Editorials
The Father/Son Cronenberg Conversation in ‘Antiviral’ [Maple Syrup Massacre]
Maple Syrup Massacre is an editorial series where Joe Lipsett dissects the themes, conventions and contributions of new and classic Canadian horror films. Spoilers follow…
Three films into his feature film career, Brandon Cronenberg has established himself as an innovative and confronting auteur in his own right. When he debuted his 2012 feature debut Antiviral, however, the quality of the film was a secondary topic; first and foremost he was compared to his famous father, David Cronenberg.
There’s a obvious level of cynicism involved whenever a celebrity’s child enters the same field (let’s all agree to bury the term “nepo baby” and move on with our lives). But in the case of Cronenberg junior, there’s an interesting argument to be made about how his father’s work influenced Brandon’s creative approach, and where he’s established himself in his own right.
For a time, David Cronenberg was indisputably Canada’s most famous director (he and Atom Egoyan seemed to parry for public favour throughout most of the early 90s). Not only had Cronenberg senior carved out a niche for himself with his “body horror” films of the 80s, Cronenberg was one of the few Canadian filmmakers actively working in horror. There were plenty of folks involved in the Tax Shelter Era of the late 70s and 80s*, when Canada was actively courting American investment – often in low budget horror films – but few writers and directors were making a career of it.
*There’s also been plenty of debate about the quality and merit of a lot of the films made during this period, but that’s another editorial.
All of this to say that, in the 80s and into the 90s the most active, recognizable Canadian working in genre was David Cronenberg, which means he shaped the industry and public perception of horror and sci-fi.

Fast forward to 2012 when Brandon Cronenberg debuted Antiviral at Cannes, his debut feature competed in the Un Certain Regard section. Cronenberg senior’s Cosmopolis, meanwhile, was in competition for the Palme D’or. And both films share the same female lead (Sarah Gadon). So not only was the son contending with the legacy of his famous father, they were both in the public eye with the same actor at the same time.
Comparisons were inevitable.
Antiviral follows Syd (Caleb Landry Jones), a low-level employee working at the Lucas Clinic. In the film’s gently futuristic world, the public’s obsession with celebrity has been taken to extreme new lengths, including the collection of celebrity diseases for injection, and incubation in their most ardent fans. Throughout the film we see Syd peddling the fantasy of being closer to fictitious celebrities like Aria Noble (Nenna Abuwa) or Hannah Geist (Gadon) via infection with their herpes or flu.
The real money, however, comes from corporate espionage. Syd injects himself with patent-protected diseases and uses a bootleg ReadyFace machine in his closet to crack the security mechanism, leaving him free to sell the diseases to Arvid (Joe Pingue), whose legitimate business is growing celebrity cell steaks for literal cannibalistic consumption.
The plot of the film kicks in when Syd accidentally doses himself with a deadly virus that is slowly killing Geist, necessitating plenty of desperate deals with seedy underworld types in order to uncover a cure before he dies.
As a film, Brandon Cronenberg’s feature debut is a little too long, a little too repetitive, and lacking in the same critical bite that his subsequent features – Possessor and Infinity Pool – contain.

As a debut feature, Antiviral accomplishes two simultaneous tasks. On one hand it establishes the foundation of Brandon’s visual style and narrative interests that will continue throughout his subsequent films. On the other hand, it also appears to be drawing from, engaging with, and even anticipating his father’s (past and future) work.
Like many of his father’s body horror films, Brandon’s feature debut has a cool, antiseptic visual aesthetic that stands in stark contrast with the dirty real world. There are plenty of scenes set within hotels and private clinics – with an emphasis on white walls, sterile syringes and medical equipment. This contrasts with the film’s grimy, low-fi vibe – embodied in the repurposed look of the ReadyFace machine, the basement of the restaurant where Syd is brought to Levine (James Cade), as well as Arvid’s unhygienic backroom.
These visual signifiers carry over into Possessor’s assassination office space, as well as the first-class resort in Infinity Pool. Possessor also adopts Antiviral’s same narrative interest in exploring corporate espionage, as well as themes of assassination and the loss of bodily autonomy. With its defined capitalist critique and slight shift away from body horror, Infinity Pool suggests a similar, albeit new creative direction for Cronenberg junior.


So what about Antiviral’s connective tissue (heh) to David Cronenberg’s films?
Syd’s status as an individual caught in a vast corporate espionage conspiracy tracks with 1981’s Scanners and 1983’s Videodrome, though the intersection of celebrity, body horror, and capitalist spy games most closely evokes David Cronenberg’s unofficial Videodrome sequel, 1999’s eXistenZ. In that film, celebrity game designer Allegra Gellar (Jennifer Jason Leigh, who also stars in Possessor) goes on the run following an assassination attempt by a corporate rival while beta testing her new game.
There are brief moments of hallucination in both Antiviral and eXistenZ: the uncertainty of the changing Canadian landscape in the latter, partnered with Pikul (Jude Law)’s fear of penetration is reminiscent of Syd’s nightmare in which his mouth has been replaced by a metal grill that leaks blood. The blossoming contusion on Syd’s arm where Levine takes a skin sample is evocative of eXistenZ diseased game pod, while Syd’s physical degradation, including his reliance on a cane, brings to mind Seth Brundle (Jeff Goldblum)’s transformation in The Fly.


Sidebar: it’s ironic that few critics noted how funny Antiviral is, particularly in the moments when Syd eavesdrops on the inane conversation of his co-workers. Cronenberg senior has a dark humour streak through many of his films, including eXistenZ. Case in point: Willem Dafoe’s performance as Gas.
The conversation between father and son appears to go both ways. Cronenberg famously returned to body horror last year with Crimes of the Future (a spiritual sequel to Videodrome & eXistenZ). The visual signifiers of Syd’s weakening condition, his sudden ascent in popularity due to his illness, the potential to profit from individuals’ literal bodies, and even the disgusting celebrity cell meat in Antiviral all have counterparts in Cronenberg senior’s return to horror (hint: think of those toxic purple bars).
Whether Cronenberg senior was deliberately drawing connections to his son’s work, or it is further evidence that father and son’s creative sensibilities remain entwined, the parallels are fascinating. Considering David Cronenberg’s substantial contributions to the development and (eventual) recognition of the artistic merits of genre films in Canada, watching Brandon embody the same visual and narrative preoccupations while also emerging as a powerful artist in his own right has been incredibly exciting.
David Cronenberg is currently in post-production on new genre film The Shrouds, which begs the question: where will his and Brandon’s work go in the future and (how) will they continue to engage each other in cinematic conversation?
Editorials
‘Bloodstone: Subspecies II’ Revisited: A Bigger, Bolder Follow-Up to Full Moon’s Vampire Cult Classic
Horror sequels are a peculiar thing. In most cases, follow-ups to scary movies tend to retread the same formula with different victims and more over-the-top scares. This is because audiences tend to be more interested in the antagonists of these pictures than anything else, with even main characters becoming disposable when the time comes to produce a sequel.
That’s why some of the most memorable horror sequels are the ones that actually manage to hold onto interesting survivors from previous films while also pushing the story forward instead of having the same thing happen again to a different group of people. From Scream 2 to Dream Warriors (and arguably even The Exorcist III: Legion), there are quite a few of these innovative sequels to go around.
However, if there’s one franchise that deserves more attention when discussing bigger and better continuations that make the most of episodic filmmaking, it has to be Ted Nicolaou’s Subspecies.
The Full Moon classic spawned an indie horror icon, but bizarre sequel Bloodstone: Subspecies II is even more beloved than its predecessor.
Building a Bigger Vampire Saga

While the film itself takes place almost immediately after the events of the first movie, Bloodstone only entered production a couple of years after the release of the original as both Charles Band and Nicolaou weighed the pros and cons of returning to Romania to continue the series. In an effort to maximize efficiency, the team decided to invest in a trilogy where parts II and III, now fully written by Nicolaou, would be filmed simultaneously over the course of a single grueling shoot.
Much like the first Subspecies, Bloodstone’s low budget meant that the filmmakers once again had to cut corners and re-use as many of their resources as possible. Thankfully, the process was much easier this time around as Nicolaou, with the help of Romanian cinematographer Vlad Paunescu and his wife Oana, became more acquainted with local customs and made new friends. Shooting abroad still came with its own unique set of challenges due to a lack of translators and the occasional safety concerns, but the crew managed to make things work by filming things guerrilla-style and setting up shop in abandoned caves and real medieval ruins.
The director’s newfound contacts, coupled with the relative success of the first movie, meant that he was basically given free rein over an assortment of shooting locations usually considered off-limits for indie horror. That’s why Bloodstone features insanely ambitious lighting and effects work even during scenes shot in the middle of a bustling Bucharest. The filmmakers went so far as to project Radu’s Nosferatu-like shadows over local monuments as if he were a Romanian boogeyman, an idea that was actually encouraged by local cinephiles.
In fact, many of the more elaborate scenes here had originally been planned for the first movie before being discarded due to the lack of available resources. It was only with the support of Romanian fans and filmmakers that Bloodstone was able to give Radu a chance to be even more menacing the second time around.
Michelle’s Transformation Takes Center Stage

However, when it came to the American part of the crew, not everyone was able or willing to return for another round of Romanian adventuring. That’s why Radu’s human-loving half-brother Stefan (Michael Watson) is unceremoniously killed off at the beginning of the film while the role of Michelle had to be recast. Denice Duff took over for Laura Mae Tate, with the character now being joined by her sister, Rebecca, played by Melanie Shatner (yes, that Shatner).
In the finished film, we follow Michelle as she awakens to her new life as a vampire and discovers that Radu has murdered her lover. Struggling with grief and her newfound bloodlust, Michelle contacts her sister overseas, with Rebecca soon travelling to Romania on an ill-advised rescue mission. Meanwhile, Radu (Anders Hove) reaches out to his undead Mummy (Pamela Gordon, underneath heavy layers of impressive makeup effects) and promises to deliver her the coveted Bloodstone artifact while also making Michelle his eternal consort.
Revisiting the movie, I was impressed with how introspective this story is when compared to the original. The sequel assumes that you’re already familiar with the previously established characters, so the story wastes no time in exploring the immediate aftermath of the previous film’s events. From Michelle’s reluctant transformation into a creature of the night to Radu’s obvious mommy issues, Nicolaou is way more interested in pushing these characters into new and uncharted territory rather than recycling existing plot points.
Practical Effects and Gothic Atmosphere Still Impress

Yet, much like the first film, it’s Romania itself that makes the movie worth watching. The ruins of Castle Vladislav are even more majestic now, and visiting the moody streets of Bucharest with its surprisingly punk-rock nightlife made for a nice change of pace when compared to the original film’s quiet village setting. Once again, the abundance of interesting locations makes the movie feel much more expensive than it really is, with the filmmakers surrounding our characters with a living, breathing environment that would be impossible to recreate in a studio.
The increased freedom also allowed Nicolaou to flex his filmmaking muscles and tackle more ambitious blocking/composition in the sequel. The low budget and tropey script mean that the visuals don’t always work, but it’s consistently clear that this neo-expressionist style could only come from a passionate team attempting to pay homage to the shadowy horror classics of yesteryear. If the retro atmosphere isn’t enough for you, there’s enough practical gore here to satisfy even the most demanding of horror hounds!
Radu himself is also far more interesting now that Hove is more comfortable working alongside an international crew, with the actor having gone on record explaining that, while he spent more time drinking vodka than working while shooting the first movie, the sequel was a much more creatively satisfying experience for everyone involved. The character’s relationship with his abusive Mummy is also a highlight of the expanded mythology, especially since the practical effects that bring her to life are just as freaky now as they were back in ’93.
My only real gripe with the horror elements of the picture comes from the glaring absence of the diminutive stop-motion minions from the first film, though I guess the surprisingly entertaining addition of Professor Popescu (Michael Denish) and his archeological antics mostly make up for that.
Bloodstone: Subspecies II is obviously the middle chapter of a trilogy, with the ending feeling a lot less definitive than its predecessor as several plot threads are left to dangle in the wind, but I appreciate how the flick explores new ground while remaining faithful to nearly all the ideas that made the original such a good time. While I don’t think it’s as big of an improvement over the first movie as some fans make it out to be, Bloodstone is definitely worth revisiting if you’re a fan of old-fashioned vampire yarns.
Tune in next time for the thrilling conclusion to this initial trilogy, Bloodlust: Subspecies III!
You must be logged in to post a comment.