Connect with us

Editorials

Fashionista Freddy: Ranking Every Krueger Character Design in the ‘Elm Street’ Movies

Published

on

Wes Craven's New Nightmare

Maybe more than any other character in the pantheon of horror villain legends, Freddy Krueger was custom built to put the fear of god into us. Nothing about his presence was thrown together haphazardly. Instead, nearly every aspect of his design had a tremendous amount of thought put into it. From makeup effects great David B. Miller’s inspired work creating the Krueger’s crispy kisser, to the subliminal mind games played by creator Wes Craven when choosing certain aspects of his look (the razor glove was meant to resemble the clawed paws of a prehistoric predator while the colors of his sweater were chosen due to the difficult time the human eye has processing red and green together), we were meant to feel Freddy’s menace on a subatomic level.

As the franchise rolled on over the years, that visual blueprint was more or less stuck to religiously. After all, why mess with a good thing? But that’s not to say that all the Krueger designs were created equally. While each has its own distinct charm and represents where the character was at in that point in its history, some stand out more than others.

For #RobertEnglundDay, here are my own painfully nerdy thoughts on Freddy’s style in each of his cinematic excursions and how they rank in this writer’s heart of hearts.


9 – The Dream Child (1989)

Freddy Krueger’s design in The Dream Child is representative of the franchise’s fifth entry in general, in that it is very much a mixed bag of a picture. Original makeup guru David B. Miller was brought in to create a new Freddy prosthetic that would take less time to apply to series star Robert Englund, but the end result was a bit of a Jekyll and Hyde affair. At times, the makeup looks fine despite having a noticeably cheaper aura about it, but there are moments where Freddy looks less like a horrifying burnt-up boogeyman and more like a dude in a rubber mask. While his business attire might have left something to be desired, we do get to see Krueger cosplay as a superhero AND a maître-d’. This might not have sparked nightmares for its audience, but it certainly made for some wonderful action figures years later.


8 – A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

Some might think its sacrilege to include the failed reboot of the Nightmare franchise on this list. However, whatever led to the film failing, its rendering of Freddy wasn’t one of them. Jackie Earle Haley’s performance is a highlight of the film and his Krueger’s appearance wasn’t the abomination some have made it out to be. The costume design was pretty darn close to what we saw in the original (right down to the sweater being knit by the same woman who made it back in 1984) but it was Freddy’s face where a new direction was taken. The makeup’s success is varied, depending really on which scene you’re watching. Sometimes, it looks genuinely disturbing, featuring details (like the addition of a blind, milky white eye) that make this Krueger a beast all its own. Unfortunately, the movie’s blending together prosthetics and CGI wasn’t entirely seamless, and that distraction does a huge disservice to the character. Overall, it was a valiant effort that was bogged down by technological limitations and overshadowed by the incredible work that came before it.


7 – New Nightmare (1994)

When Wes Craven returned to Elm Street for this proto-meta reimagining of the Freddy mythology, efforts were made to make the character scary again. His trademark sweater, hat, and scorched skin were all kept, but additions were made to his appearance that made him unlike any other version we’d seen before. Since now he was an avatar for an ageless evil entity rather than a short pervert with a penchant for one-liners, some physical alterations needed to take place. The character’s physique was pumped up, a pair of combat boots were popped on his tootsies to add some inches to his height, and his facial features were given a structure that made him look more monstrous. Coupled with this was the switching out of Krueger’s homemade mitt with a weird bio-mechanical claw that would have looked at home in Tetsuo: The Iron Man. These aspects of the redesign worked to varying degrees in terms of making the man of our dreams spooky again, but there was one that cannot be forgiven: they gave Freddy a duster. Very few people can pull off this polarizing piece of clothing. You either look cool as hell (see: Brandon Lee in The Crow) or painfully lame (think Mac in It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia). Turning Krueger into a demonic beefcake metal fetishist was all well and good, but there are some lines that should never be crossed.


6 – Freddy’s Dead (1991)

FREDDY's DEAD via New Line

On the surface, Mr. Krueger’s appearance in this contentious chapter of the Nightmare franchise seems like a disaster (I once heard someone wonder aloud whether they had rented his mask and clothing from a local costume store) but in the context of Freddy’s Dead and what director Rachal Talalay was going for, it’s a homerun. This is Elm Street by way of John Waters (many of the film’s crew- including Talalay herself – had worked with the Prince of Puke in the past) so it only made sense that Freddy’s design would need to reflect the film’s embrace of camp. And it made sense: by this point, thanks to the success of the sequels and a massive amount of merchandising, the character had permeated the pop culture zeitgeist completely. Krueger was now less a boogeyman and more a brand name, so the fact that he had a glossy, almost mass-produced look to him not only fit the tone of the film but felt like a commentary on the transformation the character had gone through during its existence. It might not have been scary, but damn if it didn’t work.


5 – Freddy vs. Jason (2003)

If you do an image search for some of the early Freddy vs Jason makeup tests, you’ll see that Krueger could have looked disastrously different from what we eventually saw when this long-gestating dream project finally hit the big screen. Thankfully, what fans got instead was a solid design that was reminiscent of his look during his 87-88 heyday. This was a welcomed return for those who weren’t thrilled with the revisions made in New Nightmare, and it made for a nice cinematic send-off for Robert Englund (he’d go on to appear onscreen in full Freddy garb one last time in a 2018 episode of The Goldbergs, but this film feels more like his true swan song as the character). While it doesn’t bring anything to the table that distinguishes it from other installments, this was a more than serviceable take on the Springwood Slasher.


4 – A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

Wes Craven

The “O.G.” It’s no wonder Freddy Krueger struck such a chord with so many people in this first outing. Combined with Robert Englund’s meticulously intentional physicality is a look that’s instantly iconic. Parts of Freddy’s character design are admittedly rough around the edges at this point. His sweater is just a tad baggy and the style of his hat appears to change at times (there’s a couple of shots where Krueger looks to be wearing a pork pie hat, as if he’s some sort of deranged Buster Keaton), but these elements would be nailed down in future installments. His burn makeup might be the grossest it’s ever been. Krueger’s face in his debut is disgustingly craterous in a way not seen in future sequels, as if large chunks of flesh were torn from his flaming visage upon his death. His style might have been perfected later on, but this was still a hell of an entrance.


3 – Freddy’s Revenge (1985)

A year after the success of A Nightmare on Elm Street, Freddy Krueger was resurrected for the first time. However, this installment would see his design handled by some new blood as David B. Miller passed the baton to up-and-coming special makeup effects artist Kevin Yagher. Just as the sequel went in a different (and divisive) direction from the original, Yagher decided to make some changes of his own. A more pronounced bone structure was introduced: while Krueger’s flesh appeared to be hanging from his face in the first film, this version’s was stretched taught across his skull. High, jagged cheekbones and unnervingly sunken eyes were the result. A hooked, almost witch-like nose was also added, and the combination of it all made this Freddy uniquely terrifying in his own right. His clothing was further refined as well, with his sweater now being a bit more form fitting and frayed. While not without its missteps (the addition of demonic red contact lenses would be axed in later films), this Krueger was not only frightening but a big step forward towards the character’s final form.


2 & 1 – Dream Warriors (1987) & The Dream Master (1988)

‘Dream Warriors’

Freddy at his fiercest. After a two-year hiatus, Krueger graced our dreams once more in a pair of stellar pictures that represent the high-water mark for sequels in the Nightmare franchise.

Both featured Kevin Yagher on makeup duty and his work in these films is iconic, blending together the best elements of the ideas he brought to Freddy’s Revenge (skeletal bone structure, witchy nose) with the stomach-turning textures of David B. Miller’s original burn makeup. Krueger’s iconic sweater was similarly on point, displaying a lived-in rattiness that gave it just the right amount of believability, and his claw was spot on. What’s more, these movies featured the first instance of the Springwood Slasher playing dress up (you gotta love part three’s Tuxedo Freddy) and accessorizing (those shades in part four are absolutely scorching). Top marks, all around.


Peel back the makeup and celebrate Robert Englund with SCREAMBOX Original documentary Hollywood Dreams & Nightmares: The Robert Englund Story, streaming now.

‘The Dream Master’

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading