rachel True) wishes for revenge against her racist bully; and, well, Nancy (Fairuza Balk) just wants to be as powerful as the god she worships— the exact opposite of how she’s viewed as and treated by her school peers and family. “The Craft” is their means of control— no matter how seemingly minor or detrimental the issues are that convolute their lives.

And who could blame them? Beyond the luring glamor that movies deduce it to be, historically, witchcraft has always appealed to the disenfranchised— those who viewed themselves as powerless or those who were told their power was wicked or immoral, searching for reclamation of that power in other ways. Witchcraft and magick (the ‘k’ added by British occultist Aleister Crowley to differentiate from the “magic” of magicians’ and illusionists’ entertainment stage shows) has long been considered a respite from conventional, organized Christian religions. With varying subdivisions and an embracing of individualism that isn’t commonly found within more “traditional” religious practices, witchcraft has been a suitable match for otherness, often emphasizing the potential of what can be done with one’s power now, as opposed to Christianity’s fixation with what should be done to reach the afterlife. Interestingly, Fleming places Catholic iconography in shots around their school that watches the girls wherever they go.

Wherein lies the issue that movies have either understood or completely neglected, however, is the myth of “black” magick versus “white.” Historically, the term “black” magick was largely used to describe the alleged invoking of demons or placing hexes, curses, and voodoo upon others, while “white” magick was considered more pure. However, according to many modern practicing witches, magick itself is neither bad nor good— the consequences of the magick come from the intent of the person conjuring it. “Using magick for selfish gain or against someone negatively will only hurt you the most in the long run,” Jessica. B.,* a practicing pagan, explained. “Hollywood has made it seem like you can get away with bringing harm to others, but it’s just the same as if you were to physically go and hurt someone. All these books that fly off the shelves that have petty little revenge spells in them are doing way more harm than good to beginners— it’s causing more chaos.” Ned T.,* a member of an online community group for Goetia practices, simplifies: “(Magick) is a tool, like a knife. Is a knife evil? Only if the wielder is evil.”

And perhaps because of its consultation with actual Wiccans on set, The Craft indeed acknowledges this. The girls are told by an elder witch, “True magick is neither black nor white. It’s both, because nature is both— loving and cruel, all at the same time. The only good or bad lies within the heart of the witch. Life keeps a balance all on its own.” She also warns, “Understand this: whatever you send out, you get back times three.” A combination of being left to their own devices and failing to listen to the little guidance they do have is what ultimately leads to everything going to shit after getting what they wished for. Bonnie, now scar-free and beautiful, makes a 180-degree pivot from timid to unbearable narcissist; Rochelle’s bully develops alopecia; Sarah’s love spell “humiliates” the jerk she’s crushing on, which, according to the movie’s logic, is what causes him to assault her (which is not her fault and could be interpreted as a glaringly wrongful message to send out about victim blaming); and Nancy aggressively believes she has the right to make the men who’ve wronged her perish. All of it is a deadly combination of not having any agency at all to taking advantage of it when it comes— even if it can’t necessarily be blamed on the magick itself.

That’s both the beauty and the bummer of the film: watching once-relatable, but flawed characters succumb to their darkest recesses. Witnessing a sisterhood of weirdos in awe of how powerful they are together in a game of “light as a feather” and bonding over calling the corners (and being heard) eventually tear themselves apart feels like a gut punch. When Rochelle watches Laura Lizzie’s (Christine Taylor) hair fall out in clumps, her reflection in the mirror is facing away instead of looking back at her— she can’t even recognize herself or her own actions, even though she’s better than that. Her and Bonnie only realize how far they’ve gone when Sarah tricks them into seeing uglier versions of themselves in a mirror by film’s end. Nancy is last seen strapped to a bed in a psychiatric hospital, still likely unable to grasp the consequences of her actions. (It’d be interesting to see an alternative ending for the Nancy-equivalent character in The Craft: Legacy.) Sarah, the token “good” witch of the four binds Nancy from doing any more harm— the only one whose powers remain.

The Craft is relatively easy on its protagonists in comparison to other films, namely Adam MacDonald’s Pyewacket or even De Palma’s Carrie that have more dire ramifications. Carrie White (Sissy Spacek) possesses natural powers and abilities, but it’s her decision to set the school prom and all its attendees ablaze that leads to her demise. Pyewacket‘s Leah (Nicole Munoz), who takes an interest in the occult and consults a book called “Black River, Black Magic” after her father’s death, performs a ritual to kill off her mother out of anger (spoiler: it works, and she regrets it). Grieving and hurting from her mother’s insults and choice to uproot her life, Leah chooses to use magick for hateful reasons instead of trying to make her life with her mom better. The mercilessly bullied Carrie is righteous before recognizing she can use her powers for revenge. Like the girls in The Craft, both are victims of terrible home/social lives and are arguably cornered into making the poor decisions that they do with magick, and it’s tragic watching them give into their darkest desires.

That’s why The Craft continues to speak to us almost 25 years later: we all sometimes feel powerless in our lives; we all have possessed dark desires; and we all have a curiosity of just how far we’d go to obtain power over those things that seem helpless. A practicing witch who wished to remain anonymous summarizes it best: “What I like about The Craft is the natural power and magick of women. When a woman embraces her own innate, magickal power and comes together with other women who are the same— it can be very powerful.”

Let’s just hope she uses her power for good.

Journalism/Communication Studies grad. A24 horror superfan- the weirder, the better. Hates when animals die in horror films.

Click to comment

Comics

‘Spider-Noir’ Comic Changes Explained: How the TV Series Reinvents Marvel’s Darkest Spider-Man

Published

on

A little while back, I wrote an article chronicling the Hellraiser franchise’s affinity for Film Noir and touched on how that genre has, historically, always been connected to horror.

This connection can be observed in everything from the cannibalistic serial killers of Frank Miller’s Sin City to the disturbing criminal plots fueling neo-noir thrillers like Stuart Gordon’s underrated King of the Ants. That’s why it came as no surprise when I finally sat down to watch all eight episodes of Prime Video’s recently released Spider-Noir series and was confronted with plenty of classic horror tropes.

What did come as a surprise, however, was how showrunners Oren Uziel and Steve Lightfoot approached these horror elements when compared to the 2009 comic book that the show is based on. From the heavily altered rogue’s gallery to an equally terrifying yet completely different origin story for Nicolas Cage’s take on the webslinger, there are plenty of changes here that I feel might be of interest to genre fans.

With that in mind, I’d like to invite readers to take a closer look at all the adjustments that Spider-Noir made to the story in order to bring this incarnation of Spider-Man to life in all of its monochromatic glory (unless you watched the True-Hue color version of the show, in which case you’ll be treated to a surprisingly comic-booky palette that you don’t usually see on television).

The Dark Origins of Marvel’s Spider-Man Noir

Our first order of business should be to examine the origins of the Noir comics themselves. Originally published as part of the Marvel Noir alternate universe that reimagined several characters as hard-boiled crime-fighters, Spider-Man Noir became the most successful book in the entire run. This highly politicized story about Peter Parker coming to terms with the capitalist evils of the Great Depression seemed to have struck a nerve with audiences looking for a darker take on the wall-crawler, which is likely why we’d soon see several sequel stories as well as a video game adaptation of the character in 2010’s underrated Spider-Man: Shattered Dimensions.

Of course, it wasn’t just Spider-Man’s darker disposition that made this version of the character a hit, as 1930s New York City was depicted as being much more hostile than what we generally see in the standard Marvel Universe. From Peter’s powers coming from an Eldritch Spider God that spawns man-eating arachnids to Vulture being an ex-Freak-Show Gimp with a taste for human flesh, you can definitely understand why this Web-Head isn’t pulling his punches.

Unfortunately, this alternate universe was a little too popular for its own good, with each subsequent sequel/adaptation further diluting the political anger and classic horror influences that fueled the original comic-book run in order to appeal to a wider audience. Spider-Man Noir was nearly unrecognizable once we got to the Spider-Verse crossover that turned the character into a household name, though this would at least lead to an interesting adaptation in 2018.

The Classic Horror Influences Hidden Throughout Spider-Noir

Jack Huston as Sandman in ‘Spider-Noir’

When Phil Lord and Chris Miller finally translated Spider-Man Noir to the big screen, with Nicolas Cage bringing the character to life in an unexpected case of pitch-perfect casting, he was still mostly relegated to comic relief as his nazi-punching antics and over-the-top edginess were played for laughs. However, while this version of the character had little to do with the comics that spawned him, Spider-Noir’s newfound popularity eventually resulted in the announcement of a darker live-action spin-off – a spin-off that I was cautiously optimistic about.

While the showrunners ultimately decided to go in a completely different direction than the 2009 comic, the new team of writers appeared to understand Noir as a genre in ways that even the folks at Marvel Noir couldn’t quite grasp. That’s likely why 2026’s Spider-Noir boasts plenty of horror elements, just not in ways we’ve seen them before.

The series is obviously borrowing tropes and aesthetics from period-accurate monster movies, with Universal’s 1930s output being a particularly big influence. From the re-imagining of Sandman and Tombstone as tragic figures to The Spider even being operated on by a mad scientist with hilariously antiquated techniques, this bizarre collection of super-powered freaks could have easily shown up in a classic creature feature.

The scares aren’t all retro, however, as the showrunners also injected plenty of body-horror into the mix during their attempt at unifying the origin stories for all these larger-than-life characters. Hell, the Spider himself is now revealed to have gained his powers after being bitten by a half-mutated Man-Spider during World War I, and the aforementioned mad scientist keeps a disturbing collection of failed experiments in her basement, proving that not all of her patients were lucky enough to simply gain superpowers after being experimented on.

Nicolas Cage Reinvents Spider-Man Noir for Television

Ben Reilly/Spiderman (Nicolas Cage) in SPIDER-NOIR
Photo: Aaron Epstein/Prime
© Amazon Content Services LLC

I also really appreciate how Cage insists on depicting Ben Reilly as an arachnid trapped inside of a human body, with his uncanny physical performance and classic Hollywood impressions keeping your eyes glued to the screen while also providing some of the show’s funniest moments.

I still think it’s a shame that the character is no longer politically motivated, and I miss the detail about Uncle Ben having been cannibalized by Vulture after his social activism ruffled too many feathers, but at least this time our protagonist actually feels like someone who could have been written by Raymond Chandler if he were a fan of Superheroes.

In fact, the writers nailed the snappy back-and-forth that Noir authors like Dashiel Hammett used to refer to as the “riposte”, and it’s fun to see supervillains being depicted as horrific movie monsters instead of specialized henchmen – with The Spider feeling like just as much of a Freak Show attraction as the rest of them. Purists might be put off by the lack of reverence for the source material, but I think that’s a small price to pay when even the show’s most clichéd moments intentionally harken back to the golden age of Hollywood.

That’s why I’d argue that Amazon’s Spider-Noir isn’t really an adaptation, but rather an equally valid take on the same premise that inspired Marvel back in 2009. And in a world filled with recycled storylines that only serve to advertise future releases, I’d rather have two completely different visions of the same character than a straight-up retelling of the same handful of ideas.

At the end of the day, there’s enough space inside this comic fan’s heart for both man-eating Vultures and a Cronenberg-inspired Man-Spider. And if you’re also a fan of nostalgic creature features with comic book flair, I’d highly recommend this street-level superhero story with a spooky twist.

Continue Reading