Connect with us

Editorials

Slasher Renaissance? A Closer Look at the Sub-Genre That Never Went Away

Published

on

Pictured: 'Silent Night'

This holiday season’s release of Eli Roth’s Thanksgiving is cause for celebration amongst slasher fans. It’s been a hot minute since mainstream horror audiences have been able to watch a wide-release slasher that feels gruesomely throwback *and* is based on a wholly original concept. Thanksgiving is a contemporary reinterpretation of cheesy 80s midnighters about masked killers and juicy, rubbery effects that hoists holiday horror back into the limelight. It’s also fair to speculate how Thanksgiving signals a possible shift in overall genre trends, but labeling Thanksgiving as the rebirth of the slasher subgenre is a bit misleading. Roth’s ooey-gooey ode to holiday horror with all the trimmings certainly sticks out in today’s horror landscape, but that’s only on surface-level evaluations.

Heck, it wasn’t even the only holiday-themed slasher in theaters this season.

Academics consider 1978-1984 the “Golden Age” of slashers, built on the backs of Black Christmas, Halloween, The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, and others. Bloody Disgusting’s queen of the beat Meagan Navarro wrote a comprehensive guide to the Golden Age of Slashers for those who want to learn more (that starts here). Franchises introduced in this heralded era would dominate the coming years when slashers and their sequels veered into the sillier direct-to-video era, then titillation and sleaze began to cheapen the product as imitators learned the wrong lessons from superior titles. These entries would become more obscure and degrade the subgenre until Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson ushered in a new wave of post-modern slashers.

Studios were hungry to duplicate the success of Scream, but the movement’s supremacy was short-lived. I Know What You Did Last Summer and Urban Legend followed suit, yet it wasn’t long before the often-derided remake boom began in the early 2000s, and producers traded originality for reusable fanbases. Hollywood was invested in the art of resurrection, not reinvention. Critics, audiences, and everyone in between drove conversations that scolded Hollywood’s creative bankruptcy without acknowledging of the types of films being made, many of which were still slashers (some of which were also very good, but that’s an argument for my “Revenge of the Remakes” column).

Platinum Dunes alone was responsible for slasher remakes of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Friday the 13th, and A Nightmare on Elm Street. Others include but are not limited to Halloween (the Rob Zombie ones), The Toolbox Murders, House of Wax, Black Christmas (the first one), Prom Night, April Fool’s Day, Sorority Row, My Bloody Valentine — slashers were not in short order as the remake avalanche cascaded alongside James Wan’s introduction into the “Torture Porn” era. Saw and Roth’s Hostel diverted attention to gross-out mutilation games that coincided with the imported popularity of ultra-violent New French Extremity shockers, but the remakes never ceased. Neither did noteworthy slasher remakes.

I recall 2012 as the year the American slasher “died” (merely faded out of favor for a few years). Particularly with Steven C. Miller’s decked-out Silent Night remake, the last real nasty slasher to keep aughts vibes alive with wood chipper deaths and slaughtered brats. The same year, Franck Khalfoun wondered aloud, “What if I remake Maniac, but it’s more Peeping Tom?”

Audiences weren’t as enthusiastic about these massacre sprees anymore, though, with both films only earning a limited release from smaller distribution companies. Extreme violence wasn’t in demand anymore, which James Wan would prove a year later when The Conjuring kickstarted the next Horrorwood fad that’d have filmmakers scrambling to copycat Wan’s supernatural overnight success.

Thanksgiving Eli Roth - killer pov

‘Thanksgiving’

The thing is, slasher films didn’t retreat to the sewers after this point. Mainstream trends may dictate what’s most talked about in popular culture, but horror is not restricted to auditorium seating and $20 ticket stubs. “Slasher Cinema” might have become a black sheep during the Conjurverse takeover, followed by A24’s ushering in of the “Trauma Horror” years, but never disappeared. Filmmakers found ways to reinvent the slasher prototype while remakes and Saw-driven bloodlust hogged all the attention, the same way 1983’s The Final Terror wasted no time rewriting the forever influential Friday the 13th blueprint.

International horror filmmakers aren’t beholden to American trendsetters. When domestic pundits were complaining about how local offerings were just feeble redesigns of “untouchable” classics, Norwegian filmmaker Roar Uthaug was upping the slasher game with Cold Prey (2006), followed by Mats Stenberg’s even more impressive Cold Prey 2: Resurrection (we don’t have to talk about Cold Prey 3). The very essence of Halloween hits snow-capped mountains for a frigid slasher trilogy that succeeds as an original property. It’s an homage to the North American slasher (itself influenced by Italian giallos), able to exist outside the rigidity of audience demand that drives our theater-packing horror movements.

Foreign popular culture doesn’t always mimic our American tastes in tandem. The impact of, say, American fashion on outside markets can operate on a delay the same way international territories might not get US movie releases until well after their domestic window. Where American studios had moved on from the slasher format 80s gorehounds know and love, international audiences and filmmakers still kept their appetite. Movies like Friday the 13th or Halloween had been riffed to death by American filmmakers, but we must remember that’s a uniquely U-S problem. For filmmakers in other countries, the slasher format was still begging for new remixes.

Whenever I hear comments about how “they don’t make ‘em like they used to,” I immediately offer up foreign language slashers like 2018’s Party Hard, Die Young (which hit Shudder in 2019). In a year headlined by buzzier marquee titles like It Chapter 2, Annabelle Comes Home and Us, Dominik Hartl’s vacation massacre keeps alive the simplest of slasher expectations: booze, sex, drugs, death. Sure, it’s formulaic, but that’s the point. You’ve got a masked killer, irresponsible young adults, and flashy practical effects — but even better? An investment in slasher filmmaking that’s given the proper attention. Party Hard, Die Young is pretty to look at and solidly acted, which hilariously feels above and beyond in subgenre comparisons.

It’s slightly insulting to claim the slasher subgenre hasn’t had value in years when these general swipes only regard American theatrical qualifications. Taneli Mustonen’s Lake Bodom (2016) takes inspiration from real 1960s murders and executes a clever slasher tale with brutal twists.

Armando Fonseca and Kapel Furman’s Skull (2020) is pure B-movie mayhem as a possessed mask turns its wearer into a slaughter-happy vessel spilling gallons of fake blood. Bartosz M. Kowalski’s Nobody Sleeps in the Woods Tonight (2020) drags old-school slasher mentalities into the digital age with plenty of love shown to American hack-em-ups like Wrong Turn 2. These are movies filled with deep knife wounds, bone shards repurposed as daggers, and pustulating antagonists that exist outside what American studio influence deems profitable at the time, very much keeping the supposedly “dead” slasher subgenre alive.

International slashers on Streaming- lake bodom

‘Lake Bodom’

Platforms like Shudder and Netflix have become a home for these ugly ducklings because streaming’s metrics for success aren’t ticket sales and box office grosses. Streamers face the challenge of subscriber retention, which means they value variety as much as or even above popularity (well, they should). Imagine if Shudder only catered to the mainstream horror demographic that dictates what plays in theaters with their wallets — you’d get bored of an entire year of new releases that were all Conjurverse replicas, wouldn’t you? That’s why Lake Bodom and Skull ended up on Shudder, and Netflix nabbed Nobody Sleeps in the Woods Tonight.

Thanksgiving might be getting all the credit for being an original IP slasher, but Netflix released two overseas slashers as competition. Why aren’t we discussing Patrik Eklund’s The Conference, a brutal Worksploitation slasher à la Severance where coworkers on a retreat start getting the axe? Or Carlos Alonso-Ojea’s Spanish Killer Book Club, a stylish meta slasher about a social media killer that wants so desperately to be Scream? Let alone recent releases from past years like A Classic Horror Story, Nobody Sleeps in the Woods Tonight II or Girls With Balls?

Then there’s the domestic independent component of it all, which is an entirely separate beast.

When studios abandoned original slasher concepts and leaned on the built-in fanbases of proven slasher properties, indie filmmakers took over. Adam Green released New Orleans-based slasher Hatchet in 2007, and the legend of Victor Crowley was born. Kane Hodder plays the deformed Louisiana brute who mutilates haunted tour victims like a throwback 80s chop-’em-up flick. Green’s “Hatchet Army” showed up for three more films until 2017’s Victor Crowley, all adhering to the beloved slasher formula of hunt, kill, repeat. Major studios were taking the sure bets, but that didn’t mean mavericks like Green weren’t trying to write their own legends. The Hatchet franchise is the closest we’d get in the 2000s and 2010s to seeing a new slasher icon rise to prominence like in the Golden Era, although Victor Crowley wasn’t alone.

Others tried to replicate slasher models as we used to know them with even tighter means. Robert Green Hall channeled his special effects background as director of 2009’s Laid to Rest, a scrappy and sleazier retro slasher where Nick Principe plays serial killer ChromeSkull (in the sequel as well). Or maybe a hamburger chain mascot is more your style of slasher villain, in which case 2007’s Drive-Thru is more your flavor. Even better, what if Ronald Regan was a slasher killer who took the phrase “drugs kill” literally and massacred a bunch of no-good hippies at a knockoff Woodstock? Then you should go watch David Arquette’s The Tripper (2006), which is, as sold, quite a trip. These types of slashers raged against the Hollywood machine and provided an antidote to forced contemporary trends, all seeking their audience outside the spotlight.

While I’m not insisting every example is a five star film, how many of those baffling 80s slasher productions were met with instantaneous enthusiasm? Something like The Mutilator is remembered as a cult classic — “So bad it’s good,” as they say. The Golden Era was losing its shine by then, yet we rewatch movies like Pledge Night with a smile. I hope what’s overlooked now will resurface thanks to archivists years down the road, when someone digs into the fossilized remains of horror history that tell a different story. Maybe one chapter can be about boutique labels ringing David Arquette to find missing reels/files/whatever of The Tripper like it’s some aughts-bred oddity.

‘Tragedy Girls’

Perhaps when someone states that “slashers died,” or any similar turn of phrase, they mean the brand of slasher that objectified beautiful women, where dialogue didn’t matter and deaths would bust open mannequins packed with rotten fruit. That would make sense, because as the times changed, slashers could either evolve or actually die. Scream opened the door to a type of slasher storytelling that poked fun at the free-wheeling 80s and goofy slasher tropes, eventually taking aim at poor representation and blatant misogyny in those naughtier titles that were dragging the subgenre into the early 90s.

In the 2000s, slashers went above and beyond to showcase how the subgenre could grow. We can all agree that Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon (2006) is an A+ example of metatextual slasher storytelling that is both a cheeky satire and a thrilling slasher. Jonathan Levine’s All the Boys Love Mandy Lane premiered as part of 2006’s Toronto International Film Festival before a seven-year shelving (distributor issues) and subverted the final girl formula with a sharp bite. Then you’ve got the “flipped script” slashers like Tucker & Dale Vs. Evil (2010) or Tragedy Girls (2017) that found unique ways to focus on the killers instead of victims (“killers” in quotes for the former), playing by their own rules to reset presumptions.

Just because it’s different doesn’t mean the subgenre is dead. As audience demand changes, so must horror storytelling norms. Just because a slasher movie doesn’t behave in the same way your late-night faves like Gynecology Massacre 27 once did doesn’t mean the subgenre is cooked. Dude Bro Party Massacre III (2015) and Slumber Party Massacre (2021) are exceptionally subversive takes on sorority house and sleepover slashers where the helpless co-eds die sexily one by one under the male gaze. These are slashers of a modern era, caught up with societal awareness more relevant to today’s viewers. Don’t get me wrong, that’s not a condemnation of what exists — you cannot judge past art on current terms — but more an acknowledgment that slashers can wear many masks (pun intended). They’re still all slashers, just with different motivations.

There are plenty of examples of these more rejuvenated slashers. Blumhouse has its Happy Death Day duo along with Freaky and M3GAN, Shudder just dropped It’s a Wonderful Knife, and Netflix has its Fear Street trilogy in addition to There’s Someone Inside Your House. You’ve also got underdogs like Joseph Kahn’s Detention (2011) and John Berardo’s Initiation (2020) that take very different approaches to school-focused slashers in vastly opposing tones. We easily recognize these slashers in structure (except Detention, that’s just bonkers fun). While they aren’t the gruesome, toothsome after-dark indulgences of yesteryear, they’re still successful slashers despite updated methods.

Terrifier 2 commentary

‘Terrifier 2’

How can we also not recognize how Art the Clown and Terrifier set the stage for primitive slashers to regain momentum? Y’all are the ones with Art tattoos, apparel, shrines — the works. “You could never make an 80s slasher today.” Oh really? The first Terrifier is the most stripped-down slasher structure imaginable, while Terrifier 2 is a no-holds-barred sequel that flies off the rails. Oh, and they’re manically repulsive. We sometimes retain memories like goldfish, because Art the Clown showcased his knife cuts well before John Carver (Roth’s stabby version). Terrifier helped make the slasher space unsafe again, like Williamson’s newest COVID-19 slasher Sick.

Wading deeper still, an entire contingency of silly-billy filmmakers are having their way with the public domain and random objects. What if Winnie the Pooh and Piglet were slasher killers? Boom, Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey. The Grinch? Here’s The Mean One! A sorority house mascot sloth? You’d dare enter the Slotherhouse? A reclining chair possessed by the soul of a pervy occultist connected to a string of deaths? You better believe Killer Sofa exists! I’ve seen some of the 70s and 80s slashers you all rave about, and don’t pretend like today’s trash is any worse. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it’s not happening — the schlock and awe are still around, even sneaking into multiplexes with the help of Fathom events.

Then there’s the double-down on slasher remakes … again. Halloween gets another reboot (David Gordon Green’s direct sequel to John Carpenter’s original). Sophia Takal’s second-take Black Christmas remake and Lars Klevberg’s malfunction of a Child’s Play reboot hit in 2019. Nia DaCosta heard her name called five times to remake Candyman in 2021. David Blue Garcia’s Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Radio Silence’s Scream V both sought their respective releases in 2022. History repeats itself just like fads come back into prominence because no matter how adventurous or expeditious we claim we are, humans, at their core, crave comfort.

Thanksgiving is a kickass slasher flick in a long line of kickass slasher flicks. The subgenre has refused to forfeit, and while it might have vacated theater chains for a spell, thrived elsewhere. Claiming that Thanksgiving hits the restart button for slashers erases all the international and indie siblings that have kept the subgenre alive, devaluing their contributions. Hell, Ti West’s X took the horror world by storm only last year (and Pearl, by extension). Thanksgiving is a crucial slasher footnote regarding domestic releases, but is just one voice in a sea of many as long as you open your ears.

Much like its villains, the slasher subgenre will never, ever die. As Chucky reminds us, “I’ll be back, I always come back — but dying is such a bitch.”

Radio Silence Scream 7

‘Scream VI’

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading