Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Hills Have Eyes’ Took a Horror Classic and Made It Even Better [Revenge of the Remakes]

Published

on

Hills Have Eyes remake

Wes Craven‘s The Hills Have Eyes is a seminal “Sunny Scary” horror flick renowned for its cannibalistic hilltop clan, but it certainly presents as one of Craven’s earliest works. The sorely missed master of horror went on to hone his craft as a writer and director, tidying visions and coaxing stronger performances. Craven’s 1977 The Hills Have Eyes is a microcosmic take on roadside roving mongrels enacting extreme violence on innocent passersby, and also a prime example of works that could benefit from a remake. The bones are sturdy but licked cleaner of meatiness, while choppy editing or ’70s technological restraints limit what can be accomplished. It’s a wonderfully demented slice of horror history that I proudly own and rewatch, serving as a reminder that remakes aren’t enemies to their originals.

Alexandre Aja‘s 2006 revamp under Fox Searchlight Pictures takes what’s there and mutates pure evils with nuclear negligence. Backstories are juicier, the scares are scarier, and the gore is gorier with extreme extrapolation. Craven’s foundation is fundamental to Aja’s success, but it’s never a direct copycat. Aja understands remakes are an opportunity to build upon legacies and inject personal flourishes, ensuring that Craven’s namesake is honored yet never regurgitated without reason. Hordes consider Craven’s The Hills Have Eyes a sunbaked classic, and Aja rises to the challenge of ensuring that historical reverence isn’t sullied nor lazily recreated.


The Approach

Alexandre Aja and co-writer Grégory Levasseur embellish every detail Craven could not and aim to expand their 2000s The Hills Have Eyes beyond prior-known boundaries. The family’s patriarch doubles down on his republican politics, ruthless villains are no longer just smudged with dirt to denote vagrancy, and America’s derelict treatment of bombing site fallouts haunts massive craters. Wes Craven contained his attack against an unfortunate road-trippin’ family to the crash site’s immediate area while Aja adventures into surrounding atomic suburbs and mineshafts. Go big or go home, as the youths say (if they even say that anymore).

Big Bob (Ted Levine) and his wife Ethel (Kathleen Quinlan) celebrate their silver wedding anniversary by driving from Cleveland to San Diego with their daughters, son-in-law, and granddaughter. Bob veers off course to soak in the scenic grandeur of New Mexico’s desert nothingness, where their sweaty-yet-idyllic vacation turns into a nightmare. After a shifty gas station attendant (played by Tom Bower) gives Bob fake shortcut instructions, they’re stranded between rocky mountain ranges after crashing thanks to Lizard’s (Robert Joy) spike strip. Of course, Bob’s flock doesn’t know their accident is by nefarious means — but they will once Papa Jupiter’s (Billy Drago) radioactive family starts hunting them for meals.

The little tweaks stand out like Bob’s American flag fastened to his truck dragging a more contemporary Airstream or gnarlier cosmetic work on the faces of an uglier cannibal collective. Aja and Levasseur ditch the weirdly incestuous undertones between brother Bobby (Dan Byrd) and sister Brenda (Emilie de Ravin) while still allowing Bobby to make that inappropriate Freudian rattlesnake joke to his mother. As 2000s horror trends go, The Hills Have Eyes leans into all the gruesome slasher tropes and hyper-adrenalized ferociousness that make for a more violent, in-your-face horror experience. Shades of 2003’s The Texas Chainsaw Massacre are present in terms of adapting to more shark-smelling-blood horror structures, making Papa Jupiter’s ranks infinitely more intimidating predators.


Hills Have Eyes remake wes craven

Does It Work?

The remake is an immeasurable upgrade in texture and tone without ditching the idea that nobody is safe in the daylight. It’s one of the original film’s undeniable contributions to horror — the stark reminder that danger lurks anywhere, at any time. Alexandre Aja doesn’t abandon any of the sweltery terrors that sting like scorpion bites yet injects more of Leatherface’s shadowy, tight-corners territory chases through houses or Michael hiding behind drying laundry lines. The finale’s focus on cell-phone salesman Doug (Aaron Stanford) — a passive democrat who Bob mocks for his aversion to guns – grants the film permission to be the more impactfully frightening horror experience as he must escape a limb-filled meat locker, then mini boss Pluto’s (Michael Bailey Smith) swinging weapon.

My generation’s The Hills Have Eyes works because it’s indebted to all the major beats of Wes Craven’s escape but not beholden to the intricate details. Poor Lynn (Vinessa Shaw) still dies, but she’s executed in a more sadistic fashion. Mama Ethel flies into the flimsy Airstream wall after being blasted by a hand cannon. German Shepard Beast still gets vengeance for Beauty’s death, but there’s more urgency and bite to the canine’s heroics. Alterations to Papa Jupiter’s people-eating survivors aren’t only of the flesh since there’s more stress put on how the American government left innocent citizens as furious freakshows after atomic bombing tests. Whatever implications once existed become ravenous commentaries in Aja’s hands, which make their points beyond physical mutilation.

The depravity in which 2006’s The Hills Have Eyes partakes is a divisive factor, considering the film was once branded NC-17. Aja’s style has always been to overload the senses, and there’s no shortage of brutality on display. “We based all our descriptions and directions on real documents, pictures, and footage that we found on the effects of nuclear fallout in Chernobyl and Hiroshima,” Aja says about his monsters. From the opening sequence where hazmat researchers with Geiger counters are pick-axed to death and hauled away as lunchmeat, you know Aja’s bringing an even meaner streak than Craven — what works for some will disgust others beyond tolerance (thinking of a more explicit and assaulting RV invasion).


The Result

The Hills Have Eyes transforms from this already bleak survival story into an outright domestic tragedy that can’t even pass through the credits without flashing images of children deformed by Agent Orange chemicals. The American Dream becomes an American Nightmare as civilians are turned into savage cannibals brought to life by K.N.B. EFX Group Inc. and Gregory Nicotero (who cameos as Cyst). Alexandre Aja and Grégory Levasseur mock firearm-waving cowboys while giving the left-wing punchline their bravest character arc over his “macho” male counterparts. It’s angrier, more rotten, and obscenely graphic from the jump — Aja finds that extra gear that pushes his remake into nitrous overdrive.

The gore effects are spectacular; whether corpses spill guts or mutations are visible. Lizard’s cleft lip, Goggle’s almost alien face, Big Brain’s bulbous cranium dangling off his wheelchair — of course, something with Nicotero’s name attached slays practical effects. The only aspect that might struggle is Big Bob’s immolation because of quick cuts and digital touches; otherwise, there’s far more horror artistry on display. Doug’s fight sequence with Pluto recalls the wall-smashing prowess of Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson’s Fast & Furious collateral damage, as Doug crashes through dividers, windows, and whatever else Pluto desires before Doug delivers the grand finale — Bob’s American flag through Pluto’s throat.

With all due respect to Wes Craven, 2006’s The Hills Have Eyes is the version we deserve. Everything gets a polish from performances to scale to excitement. Craven’s instincts are still present, but Aja washes the narrative in a cynical glaze of warped patriotism. Repugnance reigns supreme without losing the essence of Craven’s thematic explorations because Aja understands 1977’s The Hills Have Eyes is an imperfect starting point begging for further development — which he delivers like supersizing your Salisbury steak to a five-star tomahawk chop.


Hills Have Eyes remake 2

The Lesson

It’s the same lesson we learned about The Texas Chainsaw Massacre or Evil Dead. Wes Craven’s The Hills Have Eyes isn’t what most would call an impenetrable horror experience, and almost thirty years of practical effects advancement had passed. Alexandre Aja takes something darn good and makes it damn great, cherishing the source material while introducing improvements that no longer ponder what could have been. In terms of justifications, The Hills Have Eyes showcases why and when you’d contemplate a horror remake.

So what did we learn?

● If Wes Craven wasn’t precious about his movies and wanted to see them remade (Craven chose to remake The Hills Have Eyes), we shouldn’t be outraged on his behalf.

● Outdated effects and techniques are always a reason to update with new technology.

● Alexandre Aja knows his way around a horror remake.

● There’s no such thing as an untouchable horror title — just varying degrees of how well filmmakers pull off high-profile remakes.

The Hills Have Eyes is probably the earliest or one of the earliest 2000s horror remakes that made a lasting impression on younger Donato. It wouldn’t be until a couple of years later that I devoted myself to the blasphemy of horror cinema in total submergence — when I’d start devouring every horror title I could access. There was a worry that 2006’s The Hills Have Eyes wouldn’t hold its acclaim after all these years, which wasn’t the case. Credit Alexandre Aja with two of my favorite 2000s horror remakes since The Hills Have Eyes narrowly edges out Piranha 3D.


In Revenge of the Remakes, columnist Matt Donato takes us on a journey through the world of horror remakes. We all complain about Hollywood’s lack of originality whenever studios announce new remakes, reboots, and reimaginings, but the reality? Far more positive examples of refurbished classics and updated legacies exist than you’re willing to remember (or admit). The good, the bad, the unnecessary – Matt’s recounting them all.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading