Connect with us

Editorials

Viral Violence: 6 of the Strangest Infection Horror Films

Published

on

Eco Horror Movies The Ruins
Pictured: 'The Ruins'

Infectious disease has been a concern of humankind ever since we first began cooperating in large settlements, so it makes sense that this horrific fact of life has also become the basis for many of our scary stories. And while COVID and the Black Plague are scary enough on their own, some stories rely on much stranger (and often absurd) diseases in order to terrify audiences – especially when horror movies are concerned.

And with so many viral scares out there, we’ve decided to come up with a list recommending six of the strangest infection horror flicks for your viewing pleasure. After all, it might do horror fans some good to remember that things could still have been much worse after living through a very real pandemic.

Naturally, the films on this list aren’t the only strange viral horror flicks out there, so don’t forget to comment below with your own favorites if you think we missed a particularly weird one.

And while it’s not included on the list, I’d also recommend checking out the apocalyptic rat plague of Jim Mickle’s Mulberry Street, another oddball infection film that deserves some love.

Now, onto the list…


6. Blindness (2008)

Based on José Saramago’s critically acclaimed book of the same name, Blindness tells the story of a mysterious “white sickness” that spreads across the globe and renders its victims blind. Naturally, chaos ensues as society must learn to deal with the new status quo as governments are revealed to be incompetent and humanity’s worst instincts prevail.

While Saramago’s provocative novel is still the superior version of this story, the stellar cast (featuring the likes of Julianne Moore and Mark Ruffalo) and some surprisingly impressive production value make this a must-watch thriller for fans of apocalyptic fiction.


5. The Ruins (2007)

Another book adaptation, Carter Smith’s The Ruins is an underrated little splatter flick where the infection isn’t actually a disease, but instead a mysterious breed of carnivorous vine that consumes and spreads through human flesh. Following of a group of tourists who become trapped in the titular ruins of a Mayan temple as they slowly succumb to infection, this is a particularly gnarly example of a vacation gone horribly wrong.

While The Ruins is one of the most disturbing movies on this list, with scenes verging on so-called “torture porn” as the main characters suffer through intense body horror and impromptu amputations, it’s also impeccably directed and features some great performances from the likes of Shawn Ashmore and Jena Malone. Just be sure to pick up the unrated version for a slightly more interesting ending…


4. Black Sheep (2006)

Did you know that there are more sheep than people living in New Zealand? Writer and director Jonathan King certainly does, as this simple fact is the inspiration for his oddball horror comedy Black Sheep, which pits a group of locals against genetically engineered mutton that can transform human beings into cannibalistic sheep-zombies through a mere bite.

Featuring a laugh-out-loud script and absurdly entertaining practical effects (courtesy of New Zealand’s own Weta Workshop), Black Sheep is an insanely creative subversion of tried-and-true zombie tropes and one hell of a good time. That being said, you’ll likely never look at a wool sweater the same way again after watching this one.


3. Shivers (1975)

Shivers

The film that introduced David Cronenberg to mainstream audiences is also one of his best, with Shivers encapsulating nearly all of the fleshy shenanigans that the Canadian director is now infamous for. Telling the story of an isolated high-end apartment complex under siege by a parasitic disease that removes its victims’ inhibitions, the movie can basically be described as a zombie flick where the infected are after sex instead of brains.

While it’s often deeply unsettling and features quite a bit of disturbing imagery, Shivers also has a surprisingly effective sense of humor and feels like a glorious time capsule from an age when even the most bonkers stories still had a chance of connecting with the general public if they were thrilling enough.


2. Pontypool (2008)

A zombie film unlike anything you’ve ever seen (or heard) before, Bruce McDonald’s Pontypool is a unique single-location thriller about a very different kind of apocalyptic infection. Taking place in a small Ontarian town, the film follows a language-based virus that turns its victims into cannibalistic killers upon hearing a certain string of words. Naturally, society begins to collapse as a radio host becomes torn between keeping his audience informed and not wanting to spread the verbal infection even further.

Featuring a clever script with plenty of apocalyptic thrills, what really makes Pontypool tick is a career-best performance from the legendary Stephen McHattie, who grounds this horrific parable with a relatable protagonist and makes us truly fear for the future of mankind – or at the very least Canada.


1. Splinter (2007)

Boasting some of the most effective body-horror ever put on film, Toby Wilkins’ Splinter is an unconventional monster movie about a mysterious fungus that takes control of its victims’ bodies while they’re still aware enough to feel it. While the action here is mostly contained to the area surrounding an isolated gas station, Wilkins extracts so much tension out of this small-scale infection that audiences will soon be worried about the fate of the world if this thing manages to reach a larger population.

A quick and dirty romp that doesn’t outstay its welcome, Splinter also benefits from gruesome special effects courtesy of practical puppetry and nimble stunt-people working together to create monsters out of the re-animated bodies of the infected. Hell, this flick made fungi terrifying years before The Last of Us introduced us to mutated cordyceps.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading