Connect with us

Editorials

Shirley Jackson’s ‘The Lottery’ – Digging Up the 1996 TV Adaptation Starring Keri Russell

Published

on

lottery

When The New Yorker first published Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” in June of 1948, the short story was met with confusion and disgust. To this day, apparently the magazine still hasn’t received that much mail over a work of fiction. Regardless of those early negative reviews, though, this shock tale has since gone on to become ingrained in the public consciousness. Everyone remembers their immediate reaction upon reading about a deceptively quaint village where the locals conduct the most heinous ritual every year.

Despite its widespread recognition, “The Lottery” has received only a few screen adaptations over the years. The earliest was in Cameo Theatre, a long lost 1950s anthology series notable for its minimalistic production design. Then there was Larry Yust’s ‘69 short-film; this piece of kindertrauma captures the source material’s unmatched ability to go from casual to ghastly in mere seconds.

In addition to direct adaptations are those looser ones that occasionally crop up from time to time. These include the notable South Park episode “Britney’s New Look” and Mary Harron’s contribution to the short-lived anthology show Fear Itself. The former uses Jackson’s story to contextualize the magnitude of mistreatment experienced by Britney Spears; the belittled pop singer is sacrificed so as to ensure a prosperous harvest. In Fear Itself’s interpretation called “Community,” “The Lottery” is spiritually referenced when two hapless urbanites suffer the insidious evils of a gated development.

Falling somewhere between all these straightforward and less exact adaptations is a telefilm from ‘96. The Lottery first aired as part of the Sunday night programming for NBC, where it went up against the two other big networks’ own TV-movies: ABC’s period piece A Loss of Innocence and CBS’ story of sink-or-swim paternity, The Bachelor’s Baby. Of the three, The Lottery placed second in viewership. It’s safe to say, audiences back then primarily tuned in because of the movie’s familiar inspiration rather than for its cast, which included the up-and-coming Keri Russell and former MTV Sports host Dan Cortese. Also among the ensemble is Veronica Cartwright, William Daniels, Stephen Root and Sean Murray.

The foremost challenge for anyone adapting “The Lottery” as a long feature is the length. After all, the original story benefits from its brevity. Meanwhile, director Daniel Sackheim and late screenwriter Anthony Spinner stretched Jackson’s concept into a more standard mystery. As opposed to focusing solely on the village and its residents, though, this version adds an outsider to the mix. Dan Cortese plays Jason Smith, a grieving son whose father’s dying wish is to have his ashes spread over his wife’s grave. Doing so would entail Jason leaving the big city for his parents’ hometown, a place he himself left at a young age with no recollection of the area’s atrocious local custom. His own memory is indeed fuzzy, otherwise he would remember why his father moved away in the first place.

Jackson was vague about the setting for her short story; a definite location is never provided. This forces readers to use their imagination rather than be confined by concrete details that come with preconceived notions. Spinner’s script, however, brings the protagonist to a named destination: New Hope, Maine. For plenty of people, a New England locale isn’t that far off from what they envisioned as they read the story. The concept of superficial tranquility marred by a dark undercurrent is stereotypical of stories set in that American region. The unfortunate history of New England lives on long after the fact, and The Lottery profits from that reality.

Something Jackson was explicit about is the date of The Lottery: June 27. And that specific date nags at Jason during his journey. After his car breaks down in New Hope, and he encounters red tape regarding his father’s deathbed request, Jason then becomes fixated on the fact that so many people there died on June 27. Including his mother at the age of twenty-four. A good many viewers already know what lies ahead for Cortese’s character as he falls deeper down the rabbit hole, but the telefilm’s rising action is well conducted, albeit slow in pace. Even those lucky folks with no idea of what’s to come still sense something bad is in store for Jason as the ominous date in question comes closer into view.

lottery

Image: Keri Russell as Felice Dunbar.

Keri Russell, whose breakthrough role in the college drama Felicity was only two years away at that point, plays a crucial but difficult role in The Lottery. Popular school teacher Felice Dunbar is unlike other New Hopers, who are more standoffish than usual. No, she greets Jason with a warm smile that hides an unpleasant secret. Having grown up in New Hope, Felice naturally believes The Lottery serves a good purpose, but meeting Jason makes her question everything. And for a minute, it would seem Russell’s character is capable of shaking off years worth of indoctrination.

What makes Felice relatable for some people (and uncomfortably so) is hers and others’ glaring sense of conformity. Felice’s kindness toward Jason, along with her background in education, would suggest she is different and has a more advanced moral compass than her peers. Unfortunately, Felice is no different from those too afraid to think and act differently when something is as unambiguously wrong as The Lottery. Her surrendering to this harmful tradition is heartbreaking when seen through Jason’s eyes.

While Jackson ended things with the latest Lottery recipient collecting their “prize,” this adaptation goes beyond that point. The entire production has done an admirable, if not unnecessary job of filling in the gaps of Jackson’s story. As a depressing farewell gift to the viewers, Spinner’s screenplay confirms the obvious: The Lottery will never stop. Now, this isn’t the type of closure one would normally expect to find in a movie-of-the-week. Surely it would have been easier to have Felice not pick up a stone and instead leave New Hope. The original story loses something in its translation to the small screen, yet the movie at least refuses to sanitize itself in the end.

Seventy-five years later, Shirley Jackson’s story remains timeless and relevant. “The Lottery” illustrates the dangers of herd mentality and complacency, and it asks people to question the bad systems in place. This TV treatment doesn’t omit those same important lessons, although the overlong mystery leading up to the climax is admittedly of less interest. Still and all, there are strong performances here, and the movie’s centerpiece is disturbing and hard to watch even by today’s standards.

lottery

Image: Poster for The Lottery

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading