Connect with us

Editorials

‘Alive’ – 1993 Ethan Hawke Movie Is Truly Terrifying Survival Horror

Published

on

Ethan Hawke Alive
Pictured: Ethan Hawke in 'Alive' (1993)

On October 13, 1972, members of the Old Christians Rugby Football Club from Montevideo, Uruguay chartered a flight across the Andes mountains for an exhibition game in Chile. The plane crashed into the high mountain peaks initially killing 16 and leaving 29 stranded in the wreckage. 72 days later, 16 survivors emerged from the mountains, emaciated, injured and nearly snowblind, but grateful to be alive. Their harrowing story of survival was told in Piers Paul Read’s bestselling novel, Alive: The Story of the Andes Survivors.

Frank Marshall’s ambitious adaptation of this story premiered in 1993, shortly after the 20th anniversary of their rescue, reminding the world of this astounding feat of courage and perseverance. Usually classified as a drama, Alive is an authentic recreation of this harrowing ordeal and one of the best examples of true survival horror ever committed to film. Fifty years after the crash, Alive remains an inspiring example of hope in the face of certain death and a perfect film to revisit during the Thanksgiving season. 

Marshall has taken incredible pains to present the story with as much accuracy as possible. Ethan Hawke and Josh Hamilton star in Alive as Nando Parrado and Roberto Canessa respectively, the two survivors who walked for 10 days through the Andes Mountains to find rescue in the valleys below. Few members of the film’s ensemble cast are of South American descent. However, many of the actors bear a striking resemblance to their real life counterparts. Marshall filmed in the Purcell Mountains of British Columbia in conditions similar to the actual site of the crash. Parrado served as a technical advisor on the film and one survivor visiting the set remarked, “It’s like living the same life again.” While only those on the mountain could ever truly understand the horror of their experience, Marshall and Read have done their best to represent the spirit of their story. The names of those who died in the crash have been changed along with minor alterations to the story to provide a more concise cinematic narrative, but both retellings are unflinchingly honest. 

Read’s book begins with plans for the trip and chronicles the various rescue missions organized by the families of those onboard. Marshall focuses solely on the survivors, beginning the story just minutes before the crash. Excited for their journey, the boys are having fun in the plane’s cabin, throwing a football, wandering the aisles, and even commandeering the intercom system. When the plane begins bouncing through an air pocket, the mood quickly deflates. The simple question, “Are we supposed to fly that close to the mountains?” begins a horrifying reenactment of the impact as the wings and tail each break apart midair, sucking luggage, seats, and passengers out of a massive hole in the rear of the cabin. After sliding down the mountain at a frightening speed, the wreckage finally slams into a snowbank leaving those still alive left to rescue their friends and survey the damage. 

While the scene of the crash and the resulting triage is terrifying, Read’s book gives even more frightening details including the extent of Rafael Echavarren’s leg wound, Nando’s skull fracture, and the quick removal of a piece of the plane piercing Enrique Platero’s abdomen. Marshall shows the metal shaft coming out more or less cleanly, but in reality, Gustavo Zerbino (David Kriegel) removed the shrapnel along with six inches of Rafael’s intestines. Hoping to save as many as possible, they merely pushed as much of the organ back into the wound as possible, bound it with a shirt, and went back to the rescue. Another haunting anecdote involves Carlos Valeta who survived the crash uninjured, but wandered into the snow and disappeared off the side of the mountain. 

Using the fuselage as shelter, those left alive begin to line up the bodies of the dead outside in the snow. As darkness falls, they huddle together in the -40% cold with only their light clothes and seat covers from the plane to keep them warm. It’s the first of many long nights spent listening to the wails of the injured and dying. With little more than wine and chocolate, the boys quickly begin to starve. Trapped on a glacier experiencing record snowfall, they can find nothing to eat and their bodies begin to break down. In his memoir Miracle in the Andes: 72 Days on the Mountain and My Long Trek Home, Nando recalls making a single chocolate covered peanut last for three days with a mere cap full of wine allotted for each day. Knowing that they will surely die without food, the boys hesitantly begin to discuss the unthinkable.  

Despite this astounding tale of survival, the only detail many know of the story is that survivors of the crash resorted to eating the bodies of the dead. Read and Marshall describe the agony of this decision and show the solidarity that finally convinces the group to eat. Each boy decides that if he were to die, he would want the others to use his body for food. As devout Catholics, they parallel this act with the holy rite of communion and determine that God has given them a source of food, however gruesome it may be. After everything they’ve been through, to refuse this gift of sustenance would be to turn their backs on the miracle of their survival.  

Read’s book gives a frank and somewhat upsetting description of this food source, from cutting up the bodies to the taste of different organs. But neither the book nor the movie ever identifies any one specific person whose body is consumed. This is something the boys themselves have vowed never to do, believing it would only be upsetting for the families of their fallen friends. Marshall makes a point not to sensationalize the cannibalism elements of the story and presents the awful task as a last resort only. The scene in which Canessa makes the first cut is more heartbreaking than it is horrifying. One by one the rest follow suit and become even more determined to survive with their newfound source of strength. 

As if all this weren’t heartbreaking enough, 18 days after the crash, the fuselage is hit with a devastating avalanche. Striking in the middle of the night, they only survive because Roy Harley (Kevin Breznahan) hears rumbling with enough time to sit up. This is arguably the most terrifying sequence in the film and many survivors count it as the lowest point in all 72 days. Snow rushes into the cabin instantly burying the sleeping survivors. This is followed by a moment of pitch black silence. By the light of his cigarette lighter, Roy frantically begins to search for his friends in the feet of snow now filling the cabin. The next few minutes are absolute panic as each boy who is saved immediately begins to dig out another. Eight more die in the avalanche and for the next several days, the living are trapped with their bodies as the fuselage is buried by a raging blizzard. 

Ethan Hawke Alive story

Though the crash and the avalanche are terrifying, it’s the quiet moments of horror that are arguably more upsetting. Day after day, the boys are confronted with the near certainty of their impending deaths. They sleep every night just feet away from the bodies of their friends and family. Moments after the crash, team captain Antonio (Vincent Spano) realizes he is unhurt, but his seatmate has died upon impact. When searching for the tail, several of the boys reach a seat that had flown out in the snow. They turn it upright to reveal the body of their frozen friend. They gently remove his personal effects and say goodbye, the reality of death no longer shocking. Another body lies in the snow just feet away. But it’s also in these quiet moments of horror that hope survives. Having lost nearly everything, they begin to focus on what little joy they can find. Perhaps it’s in this frank acceptance of death that they’re able to hold onto their humanity long enough to survive.

It’s a dichotomy fans of the horror genre know well. Many of us watch scary movies in order to confront our most terrifying nightmares. By facing and accepting the worst things we can imagine, we’re able to remember the happiness and joy we do have. Each time someone dies, the boys find renewed strength and determination to survive. They stare into the face of death and find the will to keep going, providing a moving example of courage and gratitude. Though we are not experiencing the horror ourselves, watching it on-screen allows us to face our own darkest fears. When it’s over, we can more easily identify everything we have to be thankful for. 

November is a time when many in the United States gather with their families and friends to celebrate Thanksgiving. This holiday is not common in Uruguay and would probably not have been observed on the mountain, but 50 Novembers ago the real survivors were trapped in the fuselage desperately clinging to what few celebrations they could find. While trapped in the aftermath of the avalanche, Carlitos Páez (Bruce Ramsay) insists upon celebrating his friend’s birthday with a cigarette stuffed into a packet of snow. His claims that the next day is his own birthday followed by the birthday of his father is likely an attempt to find joy in the midst of such terrible despair. The sixteen men who emerged from the Andes still gather every December to celebrate a different kind of birthday: the day on which they returned to life after having been given up for dead. 

