Connect with us

Editorials

Melted Faces and Temples of Doom: The Horror Elements of the ‘Indiana Jones’ Franchise

Published

on

Indiana Jones horror

It truly goes without saying that the first three Indiana Jones films are some of the most beloved films ever made with one of the most beloved characters ever to grace the big screen in Harrison Ford’s Henry Jones. Jr. Spawned from the gray matter of George Lucas and brought to the screen by Steven Spielberg, these films are gilded in the eyes of cinema fans and sit alongside other beloved IPs such as Star Wars and James Bond.

I could sit here and indulge in a warmed-over analysis of why these films and the characters have endured so long, but that sounds boring and frankly, I don’t think I’m capable of offering anything new or unique to say. What I can do is gush about one of my favorite elements of the franchise – the veins of horror that run through them. Although these films are ostensibly seen as “family films,” they never shy away from grit, grim, blood, and spookiness.

In honor of Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny releasing in theaters on June 30, the franchise’s first movie in 15 years, I thought I would display my love for the franchise and discuss its masterful mix of genre – and that means horror, baby!

While the Indy films are obviously action/adventure movies first and foremost, they are never far away from delivering on the heebie-jeebies. Steven Spielberg is at his most dastardly when he’s helming an Indy flick – always tossing rotted corpses, creepy-crawlies, and melting faces at the audience with gleeful enthusiasm. There is a sense of devilish fun to the horror and supernatural elements of these movies, as if Spielberg can envision entire audiences gasping, jumping, and squirming in their seats at every trick he pulls.

In the 2017 documentary simply titled Spielberg, the maestro recounts having a blast torturing his sisters with all manner of ghoulish scares and pranks. It seems that same impish pride carried over most strongly to his work on Indiana Jones and it all starts with the first film.

Indiana Jones horror moments

The opening moments of Raiders of the Lost Ark already flirt with the film’s supernatural undertones and gruesome underpinnings. A dark and mysterious jungle gives way to a danger-laden temple overflowing with tarantulas, booby traps, and desiccated corpses. Even the John Williams score in the opening segment of Raiders feels more akin to a horror film than an adventure film.

A subtle eeriness persists during the entire film, letting itself be known here and there to remind the audience that the MacGuffin – the Ark of the Covenant – is not just a mere historical artifact, but something far more unknowable and dangerous. The masterful score by John Williams is consistently used to emphasize this point. The leitmotif that accompanies the references and narrative allusions to the Ark is one of the most memorable pieces of music Williams composed for the franchise.

The power of The Ark is spoken of with grave concern by multiple characters throughout the film. Likewise, an inexplicable wind blows through Sala’s (Johnathon Rhys Davies) home when Indy uncovers an important clue to its whereabouts, and we all know the ultimate payoff during the climax.

The Ark is the perfect kind of MacGuffin in film. Not only is it visually distinct and impressive once it’s discovered, the importance the story and characters place on it give it a life of its own long before it appears on screen.

The shockingly gory and iconic ending of Raiders is the release of the supernatural tension that has built up the entire film. Vengeful angels emerge from The Ark and turn from ethereal to horrific while a vast energy melts faces, blows up heads, and shoots through the chests of every stinkin’ Nazi in sight. It is, quite simply, the Wrath of God. It’s brutal and horrific. The gore on display would be right at home in any 80s splatter flick, yet here it is in a PG rated action/adventure film.

Indiana Jones horror movie

However, it wasn’t until 1984’s Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom that the horror inherent in the Indy franchise really started to fully cook. What was suggested and teased in Raiders was pushed to the forefront in Temple. The film still retains its sense of humor and adventure, but goes all in on the supernatural elements. Indy and company enter a world of shadowy cults and human sacrifice – of child slavery and mind altering evil. Once Indy, Short Round (Key Huy Quan), and Willie Scott (Kate Capshaw) enter the titular temple, the film becomes an outright and unambiguous horror movie.

In a 2022 interview with the magazine American Cinematographer, Spielberg said: “In many ways, the visual style of the film was conceived when George told me the story… I heard a couple of things. I heard Kali Cult and Thuggees. I heard temple of doom, black magic, voodoo, and human sacrifice. When he said words like temple of doom and black magic, what came to mind immediately was torchlight and long shadows and red lava light. I felt that dictated the visual style of the movie… It suggested the Bela Lugosi light you put under the vampire’s face that casts a nose shadow across the forehead. It suggested a lot of spooky, creepy, crawly, nocturnal imagery.”

The imagery in reference here is one of the film’s greatest assets. Cinematographer Douglas Slocombe paints the film in deep shadows and glowing reds. The trek into the temple is a descent into hell itself. After crunching through a passageway filled with squirming insects and narrowly escaping impalement and crushing from a booby trap, our trio of protagonists are seen framed in a cavern aglow in crimson, stalagmites and stalactites looking like the teeth of some abyssal leviathan. They have unknowingly entered the jaws of the beast.

The darkness of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is at once its main attraction and its biggest repellent. While a hit when it came out and still largely beloved by fans today, it was met with controversy and harsh nose-thumbing upon release for going too bleak, too dark, too icky. It’s one thing to show a few Nazi’s melting and another to feature extended scenes of cult ritual sacrifice, voodoo possession, and child slavery.

Like the exploding head of Raiders, Temple has its signature moment of shocking violence – the heart rip. The film’s villain, Mola Ram (Amrish Puri) reaches into the chest a still-living sacrifice and out comes the heart…with the PG-13 rating attached. One of the standout bits of trivia for Temple of Doom is that it is partly responsible for the creation of the PG-13 classification alongside Gremlins, also a Spielberg production.

An Indiana Jones movie would never get as intense or horrific again. Spielberg’s commitment to going all the way in Temple of Doom makes it the most pulpy of the series. It’s all derring-do, banter, narrow escapes, and one effective set piece after another. The horror isn’t just extra sauce this time, but a main ingredient.

All of this came at a cost though. Temple of Doom received backlash from both critics and parents for being too dark and violent. Spielberg himself agrees and has essentially dismissed the film as misguided on his end. Well, it’s a shame he feels that way because while Temple of Doom still receives a degree of scorn from some fans and critics, it’s still largely beloved and many (including myself) consider it their favorite film of the franchise.

The horror elements of both The Last Crusade and The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull are far more sparse than the two films preceding them, but they still have their signature moments.

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is a film that feels like an apology for Temple of Doom. You can feel Spielberg asking for forgiveness here. I don’t mean to sound disparaging of the film, it’s fabulous; if just a little tamer, a little softer, a little safer – even compared to Raiders. In the hands of a lesser filmmaker the backpedaling from controversy wouldn’t play, but I’ll be damned if Spielberg doesn’t pull it off with the most personal and emotional Indy story yet and set pieces just as immaculate as ever.

Despite this more family friendly tone, heads still roll (literally). Crusade favors globe-trotting intrigue over emphasizing the supernatural power of the Holy Grail until the climax of the film, where its fabled powers of granting everlasting life are shown to us in ironic and ghoulish fashion.

With pure ignorance and avarice, Crusade’s villain, Donovan (Julian Glover), drinks from a false Grail and rapidly ages to a dried up mummy in a matter of mere seconds. It’s another injection of pure nightmare fuel imagery brought to life by ILM wizardly.

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull may be the most family friendly film of the four and is still seen as a massive letdown by most fans although it does have its fans and defenders (me being one of them). The requisite creepy crawly bit here is an army of death dealing jungle ants that can carry a grown man into their massive ant hills. Crystal Skull‘s henchman character Dovencho (Igor Zhizhikin) meets his end by having the ants crawl into his mouth and eyes – not bad, not bad. Oh, and Cate Blanchett’s Spalko has her eyes burned out by the films alien- er, interdimensional beings. But the effect is pretty quick and lacking in the jolt factor the other villain deaths of the franchise offer.

So now that we’ve detailed what the horror elements of the Indiana Jones films are, we have to ask: What makes it all work on a deeper level than just thrills, spills, and chills? The world of Indiana Jones is one of history – history that isn’t respected or understood by the franchise’s villains or often even its titular hero. These films are about the avaricious pursuit to exploit history and its treasures for evil gains and corrupt the world as we know it.

The horror in Indiana Jones is often a sharp punctuation to the adventure that preceded it. It’s always quick and it’s always brutal, and it’s always due to the film’s MacGuffins being used against the villain. Nazi’s melt and explode from not taking the power of the Ark seriously. A religious vengeance is wrought upon them for their evil, culture destroying ways. A cult leader falls to his death after the very magical stones he used to brainwash and torture people burn his hands. An immoral American industrialist has his vanity and greed turned against him in the most ironic way possible by aging into dust. A Soviet scientist’s single-minded pursuit of knowledge without responsibility has her eyes burned from her head.

The world of Indiana Jones shows us that history, that the things we take for granted about our past because we see power and profit in exploiting them, will be reckoned with if disrespected – and that reckoning won’t be pretty. Dark stuff, indeed.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading