Quantcast
Connect with us

Editorials

Why ‘High Tension’ Still Divides Audiences 20 Years Later

Published

on

High Tension Premise

For a lot of people, Alexandre Aja‘s High Tension (Haute Tension) was their first taste of the New French Extremity. And since 2003, this French slasher has been a source of frustration for horror buffs; they feel betrayed after witnessing one of the most shocking plot twists to come out of the genre. All the while, there are those who are fascinated by the film’s audacity and multifaceted story. Wherever someone might fall on the spectrum, though, everyone can at least agree that High Tension is impossible to forget.

The conventional slasher film never quite caught on in France like it did in the United States. There are exceptions here and there, of course, but as a whole, this subgenre of horror is more of a local flavor than a universal one. However, by the time High Tension had come out, American slashers themselves were victims of postmodern overkill, parody and stagnation. No one took these films seriously anymore once Scream 3 came and went — especially not the filmmakers. In the meantime, transgressive French cinema was on the rise around the turn of the century. Not every film is of the horror persuasion, at least not in the traditional sense, yet these feral stories intentionally evoke a variety of unpleasant feelings.

High Tension is widely recognized as the first film to combine the conventions of horror with the intent and style of the New French Extremity movement. This riff on a well-known setup — women are terrorized by a bloodthirsty assailant — sounds old hat, but the execution is what seized everyone’s attention back then. Free of self-awareness, High Tension draws from the vintage era of slasher films as opposed to the then-recent revival. Marie and Alex (Cécile de France and Maïwenn) portray hapless victims who neither laugh in the face of their attacker nor seek comfort in irreverence. Because they take their dilemma seriously, so do the viewers. Playing everything straight was seen as refreshing.

High Tension

High Tension starts out like other slashers. Students Marie and Alex are visiting Alex’s family in the South of France (really Romania near Bucharest) when a random intruder (Philippe Nahon) suddenly breaks into the house and murders everyone but the two protagonists. Alex is then taken hostage by the killer, urging Marie to come save her. The body count continues to rise as the hero and villain play an especially sanguinary game of cat-and-mouse in the countryside. It all sounds like a series of horror clichés, yet the story does something bizarre and startling toward the end. 

(There are major spoilers beyond this point.)

According to some, one seismic revelation undoes all of High Tension’s good work. To this day critics and audiences alike bemoan the fact that Marie had been the killer all along and how everything seen in the film’s first two acts was her distorted account. The needle has hardly moved an inch in regards to the story’s devastating curveball; the double-crossness of it all still leaves a sting in repeat viewings. To forgive this kind of cinematic head fake seems next to impossible, but detractors can find merit in the film even if they cannot reconcile the ending.

High Tension implements as well as investigates the basic framework of American slashers. While many of its more recent predecessors relocated the killing sprees to urban surroundings and turned everyday safe spaces into death traps, this film steps further into the past. Rural environments, deserted highways, and an isolated farmhouse all register as clichés of the genre. In truth, though, Aja and co-writer Grégory Levasseur are using familiar horror iconography to create a false sense of comfort. The audience, thinking they know what is in store for the characters, fail to realize they too are becoming victims of someone’s break from reality.

Circling back to the divisive ending, High Tension takes the biggest of risks by turning the hero into the villain. Additional viewings would naturally involve the hunting of clues that foreshadow the story’s jarring turn of events. Upon closer inspection, the opening shows Marie inside an unknown facility, injured and incoherent, repeatedly muttering a line heard later on in the film (“I won’t let anyone come between us anymore.”) Then immediately the scene transitions to Marie waking up from a dream on the way to Alex’s house, claiming she was running away from what looks to be herself. What might have been dismissed as a throwaway line is actually a significant indicator of what is to come. 

High Tension

Now aware of the film’s conclusion, rational viewers will undoubtedly be irritated as they go back and uncover one plot hole after the other. To seek logic in High Tension is a Sisyphean task, though, only because the story comes from an unreliable narrator. Marie, in her current frame of mind, is untrustworthy. Rather than admitting her romantic feelings for Alex, she becomes a man. Not an ordinary man either — the killer is a stereotypical brute who unflinchingly acts on every desire and craving without consideration or remorse. He will take Alex’s love, and if not her love, her body. Her life. Eventually Marie subdues her dark half, albeit temporarily, before resuming to inflict her psychological drama on everyone around her.

To convey their hopelessness and harsh worldviews, New French Extremities tend to employ superrealism. This approach is not far off from that of older Grindhouse films, although filmmakers like Aja pursue a more painful aesthetic. Cinematographer Maxime Alexandre, a frequent collaborator of Aja, turned in an impeccable-looking debut with High Tension. The film has a metallic, cold gloss to match the killer’s deadly instruments, the overall bleak appearance channels the foreboding horrors of gritty exploitation classics, such as The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and The Last House on the Left, and the graphic extravagances of Italian gore masters Dario Argento and Lamberto Bava are evident in the kills. The ferocity of High Tension is certainly not for squeamish or general audiences, however, in line with other works from the New French Extremity movement, this film always manages to find the beauty in destruction.

Some would go so far as to call High Tension a waste of time. It is understandable that the twist would upset people — even more so than the story’s actual violence — but perhaps that was the goal all along. Bodies have been violated and destroyed in horror for decades prior to Aja’s own quarrelsome take on the slasher formula, and audiences, at the time, were not as receptive as they once were. Nothing felt unsafe anymore, so something had to change. Nevertheless, this unique abandonment of self-conscious horror accomplishes what it set out to do; it completely unsettles the viewer like anything else to come out of the New French Extremity. The only difference is High Tension achieves its goal in the most unexpected way.


Horrors Elsewhere is a recurring column that spotlights a variety of movies from all around the globe, particularly those not from the United States. Fears may not be universal, but one thing is for sure — a scream is understood, always and everywhere.

High Tension

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside. Bluesky: paulle.bsky.social

Click to comment

Editorials

Why Mainstream Horror Should Lighten Up

Published

on

“Elevated Horror.” Of all the combinations in the English language, that one is the most insufferable. 

It represents almost a decade of scary movies that, for the most part, took themselves too seriously. Horror responds to the moment, so its “why so serious” lean makes sense as we scuttle through the “worst of times” equation of Charles Dickens’ famous opening lines. But there’s still an opening and a need for a lighter approach; one that not only has fun with its audience but takes the piss out of a genre that is seemingly letting its newfound “respectability” go to its head. 

Wes Craven believed devotees see horror films to let out their fears one primal scream at a time. At their core, these movies are roller coasters; they bring us as close to the edge as possible before pulling us back into a safety net of reality. The need for a bigger and badder coaster increases during times when the size of that net decreases.

There’s a thrill that comes from imagining being in a foot race with a madman, or outthinking the hordes of zombies on the other side of the door, plus the scavenger humans coming behind them. There’s even a rush that comes from imagining how one might deal with possession to see good triumph over evil in the end. It’s all about building tension and releasing it through catharsis. That cathartic release usually sounds like screams followed by laughter, which signals relief. Genre heavy hitters over the past 10 years offered very little of that respite when the credits rolled. Films like Hereditary, The Witch, Talk to Me, and even Smile (pick one) keep that tension going after the screen fades to black.

Hereditary

As the genre became obsessed with creating trauma metaphors, that lack of release made sense. Anyone with even a small sample size of traumatic experiences knows those emotions don’t magically resolve themselves in an allotted run time. But how much trauma can one take? Especially when there’s a mess going on outside that few of us can escape from. Movies offer that off-ramp, no matter how short. 

Everything can’t be, nor should it be, “elevated.” Audiences need thoughtful explorations of life’s ills via monsters as much as they need murdering masked maniacs with kitchen knives. And no, it doesn’t have to go any deeper than that. Sometimes, a knife is just a knife, and it’s still worth our time and respect. As weird as it sounds, that simplicity is comforting not in spite of the trauma but because of it. 

The worst of times should manifest more than just anguish. People need to laugh just as much as they need to think seriously about this moment in time. Even the Scream franchise forgot the meta rock upon which it built its church when the latest foray sacrificed the subtle comedy for serious drama. Scary Movie returned at the perfect moment. It provides the necessary laughs, but it’s not a cure-all.

This isn’t a call for Scary Movie imitators but a return to a mainstream landscape where Killer Klowns from Outer Space sat with The Serpent and the Rainbow, nestled neatly with the latest Nightmare on Elm Street, which took nothing away from The Vanishing.

They Live

Even They Live, John Carpenter’s horror sci-fi satire sandwich, kept its tongue firmly in cheek while discussing serious ideas still relevant in 2026. Yes, a film about aliens taking over the world through subliminal messaging only visible through coded sunglasses is, in fact, a tad silly. Carpenter understood that mainstream horror can’t become so self-important that it never looks itself in the mirror and laughs at that inherent silliness. 

The thing is, horror historically excels at poking fun at itself. Most of the Scream franchise, The Cabin in the Woods, or The Blackening show adoration without kowtowing. They recognize tropes and trappings but invert them for an audience already in on the joke, but one that also finds solace in said conventions. This keeps the genre on its toes; once something gets parodied, it’s usually time to evolve. That breeds new ideas and fresh filmmakers, which not only strengthen the genre’s collective voice but also amplify it.

Get Out, as “elevated” as some critics want us to believe it is, is a cathartic, populist scary movie that spoke to an untapped audience rather than speaking down to them. Backrooms is one of the biggest horror hits in years, partially because it’s fine-tuned for modern-day teenagers instead of their parents. Movies like these tell everyone the genre is open for business; open for innovation and, yeah, open for new ways in which people can lovingly poke fun at with a wink and a nudge. 

Horror needs dread as much as it needs laughter.

Catharsis is just as important as tension, and pulpy populism has the same merit as more high-brow material. Respectability shouldn’t come at the expense of an experience akin to walking through a haunted house. At a time when joy seems in short supply, horror should look to its past to map out its future, and make things just a tad brighter for audiences.

Backrooms

Continue Reading