Each Thanksgiving, my own family gathers to share a meal and enjoy each other’s company. As part of our tradition, we honor the memory of loved ones no longer with us and express our gratitude for everything we still have. It’s with this spirit of Thanksgiving that the survivors of the crash found the will to keep going. Each day, they honored the memory of their lost friends and family while embracing the miracle that they were still alive. The film’s final frame perfectly encapsulates this bittersweet gratitude. The camera circles the majestic, but deadly peaks of the mountain centering on a large iron cross to memorialize the dead. A final message reads, “This film is dedicated to the 29 people who died on the mountain and the 16 who survived.”

Ethan Hawke Alive movie

Editorials

‘Amityville Karen’ Is a Weak Update on ‘Serial Mom’ [Amityville IP]

Published

on

Amityville Karen horror

Twice a month Joe Lipsett will dissect a new Amityville Horror film to explore how the “franchise” has evolved in increasingly ludicrous directions. This is “The Amityville IP.”

A bizarre recurring issue with the Amityville “franchise” is that the films tend to be needlessly complicated. Back in the day, the first sequels moved away from the original film’s religious-themed haunted house storyline in favor of streamlined, easily digestible concepts such as “haunted lamp” or “haunted mirror.”

As the budgets plummeted and indie filmmakers capitalized on the brand’s notoriety, it seems the wrong lessons were learned. Runtimes have ballooned past the 90-minute mark and the narratives are often saggy and unfocused.

Both issues are clearly on display in Amityville Karen (2022), a film that starts off rough, but promising, and ends with a confused whimper.

The promise is embodied by the tinge of self-awareness in Julie Anne Prescott (The Amityville Harvest)’s screenplay, namely the nods to John Waters’ classic 1994 satire, Serial Mom. In that film, Beverly Sutphin (an iconic Kathleen Turner) is a bored, white suburban woman who punished individuals who didn’t adhere to her rigid definition of social norms. What is “Karen” but a contemporary equivalent?

In director/actor Shawn C. Phillips’ film, Karen (Lauren Francesca) is perpetually outraged. In her introductory scenes, she makes derogatory comments about immigrants, calls a female neighbor a whore, and nearly runs over a family blocking her driveway. She’s a broad, albeit familiar persona; in many ways, she’s less of a character than a caricature (the living embodiment of the name/meme).

These early scenes also establish a fairly straightforward plot. Karen is a code enforcement officer with plans to shut down a local winery she has deemed disgusting. They’re preparing for a big wine tasting event, which Karen plans to ruin, but when she steals a bottle of cursed Amityville wine, it activates her murderous rage and goes on a killing spree.

Simple enough, right?

Unfortunately, Amityville Karen spins out of control almost immediately. At nearly every opportunity, Prescott’s screenplay eschews narrative cohesion and simplicity in favour of overly complicated developments and extraneous characters.

Take, for example, the wine tasting event. The film spends an entire day at the winery: first during the day as a band plays, then at a beer tasting (???) that night. Neither of these events are the much touted wine-tasting, however; that is actually a private party happening later at server Troy (James Duval)’s house.

Weirdly though, following Troy’s death, the party’s location is inexplicably moved to Karen’s house for the climax of the film, but the whole event plays like an afterthought and features a litany of characters we have never met before.

This is a recurring issue throughout Amityville Karen, which frequently introduces random characters for a scene or two. Karen is typically absent from these scenes, which makes them feel superfluous and unimportant. When the actress is on screen, the film has an anchor and a narrative drive. The scenes without her, on the other hand, feel bloated and directionless (blame editor Will Collazo Jr., who allows these moments to play out interminably).

Compounding the issue is that the majority of the actors are non-professionals and these scenes play like poorly performed improv. The result is long, dull stretches that features bad actors talking over each other, repeating the same dialogue, and generally doing nothing to advance the narrative or develop the characters.

While Karen is one-note and histrionic throughout the film, at least there’s a game willingness to Francesca’s performance. It feels appropriately campy, though as the film progresses, it becomes less and less clear if Amityville Karen is actually in on the joke.

Like Amityville Cop before it, there are legit moments of self-awareness (the Serial Mom references), but it’s never certain how much of this is intentional. Take, for example, Karen’s glaringly obvious wig: it unconvincingly fails to conceal Francesca’s dark hair in the back, but is that on purpose or is it a technical error?

Ultimately there’s very little to recommend about Amityville Karen. Despite the game performance by its lead and the gentle homages to Serial Mom’s prank call and white shoes after Labor Day jokes, the never-ending improv scenes by non-professional actors, the bloated screenplay, and the jittery direction by Phillips doom the production.

Clocking in at an insufferable 100 minutes, Amityville Karen ranks among the worst of the “franchise,” coming in just above Phillips’ other entry, Amityville Hex.

Amityville Karen

The Amityville IP Awards go to…

  • Favorite Subplot: In the afternoon event, there’s a self-proclaimed “hot boy summer” band consisting of burly, bare-chested men who play instruments that don’t make sound (for real, there’s no audio of their music). There’s also a scheming manager who is skimming money off the top, but that’s not as funny.
  • Least Favorite Subplot: For reasons that don’t make any sense, the winery is also hosting a beer tasting which means there are multiple scenes of bartender Alex (Phillips) hoping to bring in women, mistakenly conflating a pint of beer with a “flight,” and goading never before seen characters to chug. One of them describes the beer as such: “It looks like a vampire menstruating in a cup” (it’s a gold-colored IPA for the record, so…no).
  • Amityville Connection: The rationale for Karen’s killing spree is attributed to Amityville wine, whose crop was planted on cursed land. This is explained by vino groupie Annie (Jennifer Nangle) to band groupie Bianca (Lilith Stabs). It’s a lot of nonsense, but it is kind of fun when Annie claims to “taste the damnation in every sip.”
  • Neverending Story: The film ends with an exhaustive FIVE MINUTE montage of Phillips’ friends posing as reporters in front of terrible green screen discussing the “killer Karen” story. My kingdom for Amityville’s regular reporter Peter Sommers (John R. Walker) to return!
  • Best Line 1: Winery owner Dallas (Derek K. Long), describing Karen: “She’s like a walking constipation with a hemorrhoid”
  • Best Line 2: Karen, when a half-naked, bleeding woman emerges from her closet: “Is this a dream? This dream is offensive! Stop being naked!”
  • Best Line 3: Troy, upset that Karen may cancel the wine tasting at his house: “I sanded that deck for days. You don’t just sand a deck for days and then let someone shit on it!”
  • Worst Death: Karen kills a Pool Boy (Dustin Clingan) after pushing his head under water for literally 1 second, then screeches “This is for putting leaves on my plants!”
  • Least Clear Death(s): The bodies of a phone salesman and a barista are seen in Karen’s closet and bathroom, though how she killed them are completely unclear
  • Best Death: Troy is stabbed in the back of the neck with a bottle opener, which Karen proceeds to crank
  • Wannabe Lynch: After drinking the wine, Karen is confronted in her home by Barnaby (Carl Solomon) who makes her sign a crude, hand drawn blood contract and informs her that her belly is “pregnant from the juices of his grapes.” Phillips films Barnaby like a cross between the unhoused man in Mulholland Drive and the Mystery Man in Lost Highway. It’s interesting, even if the character makes absolutely no sense.
  • Single Image Summary: At one point, a random man emerges from the shower in a towel and excitedly poops himself. This sequence perfectly encapsulates the experience of watching Amityville Karen.
  • Pray for Joe: Many of these folks will be back in Amityville Shark House and Amityville Webcam, so we’re not out of the woods yet…

Next time: let’s hope Christmas comes early with 2022’s Amityville Christmas Vacation. It was the winner of Fangoria’s Best Amityville award, after all!

Amityville Karen movie

Continue Reading