Connect with us

Editorials

Appreciating the Post-Apocalyptic Horror of ‘Terminator Salvation’

Published

on

Terminator horror

Hollywood has never really accepted that you can’t recapture lightning in a bottle. No matter how context-specific a blockbuster’s success was, you can always count on an executive to insist on making a follow-up even if that doesn’t make sense for the story. That being said, sequels aren’t always doomed to failure, and one of the most famous examples of this is James Cameron’s Terminator 2, a film that refused to do the same thing twice and became just as iconic as the original.

Naturally, Hollywood learned all of the wrong lessons from the success of T2, as most of its sequels would be repetitive cash-grabs simply reiterating on the same tired ideas of fate, time travel and robot assassins. The only real exception to this curse would be 2009’s controversial Terminator Salvation, a post-apocalyptic thriller that genuinely expands on the world of its source material despite having been commissioned as yet another generic franchise project.

After the middling reception of 2003’s Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines, the Terminator franchise fell into legal limbo as the IP rights passed from company to company. After years of negotiations, the inevitable fourth instalment would end up being independently financed and distributed by Warner and Sony, but only after a complete narrative overhaul disconnecting it from Rise of the Machines.

With the producers assuring him that the new film wouldn’t be yet another time-travel flick, infamous director McG signed onto the film as an attempt to vary his filmography. Boasting a surprisingly dark premise that finally delved into the horrific war between humans and Skynet, Terminator Salvation ended up attracting quite a few big names (and an absurd $200 million budget) before production finally began in 2008.

Unfortunately, shooting was plagued by difficulties, and I’m not just referring to Christian Bale’s on-set meltdown where he yelled at a cinematographer for nearly 4 minutes. From constant rewrites (with Alan Dean Foster even being forced to rewrite his novelization of the movie due to how different it ended up being to the end product) to squabbling between the cast and crew, it seemed like fate itself was opposed to the idea of another sequel.

Nevertheless, in the completed film we follow Sam Worthington as Marcus Wright, a death row inmate who wakes up in a ruined world dominated by murderous machines and discovers that he’s now a cybernetic hybrid. Meanwhile, human resistance leader John Connor (Christian Bale) embarks on a mission to destroy Skynet’s base of operations before they can assassinate key figures to the resistance – including his future time-travelling father, Kyle Reese (Anton Yelchin).


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Terminator Salvation wasn’t exactly a failure, raking in nearly double its budget at the box office, but it wasn’t the hit that the producers had intended. Not only was the critical reception middling, with media outlets accusing the film of being a disjointed mess, but even the original power trio of Cameron, Schwarzenegger and Hamilton dismissed the flick as a soulless cash-grab after release.

However, despite its reputation as a generic 2000s blockbuster, the years have ultimately been kind to Salvation. After even more formulaic sequels like Genisys and Dark Fate, folks have started to look back on McG’s film as an underrated high point of the franchise that dared to tread new and refreshingly mean-spirited ground even if it couldn’t quite deliver on its lofty ambitions.

After all, there’s no denying that the flick features quite a bit of atmosphere, with this oppressive world being brought to life by detailed sets and stylish cinematography that would be sorely absent from future instalments. McG even went so far as to insist that the entire cast and crew read bleak sci-fi stories like The Road and Blade Runner in order to prepare them for a darker take on the future, and though they were held back by a PG-13 rating (despite the director later claiming that the film was never meant to be gory), the action sequences here are still legitimately thrilling – especially when they involve practical robot effects.

The high-profile cast is also a delight, with Christian Bale giving Connor some much-needed pathos and Yelchin stealing the show as a younger and more charismatic Kyle Reese. And while Sam Worthington was only really cast because James Cameron convinced McG that he was the next Tom Cruise, he ended up delivering one of his best performances as a man struggling with his own monstrous identity.

The movie may have its flaws, but I still think it’s a huge shame that the planned trilogy of post-apocalyptic Terminator flicks never panned out. I would have loved to see this world expanded on, especially if they had gone with the original leaked ending which saw Marcus take a deceased John Connor’s place by wearing the dead man’s skin over his metallic endoskeleton in order to keep the resistance motivated.


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

Terminator horror movie

After decades of action films, it’s easy to forget that The Terminator was originally meant to be a terrifying movie monster inspired by a nightmare of a skeleton walking through flames. And while I think the first film is the only that really captured this idea, Salvation comes in at a close second with its grimier depiction of Skynet’s robotics.

This was actually the final project of special effects maestro Stan Winston, who partnered up with frequent James Cameron collaborator Martin Laing to design grittier and more degraded takes on our metallic antagonists. This led to an almost diesel-punk-inspired aesthetic which really hammered home the fact that this was technically a prequel despite being set in the future.

Having our protagonist be a Terminator hybrid also adds a bit of body-horror to the mix, especially if you consider the gruesome original ending. In fact, in recent interviews, McG has claimed that his original intention was for Marcus to be taken over by Skynet after replacing Connor and infiltrating the resistance, which would have been one of the most horrific finales in Terminator history.

At the end of the day, Terminator Salvation clearly isn’t the film that McG and company had originally set out to make, but once you consider the long road from pre-production to release (with the script even having survived a writer’s strike), this is a much more entertaining film than it has any right to be. While there’s likely an alternate timeline where Salvation became as big of a hit as T2, I still think that the movie we got is the last truly enjoyable Terminator and worth revisiting even if you didn’t like it the first time around.


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading