Connect with us

Editorials

Exploring the Extraterrestrial Activity of Oren Peli’s ‘Area 51’ [The Silver Lining]

Published

on

Oren Peli Area 51

In this edition of The Silver Lining, we’ll be covering Oren Peli’s sophomore effort, Area 51.

The rise of Oren Peli is one of the most surprising success stories in Hollywood. The Israeli programmer turned filmmaker originally invested a mere $15,000 into the production of the first Paranormal Activity, which ended up exploding in popularity and launched his career as horror movie producer. Since then, he’s been behind projects like the Insidious franchise and even Rob Zombie’s underrated Lords of Salem.

However, during this impressive career, Peli has only directed one other movie, which is another interesting Found Footage endeavor that didn’t see the same success as his first feature. While Paranormal Activity was inspired by the director’s experience living alone for the first time and hearing spooky noises at night, 2015’s Area 51 was based on his interest in ufology and conspiracy theories, appealing to those who enjoy a bit of sci-fi alongside their Found Footage thrills.

Production on this alien-focused follow-up began and (mostly) ended back in 2009, hot off the heels of Paranormal Activity’s insanely profitable wide release. However, Oren Peli’s Area 51 wouldn’t see the light of day for many years, with some internet users even joking that a real world conspiracy was preventing Peli from revealing the truth about what goes on inside the base. It was only six years after the project was announced that a trailer was finally released to the public, appeasing fans who had been anxiously waiting to see the director’s take on one of America’s most compelling mysteries.

After all, Area 51 didn’t just benefit from a high-profile director who had miraculously revolutionized the Found Footage subgenre, but it also boasted a considerably larger budget than its faux-home-movie predecessor. Additionally, the flick dealt with subject matter that had inspired speculative fiction for years, leaving UFO aficionados like myself expecting something great.


SO WHAT WENT WRONG?

area 51 oren peli

While there’s no point in judging the film’s disappointing box office return, as Area 51 only played in select Alamo Drafthouse theaters before making its way over to VOD, the dismaying 14% rating on Rotten Tomatoes tells you everything you need to know about the flick’s reception. Critics almost unanimously complained about the film’s glacial pacing and silly plot, which depicted a young group of “truthers” invading the titular base in search of answers.

While it’s admittedly a little far-fetched that a group of well-intentioned civilians could so easily infiltrate one of the United States Military’s most well-guarded locations, the six-year delay indicates that Blumhouse Productions was well aware of the film’s issues since 2009. The studio actually kept going back to the project for reshoots well into 2013, attempting to re-edit and remix the material until they had another hit on their hands.

Ironically, this excessive tinkering resulted in a film that feels simultaneously too well produced and excessively amateurish. The overly convenient script and polished direction mean that the Found Footage aspect isn’t all that convincing (especially due to the heavy use of several POV filmmaking tropes), but Area 51 also lacks the budget to properly convey the otherworldly horrors of the infamous Groom Lake facility.

Couple that with an excessive amount of build-up towards the actual invasion of the titular base and you get a flick that’s much less compelling than Peli’s debut effort. Personally, I think the biggest issue here is how you never really get to know the main characters despite spending so much time with them before the action starts. Paranormal Activity wasn’t exactly Shakespeare, but you got the sense that Micah and Katie were real and likable people, which made it easy to root for them when things took a turn for the worst. The same can’t be said for Area 51, which treats its characters more like an excuse to keep the cameras rolling.


THE SILVER LINING

Oren Peli Area 51 found footage

A lot can happen to the horror genre in six years, and that’s why I think Area 51’s overwhelmingly negative reception mostly comes down to bad timing. It may have its flaws, but few elements of the film are actively bad, it just wasn’t a novel experience by the time it finally came out. Found Footage went through a creative boom after the release of Paranormal Activity, which led to experimentation in projects like Chronicle and Bloody-Disgusting’s own V/H/S films. As a result, most of Area 51’s filmmaking innovations had already become standard genre fare by 2015.

However, if you can overlook the film’s more dated elements, you’ll find an intriguing thriller with plenty of sly references to real world conspiracies that are sure to keep UFO buffs entertained. In fact, many of the wacky sci-fi shenanigans going on at the movie’s version of the base are inspired by the Bob Lazar interviews, which touched on everything from extraterrestrial pilots to anomalous anti-gravity technology. No matter what your opinion is on the veracity of these claims, there’s no denying that they make for some kick-ass Science Fiction.

The film also boasts a few genuinely intense chase sequences featuring aliens and base personnel. That being said, I think the experience is at its best when it attempts to be a conspiratorial thriller rather than a traditional horror flick. The mythology and shady politics surrounding the Nevada base are downright fascinating and don’t really require a blockbuster budget to properly convey, making the moments that explore these aspects of the story some of the most interesting. Of course, the rumors of government cover-ups regarding illegal experiments and alien technology are simply irresistible when it comes to speculative fiction, so I can respect how the filmmakers attempted to scratch that expensive Sci-Fi itch as well.

While it certainly doesn’t capture the same home movie madness of the original Paranormal Activity, I’d argue that Oren Peli’s Area 51 is still an enjoyable Found Footage experiment that doesn’t deserve all the hate. Your mileage may vary regarding whether or not you think the payoff is worth the buildup, but there’s definitely some fun to be had with the film’s dive down the extraterrestrial rabbit hole.


Watching a bad movie doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad experience. Even the worst films can boast a good idea or two, and that’s why we’re trying to look on the bright side with The Silver Lining, where we shine a light on the best parts of traditionally maligned horror flicks.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading