Connect with us

Editorials

‘Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings’ at 30: Fun Sequel Delivers Halloween Atmosphere and Gory Kills

Published

on

Don’t ever assault a possible witch, light her house on fire, dig up her Pet Semetary backyard and use the vial of blood you found next to her book of the dead to resurrect the town monster, K? Equally, don’t ever watch Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings right after watching the original Pumpkinhead. It’s not meant to happen that way.

Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings forgoes the typical sequel that actually tries to live up to its predecessor and goes straight for the fourth-to-seventh sequel package. It does not pass go nor collect $200 but rather heads straight to video and parks its barely running, smoke engulfed 1993 Ford truck on Camp Avenue. Many hate it for that reason. I understand.

I also happen to enjoy the ever lovin’ shit out of it.

While Stan Winston’s Pumpkinhead featured amazing practical effects and an original monster that was frightening as hell, it also featured an amazing acting performance from Lance Henriksen and a heart wrenching and emotional story that added its own forever stamp on the legacy of horror. 1993’s Blood Wings stops at amazing practical FX and a monster that looks really cool with a strobe light behind it. Then, it rips all the other shit out and replaces it with slasher camp. I can totally understand why people were upset. Pumpkinhead definitely deserved a serious attempt at a sequel. But if you can be willing to forgive and forget? Blood Wings can be one of the most entertaining slasher monster parties around.

I truly believe that had the original Pumpkinhead never existed, Blood Wings would be a beloved cult hit. Maybe I just have bad taste, but allow me to explain why I feel that way…


Halloween Atmosphere in the Holler

One of the things that makes Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers so beloved to me – despite Michael’s shoulder pads and constantly surprised looking mask – is the unrivaled Halloween atmosphere. Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings looks as if it were made in the exact same universe. Though the holiday is barely mentioned (if at all, despite a glass pumpkin breaking outside a barn), the entire screen is dripping in Halloween atmosphere.

Ferren Woods could easily be amongst the backroads to an even smaller town connecting to Haddonfield. They even have a country militia carrying rifles and driving around on the beds of trucks for God’s sake! And when Pumpkinhead shows up in all his glory it is truly something to inject straight into your veins on a dark October night. It may not be an A24 and a glass of wine kind of night, but it sure goes down smooth with a Busch Light and a laugh.


A Cast That Compliments The Mood

Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings features a cast that includes everyone from Kane Hodder (as a chicken fighter manager who has sex with his sister) to Bill Clinton’s brother Roger Clinton (as the perm-headed town mayor who wants to kill Pumpkinhead and use him to attract tourists). Punky Brewster herself, Soleil Moon Frye (as a troubled youth into the supernatural) is in the mix as well, and then there’s the new town Sheriff, played by Hellraiser’s Andrew Robinson. Almost every cast member otherwise has some sort of classic connection to horror, from Texas Chainsaw Massacre III to Return of the Living Dead III.

You see this kind of thing from time to time in certain low budget flicks and unfortunately more often than not, the cast members deserved better. Sure, Pumpkinhead II brings the camp as previously mentioned but does so with intent and focus. It’s not quite as subtle as Tom McLoughlin’s Jason Lives or a Sam Raimi flick (specifically the hilarious but also frightening witch possession scene), but it’s somewhere in that stratosphere. The actors here aren’t accidentally making a campy film; they are doing so on purpose and laughing along with us.


Pumpkinhead Kills

When ole’ Pumpkinhead finally shows up on screen and starts tearing limbs, it’s an absolute sight to behold. The wind flies everywhere as though an Evil Dead portal opened just outside the barn doors, the strobe light is going crazy, and there is Pumpkinhead in all his glory. The camera is un-afraid to show every inch of this glorious practical FX creation. I think he looks, excuse my French, fucking awesome.

When Pumpkinhead shows up its kind of like his theme music comes on and he’s running down a ramp to whoop some ass. It’s pure Halloween fun. Sure, there are moments where you wish they would throw some goo on him or something to make the suit a little less obvious but alas; it’s just nice to see the original movie’s incredible practical FX once again on display here. The camera also does a pretty good job of cutting away right as the mechanics of Pumpkinhead slicing, dicing and squishing heads is about to look a little silly.

Almost every death set piece in Blood Wings is fantastic. Most specifically when the local, thieving mailman with no reasonable explanation is sleeping with a lady who looks like she walked straight off the set of a Whitesnake video in his actual barn home and Pumpkinhead shows up for his vengeance. It’s a hilarious scene where he swigs a Budweiser and grabs a Marlboro Red, exclaiming “This sure as hell beats delivering the mail” as Pumpkinhead shows up and brutally massacres him. When his lady friend is found, the doctor exclaims that she’s now catatonic because she was one step short of being (as she dramatically turns to the camera) “scared to death” … and if you don’t spit out your Oktoberfest in pure fourth wall-breaking delight, then maybe this movie just isn’t for you.

Bottom line, if you want to watch a cheesy slasher movie where the FX are actually extremely impressive, the Halloween atmosphere is on an eleven and the actors are selling the shit out of a campy script? I’d recommend Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings in an instant.

Maybe it’s time to resurrect Pumpkinhead II: Blood Wings and see if it doesn’t rip your insides apart this time. Just don’t watch it right after partaking in the original. They don’t mesh.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading