Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Slumber Party Massacre’: Slashing the Patriarchy

Published

on

Knife wielding killers, synth scores, and premarital sex are the language of slasher films. Rising to popularity in the late 1970s and early 1980s, this subgenre of horror is known for its violent and exploitative nature. Films like Halloween and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre helped create the formula, and ever since films have been copying, subverting, and reinventing the form. Amy Holden Jones’s 1982 film The Slumber Party Massacre dissects the slasher with feminist ferocity, commenting on the misogyny of slasher films as well as the generally male dominated genre. 

As the film begins, the audience is informed that a mass murderer has escaped from prison. Within the next few minutes we meet Trish (Michelle Michaels), a high school basketball player who seems like a nice girl. She is shown topless in the very first scene in which we meet her, the gratuitous nudity not wasting a minute of time. Since her parents are going away for the weekend, Trish plans a small get together between her and her friends on the basketball team. With boyfriends, mischievous jocks, and the new girl next door, the night is already primed for trouble. Throw in a drill wielding psycho killer, and you have yourself a slumber party ripe for a massacre. 

What distinguishes this film from most other slashers is the approach it takes in portraying the female characters and how it satirizes the elements of the genre. Written by feminist author Rita Mae Brown, the film was originally meant to be a parody of slashers. The producers went against her ideas and wanted a more straightforward horror flick, but Jones’s direction still accomplishes what Brown might have originally intended. Through using the known tropes of slasher films to an exaggerated degree, Jones is able to comment on the stereotypes of the genre in a clever way. 

The gratuitous nudity is the most obvious example. At nearly every possible moment, topless women are shown, with the camera slowly gazing over their nude bodies. This happens within the first few minutes when we meet Trish, as well as when the girls are showering after basketball practice. During a later scene in Trish’s house during the sleepover, their jock friends peer in through the window of the living room and watch the girls change into their pajamas. The constant leering at the women’s bodies, done so in an exaggerated manner, highlights the obsession horror has with nude women. They are constantly murdered, raped, and tortured in horror films, seemingly punished for their bodies. The excess of nudity in this film calls attention to itself, highlighting the ridiculous, often senseless disregard filmmakers have for women’s bodies. 

Apart from the commentary on female bodies, the film also explores female sexuality. Courtney (Jennifer Meyers), the younger sister of the new girl Valerie (Robin Stille), steals her sister’s porn magazine to look at out of curiosity. Valerie teases her and they talk about masturbation. Courtney’s interest in sex is discussed naturally, not something to be afraid of or something that girls don’t experience. This contrasts with the voyeuristic way in which the girls’ jock friends sneakily look into their window to watch them undress without their consent, which is treated as normal in most films. 

Where the most blunt commentary lies, however, is in the portrayal of the killer himself. Russ Thorn (Michael Villella), the escaped mass murderer whose weapon of choice is a power drill, chooses Trish and her friends to terrorize. The immediate irony is his weapon, which is a phallic symbol and is oftentimes held at his waist to appear as so. In an iconic shot, Thorn closes in on one of the girls with his drill, but the shot is taken at a lower angle through his legs so that it looks as if it is his penis. Thorn also doesn’t speak until near the end of the film when he has Trish cornered. She asks why he chose them and he states, “You’re pretty, all of you are very pretty… It takes a lot of love for a person to do this. You know you want it. You’ll love it.” This language is clearly very similar to things that victims of sexual harassment and assault hear, which plays as the killer’s motivation. 

In the final showdown, only Trish, Valerie, and Courtney are still alive. It takes the three remaining girls to defeat him, which features Valerie using a machete to slice the drill in half, rendering Thorn useless. The symbolism of her destroying the phallic symbol — the weapon of the killer and a patriarchal stereotype — is a powerful image even if overt in its imagery. A satisfying ‘plunk’ sounds as the end of the drill falls into the pool water beside Thorn. He falls into the pool after Valerie cuts off his hand. Celebrating their victory, Courtney and Valerie don’t notice that Thorn rises from the water — it’s a slasher, the killer always comes back for one last scare. Trish, Courtney, and Valerie struggle with him as he tries to strangle Valerie. Then she grabs her machete and holds it upward as Thorn falls onto it.  

Interestingly, the girls are only able to defeat Thorn by also using a phallic shaped weapon. Valerie’s machete is what slices through his power drill, and she also holds it at her waist as he falls onto it. The phallic shaped power drill can be seen as a metaphor for the patriarchy, misogyny, and hypermasculinity. By Valerie cutting through this with her own phallic shaped weapon, it can be seen as her reclaiming power that she has never been granted under a patriarchal society. This extends to how a lot of women are treated in other horror films, their helplessness usually resulting in only one final girl surviving. That doesn’t happen here. There is no final girl. 

Slumber Party values its female characters, something that many other slashers tend to disregard. The girls, despite being objectified by the camera in the first half of the film, are rounded out beings with greater depth than their male counterparts. Valerie and Courtney are not sentenced to death because of their interest in sex, and Trish is able to make smart enough decisions to fight off Thorn and survive. After an era of horror films featuring massacred naked girls covered in blood, this underseen gem shines bright amongst the onslaught of slasher movies made in the 1980s. Although overt in its satire and feminist message, The Slumber Party Massacre is a cleverly executed criticism of the slasher genre that still holds up today.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading