Connect with us

Editorials

‘Halloween H20’ 25 Years Later: Why the 1998 Film Remains One of the All-Time Great Legacy Sequels

Published

on

Halloween H20 Steelbook
Pictured: 'Halloween H20' 4K SteelBook Artwork

The best legacy sequels concern themselves with the weight of the decades that have passed and the long-term effects of the events separated by the gulf of time between entries. While these stories occur across the wide spectrum of entertainment, the horror genre is uniquely positioned to explore such follow ups. After all, just as years affect a life, so too does the horrors of one blood-soaked Halloween night.

Long before Halloween (2018) brought Jamie Lee Curtis back into the fold as Laurie Strode in an effort to explore her deeply repressed trauma, Halloween H20 (1998) set out to accomplish just that. Itself twenty years removed from John Carpenter’s original Halloween (1978), Halloween H20 is one of the most successful films of its kind and a high point for the franchise, providing emotional depth and a satisfying conclusion to Laurie Strode’s narrative. It may have hit theaters in early August, but its chilly, fall atmosphere is undeniable, emerging as the perfect slasher pallet setter as the seasons change and October approaches.

Halloween H20 began life as a direct-to-video sequel to Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Myers (1995). At the time, a cloud of fatigue had settled around the Halloween franchise. While Halloween 6 had performed favorably at the box office, it had been a troubled production that led to a convoluted and murky narrative spanning multiple cuts of the film that left fans and casual viewers alike scratching their heads. Somewhere along the line, the simple days of the Shape stalking its prey had given way to psychic connections and celestial curses, causing producers to seek a fresh start.

At the same time, Jamie Lee Curtis was reflecting on her role in Halloween, marinating on the past twenty years and growing ever more interested in seeing the repercussions of the first film’s events play out in almost real time. She contacted director John Carpenter and producer Debra Hill, hoping to gain their involvement, ready to finally return to the role that first introduced her to the big screen.

As production loomed closer, Carpenter and Hill dropped out and experienced genre director Steve Miner stepped in. Screenwriter Robert Zappia had already been hired to write Halloween 7 when Jamie Lee Curtis came on board. His original script about an all girls prep school and a Michael Myers copycat killer was reworked into Halloween H20, with Scream (1996) scribe Kevin Williamson brought in for rewrites. Jamie Lee Curtis’ only demand was that the film end with the destruction of Michael Myers, that Laurie Strode’s conclusion would arrive with the catharsis of finally facing and defeating her trauma in the literal form of the white masked Shape.

At the last moment, however, the creative team was informed that, by contract, Michael Myers could not be killed. The producers insisted that the evil live on so that it might live to stalk future sequels. A deal-breaker for Jamie Lee Curtis, the production almost came to a screeching halt before the creators and the producers finally agreed on an ending that satisfied both fronts. Laurie would believe she was killing and defeating Michael, even if a subsequent entry claimed she hadn’t. While she was obligated to cameo in a sequel, Jamie Lee Curtis was satisfied in knowing that Halloween H20 would serve as a true ending in her eyes and, hopefully, the viewer’s.

Halloween H20 jamie lee

With cinematography by Daryn Okada (Phantasm 2 (1988)) and Steve Miner’s focused vision, Halloween H20 embodies a classical feel. From its opening moments, the film appears to work side by side with the first two installments in the franchise, evoking the taut simplicity of the series’ hallowed roots.

The quaint suburban streets that line its opening moments seem to almost be hiding under the shade of its overbearing trees as the people there lead public but private existences, crafting the perfect, familiar place to reintroduce Nancy Stephens as nurse Marion Chambers. Providing thoughtful connective tissue between entries, Stephens’ reserved performance juxtaposes well against the stereotypical cold open of a modern day slasher flick, offering something for both newcomers and returning devotees to latch onto right away.

As the opening credits begin and John Ottman’s orchestral version of John Carpenter’s original iconic theme resounds over newspaper clippings, drawings of Myers and a newly recorded Dr. Loomis voiceover by the talented Tom Kane, the movie envelopes the viewer into all things Halloween. Accomplished editor Patrick Lussier builds this sequence as he does the film: with care, attention to detail and a dedication to unflinching atmosphere.

The story finds Laurie Strode as the headmistress of Hillcrest Academy, operating under the pseudonym Keri Tate. Despite the presence of her teenage son John, played with the proper amount of youthful angst and mischievousness by Josh Hartnett, and her romantic relationship with the school’s guidance counselor Will, eloquently portrayed by Adam Arkin, she suffers from night terrors and crippling anxiety. The damage that was inflicted upon her as a high schooler has only hardened and seeped ever deeper into her soul, resulting in self-medication and an inability to trust in any foreseeable future.

Jamie Lee Curtis brings pathos to the role that can only come from decades of life lived, applying a deep emotionality and sense of forced control to the character’s actions that elevates every second that she’s featured onscreen. From small, distracted looks as she falls into Will’s embrace to hastily gulping down wine while her partner visits the restroom so she might secretly imbibe just one more glass, Laurie’s hidden pain is made visible for the viewer to witness and feel.

The film moves at a speedy pace, guided by Steve Miner’s watchful hand, employing careful measures to invoke fear, scares and its consistent level of ever mounting tension. He emulates the sense of being watched that Carpenter’s original exuded so strongly, placing Myers’ visage into reflections and moving him in and out of peripheral shots and glances as Laurie attempts to navigate the day to day life of someone who sees her abuser everywhere she goes.

ranking scream imitators

The school is quickly emptied out due to an annual Halloween camping trip to Yosemite, leaving behind John and three of his companions: his girlfriend Molly, in an impressive turn by Michelle Williams, and his friends Charlie and Sarah, played respectively by Adam Hann-Byrd and Jodi Lyn O’Keefe. The group sets to work hosting a secret Halloween party in the school, gathering food, decor and liquor. The backdrop of the exodus of excited students from their place of learning and the empty stretches of the school left in their wake evokes a sense of summer amidst the fall foliage, allowing the film to operate as a seasonal bridge of a slasher flick unique amongst its franchise number.

Filling out the cast is LL Cool J’s Ronny Jones, a quirky guard who tends to a gatehouse at the school’s main entryway. Spending his free time on his budding romance novel career, Ronny is one of the more memorable supporting characters in a slasher movie this side of the 1980’s, offering both levity and someone to root for when Michael Myers comes to call. As if that weren’t enough, the film also brings in Jamie Lee Curtis’ mother Janet Leigh in a cameo performance as Keri Tate’s secretary, equipping her with the same vehicle and musical stinger that she had in Psycho (1960).

Myers’ attacks on the school begin as Laurie finally reveals her true identity to her lover Will. Instead of immediately focusing on the raucous attacks that Myers will assuredly usher forth on the unsuspecting teenagers, the film spends time on Laurie’s confession. She reveals herself in a show of vulnerability uncharacteristic of the Laurie we’ve gotten to be reacquainted with, providing her the chance to speak her truth, own her trauma and take a step forward in finally putting it to some kind of rest.

The death scenes and kills are handled with practicality and simplicity, rarely relying on anything but a little blood, precision staging and performance to sell the impact. Scenes of Charlie sticking his hand into a garbage disposal and an unnamed mother opening a dark doorway to a deserted rest stop play with viewer expectations but rarely deliver the horrors they imply. Instead, the scenes carry through to an unexpected moment of terror that surprises rather than delivers the conventional, creating opportunities for standout set pieces in place of unyielding jump scares— although there are plenty of those too.

Still, the film is not without the grotesque trappings of its infamous genre. Sarah’s death shocks and disturbs, with her leg being crushed and nearly severed by a falling dumbwaiter. Later, her body is discovered hoisted up and attached to a ceiling light in a ritualistic fashion only Michael Myers would think to display.

Halloween H20 mask

The biggest distraction with the practical look of the film comes in the way of Michael Myers’ mask. A contentious issue during production, four masks appear on screen during the course of the film. From the original KNB mask that was created for the film to a mask by John Carl Buechler molded from the Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Myers design, there are sequences where the mask changes from shot to shot. Even a CGI created mask appears in one unfortunate scene. The final incarnation was a mask designed by none other than Stan Winston and can be seen throughout most of the film due to studio mandated reshoots, but even this mask is often criticized for making Myers’ eyes clearly visible, his face too thin and his hair too messy.

It wasn’t just the mask that the various creators involved disagreed on, but the score as well. John Ottman’s original score was large, orchestrated and seemed designed for a different film. While some of the music was able to be salvaged for the final picture (the opening credits sequence, for example), much of the movie was rescored by composer Marco Beltrami in an effort to be less elaborate and more complimentary to the happenings on screen.

The climax of the film unfolds quickly. After a brilliant moment of pure tension where John and Molly find themselves caught between two gates as Myers slashes at them while they fumble with their keys, Laurie and Michael come face to face for the first time by way of a small, circular window. Terror, pain and acceptance actualize on Laurie’s face and the film begins its tread toward its inevitable conclusion. Characters are whittled down as Ronny is incapacitated, Will perishes and John and Molly are sent driving down the road for help. Finally all that’s left is Laurie and Michael.

Isolated in the grounds of the school, Laurie grabs an axe and makes her way up the drive, shouting for Michael; hollering into the Halloween night’s starlit sky for the one who has haunted her for the past twenty years. No longer a victim, Laurie is on the prowl. The line between predator and prey is gone.

This entire sequence, from the way it is staged, shot and lit to the manner in which Jamie Lee Curtis carries it out, is not only one of the best in the whole of the Halloween franchise, but one of the best in slasher history. It’s a moment that is served by the distance of time that has passed since the 1978 original and a testament to how and why legacy sequels should work.

What ensues is a relentless battle between Laurie and Michael that transcends their physical interactions. A reckoning of the damage that Michael has inflicted on Laurie’s world and her stance that he will no longer be a specter haunting her every conscious and unconscious moment. The staging and composition of scares and action remains impressive, as Michael slowly lowers himself from a pipe against the ceiling and eventually flips table after table in a dining hall while searching for Laurie. Even after she defeats him and his demise is fortified by the authorities, she still cannot rest. She must ensure that her demon is destroyed. She must reclaim her life.

Halloween H20 ending

The story concludes with a bombastic battle involving an upturned ambulance, an axe and the beheading of Michael Myers. In the film’s final moments, Laurie looks down upon the man who has so relentlessly damaged her body, her mind and her world. She observes as he reaches out to her, even reaching back, considering his lost humanity. Her emotions run free and wild before hardening once more and she swings her weapon down, ridding herself of her monster so that she might finally begin to heal.

Halloween H20 released to financial success and was regarded by many as being one of the best sequels the franchise had generated up to that point. Viewed as both a cathartic way of returning to her first big screen role and a “thank you” to those genre lovers who were there when Jamie Lee Curtis’ impressive career first began, the film is elevated by an astounding performance from one of the screen’s most talented players. Regardless of what followed, H20 offered a conclusion to the legacy of John Carpenter’s seminal classic and a fascinating examination of the lifelong effects that such onscreen atrocities might have were they explored beyond the confines of any given slasher film’s runtime.

In the years that have passed since Halloween H20, many films have attempted to emulate its lofty aims. More than once even the Halloween series has sought to uncover the results of festering trauma with Rob Zombie’s Halloween 2 (2009) and David Gordon Green’s own Halloween trilogy that began in 2018. The legacy sequel has evolved from franchise anomaly to IP rite of passage, inspiring sequels, remakes, spin-offs and reinvigorating abandoned properties just as they did when Halloween H20 was in production, the cycle forever feeding into itself. For, as the success of Halloween (2018) inspired Scream (2022), so did the success of Scream and its initial interrogation of the slasher subgenre once pave the way for Halloween H20.

A lifetime passed between Halloween and Halloween H20. An entire generation. Then another twenty years between H20 and 2018’s Halloween. There’s a desire to look back while looking forward when it comes to ourselves and the things we love. Nostalgia culture, legacy sequels, in-canon reboots— call it what you like. Some work, others don’t. What’s consistent amongst the ones that do is a willingness to acknowledge, own and grow, to build off of the events of the past and find conclusiveness in facing that legacy head on and putting it to bed. In some ways, the best of these are the antithesis of such continuations, concluding a story rather than opening a door to endless more entries.

Halloween H20 was a pioneer in that respect. Its interest and aim was not in the future of the franchise, rather in reflecting on what the legacy of that franchise had become and what it still could be. A perfect blast of autumnal atmosphere released in the thick of summer, transitioning the lush brightness of a hot August day to the crisp cool air of a shady October night, Halloween H20 accomplished what it set out to and set the stage for what a legacy sequel could and should be, not just for the franchise, but for the genre.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading