Connect with us

Editorials

Hot Pink Horror and the Color of Feminine Rage [1989 Week]

Published

on

Presented by Lisa Frankenstein1989 Week is dialing the clock back to the crossroads year for the genre with a full week of features that dig six feet under into the year. Today, Jenn Adams puts a candy-colored lens over the hot pink horror sub-genre.

The color most associated with the horror genre is undoubtedly red. Not only the hue of blood and anger, it’s also the shade of the iconic devil – a masculine figure said to be the source of all evil. But in recent years a new color has emerged to evoke a different kind of rage. Hot pink has become the new tone of female-centered horror. An effeminate variation of blood red, this electric hue combines the strawberry tones of wholesome girlhood with the electric fires of female empowerment.

LISA FRANKENSTEIN

Zelda Williams uses this color to her advantage in her horror comedy Lisa Frankenstein. Quiet and reserved, Lisa (Kathryn Newton) is still trying to adjust to life at a new high school when a freak lightning storm resurrects the dreamy corpse who’s grave she’s been tending. Hiding the Creature (Cole Sprouse) in her bright pink bedroom, Lisa begins to restore his decaying body with a sewing kit and a hot pink tanning bed. Williams bathes the film in rosy hues, evoking the girly pop iconography of the late ’80s.

Lisa Frankenstein may perfect the use of hot pink horror, but Williams is not the first filmmaker to play in a magenta sandbox. Each of the following five films display this empowering color as a unique metaphor for feminine strength.


Jennifer’s Body

Fifteen years before Diablo Cody created Lisa and her Creature, she wrote the hot pink horror classic Jennifer’s Body. Directed by Karyn Kusama, Jennifer (Megan Fox) is a gorgeous cheerleader who morphs into a boy-eating monster after surviving ritual sacrifice at the hands of an evil boy band.

The film’s most enduring image is of Jennifer – full after gorging herself on a clueless football player – sauntering down a high school hall in petal pink earrings, and a hoodie covered with cherry red hearts. Everyone else fades into the background as Jennifer approaches, electrifying the world with her feminine glow. After a lifetime of designing her appearance to appeal to men, she has become the predator – the boys who once judged her are now her prey.

Kusama uses the color to evoke female power in the film’s climax as well. With the bodies beginning to stack up, Jennifer’s best friend Needy (Amanda Seyfried) decides that something must be done to stop this insatiable lady killer. She dons a magenta, ’80s-inspired dress and sets off to find Jennifer at prom before she can devour any more unsuspecting boys. Needy also strikes a devastating blow with a can of pink pepper spray, the physical manifestation of a woman’s protective rage.


The Loved Ones

Jennifer may be a powerful predator, but she’s nothing compared to the sadistic Lola (Robin McLeavy) in Sean Byrne’s 2009 shocker The Loved Ones. This awkward loner loves all things girly and spends her days drawing hearts in her yearbook around the face of her latest crush. With the school dance approaching, Lola takes a chance and asks out Brent (Xavier Samuel), a popular classmate with problems of his own. He politely declines, but Lola unleashes her hidden rage and sends her Daddy (John Brumpton) to punish Brent for this rejection. They kidnap the poor teen and force him to attend a private dance set in the living room of their remote house.

Dressed in a pink satin dress, Lola brutally tortures Brent and prepares to turn her “prince” into a zombified “frog.” We learn that Brent is merely the latest in a long line of suitors Lola has targeted with her malevolent love. Demanding to be treated like a princess, she uses her femininity as a vicious weapon and destroys any man who refuses to submit. The film’s iconic posters feature Lola in her pink dress and paper crown pointing an electric drill at the camera, a disturbing portrait of female fury.


The Neon Demon

The Neon Demon

Nicolas Winding Refn uses hot pink to symbolize a different kind of female aggression in The Neon Demon, a striking film about the cannibalistic world of L.A. modeling. Refn introduces us to a young ingénue named Jesse (Elle Fanning) lying motionless on a couch in an electric blue dress covered in bright red blood. Despite this gruesome styling, she wears flamingo pink makeup on her eyes and lips, subtly hinting at her desire to succeed in this shallow world. The disturbing tableau pans out to reveal pink neon lights surrounding the set, as if poised to consume the naive young model. At an industry party two older women verbally tear her down in a bathroom lit with magenta light and she’s signed by a duplicitous agent wearing a striking fuchsia pantsuit.

Jesse quickly learns that it’s every woman for herself in this cut-throat industry. The pastel pinks and soft muslin whites of her own wardrobe slowly morph into more striking and severe garments as she begins to unleash her inner strength. While preparing to close a high profile fashion show, she catches a glimpse of her sinister alter-ego in the geometrical mirrors and finds herself reborn on the runway’s scorching raspberry lights. Having fully embraced her power and potential, she later stands in a strawberry robe and covers her face with bright pink glitter. With her competitors waiting with baited breath, Jessie finds herself fully immersed in the cruel world of hot pink artifice – for better or worse.


M.F.A.

Rape-revenge films have never been known for their subtlety. Though opinions vary wildly, many have accused older subgenre entries of exploiting sexual assault and capitolizing on a crime far too common in the real world. However, a new wave of filmmakers are attempting to reclaim the narrative by telling this horrific story through a female lens. Natalia Leite’s 2017 film M.F.A. tackles campus rape from an informed perspective with a moving script written by co-star Leah McKendrick. Noelle (Francesca Eastwood) is a college co-ed struggling to earn a graduate degree in visual art when she’s assaulted by a popular member of her studio. When her school’s administration cares more about sweeping this violent crime under the rug, Noelle takes matters into her own hands in an unplanned confrontation that leads to her attacker’s accidental death.

Stunned by a newfound feeling of power, Noelle embarks on a mission of revenge and seeks out other campus rapists who escaped prosecution. In a pivotal sequence, she dons a hot pink wig and crashes a fraternity party hell-bent on tracking down the perpetrators of a brutal gang rape. Noelle lures her target into her trap with this enticing mix of seduction and strength. Once she has him alone, she pounces and makes him pay a brutal price for the pain he has caused other women. Like a superhuman vigilante, Noelle uses this bright pink color as a powerful disguise allowing her to hide her own pain and demand the justice she’s been denied.


Revenge

Coralie Fargeat’s Revenge is a more fantastical examination of the rape-revenge subgenre connected to M.F.A. with a hot pink thread. When Jen (Matilda Anna Ingrid Lutz), a gorgeous if naive socialite on a weekend getaway with her rich boyfriend Richard (Kevin Janssens), climbs out of a helicopter in the opening scene she embodies the bubblegum innocence of a young woman in love. Unfortunately, Richard’s two associates show up unannounced and one of these brutish men sexually assaults her while his boss’s back is turned. Loving boyfriend that he is, Richard decides to handle the matter by pushing Jen off a cliff.

Having survived this horrific attack, Jen crawls into a nearby cave and tends to her wounds. She emerges transformed and becomes a warrior determined to punish these despicable men. Now a fearsome predator dressed in black, Jen looks nothing like the carefree young woman who first arrived at the desert bungalow. But despite this dramatic transformation, she never removes her pink star earrings. Jen may pick up the weapons of the men who are hunting her, but she holds onto the essence of who she is. This signature accessory becomes a symbol of female strength and a powerful reminder of who she will be on the other side of revenge.

Fargeat’s film is no doubt a harrowing watch, but it perfectly encapsulates the power of hot pink horror. Women do not have to adopt a masculine persona to find our own strength and we don’t have to lose track of what makes us uniquely identify as female. It’s called hot pink for a reason. Not only does the color imply the unique traits of a girlish joy, it also burns with the electric fire of our feminine rage.


Lisa Frankenstein is Now Playing Only in Theaters. Get Tickets Now!

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading