Connect with us

Editorials

Toy Terror: 5 Creepy Doll Tales from TV Horror Anthologies You Should Watch

Published

on

There are times when something that’s almost human is more terrifying than an actual monster. After all, uneasiness often stems from things that come eerily close to resembling humanity. Roboticist Masahiro Mori explained why people feel this way with his 1970 essay about the “uncanny valley” effect, and ever since, society has better understood why they feel uncomfortable around things such as lifelike dolls.

The living doll shows up infrequently in the horror genre, but when it does, people take notice. They’re ultimately torn between curiosity and repulsion as these puppets gain sentience and carry out their sinister missions. Chucky and others have all skittered across the big screen, but these stories, from five different anthology series, are a reminder of how toy terror also lives on television.


The Twilight Zone (1959-1964)
Living Doll

Even on its last legs, Twilight Zone — by then, the series had already dropped the “the” from the title — managed to come up with some all-timers. Surprisingly enough, one of its most memorable episodes, “Living Doll,” wasn’t written by series heavy-hitters Charles Beaumont or Richard Matheson. Beaumont was credited, but this classic dose of dolly dread was penned by Jerry Sohl and directed by Richard C. Sarafian.

“Living Doll” includes the familiar setup in these kinds of stories; a child brings home a seemingly normal toy, which then unexpectedly comes to life. And as usual, a parent is the first to detect the doll’s sudden consciousness. The toy in question is Talky Tina (voiced by June Foray), and host Rod Serling describes her as an “unwelcome addition” to the Streator household.

Erich (Telly Savalas) isn’t a great stepfather to Christie (Tracy Stratford), and his bad behavior only worsens when Talky Tina comes into the picture. Christie’s mother (Mary LaRoche) has a hard time endearing her daughter to her new husband, hence comforting the child with toys. Of course what makes the kid happy turns into a source of dismay for the patriarch. At first Erich thinks his family is playing a trick on him, but by the time he realizes Talky Tina is in fact alive, it’s much too late to stop her.

“Living Doll” is a prime example of cautionary tales involving domestic abuse and inanimate objects. Talky Tina comes to the defense of a mistreated girl, and her threat isn’t limited to the father. Everyone must heed her warning or they’ll be sorry. As for Erich’s resentment toward Christie, that really has nothing to do with her; he’s upset about his own shortcomings as both a man and a husband.


Night Gallery (1969-1973)
The Doll

The Night Gallery episode “The Doll” is based on a novella by author Algernon Blackwood. Series creator and occasional show writer Rod Serling alters a good chunk of the source material, which was published around the late 1940s, but he also emphasizes the horror element.

In this haunted episode, an officer in the colonial forces of Queen Victoria (John Williams) returns home from India to find his niece in possession of a ghastly new doll. She (Jewel Blanch) and the housekeeper (Shani Wallis) believed the doll was a gift sent from India by the uncle, but he reveals he did no such thing. Soon the colonel realizes the wicked toy is part of a nefarious revenge scheme.

If there’s anything about “The Doll” that doesn’t exactly work, it’s the doll itself. The first one, that is. The niece’s new toy looks frightful, so it’s hard to believe she’d want to play with it, much less keep it. “Living Doll” from Twilight Zone at least hid Talky Tina’s malevolence beneath a soft and lovely veneer. Having this doll be so openly evil-faced undoubtedly helps etch this episode in viewers’ mind, but it doesn’t make much sense from a logical perspective.

This episode is both an early instance of the evil doll trope and a subtle offering of colonizer horror. Serling wisely cut out some problematic parts from the novella, though the screen adaptation sees Henry Silva and Than Wyenn each wearing brownface. Regardless, the best aspects of “The Doll” shrine through. This includes a new ending, one not seen in Blackwood’s story. It’ll be hard to scrub that cursed image from your eyes.


Tales to Keep You Awake (1966-1968, 1982)
Freddy

Ventriloquist puppets are within the realm of dolls, though they aren’t necessarily for play, either. These things bring up other ill feelings apart from those caused by the “uncanny valley” effect; their whole purpose is to act alive. Someone being able to throw their voice also leads to other frightening possibilities.

After taking an extended break away from Tales to Keep You Awake (Historias para no dormir), Narciso Ibáñez Serrador revived the series in the ’80s. Not only was the show obviously in color, but episodes were now also feature-length. The downside was the return was shot on a low budget, there were only four episodes, and everything was put together rather quickly. Even so, fans of this obscure Spanish anthology can’t shake the creepy title character of “Freddy.”

The third season’s premiere episode is a mesmeric experience, especially if you’re only expecting a killer puppet. There is certainly a slasher element in “Freddy,” but for the most part, the story mainly concerns the human characters, including the namesake’s puppeteer. Serrador does not take a spartan approach here; the dialogue is about as long as the chase scenes.

Whenever the intentionally cliché-ridden “Freddy” does embrace its macabre side, those moments feel like epics. Hapless women wander aimlessly through shadowy rooms and corridors for what feels like hours, unsure of who (or what) is following them, if they’re being followed at all. The giallo-esque lighting undeniably helps the mood, as does the increasingly menacing music. These ’80s episodes’ master tapes were unfortunately damaged, but those visual artifacts and blemishes make for some happy accidents. And that twist at the very end? Talk about surprising.

Buy the series on subtitled Blu-ray from Severin now, or if you speak Spanish, watch the untranslated episode on Tubi.


Monsters (1988-1991)
Holly’s House

Some dolls aren’t toys, and some dolls aren’t even dolls. Not in the traditional sense, at least. The robot seen in the Monsters episode “Holly’s House” is a child-sized animatronic that resembles a doll, and she’s remote-controlled by Katherine (Marilyn Jones). While the fictional series Holly’s House has proven to be a success, it’s also weighed heavily on Katherine’s personal life.

What should have been an ordinary day on set ends up being a tense one when Katherine’s boyfriend and costar (Perry Lang) asks her to marry him. This comes only after Katherine reveals she’s pregnant. Others urge Katherine to say yes, but a voice in her head holds her back. And with this being Monsters, that voice starts to take on a life of its own.

“Holly’s House” features a potent psychological study of its main character, which is uncommon in this series. Katherine essentially uses her TV show to keep herself from growing up and having to make adult decisions. Playing Holly was, up until now, a rather safe and acceptable form of escapism. But with a baby on the way, Katherine is forced to make choices she doesn’t want to make. Either way, she has to give up one of her babies.

This is a sad story about a woman who can’t have it all. There is a vagueness to what happened here, though in both theirs and your best interest, it’s better if there’s no hard answer. “Holly’s House” is a high point in Monsters that offers the audience more to chew on than usual.


Goosebumps (1995-1998)
Night of the Living Dummy (II & III)

A question that comes up often in the Goosebumps community is, why didn’t the show adapt the first book in the original Living Dummy trilogy? The second and third entries were sent to the small screen, but the series skipped one of Stine’s most renowned stories.

When asked about the “missing” episode, producer Steve Levitan said: “There were a bunch of books we tried during the outline stage before there was a first draft script. We would just decide ‘No, this isn’t going to work. Let’s move on to another one.’ There’s no lost episode that was shot.”

Even without an origin episode for Slappy, “Night of the Living Dummy II” works even better as an introduction. Slappy gets all the attention here, whereas in the first book, he played more of a secondary role. Then, the two-parter “Night of the Living Dummy III” features even more animated dummies, and unlike the last episode, actors are regularly used to play Slappy and his friends. There are consistency issues to consider, such as the dummies’ sizes changing from shot to shot, but watching Slappy physically chase after children is unnerving.

There is another Slappy episode in the original show, adapted from Goosebumps Series 2000, called “Bride of the Living Dummy.” Here Slappy seeks a mate, and he does so by stalking a pair of sisters and their blonde doll named Mary Ellen.


Series of Frights is a recurring column that mainly focuses on horror in television. Specifically, it takes a closer look at five episodes or stories — each one adhering to an overall theme — from different anthology series or the occasional movie made for TV. With anthologies becoming popular again, especially on television, now is the perfect time to see what this timeless mode of storytelling has to offer.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading