Connect with us

Editorials

This Is Halloween: The Gateway Horrors of ‘Cobweb’ and ‘The Curse of Bridge Hollow’ [Double Trouble]

Published

on

Hulu October - Cobweb rotting pumpkin patch
Pictured: 'Cobweb'

I grew up on Hocus Pocus, Halloweentown, and Goosebumps. These gateway horrors opened up a whole new world for me. The trembling fear I endured when Carly Beth slid on that terrifying green mask still lingers with me even now. And I’ll never forget the chills I felt running down my spine when Sarah launched into “Come Little Children” or the penetrating gaze of Kalabar that seemed to cut into my soul. These images provoked something in me, conspiring to lure me into horror – and I’ve never left. I might be 30-something now, but I can still enjoy nice little gateway horror movies, especially when they’re as compelling as the Halloween-set Cobweb and The Curse of Bridge Hollow.

In Cobweb, screenwriter Chris Thomas Devlin stages an epically creepy story about a young boy named Peter (Woody Norman), whose parents Carol (Lizzy Caplan) and Mark (Antony Starr) rule with a stringent hand. Their kindness always comes with conditions, in a Stockholm Syndrome kind of way. Carol and Mark bear a striking resemblance to Man and Woman from Wes Craven’s The People Under the Stairs in their devotion to strict, brutally unrelenting parenting. It’s the way they sneer, gleefully disturbed expressions that run the blood cold. Peter’s pleas that he hears knocks inside his bedroom wall are shrugged off as wild fantasies, tricks of a deluded mind. When Peter sketches an unsettling picture in class, seemingly asking for “help,” he’s grounded and trapped inside the basement for the night. The following morning, Carol brings her son a tray of pumpkin cupcakes, tip-toeing down the stairs with a too-wide grin plastered on her face. Such acts are meant to justify such a horrifying punishment. 

As the film unravels, the knocks grow louder inside Peter’s walls and a small voice pierces through the plaster and wallpaper. The sweetly strained voice – that of a girl named Sarah (Olivia Sussman) – claims to be Peter’s sister, whom the parents locked inside a secret room in the walls. She’d been waiting for Peter, hoping that when he was big enough he’d help her escape the suffocating prison. After Sarah coerces Peter into poisoning Carol and Mark (their black bile spilling on the hardwood), Peter then frees Sarah from the hole in the wall, hidden behind the grandfather clock. The voice (now played by Debra Wilson) grows deeper and more maniacal, cackling with ferocious intensity and seeping from the dark. It was all a sick game, and Sarah, now a monster (Aleksandra Dragova), crawls with bones snapping and popping into the light. We don’t get a good glimpse of Sarah until later, leaving much to the imagination. The third act packs a punch with utter chaos, a well-earned blood bath when a group of bullies show up on Peter’s doorstep to exact their revenge after Peter shoved Brian (Luke Busey) down the stairs, resulting in a broken leg.

Cobweb interview with Woody Norman

Pictured: ‘Cobweb’

Director Samuel Bodin takes these haunted storybook images and breathes life into them. Cobweb has a particularly spooky Halloween mood. Each frame seems to soak in the crispness of autumn. It also helps that the family grows a pumpkin patch out behind their house. It just feels like Halloween. You can practically smell crunchy red, brown, and yellow leaves as they scatter down the sidewalk. Even though it’s technically rated R for graphic violence, there’s enough here that makes for a fantastic entry point into the genre. From the grotesque “monster” to the bone-breaking, expertly-shot sequences – owed also to cinematographer Philip LozanoCobweb captures the very spirit of All Hallow’s Eve with blinding brilliance. If you enjoy The People Under the Stairs, you’re likely to find plenty of bite with this one. Even more, there are several emotionally driven beats with Peter to make you actually care what happens next, as the monster circles around him, breathing odorous breath on the nape of his neck. You even root for substitute teacher Miss Divine (Cleopatra Coleman), who takes a special interest in Peter, believing him to be abused at home. The strength of the film not only lies with the cinematography but the leading actors’ performances – glued together with nuance and attention to humanity. From the parents’ deranged behavior to the monstrous physicality of Sarah, Cobweb makes for a perfectly tasty holiday treat.

The same can be said for The Curse of Bridge Hollow, perhaps even more so. Carrying a distinct Hocus Pocus finish, the film finds writers Todd Berger, Robert Rugan, and John R. Morey tapping into the charm and joyous abandon of the holiday while supplying plenty of ghoulishness to get the blood pumping. The story goes something like this: a young girl named Sydney (Priah Ferguson) and her family – Marlon Wayans and Kelly Rowland play her parents, Howard and Emily, respectively – move into the neighborhood where the residents take Halloween super seriously. Every lawn is littered with high-caliber decor, often centered around a theme, much to Howard’s chagrin. You see, he hates Halloween, after a particularly nasty childhood experience, so he never lets Sydney decorate. When she discovers a jack-o’lantern in the attic, she lights it, unwittingly setting the devilish spirit of Stingy Jack loose on the town. But instead of an apparition of the usual order, Stingy Jack inhabits the Halloween decorations, bringing them to full vitality. There’s spiders, zombies, witches, oh my! It’s then up to Sydney and her father to figure out how to stop Stingy Jack from completely taking over the town before the stroke of midnight.

The Curse of Bridge Hollow

Pictured: ‘The Curse of Bridge Hollow’

What director Jeff Wadlow then manages to do is deliver the story with a polished, yet still eerie, style. Sequences like when neighbor Sully (Rob Riggle) is attacked by a horde of plastic zombies or when a giant spider descends upon a nursing home are frightful and fun. There’s a whimsy to the narrative that not only allows younger audiences to glom onto the characters but gives adults a chance to relive their childhoods. There’s nothing quite like Halloween night seemingly stretching on for hours and hours, as you scamper through darkened streets collecting candy and trying to scare your friends. The feeling that you could spend your entire life in the present moment sends a thrill through your body. The Curse of Bridge Hollow bottles up these experiences like catching lightning in a bottle. It somehow is able to feel nostalgic yet modern, planted firmly in the now – I mean, hello, Sydney even pulls up an Ouija app rather than tracking down a wooden board. You can’t get more modern than that! (But seriously, does an app actually work?!)

The Curse of Bridge Hollow might feel familiar to some but it’s magical nonetheless. It’s appropriately silly but pounds with a tremendous amount of heart. As the night progresses, Howard changes his stance on the holiday as he sees how passionately his daughter believes in what’s happening. It takes him almost getting eaten by an enormous spider and murdered by an ax-wielding clown for him to get a clue, but he does come around to Sydney’s way of thinking. Plus, he rediscovers the enchantment of Halloween night and how extraordinary the celebration of All Hallow’s Eve really is. Even if you don’t believe the veil between worlds is at its thinnest or that the dead return to earth, you can at least appreciate those who do and find what it all means for you. Wadlow understands the assignment and infuses the tale with lessons about family ties and holding onto one’s youth and curious nature.

Cobweb and The Curse of Bridge Hollow make for a delightful romp, a double feature perfect for kids and adults alike. The contrasting tones complement one another. Where one goes hard into grotesque scares and cursed images, the other honors the playfulness of Halloween and simply warms the heart. Gateway horrors are the keys to the genre. Whatever you grew up watching, it always led you somewhere else. That’s the beauty of these films; they take cues from their predecessors but open up the genre in an exciting way all on their own.

In watching Cobweb and/or The Curse of Bridge Hollow, hopefully, a young kid somewhere is as transfixed as I was so many years ago watching Hocus Pocus. And maybe they will become tomorrow’s horror lovin’ adults. We can only hope.

‘The Curse of Bridge Hollow’ Review – Netflix's Family-Friendly Halloween Movie Goes Big on Holiday Spirit and Spectacle

Pictured: ‘The Curse of Bridge Hollow’


Double Trouble is a recurring column that pairs up two horror films, past or present, based on theme, style, or story.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading