Connect with us

Editorials

Diving into the Heart of ‘Devilman Crybaby’ 5 Years Later

Published

on

Anime for Horror Fans - Devilman Crybaby

Sometimes, it takes an outsider’s point of view to reveal the peculiarities of traditional belief systems – especially when it comes to religion. This is likely why so many people are fascinated with Japanese artists that incorporate Western religion into their work. From the apocalypse of Neon Genesis Evangelion to the pacifism behind Trigun, there’s a long history of anime and manga borrowing from Christian imagery and beliefs in order to tell engaging stories.

In fact, one of the most successful examples of this special kind of cultural fusion happened back in 1972 with the release of Go Nagai’s seminal manga series, Devilman. Long before the days of similar hell-themed heroes like Spawn and Hellboy (or even Marvel’s revamped Ghost Rider, which came out a couple of months later), Nagai cooked up a horror/superhero hybrid that managed to turn a demonic outbreak into a terrifying anti-war parable.

Despite the series’ strange artwork and graphic violence, it became a surprise hit amongst shonen fans, leading to numerous adaptations that tended to tone down the source material. It was only in 2018 that we’d see a new adaptation attempt to tackle Nagai’s original tragic ending, courtesy of a partnership between Netflix and Science Saru. And with the ensuing Devilman Crybaby celebrating its 5th anniversary, I think that this is the perfect time to look back on the brilliance of this infamous modern-day reboot.

A fan of the original manga, Science Saru co-founder Masaaki Yuasa jumped at the opportunity to revisit one of Japan’s most underrated superheroes once Netflix informed the team that they wouldn’t be held back by pesky Network Television guidelines. Not only did this mean that the studio could try their hand at concluding the story with the aforementioned tragic finale, but it also allowed Yuasa to up the violence and sexuality, with the director figuring that Nagai’s original work had been naturally censored by 1970s shonen sensibilities.

Other changes included a Greek chorus of sorts in the form of hip-hopping teenagers (which replace the traditional bullies of the manga), as well as elements of social media outrage once news of the demons gets out. And in a clever fourth-wall breaking twist, the original Devilman anime somehow exists in this world, showing up on TV and posters as the story goes on. However, the overall plot remains largely the same as the manga, especially when it comes to characterizing our noble protagonist.

“Demons exist. There could be one right next to you.”

In the finished series, we follow sensitive high school athlete Akira Fudo as he reconnects with his childhood friend Ryo Asuka and discovers that demons exist. After a plan to expose the demons in a nightclub goes awry, Akira becomes possessed by the demonic influence of “Amon” but manages to resist his murderous urges through sheer force of will, transforming into the super-powered Devilman in the process. What follows is a peculiar mix of gory super-hero adventures and wartime paranoia as Akira comes to terms with his new abilities while navigating a world torn apart by the newly revealed existence of demons.

Much like its source material, Devilman Crybaby is much more than the sum of its bizarre parts. From brutal gore and extremely graphic sex scenes to moments of genuinely touching teenage drama, there’s nothing else quite like it even in the anime world. While the plot initially follows familiar superhero tropes as our young protagonist learns how to use his powers for the greater good, this premise is eventually abandoned in favor of a fascinating geopolitical allegory that dives into the consequences of prejudice and media manipulation.

This ambitious tapestry of narrative threads means that the pacing is a bit wild, with the story allowing almost no time for the viewer to reflect on events as conflict continuously escalates in 20-minute episodes that have little to no breathing room, but this ends up giving Devilman Crybaby an infectious energy that keeps you hooked from the very beginning.

As if that wasn’t enough, the animation alone here is already enough to keep up your eyes glued to the screen. Science Saru is known for their highly stylized action (which is likely why they were hired for last year’s Scott Pilgrim Takes Off), but the Netflix budget and minimalist art style make this one of their best and most fluid works yet. Vivid colors and solid motion make for some of the most memorable visuals in animation history, and it’s all boosted by a kick-ass soundtrack that effortlessly mixes techno, hip-hop and rock into a unified experience.

Devilman Crybaby Netflix series

“You’re not a demon, you’re not a human either.”

Of course, it’s the horror elements that make this superhero story stand out, and while the disturbing monster designs and excessively detailed gore are terrifying enough, it’s the faith-based terrors that make Devilman Crybaby such a chilling show. Borrowing from the darker side of Christianity and human history as it depicts a society on the verge of collapsing while humans turn on each other, this is one of the most unique takes on religious horror to ever come out of Japan. The origins of these demons and the angelic antagonist might not be 100% “lore-accurate,” but the scenes showing how Christian characters react to this terrifying test of faith are proof that the creators took the source material seriously.

These quieter moments make the horror hit that much harder, with the show juggling themes of family and identity while also showing that the demons can often be more human than human as they indulge in mindless sex and violence. I also really appreciate how Akira doesn’t really have a traditional character arc, starting out as a sensitive and caring person and continuing to celebrate these qualities to the bitter end like a slightly more demonic Superman.

And speaking of the end, you can’t discuss the first adult-oriented Devilman adaptation without diving into its controversial ending. While I won’t get into details in order to avoid spoilers for newcomers, I will say that this is the perfect conclusion to a story about the horrors of war and persecution even if it does come out of left field. Honestly, I’d rank it up there with The Mist as one of the most meaningful downer endings of all time.

At its core, Devilman Crybaby is a story about the viral nature of empathy and hatred, which is something that we’ve seen play out in real life time and time again since the anime’s release. Science Saru may have recontextualized the story for a new generation, but moments like that final relay race where students literally pass a baton of empathy to each other in the middle of the climactic showdown are proof that the studio understood the decidedly human heart of Nagai’s creation.

Sexy, brutal and captivating, Devilman Crybaby still hasn’t been surpassed in the five years since its release. The frantic pacing and graphic content mean that it’s probably not for everyone (especially if you’re not used to over-the-top anime stories), but I’d argue that even non-anime fans should give this strange little show a chance.

Devilman Crybaby Netflix

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading