Connect with us

Editorials

Slasher Series ‘Cold Prey’ is Norway’s Answer to ‘Halloween’ and ‘Friday the 13th’ [Horrors Elsewhere]

Published

on

cold prey

The characters in the Norwegian slasher franchise Cold Prey (or Fritt Vilt, meaning “fair game”) may be accustomed to harsh and wintry climates, but they’re not prepared for a pickaxe-wielding killer with almost superhuman stamina. The first stab in this successful trilogy made its way into theaters in 2006, on a Friday the 13th, no less. Five characters go on a ski trip in Jotunheimen, and when someone gets injured, they find shelter at the abandoned ski lodge on the mountain. As they wait for help to come, the group slowly realizes the place isn’t so empty after all. A serial killer inhabits the old hotel with a long and dark history. This ruthless and stoic assailant, referred to as the Mountain Man, then proceeds to butcher his unwelcome guests.

Slasher movies are typically associated with hot weather. Thoughts of summer camps, sweaty small towns, and warm woods enter one’s head when talking about this popular subgenre. In a place like Norway, though, the chances of seeing a sweltering setting in a horror movie are low. And with such long and snowy winters, it’s logical for homegrown horrors to feature cold backdrops. A frigid climate can often enhance the atmosphere as well as make the odds of survival harder. The characters of Cold Prey understand if the Mountain Man doesn’t kill them, frostbite might.

As slashers evolved into their much more violent and sadistic forms throughout the 2000s, nice and unassuming victims weren’t as regularly seen, and sometimes this led to a lack of sympathy on the audience’s part. Cold Prey, on the other hand, does terrific character work, given the context. Director Roar Uthaug and screenwriter Thomas Moldestad don’t dig deep into these young people’s souls, and they’re definitely not more developed than they have to be for a straightforward slasher like this, but Jannicke (Ingrid Bolsø Berdal) and her friends are approachable and easy to care about.

What also sets Uthaug’s Cold Prey apart from a lot of slashers is its measured approach and ability to make every death count. There are no opening kills to speak of in those first two movies; it takes a good forty or so minutes until someone actually dies on screen. The stories instead build suspense and establish a seemingly calm but restless mood before bringing utter chaos down on these unfortunate Norwegians. Once the killing does start, though, the Mountain Man doesn’t hold back. He’s relentless, bizarrely strong, and talented with all things sharp or spiked.

cold prey

Uthaug began writing a follow-up while the original movie was still being promoted. And almost exactly two years after introducing the world to the Mountain Man, Cold Prey II hit theaters. This sequel, under the direction of Mats Stenberg, picks up right where the first one ended, but now the danger has been brought in from the cold. Along with the lone survivor of the first massacre, the supposedly dead antagonist awakens in a nearby hospital. Getting back to his sanctuary then entails a sizable murder spree.

Cold Prey II plays out like an homage to Rick Rosenthal’s Halloween II, due to the structure and setting. The virtually empty hospital — Uthaug and co-writers Thomas Moldestad and Martin Sundland clarify Otta Hospital is closing its doors soon, hence the skeleton crew and dearth of patients — is a reminder of how badly underused this locale is in slashers. The hospital’s abandoned aesthetic pairs nicely with the series’ minimalist visuals. And in the same way snowy scenery can send an extra chill down people’s backs in a horror movie, hospitals bring up a natural sense of discomfort.

Like in the previous movie, Cold Prey II bides its time, though at this point the audience knows what all to expect. It’s just a matter of how this second slaughtering will go down. The Mountain Man, who’s not as dead as everyone initially thought, springs back to life on the gurney. Still driven by murderous, pent-up rage and showing no signs of slowdown since meeting the business end of a pickaxe, the herculean hunter makes his way through hospital personnel, local police, and most importantly, the victim who got away.

Cold Prey II tends to trade character work for action. While that may sound like a con, the compromise is handled well, and with care and skill. Even new characters, whose deaths are easily foreseeable, are still worth caring about. The small increase in human fodder also allows for more Mountain Man screen time and mayhem, especially since there’s no longer a need to hide his existence. Showing the villains too often can make the audience desensitized, but at the same time, the camera doesn’t stay on the Mountain Man for long. He still feels like a mystery, despite the greater presence and background information delivered by the series’ own analog for Dr. Loomis.

cold prey

Quick slasher sequels don’t always bode well, but Cold Prey II is quite nearly the best of its kind. This was neither a rush job nor a mere cash grab. In many ways, this continuation goes bigger — body count, killings, and even the addition of a second Final Girl — and in some books that would make it the better of the original two movies. Wherever someone’s preference lies, there’s no denying how well these movies complement one another.

Although it was presumed Cold Prey would finish as a duology, a prequel was filmed and shot in 2010. Uthaug wasn’t a part of this one, and stepping in as director is Mikkel Brænne Sandemose. The 1980s-set prequel further explains how the Mountain Man came to be, and how the police chief from Cold Prey II, Einar, first caught wind of his activities. The hotel is visited, but it’s not the main setting here. Instead, an unlucky group of campers is stalked throughout Jotunheimen National Park, and as the previous movies state, they, like so many others in the area, are never seen or heard from again. Admittedly there are no notable surprises in this needless prelude, however Cold Prey III is exquisitely shot, and the Mountain Man’s inability to distinguish human prey from animal prey is the most pronounced here.

With another slasher resurgence underway, ardent fans are encouraged to seek this series out. What the filmmakers do with such an overused idea is refreshing and comforting all at the same time, and other similar movies would be so lucky to have this kind of beautiful cinematography. Cold Prey is indeed a prime example of how alike yet different a concept can be when told through someone else’s eyes.


Horrors Elsewhere is a recurring column that spotlights a variety of movies from all around the globe, particularly those not from the United States. Fears may not be universal, but one thing is for sure — a scream is understood, always and everywhere.

cold prey

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

Finding Faith and Violence in ‘The Book of Eli’ 14 Years Later

Published

on

Having grown up in a religious family, Christian movie night was something that happened a lot more often than I care to admit. However, back when I was a teenager, my parents showed up one night with an unusually cool-looking DVD of a movie that had been recommended to them by a church leader. Curious to see what new kind of evangelical propaganda my parents had rented this time, I proceeded to watch the film with them expecting a heavy-handed snoozefest.

To my surprise, I was a few minutes in when Denzel Washington proceeded to dismember a band of cannibal raiders when I realized that this was in fact a real movie. My mom was horrified by the flick’s extreme violence and dark subject matter, but I instantly became a fan of the Hughes Brothers’ faith-based 2010 thriller, The Book of Eli. And with the film’s atomic apocalypse having apparently taken place in 2024, I think this is the perfect time to dive into why this grim parable might also be entertaining for horror fans.

Originally penned by gaming journalist and The Walking Dead: The Game co-writer Gary Whitta, the spec script for The Book of Eli was already making waves back in 2007 when it appeared on the coveted Blacklist. It wasn’t long before Columbia and Warner Bros. snatched up the rights to the project, hiring From Hell directors Albert and Allen Hughes while also garnering attention from industry heavyweights like Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman.

After a series of revisions by Anthony Peckham meant to make the story more consumer-friendly, the picture was finally released in January of 2010, with the finished film following Denzel as a mysterious wanderer making his way across a post-apocalyptic America while protecting a sacred book. Along the way, he encounters a run-down settlement controlled by Bill Carnegie (Gary Oldman), a man desperate to get his hands on Eli’s book so he can motivate his underlings to expand his empire. Unwilling to let this power fall into the wrong hands, Eli embarks on a dangerous journey that will test the limits of his faith.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Judging by the film’s box-office success, mainstream audiences appear to have enjoyed the Hughes’ bleak vision of a future where everything went wrong, but critics were left divided by the flick’s trope-heavy narrative and unapologetic religious elements. And while I’ll be the first to admit that The Book of Eli isn’t particularly subtle or original, I appreciate the film’s earnest execution of familiar ideas.

For starters, I’d like to address the religious elephant in the room, as I understand the hesitation that some folks (myself included) might have about watching something that sounds like Christian propaganda. Faith does indeed play a huge part in the narrative here, but I’d argue that the film is more about the power of stories than a specific religion. The entire point of Oldman’s character is that he needs a unifying narrative that he can take advantage of in order to manipulate others, while Eli ultimately chooses to deliver his gift to a community of scholars. In fact, the movie even makes a point of placing the Bible in between equally culturally important books like the Torah and Quran, which I think is pretty poignant for a flick inspired by exploitation cinema.

Sure, the film has its fair share of logical inconsistencies (ranging from the extent of Eli’s Daredevil superpowers to his impossibly small Braille Bible), but I think the film more than makes up for these nitpicks with a genuine passion for classic post-apocalyptic cinema. Several critics accused the film of being a knockoff of superior productions, but I’d argue that both Whitta and the Hughes knowingly crafted a loving pastiche of genre influences like Mad Max and A Boy and His Dog.

Lastly, it’s no surprise that the cast here absolutely kicks ass. Denzel plays the title role of a stoic badass perfectly (going so far as to train with Bruce Lee’s protégée in order to perform his own stunts) while Oldman effortlessly assumes a surprisingly subdued yet incredibly intimidating persona. Even Mila Kunis is remarkably charming here, though I wish the script had taken the time to develop these secondary characters a little further. And hey, did I mention that Tom Waits is in this?


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Denzel’s very first interaction with another human being in this movie results in a gory fight scene culminating in a face-off against a masked brute wielding a chainsaw (which he presumably uses to butcher travelers before eating them), so I think it’s safe to say that this dog-eat-dog vision of America will likely appeal to horror fans.

From diseased cannibals to hyper-violent motorcycle gangs roaming the wasteland, there’s plenty of disturbing R-rated material here – which is even more impressive when you remember that this story revolves around the bible. And while there are a few too many references to sexual assault for my taste, even if it does make sense in-universe, the flick does a great job of immersing you in this post-nuclear nightmare.

The excessively depressing color palette and obvious green screen effects may take some viewers out of the experience, but the beat-up and lived-in sets and costume design do their best to bring this dead world to life – which might just be the scariest part of the experience.

Ultimately, I believe your enjoyment of The Book of Eli will largely depend on how willing you are to overlook some ham-fisted biblical references in order to enjoy some brutal post-apocalyptic shenanigans. And while I can’t really blame folks who’d rather not deal with that, I think it would be a shame to miss out on a genuinely engaging thrill-ride because of one minor detail.

With that in mind, I’m incredibly curious to see what Whitta and the Hughes Brothers have planned for the upcoming prequel series starring John Boyega


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading