Connect with us

Editorials

‘The Exorcist’ vs. ‘The Exorcist: Believer’ – Why the Original Classic Is Far More Shocking Than the Legacy Sequel

Published

on

The Exorcist Believer Review

Warning: The following contains major spoilers for The Exorcist (1971) and The Exorcist: Believer (2023).

On lists ranking the scariest movies of all time, William Friedkin’s The Exorcist invariably falls at or near the top. Faithfully adapted from the 1971 novel by William Peter Blatty, the 1973 film stunned audiences with its brutal vulgarity involving then fourteen-year-old actress Linda Blair. The story follows Chris MacNeil (Ellen Burstyn), a mother and movie star who will stop at nothing to protect her daughter Regan (Blair) from a demon called Pazuzu. Coming to her aid, Fathers Merrin (Max von Sydow) and Karras (Jason Miller) perform a dangerous exorcism and lose their lives to the unholy force. In spite (or perhaps because) of the film’s notorious reputation, The Exorcist was a massive hit with box office lines stretching around the block and waves of traumatized moviegoers streaming out after the final credits. Few films since have had such an impressive cultural impact while retaining the ability to shock and destabilize five decades later. 

Part of the film’s power lies in the horror of innocence lost as an increasingly demonic young Regan convulses on her bed. Not only does she physically assault anyone who comes near, but the possessed young girl spits some of the most upsetting lines of dialogue ever uttered by an onscreen child. David Gordon Green’s legacy sequel The Exorcist: Believer follows not one, but two young girls, Angela (Lidya Jewett) and Katherine (Olivia O’Neill), possessed by a demonic entity who may or may not have ties to Regan MacNeil. When confronted with the truth of his daughter’s condition, Angela’s father Victor Fielding (Leslie Odom Jr.) seeks out an aging Chris for help in navigating this hellish ordeal.

With twice as many victims and double the demonic power, does this result in a more shocking film? To find out, we’ll stack up Friedkin’s most infamous scenes against their counterparts in Green’s sequel in an ultimate battle to ordain the most shocking Exorcist entry of all time.


Dimmy’s Mother vs. Angela’s Birth

Both films build on the foundations of tragedy. Father Karras is a loving son trying to care for his ailing mother in Manhattan while living in Jesuit housing in Georgetown DC. Worried about her living alone, he urges her to move to an assisted living facility, but she adamantly refuses to leave her home. After a brief stay in a psychiatric ward, she passes away at home and it’s days before anyone discovers her body. Karras carries extreme guilt over abandoning his mother, compounding his already dire crisis of faith. In the midst of the exorcism, Pazuzu exploits his grief by speaking with her voice and using her image to beg for help. Even worse, it insults her memory with degrading comments and insists she’s now burning in the fires of hell.

Green’s film begins with tragedy on a larger scale. While vacationing in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Victor and his very pregnant wife become caught in the devastating earthquake of 2010. Trying to escape her hotel room, she falls in the collapsing stairwell and Victor must choose between treatment for her injuries or the safe delivery of their unborn child. Catching up with the single father thirteen years later, we’re led to believe he chose the life of his child. However, during the exorcism, the demon reveals that he actually instructed doctors to prioritize his wife’s health, a choice he’s tried to keep secret for thirteen years. The demon also exploits this decision, asking him to once again choose between his daughter’s life and the life of another. 

WINNER: The Exorcist: Believer

Though the death of a parent and the accompanying grief is always horrifying, Green’s earthquake is a nightmare brought to life. Not only must Victor face a devastating choice, but this opening scene is a recreation of a real disaster that affected an estimated 3 million people taking with it more than 100,000 lives.  


Medical Exams Showdown

One of the most harrowing scenes in Friedkin’s original film involves Chris’s desperate attempts to help her daughter. As an A-list star, she has the resources to consult with a team of doctors and exhaust every treatment in order to find a cure for Regan’s condition. Unfortunately this means submitting Regan to a battery of painful tests including spinal taps and angiographic imaging. Cutting edge technology by 70s standards, these tests feel brutal and barbaric today. One procedure involves inserting a heavy needle into Regan’s neck, causing blood to spurt out across her body. With her head stabilized and a doctor pumping fluid into her artery, Regan winces in pain as the lights dim and machines bang just inches from her face. Even more upsetting, these tests reveal absolutely nothing. She has been put through medical hell and comes out the other side with more questions than answers. 

After disappearing for three days, Angela and Katherine emerge from the woods disheveled and confused. The authorities waste no time bringing them to the local hospital in hopes of finding out where they’ve been and what they’ve survived. The two girls endure multiple tests of their own including swabs, stitches, exams, and X-rays culminating with a procedure commonly known as a rape kit. Fortunately this invasive exam reveals no signs of sexual assault in either girl, but watching them suffer through the painful ordeal feels horrific in and of itself. 

WINNER: The Exorcist

Angela and Katherine endure a humiliating day of invasive tests, but luckily they’re surrounded by their parents and professionals trained to make the experience as painless as possible. These compassionate caregivers stand in sharp contrast to the masked doctor who tells Regan she’s going to feel “some pressure” then proceeds to cut into her neck. She suffers through this horrific arteriogram surrounded by strangers with her mother watching from behind a pane of glass. Anecdotal evidence from the film’s premieres reveal this scene to have caused the most visceral reactions, made all the more upsetting by its unflinching accuracy.  


Faces Lurking in the Shadows

The demonic forces mostly exert their unholy influence through their chosen hosts, but they also project evil energy out into the larger environment. Chris hears suspicious noises coming from the attic and a crucifix appears in Regan’s bedroom without explanation. In a 2000 restoration subtitled The Version You’ve Never Seen, Friedkin added imagery from an unused makeup test to hint at this demonic oppression and amplify an already terrifying scene. As Chris enters the kitchen to answer a ringing phone, the overhead lights flash on and off intermittently plunging the room into darkness. Standing next to the oven’s hood, Chris peers into the next room as a demonic face appears just inches away. Gone in an instant, this subliminal imagery provides a terrifying reminder that no one is safe in the MacNeil household. 

Arriving home from the hospital, Victor tries to make Angela as comfortable as possible. He tucks her into bed and gently reminds her that he will always love her no matter what. While asking again what happened over the three days she was missing, a devilish face appears in the room just behind his own. It’s unclear whether Angela sees or recognizes this apparition, but it’s presence shows that not only has the Fielding house been infiltrated by a demonic force, but it will stop at nothing to corrupt the bond between Victor and his daughter.  

WINNER: The Exorcist

Friedkin originally deemed these images “too theatrical” and removed them from the film’s original cut. However, by peppering them into the 2000 rerelease, he adds an ominous presence to a film we didn’t think could shock us more than it already has. Green’s addition of a horrific face in Angela’s room may be jarring, but it disappears so quickly that it’s possible to miss it altogether. 


Spider Walk vs. Bedroom Brawl

Friedkin’s film horrified audiences with its theatrical cut, but several infamous sequences were left on the cutting room floor. Dubbed the spider walk, one notorious scene tantalized genre fans for decades before finally premiering in the film’s 2000 rerelease. Just moments after learning about the death of her director and friend, Chris turns toward a mysterious sound. Regan is scuttling down the stairs like a hideous spider, her body bent into a horrifying backbend. At the foot of the stairs, she flips over and chases her mother and Sharon (Kitty Winn), the nanny, while flicking her tongue into the air like a hellish lizard. 

Though Angela has been cleared by her doctors, she returns home dazed and out of sorts. Victor wakes her up the next morning and notices that his daughter has reverted to infantile habits and wet the bed. While the confused father prepares a bath and strips the sheets, Angela creeps up behind him and attacks. She slams his head into the bedframe and viciously knocks him to the floor. Not only is this a violent mockery of a family game, but Victor can no longer pretend there isn’t something seriously wrong with his daughter.

WINNER: The Exorcist

This one is no contest. There’s a reason the spider walk sequence was cut from Friedkin’s original release. It’s still jarring to watch this little girl patter backward down the stairs leading with her upside down head and the sinister grin on her face makes it all the more frightening. While Angela’s attack could ultimately be chalked up to an accident or PTSD, there’s no doubt that something evil is going on in the MacNeil home. 


In Restraints vs. In the Hospital

Before Pazuzu takes possession of Regan’s body, it makes its presence known in horrifying ways. After a disturbing incident at Chris’s cocktail party, Regan begins screaming and calls to her mother through the bedroom door. Chris bursts into the room to see the entire bed violently shaking, seemingly moved by unseen hands. Later scenes show Pazuzu tossing Regan’s body around the room and causing her to harm anyone who gets too close. She convulses back and forth, strikes visitors, and injures herself before they finally manage to sedate and restrain her. For the rest of the film, Regan appears strapped into a heavily padded bed, only freed as she levitates during the deadly exorcism. 

After Angela’s violent attack, Victor arranges for her to stay in a psychiatric ward until he can find some answers. As a single father struggling to make ends meet, he can’t afford to miss work to care for his daughter round the clock. Having enlisted Chris’s help to save his daughter, the two distraught parents visit Angela’s room and observe her from behind protective glass. The young girl growls at them from under the bed and scratches Regan’s name deep into the door’s wooden paneling. 

WINNER: The Exorcist

Another easy contest, the sight of Regan wildly thrashing back and forth in bed is both heartbreaking and frightening. Achieved through practical effects, a malfunctioning harness caused a painful fracture to Blair’s lower spine, footage that made its way into the final cut of the film. While the implication that the demon has been laying in wait feels ominous, Angela’s sinister face and unpredictable actions simply can’t hold a candle to the horror of Regan’s transformation. 


Crucifix Masturbation vs Corrupted Communion

As the demon strengthens its hold over Regan, the tween begins to act out in increasingly vulgar ways. Hearing a commotion, Chris runs up to her daughter’s bedroom to find absolute chaos. An unnatural wind is blowing through the room and Regan is using a crucifix to stab her crotch with so much force that blood splatters all over her nightgown. Chris jumps on the bed and tries to wrestle the cross away but Regan grabs her head and shoves it into her lap screaming “ lick me.” Chris emerges with her face covered in blood as Regan strikes her with enough force to send her flying across the room.                                                                                                                                  

After bringing Katherine home from the hospital, her parents attempt to reinstate their weekly routine. This includes church on Sunday morning where they prepare to give thanks for their daughter’s safe return. Unfortunately, Katherine has other ideas. The recovering girl, still bruised and bloody from her time in the wilderness, sits strangely in the pew and stares at her younger siblings. The positioning of her skirts implies she is masturbating during the service but we never get clear confirmation. As her parents get up to take communion, Katherine sneaks to the back of the church. She emerges with her white dress covered in communion wine screaming, “the body and the blood” over and over again as the congregation looks on in horror.

WINNER: The Exorcist

It’s difficult to describe how effective Friedkin’s scene is. Not only is Regan being forced to viciously assault herself, but her poor mother receives unthinkable punishment for trying to intervene. This moment is also followed by Regan turning her head around backwards and screaming obscenities. Trapped in the room with a monster who looks like her daughter, Chris can do nothing but turn her own head to the wall and wail. While Katherine’s actions are shocking, no one is physically harmed unlike Chris who will likely be traumatized by this moment for the rest of her life. 


“Help Me” vs “Help Me”

One of the most upsetting moments in Friedkin’s film leads to Regan finally getting the help she needs. While the poor girl sleeps, Sharon notices something truly horrific and rushes to tell Father Karras. Lifting the shirt of Regan’s nightgown to expose her stomach, they see raised marks appear from underneath her skin. These faint lines seem to form the words “help me” a clear sign that the real Regan is calling out from deep inside her tortured body. 

Green recreates this moment and adds his own bloody spin. Photographic records taken during Angela’s exam reveal the same words marked in bloody scratches on her own stomach. Nurse and neighbor Ann (Ann Dowd) finds the photo and remembers a similar occurrence described in Chris MacNeil’s book recounting Regan’s terrible ordeal. When confronted with this connection, Victor can no longer deny that what his daughter truly needs is an exorcist. 

WINNER: The Exorcist

This one is a bit more difficult to decide. While Angela’s damaged skin is more physically destructive and causes scars she will carry for the rest of her life, we only see the after effects of this injury. There’s something so unsettling about watching the faint cry for help appear on Regan’s skin, making us wonder what kind of hellish prison the little girl is currently trapped in. 


Deadly Dresser vs. Blinding Wounds

Dick Smith makeup The Exorcist

Though Regan is Pazuzu’s direct target, Chris does not escape the film unscathed. While her daughter assaults herself with a crucifix, Chris attempts to grab the weapon, earning a backhanded blow that knocks her to the floor. As the household staff rushes to her aid, the door closes on its own and a heavy bureau rumbles across the room moved by unseen hands. She meets Father Karras with the marks of Regan’s violence clearly visible across her face.

Unfortunately, Chris does not fare so well in Green’s sequel. Visiting Katherine’s home, she and Victor find the house nearly deserted as the demonically possessed little girl wanders the halls terrorizing her family. When Chris enters the girl’s bedroom, the demon seems to recognize her from Georgetown all those years ago. Katherine jumps onto the bed and stabs Chris in both eyes, using a crucifix to blind the woman trying to save her. 

WINNER: The Exorcist: Believer

Leaving aside the question of Chris MacNeil’s presence in this sequel, there’s no doubt that Green’s story is more brutal to its legacy character. She emerges from her Georgetown home traumatized and bruised but mostly okay. However, this new interaction with the demon has forever taken her ability to see.


Two Deadly Exorcisms

Exorcist Believer

Both films climax with horrifying exorcisms that prove fatal to several men of the cloth. We don’t see Father Merrin die by Pazuzu’s hands, but the medication he’s been taking leads us to believe the strain of this religious rite has caused a fatal heart attack. Father Karras reenters the room to find his body lying on the floor, the demon watching on with pleasure. With hope fading away, Karras makes a devil’s bargain that ends up taking his own life. He asks for the demon to leave Regan and enter his body then throws himself out the window. Falling down a steep flight of stairs, he lands in a bloody heap on the street far below.

Once Ann begins to suspect possession, she turns to Father Maddox (E.J. Bonilla) to help the two tortured girls. Unfortunately, he’s unable to convince the Catholic Church to get involved and tries to dissuade Victor from going ahead with the ritual. Father Maddox later enters the Fielding home determined to join the fight on his own accord, but the demons take quick action. As he begins to read from the Bible, the girls cause his head to slowly twist to the side. We hear a horrific crack and watch as the bones of the young priest’s spine begin to poke into the skin of his neck while his head faces backward, snapping his neck with the unholy force. 

WINNER: The Exorcist 

While Father Maddox’s grisly demise is certainly unsettling, we know very little about the man himself. However, Friedkin’s tale belongs just as much to the exorcists as it does to the girl they’re trying to save. Our hearts break for Father Karras when he finds the body of his mentor and we wince as he tumbles down the concrete stairs. Lying in a pool of blood, he gives a dying confession by squeezing the hand of his best friend, a devastating ending to a harrowing film. 


WINNER: The Exorcist – 7

The Exorcist: Believer – 2

Fifty years after its theatrical release, Friedkin’s film still packs quite a punch. Though Green attempts to double the emotional impact with two possessed children, we lose the emotional connection to the doomed girls and the slowly escalating terror as demons take incremental control of their bodies. While Green’s film is undoubtedly shocking, he’s battling a true titan of the genre. It’s unlikely that few films will ever be able to match the shocking vulgarity, violence, and vicious cruelty on display in Friedkin’s flawless film. 

Editorials

‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ Only Got Better from 1956 to 1978 [Revenge of the Remakes]

Published

on

Pictured: 'Invasion of the Body Snatchers' (1978)

We’re zapping into science fiction territory and back into “re-adaptation” conversations this month for Revenge of the Remakes. Don Siegel and Philip Kaufman bring vastly different approaches to their Invasion of the Body Snatchers films, uniformly citing Jack Finney’s 1954 novel “The Body Snatchers” as their source. Kaufman isn’t directly remaking Siegel’s film but acknowledges its existence multiple times; there’s a literary influence behind both features, yet Kaufman can’t ignore what already exists. The same conversation arose in my The Fly analysis, and will assuredly surface again down the road. Invasion of the Body Snatchers can’t help itself from being a remake, and with decades apart, Kaufman evolves the product into a contemporary extraterrestrial nightmare (speaking for the late 1970s).

Everything about Invasion of the Body Snatchers showcases how cinematic advancements benefit remakes like The Blob or House on Haunted Hill, reimaginings of classics from the ’50s and ’60s with newfangled technology. There’s only so much Siegel’s black-and-white doppelgänger thriller can accomplish, whereas Kaufman’s era edged on the golden age of practical horror effects. It’s hard to find the horror in on-screen scenarios created using rubber suits and limited craft capabilities—not to disparage entire periods of Hollywood history, but more to justify why these remakes feel more appropriate. Kaufman harnesses the full intensity of a more elaborate horror genre that ditched pre-70s theatricality, transforming a freaky little ditty about “pod people” into blaring, mouth-agape screams.


The Approach

‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ (1956)

Original screenwriter Daniel Mainwaring favors more romantic blushes in 1956’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Kevin McCarthy’s Dr. Miles Bennell and Dana Wynter’s Becky Driscoll are selling Roman Holiday meets botanical body-swappers, aligned with the machine-like output of dependably wholesome, wide-appealing ’50s releases (which Quentin Tarantino labels as one of the worst stretches of moviemaking). W. D. Richter takes an alarmingly tense approach to 1978’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers, not without its lovestruck exchanges but far outweighed by neurotic suspense that eats away at our insides. Kaufman isn’t here to calm his audience’s paranoia, staying true to the frightening fantasy found in Finney’s words.

The remake begins where Siegel’s picture ends, switching backdrops from a sleepy rural hideaway like Santa Mira to the big city of San Francisco. Donald Sutherland stars as Health Department employee and baked potato enthusiast Matthew Bennell, unaware of jelly-like parasitic boogers falling from the sky. His colleague Elizabeth Driscoll (Brooke Adams) is the first to point out odd happenings when her animated sports fan of a boyfriend begins acting like an emotionless robot. Elizabeth swears she no longer recognizes her loved one despite his unchanged physical appearance, and she isn’t alone. Renowned psychiatrists like Dr. David Kibner (Leonard Nimoy) try to rationalize away these rampant feelings about body-swapped husbands or wives. Still, it’s not long before a familiar foe presents itself in seedling pods that start growing clones and replacing human civilians.

The titles share storytelling parallels, but Kaufman aims for something grander than podunk isolation and eerie smiles. McCarthy appears as a raving lunatic who slams into Matthew’s car, ranting and raving about something that’s coming—just like his Dr. Bennell in the original. It’s a cheeky nod that suggests the films could exist in the same universe despite timeline differences, presuming McCarthy’s unnamed “Running Man” just came from an already overrun small town outside San Francisco. You still get the same allure of Matthew and Elizabeth’s slow realization about what’s going down—Jeff Goldblum and Veronica Cartwright appear as the Bellicecs in a familiar set of arcs—but within bustling urban environments. Matthew and Elizabeth have a much taller order avoiding population threats in San Francisco, which plays into the on-edge sensation that never settles once the first transformation becomes clear.


Does It Work?

‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ (1978)

From the opening credits float through stardust until Sutherland’s farewell screech, Kaufman highlights the advantages of his second Invasion of the Body Snatchers. There’s so much more visual appeal when addressing the parasitic entities from another planet, first shown as gelatinous blobs hurtling through space toward Earth’s unharvested potential. Kaufman can animate transformation sequences with yuckier graphic brutality or nasty-up the unfinished versions of pod fetuses with more details like hairy tendrils. Based solely on retooling special effects, a clear upgrade enhances uncanny attributes and drives home sci-fi irregularities. That’s reason enough to clear anyone’s conscience.

Richter’s screenplay expands upon the dystopian homogenization of a community that’s been turned docile and obedient. The original film toys with Capgras delusions—a real syndrome where people believe someone close has been switched with an imposter—but is missing bigger-picture thoughts. Richter uses Nimoy’s intellectual Dr. Kibner to prattle on about irrational claims about extraterrestrial takeovers, using therapy diagnoses to silence someone like Elizabeth, which becomes a vastly more psychologically sadistic tweak. The remake strives harder to illustrate behavioral changes that reveal someone’s been hijacked and has more to say about singular individuality versus nondescript replicants filling civil duties. The fear of losing one’s self is more palpable and existentially morbid.

The film feels like one giant deviation away from unshakable expectations, which adds ample personality. Jack and Nancy find the half-formed body that spirals events on cue in their mud spa, where Veronica humorously tells a client she won’t turn the music down minutes prior because it calms her beloved plants. Pod people warn others about intruders by emitting a bloodcurdling pitch that strikes a creepier note, far more disturbing than anything in the original. Even Matthew’s wok-cooked meal of random vegetables for Elizabeth adds a dash of quirkiness that’s worth fighting to retain, even in an almost two-hour inflation from the original 80-ish minutes. What’s reused is nailed, and what’s added doesn’t belabor any additional points beyond intrigue, like, “Why Banjo Man Dog?” Who cares, it’s rad!


The Result

‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ (1978)

Invasion of the Body Snatchers 2.0 is bigger, better, faster, and stronger. My hesitancy about the duration leading to narrative overkill is proven horribly predetermined. Kaufman follows proper instincts to unleash the straightforward horror potential at the concept’s core, whether through more frantic performances or grosser effects designs. Not to say Siegel ever sells Finney’s tale short—his tones are a product of old-school Hollywood—but Kaufman unleashes the blueprint’s full sci-fi horror potential. It’s the end of humanity as we know it, and Kaufman wants us to feel that inescapable weight pressing down on our chests. Not to mention, the film’s relocation to San Francisco feels like a response to real-world atrocities that took place in Northern California—like the Zodiac killer’s spree—feeding into this horrible idea that existence is better served as a pod person than being subject to life’s unpredictable cruelty.

Credit Siegel’s production in the same way The Blob and The Fly achieve a few memorable special effects by whatever means they could back then. There’s nothing wrong with the bulbous pods and frothy, milky liquid that gushes around blank replicant slates upon their regurgitated births—Kaufman’s special effects workshop just perfects more details. The seedling casings sprout this moist flower on top, and the ghoulish, slimy figures that pop out are far more repulsive. There’s more mucusy ick and gory excess when replications are encountered or eliminated, and it’s cleanly executed (clean but sloppy, you understand). Even the deceptive not-fully-sized pods are a nice touch, camouflaged by natural beauty, highlighting the attention to tiny details that blossom into a more immersive experience.

As for the cast, the remake’s ensemble has more opportunity to express doomsday displeasure because of Richter’s dire themes. Sutherland and Adams aren’t dancing to jukebox tunes in an empty martini bar. However, their romantic chemistry still thrives—not to be scrapped entirely, as their shared dread promotes infinitely more harrowed responses to societal alienation. Goldblum and Cartwright are better Bellicecs, led by Goldblum’s patented eccentrics as a mouthy aspiring writer who immediately flips to red alert when his pod equivalent reveals itself. Then there’s Nimoy, a killer choice for the dangerously persuasive Dr. Kibner, who throws around textbook anecdotes about abnormal social phenomena that deter his friends’ investigations. Even Art Hindle—as Elizabeth’s passionate basketball-loving boyfriend and first victim—finds peculiar ways to shine, which speaks to Kaufman’s ability to draw the best out of his actors.


The Lesson

‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ (1978)

Invasion of the Body Snatchers hits that hallowed sweet spot as a remake with standalone appeal. Siegel’s acclaimed 1950s original was voted into the National Film Registry for a reason: a film so culturally relevant that it coined the slang “pod people.” Kaufman doesn’t step on any toes when architecting his vision, ballooning the scope and maximizing horror atmospheres for an exceptionally altered breed of interstellar invasion. Neither filmmaker would ignore the other at a party because both films amicably coexist as examples of genre trends in their respective calendar years.

So what did we learn?

● This one’s not rocket science. Twenty-something years make a huge difference in terms of special effects quality.

● Science fiction movies from the ’50s are the best candidates for remake focuses.

● It’s hard for a re-adaptation to avoid also being a remake. Some might argue that Invasion of the Body Snatchers is a “sequel” or “continuation,” but that’s only a portion. It’s a remake that gets creative, even with Kevin McCarthy’s inclusion.

● I rarely like to “justify” a remake before seeing its quality—a movie isn’t bad just because it exists. Still, if there’s any surefire justification, it’s the “X Decades Later Gap” argument.

Invasion of the Body Snatchers is one of those overexposed horror pillars that never felt start-to-finish new to me despite both films being a first-time watch for this column. I’ve seen the Donald Sutherland “Oh No!” face used all over social media as an image, not to mention how Finney’s story is foundational science fiction canon. Entire scenes felt torn from my memories, whether they’ve been included in clip shows or I’ve read about them elsewhere in other journalists’ pieces.

It’s a strange occurrence that happens to me occasionally because while I still have plenty of blind spots, specific movies have entered into pop culture rotations too long ago to avoid. Such are the not-so-worrisome problems of a late-blooming horror fan who dove head-first into the deep end and has been charting his own journey ever since.

Continue Reading