Connect with us

Editorials

Unearthing the Previous Attempts to Bring ‘Moon Knight’ to TV

Published

on

“Moon Knight” Review - The Disney+ Genre-Bending MCU Series Introduces a Volatile, Fascinating Antihero

Moon Knight is one of the comic book characters I’ve spent years wanting to see on the screen without ever once thinking it would actually happen, if not the number one. Even after the Disney Plus series was officially announced, I had my doubts. Now that it’s here, the feeling is so surreal.

This character has certainly earned his time in the spotlight, but has never really gotten it, not even on the page. Moon Knight (AKA Marc Spector AKA Steven Grant AKA Jake Lockley AKA Mr. Knight…) is one of Marvel’s most fascinating characters, and also one of its most wildly inconsistent, both in terms of continuity and in terms of maintaining an ongoing title. For a long time, he was simply known as being Marvel’s Batman, a hard-edged hero with an array of cool gadgets. Over time, his Dissociative Identity Disorder became the character’s most well-known trait. But in the early runs, Moon Knight’s DID is barely even hinted at, or flat out nonexistent. In some comic book runs, he could be simply using the names Jake Lockley and Steven Grant as aliases. In others, they’re totally individual personalities. The central concept behind Moon Knight as a hero is that he is the chosen avatar of the Egyptian moon god Khonshu. But in some comics, Khonshu is hinted as being simply another manifestation of Marc’s mental illness, whereas in others, he’s an explicitly real entity.

These inconsistencies are honestly a part of what make Moon Knight such a great comic, character, and concept. The world is malleable, the character is open to all kinds of interpretations, and with so many varied takes, it’s exciting to read through that history and see the things that do remain consistent throughout each version. There are also some general things about Moon Knight that make him stand out from the sea of other Marvel heroes. One, as the son of a rabbi, he’s one of Marvel’s most prominent Jewish characters. Also, despite his costume and cape, he falls pretty firmly into the supernatural side of Marvel. Moon Knight made his first appearance in the pages of Werewolf by Night and the two characters have made regular appearances in each other’s books ever since. These are also the things that make the character so ripe for adaptation. There are so many fresh directions to take him in and, based solely on the pilot, Jeremy Slater and the rest of the team behind the new series seem to understand and take full advantage of that.

But while I’ve said that I never expected Moon Knight to ever make it to the screen, that doesn’t mean that there haven’t been attempts over the years. There have, and they date back surprisingly far. In 1978, Japan’s Toei Company released their now infamous live-action Spider-Man series, which has now achieved cult status for the astonishing liberties it took as an adaptation. In that show, Spider-Man was a motocross racer with his powers gifted to him by an alien, and would call upon his trusty giant mecha-robot to save the world from monsters. Spider-Man was not the only hero Toei licensed from Marvel, though. They also had plans for the Silver Surfer, 3D-Man and, as you’ve probably guessed since you’re reading this article, Moon Knight. There had previously been a Western-influenced Japanese hero named Moonlight Mask, and apparently the folks at Toei thought the Marvel hero would be a clever way to reference their own past. And, in a way, this did wind up happening. Even though Toei’s Moon Knight was tragically never realized on screen, they did produce a manga series published in Televi-Kun magazine from 1979 to 1980.

Moon Knight

The second attempt at bringing Moon Knight to television came through the now largely forgotten Blade: The Series. This series was the first live-action Marvel property to name-drop Marc Spector, right in the pilot, in a bit where Blade describes him as a “werewolf expert.” This is a clever nod to the character’s history, as Moon Knight made his debut appearance in an issue of Werewolf by Night. That reference was not totally off-hand, though. There were plans to introduce Moon Knight in Blade’s second season, had the show continued. Unfortunately, despite the fact that Blade was actually a success for Spike TV at the time, the network made the decision to move away from scripted content. In a 2006 Comic Con panel, showrunner David Goyer mentioned that they had a “really interesting take” on Moon Knight, with one major conceit, as he also noted that he wasn’t sure the character could wear his costume on screen. That makes the “what could have been” aspect of Moon Knight’s appearance on Blade a lot less exciting, though it’s not remotely surprising for the time.

Later that same year, in 2006, Marvel Studios partnered with No Equal Entertainment, a Vancouver-based company, to develop a Moon Knight TV series. Given the separate production company and team and the fact that it was announced after Blade had ended, it almost certainly would have had nothing to do with Blade’s take on the character. Hopefully that means it also would have included the character’s costume. There’s a better chance, as the studio at the time at least made it sound like the show would have embraced genre conventions. Marvel Entertainment’s David Maisel noted that No Equal Entertainment had “a real passion for the project and an amazing vision of how to bring the character and storyline to life that will appeal to action and sci-fi enthusiasts.”

No Equal’s J.B. Sugar would have served as executive producer, and also noted at the time that, “We are delighted to be in business with Marvel Entertainment and believe that Moon Knight will make a compelling and long-lasting television series.” As a director and producer Sugar worked on everything from the TV series The Collector to Painkiller Jane, R.L. Stine’s The Haunting Hour, Bitten and Dark Matter.

Moon Knight

In 2008, after nearly two years of silence following the initial announcement, an update was made that Jon Cooksey—known for everything from Rugrats to Primeval—was hired to develop the series, had written the series bible, and that six scripts had been developed for the first season. That almost sounds like a done deal, but of course it was not the case. Unfortunately, no details have ever really gotten out there about what this series would have entailed. As mentioned, there are so many wildly varied ways to do Moon Knight that one can’t help but wonder how similar or incredibly different it could have been to what we’re now getting. Even though I’m thrilled that this hero has finally made it to the screen, I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t deeply curious to read those six scripts, or even know what happened in them, if they were ever actually written.

Since then, there have been one or two other close calls, with just as few details given. At one point, James Gunn admitted that he had pitched a Moon Knight movie to Marvel Studios, and that it had gone nowhere. Throughout the entire run of the Netflix shows, there were constant rumors popping up as to the possibility of a Moon Knight appearance, though it’s unknown and probably unlikely that anything was ever actually planned. Moon Knight also made a few animated TV appearances over the past few years in Ultimate Spider-Man, Avengers Assemble and the 2017 Spider-Man series.

Now, after years of less and less likely attempts, Moon Knight is here. It’s happening. He’s made it. As a fan, I loved the pilot and don’t mind the deviations from the source material, because there’s no real concrete canon to latch onto. I love that Steven Grant, a secondary personality of Marc Spector’s in the comics (and apparently in the series as well) is the protagonist. I love that Arthur Harrow, a character who has appeared in a small handful of comics at best, is the villain. I have no idea what to expect from this show from one moment to the next, and I get the feeling that neither does its main character and that, to me, is the essence of Moon Knight. And as someone who foolishly got my hopes up reading about the TV show’s announcement in 2006, I am so, so happy that it finally exists.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading