Connect with us

Editorials

Losing Hope: Re-Evaluating the Shocking Ending of ‘The Mist’ 15 Years Later

Published

on

Stephen King Netflix The Mist

Content Warning: Suicide

It may not be one of Stephen King’s most popular stories, but The Mist is still a surprisingly influential piece of genre fiction. From Half-Life to Silent Hill, several horror properties have openly drawn inspiration from this eerie novella. That’s why it’s surprising that it took so long for the story see an adaptation, with frequent King collaborator Frank Darabont championing the project for nearly three decades before finally releasing his take on The Mist in 2007.

Starring genre favorite Thomas Jane as artist David Drayton alongside a talented ensemble featuring names like Marcia Gay Harden and Andre Braugher (as well as several actors who would later become popular in Darabont’s The Walking Dead series), the film is a decidedly faithful adaptation of King’s original tale, right down to the disturbing creature descriptions and multiverse references. Taking place in central Maine, the plot follows a group of people who become trapped in a supermarket after a mysterious mist rolls into town, bringing with it otherworldly horrors. Isolated and besieged by primitive monsters, some of the survivors slowly begin to devolve into religious fanaticism, leading to an unsettling single-location thriller.

Despite the film keeping most of its source material intact, with King even citing the first screening of the flick as one of the happiest moments of his career, Darabont’s take on the story ends on a much more sinister note. In fact, the film’s final moments were the subject of major controversy among horror fans upon release, with audiences accusing the uncomfortable climax of ruining everything that preceded it and being an example of shock for shock’s sake.

While I agree that the ending of The Mist might be a bit too mean-spirited for some viewers, I’d argue that the downer finale is a perfect counterpoint to the film’s overarching themes. That’s why I’d like to discuss how it was a perfect ending back in the day, and even more impactful a decade and a half later, making the movie a memorable classic by ending it on a dramatic gut-punch. And just in case you’ve yet to witness this tragic masterpiece: there are major spoilers ahead, as we’ll be discussing the ending of both the movie and the novella…

Not exactly 2007’s feel-good movie of the summer.

Overall, the original narrative played out in pretty much the same way as the film, with slight variations in character deaths and a few extra subplots like David having a stress-induced affair with Amanda. Once the group finally escapes the madness of the supermarket, the story concludes with David noting that death would be preferable to becoming lost in the mist and realizing that there aren’t enough bullets for suicide. The group then rides off towards an uncertain fate, though a faint radio signal ends the tale with a glimmer of hope.

However, the final act of the movie is where Darabont took some serious creative liberties, seeing our traumatized protagonists escape the supermarket only to find themselves stranded in the middle of the mist once their jeep runs out of gas. After a moment of resigned silence, the group agrees to mass suicide despite not having enough bullets, with David being forced to shoot his own son and then face the extra-dimensional horrors on his own. Moments later, the lone survivor witnesses a military operation clearing out the mist as trucks transport people to safety, realizing that his friends and only child died for nothing.

Not quite a “happily ever after”.

Naturally, this ending is incredibly dark even for a Stephen King story, especially when the author is known for coming up with some of horror’s most absurd deus ex machinas in order to provide his readers a reasonably satisfying conclusion (though fans of Pet Sematary and Revival know that this isn’t always the case). While the movie had some pretty disturbing stuff up to that point, like the sacrifice of Private Jessup and that entire pharmacy sequence, there was nothing this downright mean. That’s why it makes sense that some viewers thought the scene came out of nowhere, though I don’t think that’s the case.

If you keep in mind the film’s meditations on hope and faith and how that influences people’s reactions during a crisis, it becomes clear that these misguided deaths were more than just a gratuitous expression of nihilism. While it makes sense that our lead characters would reject the notion of hope after everything they’ve seen (which is what makes the story a great example of cosmic horror), I believe that this tragic ending to The Mist is meant to criticize the complete rejection of faith in the same way that the supermarket’s religious insanity is meant to criticize the fanatical embrace of faith.

The Mist Ending stephen king

Even gloomier in the Black & White version!

As we’ve seen throughout history, while an excess of faith can make dire situations worse and even lead to man-made atrocities, a complete lack of it can often result in the same kind of well-intentioned destruction – with faith not necessarily meaning “religion”. While it wasn’t quite as apocalyptic as the Arrowhead disaster, the Covid-19 pandemic serves as a grim example of this. Since 2020, several groups devolved into political fanaticism after becoming trapped in confined spaces due to a worldwide threat. Meanwhile, mental illness took its toll on the population as folks began to lose faith in each other, often motivated by awful stories in sensationalist media. It’s this kind of decidedly human horror that makes The Mist such a timeless experience (especially when some political groups were so keen on “sacrificing” certain demographics to the virus in real life).

With that in mind, it’s clear that Darabont’s version of The Mist ends in a more nuanced manner than King’s original story, functioning even better as a cautionary tale. In fact, Darabont only agreed to direct the film for Dimension if they promised not to make him change his script’s horrific ending, with the studio even offering double the budget if he changed that simple detail. The director obviously refused, having planned this passion project for decades and knowing that the story needed this added balance.

Like all good art, the exact intention behind Darabont’s ending to The Mist is still up for interpretation, though the director has gone on record stating that he sees the film as a thematic companion piece to The Shawshank Redemption. This makes sense, as that story was about hope and this one is about hopelessness. That being said, I particularly enjoy the grisly theory that Mrs. Carmody was right about everything, as salvation only comes after a malevolent God has received a bloody sacrifice.

Personally, I appreciate the finale as a poignant parable about not despairing during dark times, as this tragedy wasn’t inevitable. That’s why I think The Mist‘s ending isn’t quite as bleak as it initially appears, and is part of the reason why this brilliant little monster movie continues to age like a fine wine.

The Mist Ending

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading