Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Demon Murder Case’: The 1983 TV Movie That Was the Original ‘The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It’

Published

on

With this past weekend’s release of The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It, based upon the Arne Cheyenne Johnson murder case of 1981, the furor surrounding the real life exploits of married demonologist/clairvoyant team Ed and Lorraine Warren (and the charges that they were frauds) has fired up yet again, setting social media ablaze with arguments either defending or excoriating the couple. Such reactions can be traced to the release of the first Conjuring film back in 2013, itself based on a Warren case regarding the haunting of the real-life Perron family in the 1970s. Seven films set within the Conjuring Universe have followed, ranging from “Based on a True Story” tales to utter fictions molded from the creative license of the filmmakers behind the flagship series. The questionable veracity of the former seems to fuel the hottest of the arguments, seeing passionate defenders on either side of Twitter and the like.

What cannot be argued is that, in February of 1981, Arne Cheyenne Johnson stabbed Alan Bono to death and was subsequently arrested, tried, and sentenced to a term of 10-20 years in prison, ultimately serving five before his release. The court case gained significant notoriety when Johnson’s attorneys employed the unprecedented defense that the young man had been possessed by demons at the time of the killing. Ed and Lorraine Warren backed his story, with an eventual book released detailing the horrific possession of a young child (David Glatzel, the younger brother of Arne’s girlfriend) preceding Johnson’s purported possession and Bono’s murder.

Andy Griffith and Beverlee McKinsey as Guy and Charlotte Harris in ‘The Demon Murder Case’ (1983)

The case garnered national interest, which not only brought with it an expected media firestorm, but a televised dramatization in the form of The Demon Murder Case. This 1983 NBC-TV movie covers roughly the same events of the third Conjuring film, albeit in a wildly different (and decidedly more lo-fi) way, all while changing the names of the people involved in the case. The film opens with Kenny Miller (the Arne Johnson analogue, played by a very young, post-Friday the 13th Kevin Bacon), in cuffs and being drive via prison bus to the courthouse. There, we meet: his lawyer Anthony Marino (The Thing’s Richard Masur); Joan Greenway (Young Frankenstein’s Cloris Leachman), an atheist reporter drawn into covering the trial; and Warren stand-ins Guy and Charlotte Harris (Andy Griffith and Beverlee McKinsey).

‘The Demon Murder Case’ VHS artwork

After a brief scene in the courtroom depicting Marino’s attempt to introduce demonic possession as the defense tactic for his client (with the judge swiftly striking down this plea), reporters swarm Marino for his reaction. Guy Harris trails behind, solemnly addressing the press with “I tell you, this is a battleground. This is not a case of murder. This is a confrontation between the devil and the human race.” From here, we cut to one year earlier, focusing on the Frazier family (standing in for the Glatzels) as they move into a new house. The youngest child, here named Brian, reveals to his mother that he has been visited by “the Beast”, who has followed him from their previous home. From their first night forward, Brian begins exhibiting increasingly alarming behavior straight out of the Regan/Pazuzu playbook. At their wits’ end, the family contacts the Harrises, who consult on the case alongside the prickly Father Eagon. Griffith brings his folksy charm to the role, while McKinsey radiates kindness, both creating a warm impression with their take on the Warrens.

Further outbursts, brutal attacks and levitation figure into Brian’s possession, leading the religious authorities to sanction an exorcism administered by Father Dietrich (The Devil’s Rain’s Eddie Albert). Charlotte assists, drawing out the names of the forty-two (!!!) demons inhabiting the boy, in a sequence that reminds one of Lorraine sussing out the Nun/Valak’s true name in the second Conjuring film. The sequence is hardly frightening, but it is more than a little fun (the child shouts and grumbles as the ground shakes, lights swing wildly from the ceiling, and candles spray fire into the air). Unfortunately for everyone involved, the exorcism doesn’t work, leaving Brian still under the Beast’s control even as he’s taken back home.

It all culminates with Brian attacking Kenny with a knife, with the surrogate older brother commanding the demon to come into him. From this point, we follow Kenny and his girlfriend Nancy as they move into a new home owned by Nancy’s boss Phillip Russo (Cutting ClassTom Ligon), who makes no secret of his designs on his pretty young employee. Tensions boil with Phillip’s growing lechery and Kenny’s burgeoning jealousy, leading to the inevitable confrontation which sees Phillip’s death at Kenny’s hands.

‘The Demon Murder Case’ TV Advertisement

From here we move back to the present, with Marino making an impassioned defense with the support of the Harrises. Nevertheless, Kenny is found guilty and sentenced. The film ends with Kenny staring out of his prison cell, muttering “Demons” to himself as he gazes into the empty night before him. One final scare at the Frazier house carries us to the end credits, assuring us that the terror isn’t yet over for the poor family.

While the film surely won’t sway any of the Warrens’ detractors, it does act as an interesting companion piece to the third Conjuring film. Whereas that new film only covers the initial possession and subsequent murder briefly in its first act before sending the Warrens off on an investigative journey, The Demon Murder Case delves heavily into the initial possession and the fraught relationships which led to the bloodshed. Curiously, even for all of the supernatural shenanigans in its first half, the TV movie illustrates that resentment and copious amounts of alcohol were far more responsible for the stabbing that took a man’s life than a demonic possession. In addition, we get much more time in the courtroom with this earlier film, depicting the trial and sentencing at length.

Though the film’s direction is a bit pedestrian at times, with chunks of the movie playing out like a cheap, neutered Exorcist ripoff, there are some genuine moments of stylish flair on display. The writing is solid, while the performances are generally quite good. While it may be a tad slow at times, The Demon Case Murder stands as an interesting enough curiosity for fans of paranormal history, The Conjuring franchise, and, yes, the Warrens. Controversy be damned.

Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga as Ed and Lorraine Warren in ‘The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It’ (2021)

Click to comment

Editorials

From Antichrist to Action Hero: Sam Neill Redefined Horror’s Leading Man

Published

on

Sam Neill Horror Movies
Event Horizon

On July 13th, 2026, the world lost one of its brightest stars.

Beloved New Zealand actor Sam Neill passed away from pneumonia after a long battle with stage 3 lymphoma. The multifaceted movie star will be remembered by mainstream audiences for his iconic role as Dr. Alan Grant in Steven Spielberg’s 1993 masterpiece Jurassic Park, as well as powerful turns in A Cry in the Dark (1988), The Piano (1993), and Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016), and prestige TV series The Tudors and Peaky Blinders. But horror fans know him as one of the genre’s most surprising Scream Kings.

Through a handful of memorable starring roles, Neill spent the 80s and 90s bringing life to a wide variety of characters and finding humanity in the most unusual leading roles, regardless of how heroic or villainous. 


The Final Conflict (1981)

After a decade on the stage and screen in New Zealand and Australia, Neill made his international debut as Damien Thorn in Graham Baker’s The Final Conflict, the third installment of The Omen franchise. Now a 36-year-old businessman, Damien is fully aware of his devilish parentage and hell-bent on world domination. But rather than a hooved and horned monstrosity, Neill’s Antichrist is a suave businessman who leads his followers in an expensive suit and seeks to bring about the apocalypse through deceptive altruism rather than grand proclamation. 

Despite his austere demeanor, the man’s true evil knows no bounds. When a prophecy foretells the second coming of Christ, known in the film asthe Nazarene,Damien commands his followers to commit widespread infanticide, murdering all baby boys born on a specific date. He seduces a high-profile reporter while transforming her teenage son into a bloodthirsty disciple, then uses the child as a human shield. This tricky role allows Neill to demonstrate his trademark versatility, easily charming the outside world while dropping his suave mask of normalcy behind closed doors. Though certain aspects of The Final Conflict are admittedly dated, Neill’s performance feels eerily prescient. He’s mastered the heinous portrayal of a politician willing to sell his soul for power that will ultimately bring about the end of the world. 


Possession (1981)

Though Andrzej Żuławski’s Possession is often remembered for Isabelle Adjani’s stunning depiction of a woman on the edge, Neill delivers an equally unhinged performance as Mark, a spy returning home from a lengthy assignment in divided Berlin. Upon discovering that his wife Anna (Adjani) wants a divorce, Mark desperately tries to hold his family together even at the expense of her sanity. Filmed the same year as The Final Conflict, Neill dives headfirst into this visceral role, managing to evoke sympathy for the distraught father who becomes ever more desperate to regain control. Inspired by his own divorce, Żuławski resists blaming either party for the separation, instead showing the chaos and heartache that comes in the wake of a family’s dissolution. 

Once considered to replace Roger Moore as the next James Bond, Neill has fun with the international spy persona as Żuławski’s plot grows increasingly bizarre. But the skilled actor never lets us forget that Mark is a flawed human being struggling to keep his life from falling apart. A second character emerges in the film’s mesmerizing climax, allowing Neill to lean into full villainy with a glassy-eyed stare that chills to the bone. Now a cult classic, Adjani and Neill bounce off each other’s seething rage, creating one of the most effective cinematic duets in the history of horror. 


Jurassic Park (1993)

When Steven Spielberg’s creature feature first hit theaters, Neill was by no means a household name and hardly a traditional leading man. Without the swashbuckling swagger of Harrison Ford, the mega-watt smile of Tom Cruise, or the chiselled jaw of Brad Pitt — all famous action stars of the era — Neill felt like an unconventional choice for this massive role. But he perfectly captures the essence of Grant, an aloof academic who prefers dig sites to fancy fundraisers and social events. Despite an aversion to children, the dinosaur expert finds himself tasked with saving the theme park’s youngest survivors who gradually break down his emotional walls. Grant’s transformation into a courageous caretaker is a landmark deconstruction of traditional gender norms wrapped in the guise of a rugged outdoorsman. 

Neill proves to be the perfect action star, effortlessly navigating Spielberg’s stunning set pieces without losing the character’s relatable hook. But perhaps the film’s most touching moment is Neill’s childlike wonder at seeing a dinosaur for the first time. Stunned to speechlessness, he channels the audience’s wondrous joy when Grant first spies a real, live Brachiosaurus. But he seamlessly weaves this infectious awe into serious concerns about the creature’s existence, amplifying the story’s prophetic messaging. Jeff Goldblum may utter the film’s iconic warning, but the duality of Grant’s performance perfectly illustrates the scientific imperative, reminding us that just because we can doesn’t mean we should.  

Neill would go on to lead Joe Johnston’s 2001 sequel Jurassic Park III, in which Grant is again tasked with saving a child. In 2022, he would appear in Colin Trevorrow’s legacy sequel Jurassic World Dominion, which merges the franchise’s two distinct eras while bringing the carnage onto mainland shores. Despite turning in strong performances, neither film is able to top the magic of Spielberg’s original or Neill’s captivating performance as the stoic leading man. But his nuanced depiction of Alan Grant inspired a generation of would-be paleontologists and quiet kids who could now see themselves as courageous academics capable of surprising strength. 


In the Mouth of Madness (1994)

After catapulting to worldwide fame, Neill returned to horror proper to lead John Carpenter’s mind-bending In the Mouth of Madness. We first meet John Trent (Neill) as he’s dragged, kicking and screaming, into a padded cell. An unknown stretch of time later, he recounts an unbelievable story while covered in protective crosses scrawled into his skin — and the cell’s walls — with black crayon. A private investigator, Trent has been tasked with locating Sutter Cane (Jürgen Prochnow), a world-famous yet elusive genre author whose work has been driving his ravenous readers to disturbing acts of random violence. 

A love letter to fans of horror fiction, we delight in watching Trent explore literary easter eggs that lead him down jarring rabbit holes. A late-night road trip takes Trent and Linda Styles (Julie Carmen), an editor for Cane’s publishing house, to a tiny New England hamlet teeming with darkness. While investigating an ominous cathedral on the outskirts of town, Trent realizes that he’s somehow been transported into the author’s interdimensional story and become its unwitting protagonist. 

Neill serves as a skeptical everyman and the audience’s conduit through this bizarre tale of literary monsters that find a way to burst through the page. An often overlooked Carpenter film, In the Mouth of Madness spirals into insanity, but Neill keeps us grounded throughout each outlandish twist. A shocking conclusion leaves us gaping at our screens and contemplating our own relationship with horror fiction. After all, does free will truly exist? Or, like Trent, are we merely pawns in someone else’s monstrous creation?


Event Horizon (1997)

One of the scariest movies ever set in space, Paul W.S. Anderson’s Event Horizon builds upon the heroic image Neill established for himself in Jurassic Park. Dr. William Weir (Neill) is a physicist temporarily joining the crew of the Lewis and Clark to assist in their latest rescue mission. Seven years after vanishing without a trace, a spaceship called the Event Horizon has suddenly reappeared near Neptune’s orbit. As the creator of a top-secret gravity drive designed to facilitate faster-than-light travel, Dr. Weir has been sent to explore the ship and find out what happened to its missing crew.

Still haunted by his late wife’s suicide, Dr. Weir is a sympathetic figure, particularly in comparison to the harsh Captain Miller (Laurence Fishburne) who commands the crew of the Lewis and Clark. But Weir’s desperation to return to the infamous ship hides a sinister secret that leads his fellow astronauts to the threshold of hell. Neill’s talent for playing the everyman pays off in spades as the formerly sympathetic widower transforms into a disciple of this frightening dimension. Resembling a long-lost cenobite, Weir claws out his own eyes and prepares to drag the crew into a world consumed with sadistic pain. 


Daybreakers (2009)

Neill returns to his Omen roots in Michael and Peter Spierig’s action-packed film as a secretly sinister businessman. But rather than the Antichrist, Charles Bromley (Neill) is a proud vampire convinced of the species’ superiority. With human blood in short supply, Bromley Marks Corp. is working on a synthetic substitute to prevent the human race from impending extinction. While hematologists perfect the formula, Bromley oversees disturbing fields of humans chained to massive machines that systematically harvest their blood. 

Neill chills in this sinister role with vampiric yellow eyes, a pale complexion, and subtle fangs. But more upsetting is the fact that he honestly doesn’t believe he’s wrong. Once diagnosed with cancer, Bromley was delighted to find that vampirism would totally reverse his illness and grant him the gift of eternal life. He begged his daughter Alison (Isabel Lucas) to turn alongside him, but she has rejected her father’s controversial choice and is now hunted by his bloodthirsty goons. In a heartbreaking moment of clarity, Bromley brings his daughter to the brink of death, then turns away in disgust when she will not embrace his undead lifestyle. 

Daybreakers is a surprisingly thrilling exploration of survival and sustainability. Similar to a plot Damien Thorn would hatch, Bromley’s ultimate plan is to placate the vampire population with synthetic blood while allowing the human population to replenish itself. With a larger stock, he plans to sell authentic humans at a premium, hunting these poor souls to season the meat. Bromley rejects a cure that would reverse the vampiric disease, choosing to enrich himself over saving the world. The strangely captivating villain’s end is a cathartic nightmare and fitting punishment for a wealthy man who places himself above everyone else. 


In the Mouth of Madness

While the world may remember Neill for his signature role as a gruff but compassionate paleontologist going head to head with a raging T-Rex, horror fans may picture the versatile actor maniacally rocking back and forth in a filthy Berlin apartment, commanding a boardroom of corporate vampires, disappearing into the darkness of a haunted spaceship, sermonizing to satanists, or giggling over popcorn in a deserted movie theater. Or perhaps you have another favorite role in the beloved actor’s stellar career. But whether he was playing a hero or villain, Neill brought undeniable humanity to every role, redefining our idea of masculinity and the very nature of goodness vs. evil. By bringing such disparate characters to life, Neill challenged audiences with a variety of complex roles, asking us to examine the humanity of each character no matter how flawed or virtuous.

Continue Reading