Connect with us

Editorials

Animals Gone Wild: Four Bigfoot Movies That Do the “King of All Cryptids” Justice

Published

on

Bigfoot movies
Pictured: 'Abominable'

If there is one perpetually underappreciated horror monster out there, it’s Bigfoot. America’s most famous and recognizable cryptid has a wealth of films and literature devoted to it – but the elusive, hairy beast has rarely found itself in the horror spotlight among its brethren such as the vampire and werewolf.

Legends and myths of Bigfoot or Bigfoot-esque creatures span centuries and continents. Sasquatch, Yeti, Skunk Ape, and more all come to fall under the Bigfoot banner. Many states and regions across the country have their own version of the ape-like figure. Entire communities and groups of people can be found dedicated to tracking down and proving Bigfoot exists. The legend also comes with a decent score of individuals looking for a bit of attention by concocting pranks, hoaxes, and staging sighting.

The ongoing fascination with Bigfoot is easy to understand. It taps into our collective obsession with the unknown and the mysterious. We humans may not agree on most things, but we all enjoy ourselves a good yarn involving the few shadowy corners of our world that have yet to be illuminated.

In a world where any question seemingly has an answer and the entire history of the world is at our fingertips, the desire to believe in something outside of our capacity to understand is magnetic indeed. Not having the proof is all the fun. If we can’t disprove it without a shadow of a doubt, then well, whatever it is may still be out there.

In honor of the King of all Cryptids, let’s take a long at four genre movies that do the legend of Bigfoot justice and see if they can make believers out of us.


1. Night of the Demon (1980)

This is it, guys. Night of the Demon is one of those oddball genre jamborees you hear tell of often for how good it is at being uniquely bad. Y’know the type of film I’m talking about: the kind of low rent schlock with such wacked out charm it transcends its shoddy makings to become an experience unto itself.

The story is simple. A group of college students and their professor trek into the wilds of Northern California in hopes of finally proving the existence of Bigfoot. Spoiler alert: he exists.

Shot in 1979 but not released on VHS in the U.S. until 1983, Night of the Demon is one of the rare cases where the hype delivers on all it promised. Censored in the UK as a Video Nasty, this James C. Wasson helmed creature feature classic has it all. It’s gory, it’s salacious, and it’s unintentionally hilarious. Everything exploitation junkies crave can be found in this 92 minute meal of hot celluloid cheese.

The majority of the kill scenes are showed to the audience via flashback as our hero, Dr. Nugent (not of the Ted variety) tells his team about all the recent encounters with the mysterious beast. Each kill is its own mini-movie of giddy genre goodness. Silly acting, terrible dubbing, and low rent gore carry the film until its bonkers finale.

When Bigfoot mayhem is not on screen, our cast of characters is shockingly agreeable to be around. They aren’t anywhere close to being developed or nuanced, but they aren’t actively annoying or hateful which goes a long way for a film like this.

Night of the Demon is one of those “I gotta show this to my friends” kind of exploitation flicks. It makes a great double-feature with something like Don’t Go In the Woods…Alone! or Pieces. If you haven’t seen this film yet, those two references should clue in you in to the general vibe Night of the Demon gives off.


2. The Legend of Boggy Creek (1972)

Bigfoot movies boggy creek

If a campfire tale was a movie, it would be The Legend of Boggy Creek. Shot and edited by renowned regional genre filmmaker Charles B. Pierce (The Town That Dreaded Sundown), Boggy Creek is a gorgeously photographed docudrama detailing the myth of the Fouke Monster who is said to reside in Fouke, Arkansas.

Told through lovely narration by Vern Stierman, Pierce uses actual Fouke locals to craft his docudrama. Many of the people featured are also actual self-proclaimed witnesses of the beast. The tangible air of authenticity this lends to the picture can’t be overstated. It’s a wonderful glimpse into a different era and small town rural life.

The DIY love and craft that goes into low budget regional horror is always something to appreciate no matter the outcome of the work itself. With a Pierce film however, you can always expect to see something with gorgeous cinematography and an above average grasp on shot composition. The Legend of Boggy Creek is loaded with brilliant nature photography. Pierce lingers on the still waters, the twisted branches of trees, hanging moss – it creates an immersive atmosphere that makes the natural landscapes of Fouke almost feel endless in their beauty and mystery.

The Legend of Boggy Creek is downright cozy, so those going into the film expecting to see a Bigfoot-esque creature tear through a cast of hapless victims won’t get this here. What Pierce accomplishes here is something more low-key, with the sole victim of the entire film being a dog. Outside of a few shots of decaying animal carcasses, the film is also utterly devoid of blood.

In that regard Boggy Creek is an ideal gateway horror film for young and enthusiastic horror hounds.

That’s not to say the film is devoid of chills or tension. The depiction of the Fouke Monster himself is startlingly well done. While obviously a man in a black fur suit, Pierce shoots him from a distance or obscured by foliage. At times the beast almost looks like a black void disrupting the natural beauty of the area. Pierce’s keen eye and the exceptional sound design of the film (the Fouke Monster’s wailing cry is a true spine-tingler) do everything to sell the beast as something that could truly exist.

The Legend of Boggy Creek is a true gem, and served as an inspiration for the granddaddy of all Found Footage films: The Blair Witch Project. Which brings me to my next suggestion…


3. Exists (2014)

Exists

I don’t recall this film making much of a splash when it was released. You would figure Eduardo Sanchez, one of the architects of The Blair Witch Project, returning to the world of Found Footage would create a bigger a buzz with genre fans…alas it seems Exists kind of just came and went.

Perhaps it was due to the subgenre being well into oversaturation by this point. Or maybe most people just didn’t think it was that good (the critics were not kind to the film). Oh well, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that Exists is a prime slice of Found Footage horror with an excellent depiction of Bigfoot.

As with all Found Footage the conceit here is very simple. A group of young people drive up a secluded cabin in the woods. Bigfoot is, uh, afoot. It terrorizes the group, picking them off one by one in increasing intensity. What did these kids do to incur the wrath of the beast? Is there something more at play than Bigfoot just being a mindless killer?

Exists is a film that gets better as it goes. The set-up is too familiar and the cast too generic at first to make the film standout in the Found Footage pantheon. However, as the conflict escalates the characters become more endearing and the danger more intense. There are some really, really fun set pieces in Exists. The staging and execution of the attack sequences are expertly crafted, putting some of the action on par with Matt Reeves’ Cloverfield – which still holds the gold medal for Found Footage monster action.

One of the most impressive elements of Exists is the ending. Most Found Footage films tend to have very abrupt endings. This goes with the territory of the concept. Exists takes the time to bring the mayhem full-circle and ends on surprisingly emotional and nuanced moment. It’s genuinely affecting.

Props should also be given to the film for featuring what is, in my opinion, the best Bigfoot design to grace the movies outside of Harry and the Hendersons.


4. Abominable (2006)

Bigfoot movies horror

Ryan Schifrin’s Abominable is the most straightforward creature feature on this list, and the most appropriate Bigfoot flick to go out on.

Since its release in 2006, Abominable has maintained a fan-favorite appeal for genre fans. It’s a no frills monster movie that delivers everything horror hounds look for in this kind of film. It’s got gore, it’s got a bit of sleaze, and it’s got a cool as hell monster.

Rear Window meets Bigfoot is this film’s foundation. Our protagonist, Preston (Max McCoy) is still reeling from the tragic death of his wife during a mountain climbing excursion. Not only did he lose his wife, he also lost the use of his legs.

On the recommendation of his therapist, Preston is driven back to his cabin in Flatwood where the tragedy happened, his asshole nurse Otis in tow as his caretaker. Meanwhile a group of young women move into the cabin next door for a bit of partying. Both the girls and Preston will soon become the target of something monstrous lurking in the woods.

Much of what makes Abominable work is that we like and care about Preston. McCoy gives a very sympathetic and vulnerable performance that bolsters the material above being just fun schlock. The rest of the cast is stacked with fun supporting roles from genre favorites ranging from Dee Wallace to Lance Henriksen to Jeffrey Combs. B-movie Queen Tiffany Shepis is also on hand to provide an added dose of genre cred to the proceedings.

The titular beastie is “guy in a suit” perfection. He’s big, he’s hulking, and he rocks one gnarly set of crooked chompers in his puss. He’s one ugly ‘squatch that can distend his jaw like a snake to bite the face off of his prey if he so desires.

Abominable is the kind of monster movie I greatly miss. It utilizes a meager budget to give the audience as much fun as it can deliver. The cast is game and treat the material as seriously as it needs to be treated to make it a step above just another goofy monster movie – although it still scratches that goofy monster movie itch, make no mistake.

Sometimes, that’s exactly what you’re looking for.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading