Connect with us

Editorials

11 of the Weirdest, Wackiest Settings in Shark Horror Movies

Published

on

Shark horror movies - Sharks of the corn

Steven Spielberg’s Jaws left an indelible mark on cinema upon release in 1975, ushering in the summer blockbuster as we know it. Like its many taglines, Jaws also made people afraid to go into the water thanks to a newfound fear of man-eating sharks. And the film’s massive box office success created a tsunami of copycats, launching the “sharksploitation” subgenre.

But emulating Jaws only goes so far, and the subgenre has been forced to constantly find inventive new ways to reimagine the shark horror movie. One surefire but cheeky way to stand out from an increasingly crowded subgenre is to add novelty to the concept, often by altering the setting. If people are too afraid to go into the water, the shark should go to the people.

Luckily, there’s no shortage of weird, wacky settings that dramatically alter the formula…

Here are eleven of the most outrageous settings in shark horror movies. 


Jaws 3D – A Trip to SeaWorld

Jaws 3D

The third entry in the Jaws franchise attempts to shake things up by leaving Amity beaches behind to relocate to SeaWorld in Florida. There, Martin Brody (Dennis Quaid) finds himself contending with a shark mother and pup that have invaded the water parks and begun feasting upon employees, water skiers, and more. In keeping with the SeaWorld theme, Jaws 3D even incorporates dolphins that frequently save the protagonists from becoming chum. Not even the 3D gimmick could save this entry, though, and the subsequent installment returned to more familiar beaches.


Shark Night 3D – Lake Party Crashing

Shark Night 3D

A weekend getaway on the lake among college friends turns into an aquatic nightmare when they discover the hard way that sharks have infiltrated. Shark Night also employed 3D upon initial release, and much like Jaws 3D, it’s not so far-fetched in setting. What makes this shark slasher feature so unusual in its environment is the sheer variety of sharks collected in a Louisiana lake. Great whites, hammerheads, and even deep sea cookiecutter sharks are among the predators culling the college kids’ numbers.


47 Meters Down: Uncaged – Enclosed Cave System

47 Meters Down Uncaged Shark Horror Movies

Johannes Roberts’s 47 Meters Down trapped a pair of sisters on the ocean floor thanks to a faulty diving cage. For the sequel, Roberts takes it much further by trapping friends in a submerged Mayan city. That doesn’t sound all that strange on paper, but the sharks that stalk and prey upon the divers have lived so long within the cave system, isolated from the open water, that they’ve evolved to the darkness. Roberts demonstrates the sequel’s off-kilter, cheeky tone with a screaming fish that incites the cave entrance’s collapse, dooming the divers to a harrowing fight for survival. Yes, screaming fish and blind cave-dwelling sharks.


Sand Sharks – Get It? They’re Land Sharks.

Sand Sharks

Thanks to Jaws, the image of a shark’s dorsal fin cutting through the water as it barrels toward prey evokes fear. If you wondered what that’d look like on land, fear not; Sand Sharks evolves its predators to chase down humans on sandy beaches and beyond. That’s terrible news for the locals!


House Shark – A Shark House Party

House Shark

The tagline, an unmistakable riff on Jaws, says it all: “You’re going to need a bigger house!” An ex-cop seeks the aid of a shark expert and a real estate agent, and a hungry shark invades his home. The “what if Jaws, but indoors” concept serves as the silliest possible parody of Spielberg’s classic; there’s no pretense here. Just a trio of fools versus a crudely made shark terrorizing a house, complete with lowbrow humor. You’ll know whether it’s for you within minutes.


Bait 3D – Supermarket Siege

Bait 3D Shark Horror Movies

If there’s a secondary recurring theme on this list beyond the continued break from scientific reality, it’s the employment of 3D to enhance the over-the-top shark mayhem. In Bait 3D, sharks get trapped in a crowded grocery store mid-robbery, thanks to a tsunami. In other words, the eclectic group of characters must overcome palpable tension and put aside their mistrust to find a way out of the flooded supermarket and evade getting eaten. Bait 3D really leans into its setting, delivering fun set pieces from the tops of grocery store shelves to crumbling parking garages.


Sharknado – You Guessed It. Tornadoes.

Sharks in sky in Sharknado 2

The Syfy feature that launched a franchise saw a freak tornado strike Los Angeles, scooping up a plethora of sharks to terrorize the city. When you’re too afraid to enter the water, the tornados will happily bring the man-eating sharks to you. The original 2013 film surprisingly bides its time delivering on its title, setting up the characters and the meteorological events that lead to the shark-filled “sharknados.” Don’t worry; the franchise’s six installments ensure no shortage of sharks chomping down from the sky. It gets more outlandish as the franchise continues.


Avalanche Sharks – Ski Resort Invasion

Avalanche sharks - shark horror movies set in snow

Forget the ocean; Avalanche Sharks transports the aquatic predators to the Canadian mountains. Snow is just frozen water crystals, after all, right? This sharksploitation feature takes Sharknado’s concept and runs with it, with a ski resort under siege by a snowy avalanche of angry sharks. Logic be damned, but at least you can see what happens when sharks meet snow.


Sharks of the Corn – Not Even Cornfields Are Safe.

Sharks of the corn Shark Horror Movies

When countless sharksploitation entries ape Steven Spielberg’s classic, this one switches gears entirely by borrowing a page from Stephen King. Strange things are happening in Druid Hills, Kentucky. Or rather, strange things are happening within the cornfields. Instead of “He Who Walks Behind the Rows” inspiring children to commit murder, the body count here comes from a killer shark. Naturally.


Shark Side of the Moon – In Space, No One Can Hear You Scream.

Shark side of the moon - shark horror movies in space

Russian scientists create humanoid-shark supersoldiers that escape the lab and then get sent to the moon in the appropriately titled Shark Side of the Moon. Cut to forty years later, when an American space mission to the moon leads to the discovery that the sharks have advanced. Thus, killer sharks make their way to space. While they’re more humanoid than typical shark horror, reality holds no meaning in this subgenre, so it all counts.


Ghost Shark – Ghost Shark Is EVERYWHERE.

Ghost shark Shark Horror Movies

Sharks seeking revenge is old news. What about a shark seeking revenge posthumously as a ghost? Ghost Shark doesn’t even require much to enact vengeance; any tiny amount of water will do. Car wash buckets, swimming pools, slip and slides, water coolers, fire hydrants, drains, and more become feeding grounds for this outrageous movie monster. Ghost Shark has no trouble coming up with the most unpredictable, outlandish deaths that leave you guffawing while shaking your head.

Horror journalist, RT Top Critic, and Critics Choice Association member. Co-Host of the Bloody Disgusting Podcast. Has appeared on PBS series' Monstrum, served on the SXSW Midnighter shorts jury, and moderated horror panels for WonderCon and SeriesFest.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading