Connect with us

Editorials

ABC’s ‘Rear Window’ Starring Christopher Reeve Put a 90s Spin on the Hitchcock Classic [TV Terrors]

Published

on

rear window 1998

For this month’s installment of “TV Terrors” we revisit the small screen made-for-TV remake of Hitchcock’s Rear Window, which aired on the ABC Network back in 1998.

1954’s Rear Window, directed by Alfred Hitchcock, is a film that’s been analyzed, explored, and discussed by movie buffs the world over. It’s a masterpiece that’s based on the short story “It Had to Be Murder” by author Cornell Woolrich, which has also inspired many other classic genre films. The ideas of voyeurism, alienation, and murder have always been a great platform for a bang up horror film or thriller, and Hitchcock’s masterful film nailed them all.

In 1998, ABC took the premise for Hitchcock’s film and adapted it to a primetime television film. While you could charitably consider it a new adaptation of the source material, this 1998 television film borrows a lot more from Alfred Hitchcock’s take on the crime thriller (as the credits indicate).

Premiering during primetime on the ABC Network in 1998, the new Rear Window starred none other than the late, great Christopher Reeve (taking over the role filled by James Stewart in the Hitchcock film), who returned to the screen after his terrible accident in 1995. Reeve plays quadriplegic Jason Kemp, a former architect who now uses a specially equipped wheelchair after months spent recovering from a terrible car accident. He returns to his home, now a technologically advanced haven, which has been equipped to his needs. Anxious to return to some semblance of normalcy, Jason relieves the boredom of his daily existence by engaging in spying on his neighbors from the rear window of his apartment.

When he witnesses sculptor Julian Thorpe viciously beat his wife Ilene, he reports the incident to 911 and the police remove the man from his home. Thorpe is released the following day, however, and that night Jason Kemp hears a blood-curdling scream from the courtyard. From that moment on, Ilene is missing from her apartment, apparently replaced by another woman. Jason, certain she was murdered by her husband, tries to convince his colleague Claudia (Daryl Hannah), nurse Antonio, and friend Charlie (Robert Forster) that his suspicion is true.

Thorpe slowly comes to the realization that Kemp is fully aware of his crime, and engages him in a game of cat and mouse in an effort to silence him. Rear Window 1998 makes sure to carve itself out as a retrofitted remake (much in the spirit of Dial M for Murder to A Perfect Murder), contemporizing a lot of the plot elements for 1998, the beginning of the digital age. It includes a lot of what would become common elements in horror and thrillers including the use of email, and implementing computers as plot points that can often turn the tide for heroes and villains.

rear window christopher reeve

To fit the circumstances of the production, Rear Window becomes less about a man in his secluded apartment, instead morphing into a thriller about a man in a veritable fortress who uses his debilitating disability, and the machines used to comfort him, as a means of protection. Putting Reeve in the lead role is quite the task and Reeve, only a few years after his accident, takes it upon himself to play Jason to the best of his ability. The once gallant and dashing dramatic actor is confined to his wheelchair for all of Rear Window, and proved that he could still offer a great performance despite his obvious physical limitations. He’s as charming as ever here, his raw acting talent unhindered by the accident that robbed him of his mobility.

In fact, Reeve is almost too good for this remake, which tends to suffer from poor pacing and bland direction from Jeff Bleckner that’s lacking in vision or any kind of energy. Additionally, the set design is pale in comparison to Hitchcock’s grander set pieces. Daryl Hannah is fine in her co-starring role (she’s no Grace Kelly), and Robert Forster pretty much sleepwalks through his performance. Bleckner does at least pull off the occasional creepy and suspenseful shot, including a back and forth with Jason and Thorpe through e-mail, and Jason being discovered by Thorpe’s mistress through the darkness-soaked windows. There is also the rather tense confrontation in the climax, to the credit of all involved in this made-for-TV remake.

But the clear highlight here is Christopher Reeve. Even with limited dialogue, he’s able to accomplish a lot with his performance as Jason; he’s a man who feels like he offers nothing in his life, and is suddenly thrust into circumstances that give him a sense of purpose. The script takes time out to expound on Jason’s recovery with a series of scenes that all feel pretty much autobiographical for Reeve, the actor. Protagonist Jason’s whole scenario is just so much more high stakes than Stewart’s was in the original film. Jason is wholly reliant on his ventilator and wheelchair, and villain Thorpe (played very well by Ritchie Coster) makes a point of exploiting that whenever possible. If Jason is murdered it’s sure to be a painful death, and Thorpe makes it abundantly clear he’ll do whatever he can to conceal his act.

Hitchcock loyalists might be turned off by the film’s willingness to take on what is still to this day a widely celebrated horror thriller, but 1998’s Rear Window still has a lot to offer. It’s an engrossing mystery, the altered plot elements are ambitious, and star Christopher Reeve’s performance is absolutely dynamite.

And hey, it at least makes a great argument for its existence. Which is more than we can say about many remakes of classic movies that have come out over the years, am I right?

Is It On DVD/Blu-ray/Streaming? Rear Window 1998 can now be streamed for free on Tubi, Amazon Prime Video (via IMDB TV), and the Roku Channel. You can also still buy it on VHS, and as a UK DVD Import–but for a very hefty price.


Horror and science fiction have always been a part of the television canvas, and constant attempts have been made over the years to produce classic entertainment. Some have fallen by the wayside, while others became mainstream phenomena. With “TV Terrors,” we take a look back at the many genre efforts from the 80’s, 90’s, and 00’s, exploring some shows that became cult classics, and others that sank into obscurity.

Felix is a horror, pop culture, and comic book fanatic based in The Bronx. Along with being a self published author, he also operates his blog Cinema Crazed and loves 90's nostalgia. His number one bucket list item is to visit Ireland on Halloween. Or to marry Victoria Justice. Currently undecided.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading