Connect with us

Editorials

‘Exists’ – ‘Blair Witch Project’ Director Unleashed One of the Best Bigfoot Horror Movies 10 Years Ago

Published

on

Exists

The beginning of Exists echoes those many other horror films set in the deep woods. Hapless folks encounter an unusual threat, likely after trespassing or offending the locals. And as this well-used formula commands, the characters then die in gruesome fashion. Eduardo Sánchez’s 2014 film is, admittedly, derivative of most body-count horrors with rural backdrops, yet it contains at least one novelty to set it apart: a Bigfoot. Hardly five minutes into this film and the young cast hits something on the road. As they assess the damage to their car and figure out what they struck, the characters get the sinking feeling that they are being watched from the nearby woods. Someone finally states the obvious: “That wasn’t no deer, bro.”

On average, found-footage horror films delay their strangeness in an effort to establish a semblance of normalcy. Make everything hypernormal and deliberately tedious so that the bizarre bits are more persuasive. Exists, however, takes a few shortcuts. The requisite videographer of the group, Brian (Chris Osborn), even shows the story’s imminent danger to his brother (Samuel Davis), their friends (Dora Madison Burge, Roger Edwards, Denise Williamson) and the viewers; his handheld camera captured a glimpse of the hairy hominid in question, walking upright and alongside the road that fateful night. Other filmmakers would steer away from revealing Bigfoot so early on and blatantly, yet knowing the beast is indeed on the prowl does not diminish the overall effect. The audience now simply waits for the inevitable to happen.

While Exists almost ended up being a mix of found-footage and traditional filmmaking, the undiluted first-person approach is far more fitting of such an elusive subject. The myth of Bigfoot, after all, endures in real life because of amateur recordings, blurry photos, and unreliable testimonies. Frequent collaborators Eduardo Sánchez and screenwriter Jamie Nash quickly confirmed the famous cryptid is real in their story’s universe, yet their film goes on to piecemeal the creature’s actualness. The Patterson–Gimlin footage-esque peeks at Bigfoot, as he or she encroaches more and more on the human characters’ spaces, come first before any point-blank shots. Eventually, though, that shaky lens becomes focused, and Bigfoot crosses over the threshold between the known and the unknown world.

exists bigfoot movie

Pictured: The characters in Exists examine the damage to their vehicle.

In certain respects, Exists is the antithesis of Sánchez’s The Blair Witch Project. The monumental 1999 film also featured young people getting lost and chased in a forest by a perilous entity, but Heather, Mike and Josh’s plight did not necessarily require a literal pursuit. The viewers’ imagination does most of the heavy lifting there, and Blair Witch is better for it. Sánchez could have easily gone down the same route with Exists, yet he wanted to show Bigfoot. There is no vagueness to speak of here, like in other similar films. Likely inspiration The Legend of Boggy Creek achieved the kind of slow-burn eeriness that its spiritual descendants lack for whatever reason. Meanwhile, Exists is the best of both worlds: blunt action and tense psychological buildup.

These days, Bigfoot is taken less seriously than in the past. The beast has since become associated with real-life cryptozoology cranks, fruitless documentaries and junky reality television, and a glut of shoddy horror films. Exists may not look all that distinguishable from the latter category, however, Sánchez is succeeds at making Bigfoot menacing again. The director turned the once-gentle guardian of North America’s woodlands — the film trades the standard Pacific Northwest backdrop for a generic wilderness setting somewhere in East Texas — into a fearsome monster. This ferocious take on Bigfoot is convincing due in large part to Brian Steele (The Relic, Hellboy II: The Golden Army, Predators). The towering creature actor is equipped with a compelling and custom-made suit — one courtesy of Spectral Motion and used again in Jon Garcia’s Summoning the Spirit — but Steele’s physical dedication and immersive performance are what ultimately sell this terrifying version of Bigfoot.

Those tuning in to Exists and expecting to see Bigfoot go ape on young fodder should walk away satisfied. The creature carnage within is not entirely mindless, though. Sánchez accomplished several well designed and exciting set-pieces that give this film its greater replay value. From Bigfoot terrorizing the stranded cast with distant bellowing to turning an ordinary cabin into a nail-biting scarehouse, the story’s hairy threat is put to excellent use. Other memorable scenes include the cryptid outrunning someone on their bike — then proceeding to torment the other characters with said bike — and a blood-pumping, topsy-turvy RV sequence. Sánchez’s previous horror offerings have a tendency to be slow and measured, whereas Exists operates at a hazardous speed.

exists

Pictured: Chris Osborn’s character Brian records himself as the Bigfoot decides his fate.

Bigfoot’s rampage in the film initially comes across as aimless and wanton. However, when remembering the prologue’s conspicuous (and totally fabricated) factoids — one particular title card states: “Experts agree the creatures are only violent if provoked” — the Bigfoot’s actions become understandable. Sympathetic, even. Compensating for the human characters’ cursory personalities is the surprisingly layered depiction of the story’s presumed villain. The inciting tragedy was, as it turns out, the breaking point for an animal whose habitat had already been ravaged by wildfires. The grief theme rings loudest toward the end, where Bigfoot’s act of mercy drives home the notion that these animals are more human than realized.

When set side by side with the average teen slasher, Exists shares most of the same attributes. There is more of a fantastical element at play, of course, yet Sánchez and Nash ground the story as much as possible, all while capitalizing on their antagonist’s unearthly abilities. The outcome is not quite as horrendous as it could have been; violence is plentiful, yet blood, guts and gore are meager. Making up for the shortfall of sanguinary amusement are those exhilarating and elaborate kills already mentioned. Horror fans typically pitch the film as “Friday the 13th with a Bigfoot.” Potentially, if the Jason Voorhees franchise ever resumed business and ventured into found-footage territory, Exists would be a useful blueprint.

The better screen portrayals of Bigfoot are, arguably, found in those meditative and nature-oriented films from decades ago. On the other hand, the bar for Bigfoot Horror is so low, something like Exists can only look better when juxtaposed with such inferior films. A contrast effect notwithstanding, Eduardo Sánchez and Jamie Nash’s stab at the ‘squatch slasher format exceeds expectations and remains the gold standard when bringing out the monster in Bigfoot.

exists bigfoot

Pictured: Brian Steele, as Bigfoot, lands on the overturned RV.

Paul Lê is a Texas-based, Tomato approved critic at Bloody Disgusting, Dread Central, and Tales from the Paulside.

Editorials

11 Years Later: The Horrific Cycles of Violence in ‘Only God Forgives’ Starring Ryan Gosling

Published

on

Traditionally, movie theater walkouts are usually associated with the horror genre, with infamous cases ranging from 1973’s The Exorcist (particularly during the crucifix masturbation scene) and even Lars Von Trier’s controversial serial killer memoir, The House That Jack Built.

That being said, there are exceptions to this rule, as some movies manage to terrorize audiences into leaving the theater regardless of genre. One memorable example of this is Nicolas Winding Refn’s 2013 revenge thriller Only God Forgives, a film so brutal and inaccessible that quite a few critics ended up treating it like a snuff film from hell back when it was first released. However, I’ve come to learn that horror fans have a knack for seeing beyond the blood and guts when judging the value of a story, and that’s why I’d like to make a case for Winding’s near-impenetrable experiment as an excellent horror-adjacent experience.

Refn originally came up with the idea for Only God Forgives immediately after completing 2009’s Valhalla Rising and becoming confused by feelings of anger and existential dread during his wife’s second pregnancy. It was during this time that he found himself imagining a literal fistfight with God, with this concept leading him to envision a fairy-tale western set in the far east that would deal with some of the same primal emotions present in his Viking revenge story.

It was actually Ryan Gosling who convinced the director to tackle the more commercially viable Drive first, as he wanted to cement his partnership with the filmmaker in a more traditional movie before tackling a deeply strange project. This would pay off during the production of Only God Forgives, as the filmmaking duo was forced to use their notoriety to scrounge up money at a Thai film festival when local authorities began demanding bribes in order to allow shooting to continue.

In the finished film, Gosling plays Julian, an American ex-pat running a Muay-Thai boxing club alongside his sociopathic brother Billy (Tom Burke). When Billy gets himself killed after sexually assaulting and murdering a teenager, Julian is tasked by his disturbed mother (Kristin Scott Thomas) with tracking down those responsible for the death of her first-born child. What follows is a surreal dive into the seedy underbelly of Bangkok as the cycle of revenge escalates and violence leads to even more violence.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

There’s no right or wrong way to engage with art, but there are some films that clearly require more effort from the audience side in order to be effective. And while you can’t blame cinemagoers for just wanting to enjoy some passive entertainment, I think it’s always worth trying to meet a work of art on its own terms before judging it.

Despite being a huge fan of Drive, I avoided Only God Forgives for a long time because of its poor critical reception and excessively esoteric presentation. It was only years later that I gave the flick a chance when a friend of mine described the experience as “David Lynch on cocaine.” It was then that I realized that nearly everything critics had complained about in the film are precisely what made it so interesting.

If you can stomach the deliberate pacing, you’ll likely be fascinated by this stylish nightmare about morally questionable people becoming trapped in a needless cycle of violence and retaliation. Not only is the photography impeccable, turning the rain-slicked streets of Bangkok into a neo-noir playground, but the bizarre characters and performances also help to make this an undeniably memorable movie. And while Gosling deserves praise as the unhinged Julian, I’d argue that Vithaya Pansringarm steals the show here as “The Angel of Vengeance,” even if his untranslated dialogue is likely to be unintelligible for most viewers.

However, I think the lack of subtitles ends up enhancing the mood here (even though some editions of the film ended up including them against the director’s wishes), adding to the feeling that Julian is a stranger in a strange land while also allowing viewers to project their own motivations onto some of the “antagonists.”

And while Only God Forgives is frequently accused of burying its narrative underneath a pile of artsy excess, I think the heart of the film is rather straightforward despite its obtuse presentation. I mean, the moral here is basically “revenge isn’t fun,” which I think is made clear by the horrific use of violence (though we’ll discuss that further in the next section).

To be clear, I’m still not sure whether or not I enjoyed this movie, I just know that I’m glad I watched it.


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

There are two different kinds of gore effects. One of them is meant to entertain viewers with exaggerated wounds and excessive blood as you admire the craftsmanship behind the filmmaking. The other kind is simply a tool meant to simulate what actually happens when you injure a human body. Like I mentioned before, Only God Forgives isn’t trying to be “fun,” so you can guess what kind gore is in this one…

From realistic maimings to brutal fist fights that feel more painful than thrilling, the “action” label on this flick seems downright questionable when the majority of the experience has you wincing at genuinely scary acts of grisly violence. I mean, the story begins with an unmotivated rampage through the streets of late-night Bangkok and ends with the implication of even more pointless violence, so it’s pretty clear that you’re not really meant to root for an “action hero” here.

I can’t even say that the deaths resemble those from slasher flicks because the movie never attempts to sensationalize these horrific acts, with Refn preferring to depict them as straightforward consequences of violent people going through the motions – which is somehow even scarier than if this had just been yet another hyper-violent revenge movie.

Not only that, but the characters’ overall lack of moral principles makes this story even more disturbing, with the main antagonist being the closest thing to a decent person among the main cast despite also being a brutal vigilante.

Only God Forgives doesn’t care if you like it or not (and actually takes measures to make sure that the viewing experience is often unpleasant), but if you’re willing to step up to this cinematic challenge and engage with the narrative and visuals on their own terms, I think you’ll find an unforgettable nightmare waiting for you on the other side.


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Continue Reading