Connect with us

Editorials

The Rock vs. Giant Monsters: Appreciating the Brutal Kaiju Action of ‘Rampage’

Published

on

The classic Kaiju movie formula may have been invented in America with flicks like King Kong and The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms, but at this point everyone’s aware that Japan is the one that perfected the genre. From Godzilla to Gamera, Japanese filmmakers have made these giant creature features part of their national identity, so it stands to reason that the west can’t quite keep up when it comes to traditional Kaiju movies.

Sure, we’re lucky enough to be living through a Kaiju renaissance with Legendary’s Monsterverse and the occasional dark horse like Guillermo del Toro’s Pacific Rim, but it’s really difficult for western cinema to capture the cheesy chaos of giant monsters wreaking havoc in densely populated urban environments. Thankfully, there are exceptions to this rule, and I’d argue that there’s one recent blockbuster that actually managed to reach the heights of its inspirations by embracing its B-movie roots and allowing the monsters to actually act like monsters.

Naturally, I’m referring to Brad Peyton’s 2018 video game adaptation Rampage, a film that I think was unfairly maligned when it first came out despite balancing both old and new Kaiju tropes in a uniquely charming cocktail that would have made the likes of Ray Harryhausen and Shusuke Kaneko proud.

A highly popular 1986 arcade game that that would go onto inspire five sequels, Rampage was set to be adapted into a motion picture once Warner Brothers acquired Midway back in 2009, with the project being officially announced in 2011. However, it would take years for the film to actually get off the ground, with producers commissioning several scripts before settling on one by Ryan Engle – who made it clear that the monsters weren’t supposed to be the heroes.

Frequent collaborators Dwayne Johnson and Brad Peyton were then set to star and direct, with the duo claiming that a shared love of the source material convinced them to sign on. In the finished film, which released in April of 2018, Johnson plays a primatologist (and former special forces soldier) who becomes embroiled in a corporate conspiracy when the Energyne company accidentally unleashes a powerful mutagen onto a trio of animals – including George, an albino Gorilla that Davis rescued from poachers. Before long, Chicago finds itself under siege by giant monsters, with Davis and George being the only ones capable of stopping their destructive rampage.


SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Peyton’s film wasn’t exactly a critical darling when it first came out (though its 51% approval rating made it Rotten Tomatoes’ highest rated video game adaptation of all time until the release of Detective Pikachu the following year), but its impressive box office numbers make it clear that audiences were craving for big dumb monster movie fun – something that Rampage delivered in spades.

There’s no denying that this is a B-movie on steroids, featuring the kind of monster movie logic usually reserved for SyFy originals alongside some truly expensive-looking visuals. And while this slightly trashy approach may have bothered some critics, I think it’s okay for a movie to aspire only to entertain and nothing else.

Featuring a surprisingly effective combination of crass humor and excessively brutal action sequences (which are boosted by detailed visual effects work and terrifying monster designs courtesy of Weta Digital), the flick’s bizarre lack of polish combined with its insanely high production value result in a blockbuster that’s way more fun than it has any right to be.

Of course, a lot of that is owed to The Rock’s natural charisma, with his patented leading man charm keeping the human portions of the flick almost as entertaining as the titular destruction – a rarity for Kaiju stories. I also really empathized with Davis’ and George’s friendship, and the fact that the two end up fighting together helped to keep the film emotionally grounded even as it delves into Saturday Morning Cartoon territory.


AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

As absurd as it sounds, Toho has a long-standing rule prohibiting Godzilla from actually eating people. Even in recent films where the radioactive dinosaur is depicted a villainous menace, he may bite at folks, but he never actually consumes human flesh. Rampage has no such rule (after all, eating people was a mechanic in the original games), and I think that illustrates why the film stands out for allowing its monsters to really let loose.

I know it sounds like a silly detail, but Rampage’s lack of reverence towards Ralph, Lizzie and George means that the film isn’t limited by trying to appease toy-purchasing children or hardcore fans of the games (even if there are quite a few instances of side-scrolling arcade action), which is why the movie can get away with some pretty gnarly stuff. I mean, the filmmakers didn’t just make George albino so he looked less like King Kong – they also changed his appearance so you could actually see more damage during the fights.

From buildings collapsing onto civilians and monsters being decapitated as these walking natural disasters have their way with Chicago, I think it’s safe to say that this is one of the most bloodthirsty PG-13 blockbusters in recent memory, and I’m not just talking about the graphic Kaiju-on-Kaiju violence. While it’s likely that only younger viewers will be scared by the film’s destruction, I think this mean-spiritedness makes Rampage feel more in line with classic Kaiju flicks like 20 Million Miles to Earth and Rodan, which is why I hope future monster movies like the upcoming Kong x Godzilla: The New Empire learn from its cheesy yet brutal approach to chaos.

Rampage certainly isn’t a perfect film, suffering from classic monster movie pitfalls like underwhelming human antagonists and saving most of the memorable action for the final act (though Dwayne Johnson does his best at mitigating these issues), but I think it’s a shame that one of the most unpretentious creature features of our time has mostly been forgotten just because it dared to embrace its B-movie charms.


There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading