Connect with us

Editorials

Logging on to “FreakyLinks” 23 Years Later – This Horror TV Hidden Gem Was Ahead of Its Time

Published

on

FreakyLinks

Following the massive success of The Blair Witch Project, production company Haxan Films kept the found-footage train going with FreakyLinks (originally titled Fearsum). While not everyone recognizes this hidden horror gem of television, those who do might recall its harrowing history. Considered by many to be ahead of its time, FreakyLinks is an entertaining time-capsule of what it was like to be on the weirder side of the internet before the turn of the 21st century.

Prior to its TV debut, FreakyLinks’ developers launched a paranormal-sleuthing website similar to the homespun one seen in the show. Sadly, the internet marketing did not pay off; shortly after premiering on Fox in October of 2000, the series was temporarily taken off the schedule due to low ratings. The network aired more new episodes that following January, yet once again, Fox pulled the plug. After the remaining episodes were burned off in June of 2001, loyal FreakyLinkers were forced to say goodbye. Fox opted to cancel the series altogether, despite the fanbase’s vocal petition to save Derek Barnes and his close crew of novice ghosthunters.

FreakyLinks was, for a short time, the best live-action interpretation of Scooby-Doo! available before an actual adaptation materialized. In place of the Mystery Machine, these young and hip characters used the World Wide Web to find their thrills and seek out creepy material for their online storehouse. Leading the misfits was Derek Barnes (Ethan Embry), the irresponsible but good-natured surfer with a dangerous curiosity for all things strange. His free-spoken confidant, Jason Tatum (Karim Prince), was a law school dropout who preferred boogeymen to briefs. And holding down the fort as the others go off in search of mysteries was the punnily named techie and computer whiz, Lan Williams (Lizette Carrion). Finally, rounding off this varied bunch was psychologist and Adam’s almost fiancée Chloe Tanner (Lisa Sheridan). She too is haunted by Adam, albeit not in the same way as Derek.

The demise of FreakyLinks could be attributed to Fox’s own interference; because the network wanted something more playful than the pilot, original showrunner Tommy Thompson parted ways. Creators Gregg Hale and David S. Goyer (as Ricardo Festiva) stayed on as consultants while former co-executive producer David Simkins was now put in charge. Meddling from the higher-ups does not always bode well, but those who tuned in to the retooled FreakyLinks still responded well, even if the tone of the remaining episodes was admittedly lighter. Most damaging perhaps was the choice to air a series, one aimed at a younger demographic, on Friday nights. The reputation of the “Friday night death slot” is overstated, although in this instance, FreakyLinks could not match the success of its own genre blueprint and a former resident of the same time slot, The X-Files.

Had things gone as originally planned, FreakyLinks would have been a more serious techno-thriller. Thompson’s darker vision can be sensed in the pilot (“Subject: Fearsum”), where the story’s inciting incident involves Derek finding his identical twin brother, Adam (Embry), dead of suicide. Rarely did the series get this heavy again, apart from one filicidal ghost story (“Subject: Threethirteen”). Scrubbing away that grim undercurrent, however, forced the most urgent subplot — Derek wonders if his twin is somehow now alive after receiving CCTV footage of Adam shot after his death — to be abandoned. Another plot thread eventually muted over time was the ever-present Vince Elsing (Dennis Christopher). This occasional ally of Derek would pop up when least expected, delivering cryptic messages about a current case or Adam.

As with Firefly, FreakyLinks aired out of order. So for fans who watched the series during its original broadcast, they might have been confused by events referenced before they even happened. In addition, Chloe initially keeps everything grounded by applying logic to the unexplained. The show’s own Dana Scully. Yet due to the slightly shuffled episode order, Chloe’s degree of natural skepticism toward all things supernatural is inconsistent. More importantly, Chloe’s own overarching story — her psychology license is almost revoked after Derek inadvertently interferes with a patient’s case — is a bit out of whack. Remembering the “lighter popcorn thriller” mandate, though, most episodes are, more or less, self-contained. So the continuity, while indeed in effect, is still loose enough to where anyone can tune in and be brought up to speed without much effort.

FreakyLinks ethan embry

What should have been the biggest attraction about FreakyLinks may have actually been off-putting to unprepared or disinterested critics and viewers. Found footage is now ubiquitous, fashionable, and widely-liked, but back in and around 2000, this storytelling technique was still in its infancy. Hand-held horrors and first-person frighteners, as a whole, engage their spectators by practically including them in the story, but this show’s most obvious appeal was lost on anyone who was not already online. And when Derek or someone else pulled out the camera to catch some ghosties or whatnot, or they played a low-quality video dug up off the ‘net, the aesthetic clashed with the traditional presentation. Even in a modern environment where found footage is ever-present in the horror genre, the mixing of styles is uncommon. Nevertheless, FreakyLinks was ahead of the curve, as far as TV found footage goes. Similar to Blair Witch, the actors ended up shooting most of the first-person footage themselves, which also entailed line improvisation.

Toning down nearly everything from the pilot was a risk that, in retrospect, paid off. Yes, it is a shame that the series did not deliver on its initial setup, but for fans of monster-of-the-week storytelling, FreakyLinks is worthwhile. As Derek honors his brother’s legacy by investigating anything bizarre that happens to find its way into his inbox, he and his friends come across a diverse list of things that go bump in the night. From a shadow-dwelling Filipino vampire (“Subject: Me and My Shadow”) to a skunk ape living in a retirement community (“Subject: Sunrise at Sunset Streams”), FreakyLinks makes up for its lack of a primary story. These episodic misadventures in cryptid country or haunted territories are typically stimulating. The show’s clever ability to toy with enduring real-life hoaxes in innovative ways, like the Civil War pteranodon in “Subject: Coelacanth This!”, also helps set it apart from the herd of supernatural series hot on the heels of The X-Files and Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

Much like its protagonist, FreakyLinks acted spontaneously and was on a long journey to figure itself out. The show did not have a concrete sense of identity; it swiftly exchanged an ongoing internal mythos for a variety of tangible but ultimately standalone mythologies. It was never clear if they were building toward something bigger, or if this casual model could sustain itself for multiple seasons. The fans will always wonder could have been had the series continued.

FreakyLinks has not gone completely unnoticed over the years; cult followers still think fondly of it, and in the same breath, they wish this obscurity would resurface on official physical media, or at least be made available for streaming. The show has been weirdly MIA since the now defunct Chiller network aired reruns. Today, all fans have left now are homemade TV rips scattered throughout cyberspace. Frustrating as that may be, it seems only fitting to relive the exploits of Derek Barnes and his fellow ghostbusters through these low-grade videos acquired from dubious sources.

FreakyLinks tv show

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading