Connect with us

Editorials

‘Dead End’ – Christmas Horror Movie Remains a Cult Favorite 20 Years Later

Published

on

Dead End

Dead End is the embodiment of the old saying “road to nowhere.” In this 2003 horror movie, one unlucky family’s annual trip to grandma’s house doesn’t go according to plan. What awaits these unsuspecting characters is a series of events that will steer them straight into the unknown. It’s one hell of a Christmas in this macabre holiday tale, which stirs up uncertainty and unrest as the pavement stretches on forever.

Dead End first showed up on video-store shelves around 2004 after enjoying great success at multiple film festivals. Made on a low budget of less than a million dollars and with a small cast of actors, this California-shot yet French-financed horror-comedy has, strangely enough, yet to be reissued on a physical media format higher than DVD. Nevertheless, it remains a cult favorite all these years later. The colorful dialogue, the progressively unnerving atmosphere, and the ensemble of quirky characters each play an important part in why this dark Christmas outing is worth revisiting every December.

Dead End is a high-concept movie regardless of its avowedly simple setup. The trouble here begins with Ray Wise’s character Frank, the head of the Harrington Family, doing the unexpected: deviating from the customary, not to mention uneventful route to his mother-in-law’s for Christmas. He took a backroad in hopes that the change of scenery would keep him awake at the wheel. Well, he was wrong. As Frank brings the car to a screeching halt after nodding off, the other passengers all awaken to find themselves alone on an empty road. Not another car or person in sight. The movie is already off to an uninspired start, but, to use another hackneyed phrase: good things come to those who wait.

Fans will often praise Dead End with one major reservation; to be more specific, they bring up the movie’s stock of clichés. A road trip fraught with peril, the creepy stopovers, and, most of all, a conclusion that was too commonly used in 2000s horror. Funnily enough, co-directors and co-screenwriters Jean-Baptiste Andrea and Fabrice Canepa were deliberate with how their directorial debut would come across to more experienced viewers. The two French filmmakers were always one step ahead of their own movie. In that sense, they played on familiar tropes almost immediately upon use without also succumbing to sheer parody. So the story, in a way, is both predictable and unpredictable at the same time.

dead end

Image: Alexandra Holden, Mick Cain and Lin Shaye’s respective characters, Marion, Richard and Laura, all react to something shocking.

Other horror movies where unfortunate fates are determined by one wrong turn would eventually bring the characters to a physical location of sorts. A cabin in the woods, a haunted house, a terrifying tourist trap — anything tangible and with an address. Meanwhile, this movie pulls a total Twilight Zone and asks what would happen if the car just kept moving in vain. The dissatisfaction of an incomplete journey is multiplied a hundred times over as Frank and his family drive onwards with no real assurance that they’ll ever reach a proper stopping point. To make this trip worse, there is a supernatural element that’s preying on the characters. A black hearse à la Phantasm is snatching them up one by one. It’s all quite obvious what is happening here, although for the sake of suspense, the Harringtons are largely clueless.

Dead End wouldn’t be anywhere as effective without its cast. Everyone is memorable all thanks to rich characterization and a handful of nasty set-pieces to remember them by. The Harringtons are, at least to someone looking in from the outside, a typical family performing a basic tradition. They still seem normal enough even after witnessing the mild discord during the movie’s outset. Once their façade and routine each start to erode, though, the extent of the Harringtons’ troubles becomes unmistakable. This one American family’s disintegration channels Twin Peaks — an apt comparison especially with Wise cast as yet another increasingly unstable patriarch  —  however, the execution here is more straightforward and immediate.

There is rarely a moment in this movie where a character isn’t carrying on, either because of their inherent personality or because that’s their natural response to stress. Mick Cain’s role as the exasperating young son and little brother falls in the former category, seeing as he’s a snarky nuisance from the get-go. In time, horror icon Lin Shaye briefly but outstandingly seizes the spotlight. She, a mother pushed far past her limit, trades indignation for insanity. Laura’s wild and trauma-induced antics include shooting her husband in the leg and, most unforgettably, rubbing her exposed brain to the point of orgasm.

dead end

Image: Amber Smith, as the Woman in White, holds a dead baby.

Wise and Alexandra Holden are the movie’s emotional anchors. To everyone’s surprise, crabby Frank becomes more and more poignant as he teeters between madness and rationality — Wise’s sharp performance as a fallible father and husband shouldn’t go unnoticed here — whereas Holden’s character of Marion was clearly designed to be the most compassionate (as well as sympathetic) of the whole lot. Marion’s default role of family mediator is encumbered by a guilty conscience that only grows over the loss of her clingy boyfriend Brad (Billy Asher) and other loved ones. From there she then has to try, albeit unsuccessfully, to keep this broken family together. 

Other horror movies set at Christmas have a tendency to juxtapose the beautiful sights and sounds of the holidays with aspects of the genre. That high contrast isn’t available in Dead End, which never has the expectations of the season ruined by a malevolent force. The characters don’t even start out as happy. More realistically, the Harringtons are celebrating Christmas together out of mere obligation than the pure desire to be with each other.  Everyone is miserable long before this dreadful road comes into view. It’s easy to think of this movie as a lighter helping of Christmas horror, due in large part to its heavy streak of humor. Yet Dead End is easily one of the most depressing movies of its kind.

As previously mentioned, many fans take issue with the story’s conclusion. The Harrington party turning out to be dead or on death’s door all this time is deemed unimaginative. Although, the difference between this movie and The Sixth Sense is Dead End isn’t trying to trick anyone. The script even drops substantial clues along the way to make the outcome less of a shocker. The ending, which comes out of nowhere for no one other than the characters, will urge viewers to deduct points from the overall score, but this is a movie where the journey is far more important than the destination.

Dead End

Image: Ray Wise’s character Frank lights a match as Amber Smith’s Woman in White character stands behind him.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading