Connect with us

Editorials

Six of the Scariest Monsters from 60 Years of ‘Doctor Who’ History

Published

on

Doctor Who scariest

For what was originally intended to be an educational kid’s show that used time-travel as an excuse for history lessons, it’s amazing just how much BBC’s Doctor Who has evolved since its debut back in 1963. From low-budget war stories taking advantage of existing period-piece sets to small-screen epics featuring CGI that rivals many modern blockbusters, there’s something here for everyone – even horror fans.

In fact, the show has a long history of scaring its viewers, with even genre creators like Neil Gaiman famously claiming to have watched certain episodes from behind the couch to protect himself from its numerous monsters. And with this sci-fi saga currently celebrating its 60th anniversary, we thought that this might be a good time to highlight six of the scariest monsters from the 60 years of Doctor Who history.

While this list is based on personal opinion, don’t forget to comment below with your own favorite time-traveling fiends if you think we missed a particularly creepy one. After all, there are over six decades of creatures to choose from, and even the most recent episodes have something scary to offer.

Now, onto the list…


6. Krynoids

Doctor Who scariest moments

First introduced in the 1976 serial The Seeds of Doom, the infectious Krynoids are a plant-based alien species hell-bent on eliminating the vegetarian inhabitants of the universe. While that sounds like a silly premise, the show’s depiction of these green monsters leans heavily into classic sci-fi body-horror, with the original serial borrowing many elements from films like 1951’s The Thing From Another World.

And while the special effects here aren’t exactly Rob Bottin levels of convincing (though watching these episodes on a low-end CRT through a shaky signal might help with that), the implication that these spores could take over the minds and bodies of the entire human race will always be terrifying.


5. The Flood

David Tennant’s tenure as the 10th Doctor is often cited as one of the most iconic renditions of the character, but I’d argue that a huge part of 10’s success is due to the incredible antagonists featured in that era of the show. For example, 2009’s The Waters of Mars tested the Doctor to his limits as he faced off against a sentient liquid that turned its thirsty hosts into dry-lipped water zombies.

Admittedly, space-zombies aren’t exactly the most original concept in the history of sci-fi, but the addition of the Doctor’s moral dilemma about stopping a tragedy he knows is meant to happen as well as some gnarly make-up effects make these parched undead some of the spookiest monsters in the show’s history.


4. Rutans

You’ve got to hand it to early Doctor Who for managing to tell extremely engaging yarns on a shoestring budget. Case in point, the 1977 serial Horror of Fang Rock is often remembered as one of the show’s most thrilling stories despite being mostly confined to a single location and relying on primitive effects to bring the villainous Rutans to life.

A race of jellyfish-like aliens obsessed with defeating their intergalactic rivals (the Sontarans), what really makes the Rutans scary is how they’re presented as a near-supernatural threat immersed in the eerie fog surrounding an isolated lighthouse. It’s unclear whether or not this was the writers’ intention, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see these amorphous creatures at the end of an especially eerie Lovecraft tale.


3. Possessed Ood

Doctor Who scariest episodes

Despite their eldritch appearance, the hive-minded Ood are actually a benevolent race of telepathic humanoids easily manipulated by other species. However, their terrifying design is soon put to good use by the showrunners as these docile creatures turn into unstoppable murderers once their hive mind is hijacked by a seemingly demonic entity in The Impossible Planet – which is precisely why they rank so high on this list.

Admittedly, the idea that this alien race was being possessed by space-Satan ended up being much creepier in theory than in the CGI-heavy finale of the story, but every subsequent appearance of the Ood has left viewers with an eerie feeling in the back of their minds as they wonder if any of that demonic influence still remains…


2. Vashta Nerada

Doctor Who scariest monsters

You’d be hard-pressed to find a more common phobia than the fear of the dark, and that’s why it makes sense that one of the scariest Doctor Who stories features sentient shadows that feed on human flesh. Thought to be the origin of legends about people disappearing in the dark, the Vashta Nerada are terrifying enough as a concept, with the Doctor going so far as to describe them as “piranhas of the air” as he warns his companions to watch out for astronauts with more than one shadow.

However, things become even creepier once these gloomy beings consume the contents of their victims’ space suits and leave behind re-animated skeletons that they can manipulate like a living body. If that doesn’t scream sci-fi horror, I don’t know what does.


1. Weeping Angels

Originally introduced in a standalone episode that basically amounts to a 45-minute horror film (2007’s Blink, starring Carey Mulligan!), the Weeping Angels have since become one of the show’s most popular recurring villains and a staple of sci-fi horror in general. Described as quantum-locked predators who can only move when they’re not being observed, this SCP-esque threat represents the absolute peak of Who-vian terror.

Some fans claim that the show ended up overusing the Angels until they were no longer scary (with one episode even revealing that the statue of liberty was one of them all along), but I’d argue that the disturbing implication that any statue could potentially be a quantum-locked monster makes the Weeping Angels worthy of the number-one spot on this list.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading