Connect with us

Editorials

‘Halloween Kills’: The Importance of the Franchise’s First Gay Characters

Published

on

I can’t say I’m surprised that it’s taken 43 years for a queer character to pop up in the Halloween franchise. There has not been a single character which could even be coded as queer 一 until now. With Halloween Kills, the second installment in David Gordon Green’s blood-soaked trilogy, not only are two gay characters given ample screentime, but their story isn’t a punch line and has little to do with any sort of trauma. Big John (Scott MacArthur) and Little John (Michael McDonald) simply exist in this heightened reality as everyday people, who just so happen to live in Michael Myers’ childhood home.

While legacy character Tommy Doyle (Anthony Michael Hall) leads an “Evil dies tonight!” revolt at the Haddonfield Memorial Hospital, Big John and Little John enjoy a nice, quiet Halloween listening to spooky records, getting high, and eating cheese. There’s a fleeting mention of Big John’s dead mother, but their inclusion in the story isn’t predicated on grief or their survival in a heteronormative world. As suggested by the stylish renovations they’ve given to the birthplace of evil itself, they have a sense of class and style, while feeling like human beings with wants, desires, and hopes for the future. But of course, this is a horror film after all, and they’re comfortable life as real estate agents is soon shattered when The Shape literally comes knocking.

Their deaths are as brutal as you’d expect with a film called Halloween Kills, but the aftermath is oddly touching. When Allyson (Andi Matichak) and her boyfriend Cameron (Dylan Arnold) track Michael to his home, they discover the bodies of Little John and Big John posed in an upstairs bedroom. The 1981 country hit “Could I Have This Dance” by Amy Grant and Anne Murray spins on the record player, and their mangled corpses are repositioned to mirror a nearby photograph. In the framed picture, sitting next to the record player, Big John and Little John flash infectious, warm smiles, an indication of their life together.

Michael’s playfulness is not a new conceit; in the original Halloween, he staged Annie’s body with the dug-up gravestone of his sister, as well as tucked away the bodies of Lynda and Bob in the closet. In Halloween Kills, however, the boogeyman seems to have picked up on their relationship in a weirdly satisfying way. Furthermore, Big John and Little John are the only victims in the film to be handled with such care. Perhaps, like Charles Lee Ray in the “Chucky” TV series, Michael isn’t a total savage when it comes to the LGBTQ+ community.

There have been vastly contrasting reactions and opinions about Little John and Big John over the last few months. Some even went as far as to claim Michael Myers to be homophobic. Even with the comments made in jest, those feelings are completely valid. One LGBTQ+ person’s opinion doesn’t speak for an entire community. The concern, it appears, stems largely from the writers behind the script: all three straight white men. As a few have suggested, could it be Big John and Little John are the straight men’s fantasy of gay men? That’s certainly a valid argument, as well. I would counter and say neither the dialogue nor the death scenes read as malicious or cruel in any way. In fact, Big John and Little John are a step in the right direction when it comes to queer representation in major studio franchises, especially with a series like Halloween, the granddaddy of them all.

Historically, slashers have existed solely in the grip of the white male gaze, always reliant on senseless nudity and the exploitation of women. So, that leaves little (if any) room for queer perspectives and stories to be told and explored. In a deeply insightful 2018 dissertation, Wayne State University student Peter Marra counter-argued that slashers serve “a distinctly queer function,” as it relates to the deconstruction of “normative depictions of United States youth.” He goes on: “They disenchant the American iconography found in prom night, summer camp, Christmas morning, etc. They propose a pleasurable satisfaction in siding with the killer whose role is to literally dismember teenage bodies and to metaphorically disassemble representations of normativity.”

1981’s Butcher, Baker, Nightmare Maker (also known as Night Warning) is a prime example to substantiate Marra’s claims. The film, directed by William Asher and starring Susan Tyrrell, sets its gore-littered action in the height of Gay Panic of the early ‘80s. Homophobia runs rampant with several characters, including the high school basketball coach, frequently dropping the F slur. It’s an uncomfortable watch, and the viewers, especially the queer audience, cheer for the killer to dismember them as quickly as possible.

Then, there’s A Nightmare on Elm Street: Freddy’s Revenge (1985), which re-engages the Freddy Krueger mythos as an allegory for one young boy’s sexuality. Jesse, as played by Mark Patton, who was in the closet at the time, and as a result of starring in this film was shunned from ever working again, is a placeholder for many queer youth. Jesse’s struggle is a universal one. He’s misunderstood by his parents (they simply think he’s crazy), and as Freddy ensnares him in his nightmarish trap, his understanding of himself gets more clouded. Despite claims by both the director and screenwriter in the 2019 documentary, Scream, Queen! My Nightmare On Elm Street, queer themes of BDSM experimentation, sexual awakening, and self-loathing are not subtext as all; it’s just the text of the film.

Around the same time, Sleepaway Camp (1983) took an explicit approach in exploring the transgender identity with its shocking ending, whereas 1986’s The Texas Chainsaw Massacre Part 2 analyzed the central villain Leatherface as a misunderstood queer icon (his lip-stained flesh mask of a woman a clear indication). A favorite knife-wielding maniac named Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins, a gay man in real life) returned with two Psycho installments in the 1980s; Psycho II came in 1983 and then Psycho III three years later. Psycho IV: The Beginning, among Perkins’ last features, arrived in 1990. Threads of queer-coded themes are present throughout each film, but nothing is ever concrete.

By the time Child’s Play, co-created by openly gay man Don Mancini, arrived in 1988, the slasher genre was exiting stage left. Despite its creator being gay, there would not be a single openly gay character onscreen for another 10 years with Bride of Chucky (1998). Gordon Michael Woolvett’s David pretends to be straight to take Jade (Katherine Heigl) to the prom. The character has very little screen time, playing the quirky gay sidekick archetype, at best. At worst, David is played for laughs when it’s revealed Jade actually does have a boyfriend.

In 1996, Scream would totally change how slashers looked, of course. From Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) resembling an evolution to The Final Girl archetype to an entire rule-breaking third act sequence revolving around sex, the Wes Craven-directed picture was a signifier of a cultural shift. In a recent interview with The Independent, screenwriter Kevin Williamson reflected on how his queer sexuality informed much of the story, again reaffirming Marra’s previous claims about slashers serving gay functions. “As a gay kid, I related to the final girl and to her struggle because it’s what one has to do to survive as a young gay kid, too,” Williamson said. “You’re watching this girl survive the night and survive the trauma she’s enduring. Subconsciously, I think the Scream movies are coded in gay survival.” 

Gay survival would continue to be the crux of many modern horror films. Several films, including Hellbent (2004) and Make a Wish (2002), suggested an LGBTQ+ reclaiming of the narrative. Paired with Mancini’s much-maligned Seed of Chucky (2004), in which the infamous Chucky and Tiffany have a child named Glen/da, a non-binary doll struggling with identity and a legacy to kill, the tides seemed to be turning.

However, alongside such queer progress, many blockbuster films returned to the days of rampant homophobia. The most obvious example is the Ronny Yu-directed Nightmare/Friday the 13th crossover Freddy vs. Jason (2003). In a crucial scene, Kelly Rowland’s character Kia blurts out the F slur: “What kind of faggot runs around in a Christmas sweater.” As Louis Peitzman wrote for Buzzfeed in 2013, “Those words weren’t spoken to me, but they stung just the same.”

In another popular franchise, Scary Movie (2000) and the sequel Scary Movie 2 (2001), Shawn Wayans starred as Ray, a character which upheld the flamboyant gay stereotype. “It was strangely thrilling to come across him, even in this lowbrow comedy,” offered Rob Dozier for Slate. “But the depiction also made me wonder if other people might be less comfortable with my emerging sexuality than I was.”

Meanwhile, the rising torture porn trend took similar cues with its bigoted tendencies. High Tension (2003) and Hostel (2005), for example, featured homophobic undercurrents to the story and characters. Horror journalist Eric Langberg dubbed the latter “a gay-panic movie through-and-through, a film littered with homophobic slurs, a horror flick deeply repulsed above all else by the idea of men penetrating and violating other male bodies.”

Slashers went out of fashion 一 and then came back in again. But queer representation continued to be in a slump. Where Wrong 2: Dead End (2007) did include a lesbian war veteran without hyper-sexualizing her character, Wrong Turn 4 (2011) undid all that good will with an overly-objectified lesbian couple with two sex scenes that leaned into exploitation, leaving an icky aftertaste, and 2015’s Most Likely to Die, starring Perez Hilton, did little to the move the needle one way or the other. Even Scream 4 (2011) mishandled the queer storyline. The character of Robbie (Erik Knudsen) asserts that he’s “gay, if that helps” in his final moment, as Ghostface drives a glinting blade into his chest. Without any real exploration into his gayness, it’s played as a joke and nothing more. Four years later, the Scream television series included a bi-curious student named Audrey Jensen (Bex Taylor-Klaus) in its first two seasons, and in the third installment, dubbed Scream: Resurrection, Giullian Yao Gioiello plays a gay student named Manny. Meanwhile, in Scream Queens, popstar Nick Jonas played Boone, who initially came out as gay but was later revealed to be pretending 一 a revelation upholding the “gays as villains” trope.

(from left) Josh Detmer (Misha Osherovich), Ryler (Melissa Collazo), The Butcher in Millie Kessler’s body (Kathryn Newton) and Nyla Chones (Celeste O’Connor) in Freaky, co-written and directed by Christopher Landon.

In the late 2010s, things went on the upswing. Between gay Nurse Carlos (Zak Santiago) in Cult of Chucky (2017) and the fabulously queer giallo film Knife+Heart (2018), slashers fully embraced being gay without a reliance on homophobia, trauma, or jokes. Freaky, directed by openly gay man Christopher Landon, who co-wrote the script with Michael Kennedy (also a gay man), arrived in 2020, signaling yet another important transition in the discussion of queer inclusion and representation. Nonbinary actor Misha Osherovich plays gay student Josh, best friend to the film’s lead Millie Kessler (Kathryn Newton). Josh never feels like a cliché or played for laughs; he simply exists in this world as another victim trying to survive. Later, after Millie and the Blissfield Butcher swap bodies, Milllie in the Butcher’s body has a touching scene with her crush Booker (Uriah Shelton), during which they make out. Millie, as the Butcher, expresses how empowered she feels being in his body, a suggestion of non-binary exploration.

In 2021, we saw gay tragedy and redemption with Leigh Janiak’s Fear Street trilogy, a story about a young lesbian couple named Deena (Kiana Madeira) and Sam (Olivia Scott Welch). With their friends, they discover the truth about The Witch, who was actually hanged for being a lesbian. Then, Nia DaCosta’s Candyman included a Black gay couple, who actually survive, defying the “bury the gays” trope, and Don Mancini’s coming-of-rage Syfy series Chucky, in which Zackary Arthur played Jake Wheeler, a gay high school student with a major crush on his classmate Devon (Björgvin Arnarson).

Amidst this very queer slasher renaissance, Halloween Kills slipped in the first gay characters in the entire franchise. I can’t help but think it is a significant moment in time. As a long-running fan of the franchise, who, like Kevin Williamson, only had straight women to root for, I felt seen in those brief moments. Big John and Little John aren’t a joke, and they’re never treated as one. And they aren’t simply thrown away as dog meat in a film that packs death scenes one right after another. I would certainly have preferred queer screenwriters been given a stab at those bits of dialogue 一 but for many, it’s a huge leap forward in a genre that has largely mistreated or ignored the LGBTQ+ community.

In the new Scream, a requel helmed by Ready or Not tag-team Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, 2022 is off to a bang up start. Jasmin Savoy Brown plays openly queer teen Mindy Meeks, opposite her twin brother Chad (Mason Gooding). She commands the screen, delivering bits of exposition and rules for the new age of horror with a cutting tongue. She’s handy with the jokes, but she never becomes one herself.

I am excited and hopeful for what this could all mean for the genre moving forward.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading