Connect with us

Editorials

The Pizza’s Still Cold: The Lasting Legacy of ‘The Slumber Party Massacre’ 40 Years Later

Published

on

The slasher film. Across several decades, one of the most dominating sub-genres in the entire horror sphere. From the beginning days of the formative slashers in the 1970s, all the way to today’s reboots, sequels, and fresh originals. From classic icons such as Michael Myers to modern killers like Mia Goth’s Pearl. The slasher truly lives forever, proving it’s always in fashion.

One of the most unique slashers is a movie that just celebrated its 40th anniversary. A movie that spawned a series of films written and directed entirely by women, a rarity in the genre.

That movie? The Slumber Party Massacre.

Released in 1982, The Slumber Party Massacre started life as an on-the-nose horror movie that would essentially be a send-up of genre tropes. This original screenplay was titled Sleepless Nights and was authored by famed feminist writer Rita Mae Brown as a parody of the often dominated slasher film genre, in particular. When the script was picked up by producers (including King of the B-movie, Roger Corman), however, the screenplay was filmed as a straight forward slasher, despite leaving in most of those originally intended comedic elements.

Directed by Amy Holden Jones, the film follows Valerie (Robin Stille) as she attempts to fit in at her new school in Venice, California. One day at school she’s invited by mean girl Trish (Michelle Michaels) to her slumber party. Unbeknownst to all of them, mass murderer Russ Thorn has escaped the local mental hospital and has his sights set on the young women. 

Even though this was 1982, the tropes the film was parodying were already set in stone. Teens gathering when the parents are away is a tale as old as the genre and the escaped killer angle was already made famous in Halloween, released only 4 years earlier. The true spin comes from the feminist ideas that lie in the film’s DNA, a result of the original screenplay.

One of the first deaths in The Slumber Party Massacre is of a handywoman at Valerie’s school, a role usually reserved for male performers. While murdering her, Russ gets his signature weapon: a massive power drill. As many have pointed out over the years, it’s not only a tool of slasher movie destruction but also a clear representation of the male killer’s “manhood”; take a look at the film’s iconic key art at the top of this article if you have any doubts about the intentions.

Though Valerie turns down the slumber party invitation, Trish and her friends still go on with their sleepover plans and of course, smoking and debauchery commence. It’s here where a bulk of the male characters are introduced; ranging from a creepy neighbor who promises not to tell their parents about the drugs, to two boys from school named Jeff and Neil. What sets Slumber Party Massacre apart from other slashers of the era is that every male character has a threatening aura about them. They give off bad vibes despite us knowing that none of them are the killer. It’s often argued that these characters exist as red herrings but could also be seen as a commentary on the constant threats of violence and uncomfortable encounters women regularly face.

More on that in a minute…

Of course, Russ eventually shows up at the slumber party to spoil all the fun and get Valerie involved, and what follows is one of the most fun and well-made slasher films from an era when these movies were a dime a dozen. The movie is predictable but is filled with all the humor of the original screenplay (whether this was intentional or not is up for debate) and in fact delivers some of the funniest moments you’ll ever see in a slasher movie. These range from eating pizza off a dead delivery boy, to a great sight gag involving a corpse and a refrigerator. Even if you aren’t into the film’s feminist roots and themes, its hard to deny that Slumber Party Massacre is a well-made and thoroughly entertaining slasher. The very definition of a group hangout movie.

In one of the final scenes we see Valerie and her sister cut the tip off the end of Russ’ drill. An on-the-nose representation of “emasculating” him and allowing them to finally finish him off in a backyard swimming pool, ending his reign of terror once and for all. Fully leaning into its feminist roots, Slumber Party Massacre ends on an exciting note that drives the commentary home.

Made for only $220,000, The Slumber Party Massacre went on to gross over $3 million and then came the inevitable sequels – two of them, in 1987 and 1990. Despite varying quality between entries, the series never lost sight of its roots. The entire franchise has to date been written and directed by women, and to this day it’s the only slasher franchise that can make that claim.

In 2021, the franchise received a reboot. Keeping the tradition alive, the reboot leans back into the ideas of the first one and embraces its feminist themes while never losing sight of being a fun and exciting slasher film. Keeping the franchise alive, Scream Factory is re-releasing the original film along with the first sequel this coming February on 4K Ultra HD.

The Slumber Party Massacre may not have the mass appeal of a hit horror franchise like Halloween or Friday the 13th, but now 40 years and four films later, its legacy still lives on.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading