Connect with us

Editorials

‘Lisa Frankenstein’ and ‘Jennifer’s Body’: A Match Made in Hot Pink Heaven

Published

on

Lisa Frankenstein review

WARNING: The following contains major spoilers for Jennifer’s Body and Lisa Frankenstein.

Few female killers in the wide world of horror have been able to match the impact of Jennifer Check. Played by the incomparable Megan Fox, Diablo Cody’s teenage seductress rises from the ashes of a hideous crime and returns to wreak bloody vengeance on the teenage boys in her small town. Jennifer’s Body was initially dismissed as a vapid vehicle for a gorgeous star – an unfortunate parallel to the film’s own message – but Karyn Kusama’s teen horror comedy has finally found a devoted audience that appreciates its biting satire and unflinching look at the hell of teenage girlhood. Fifteen years later, Cody returns to the genre with a new heroine searching for power in a world built to dismiss her. Directed by Zelda Williams, Lisa Frankenstein follows a teenage girl desperate for acceptance who finds love in the arms of a resurrected corpse. Connected by a distinctly female rage, both young women shred the stereotypes they’ve been trained to uphold but only manage to find freedom in the grim embrace of death. 

At first glance, Jennifer Check has it all. She’s not only one of the most gorgeous young women on earth, she’s a popular flag girl with guys lining up to date her. But Cody’s impeccable script gives us a peek behind this hot pink curtain. After years of dating, Jennifer knows exactly how people see her: boys want to sleep with her, girls want to be her, and that’s about it. The only person she can trust is her best friend Needy (Amanda Seyfried). This nickname (short for Anita) hints at an unhealthy attachment, but we quickly learn it’s Jennifer who clings to the friendship. Needy has a solid relationship with her boyfriend Chip (Johnny Simmons) and seems to get along with the rest of her classmates. By contrast, Jennifer treats the rest of the world with disdain. Either openly cruel or actively flirtatious, she seems to only relax when she spends time with Needy.

Early in the film, Jennifer drags her best friend to a local concert for company while she flirts with the lead singer of an emo band. She’s delighted when he seems to like her too, but he’s far from the dream date she’d imagined. After a devastating fire, he and his bandmates drag her out to the woods and sacrifice her to Satan, casting a spell for fame and fortune. They literally use her for her body then toss her aside – an extreme example of the way she’s been treated for most of her life. But the spell goes wrong and Jennifer returns from the dead. Because she is not the virgin the ritual requires, she emerges from the woods transformed into a powerful succubus. Seeming to embody the rage of a woman scorned, Jennifer begins using her body as a weapon and hunts down unsuspecting boys to feast on their flesh. No longer consumed with outside approval, Jennifer uses reductive male desires to her advantage and finds that she is now the one in control. 

Kathryn Newton Cole Sprouse in Lisa Frankenstein

Cody’s second entry in the burgeoning coming-of-rage subgenre, Lisa Frankenstein, shares the same universe as Jennifer’s Body though the titular heroines never meet. Lisa (Kathryn Newton) is a shy girl in the late 80s who hasn’t spoken much after the brutal murder of her mother. Rather than provide support, her father has moved on quickly and married a cruel woman named Janet (Carla Gugino) who clearly dislikes her awkward new stepdaughter. She constantly accuses Lisa of acting out and threatens to send her to a mental hospital. By contrast, her daughter Taffy (Liza Soberano) is a delight. Though slightly bubble-headed, she seems to genuinely want a connection with Lisa and goes out of her way to help her make friends. But Lisa needs much more than a well-meaning stepsister. After essentially witnessing her mother’s brutal murder, she needs therapy and the freedom to “act out” until she’s able to process her overwhelming rage and grief. 

It’s no wonder Lisa spends so much time in a local cemetery. Her world was ripped apart by a shocking death and it’s natural that she would feel most at home among the dead. Dreaming about the corpse buried under her favorite grave marker, she longingly whispers “I wish I was with you” as the night erupts in a lightning storm. The Creature (Cole Sprouse) this wish resurrects takes her remark to mean she wants a relationship with him, but Lisa actually means something much darker. She wishes she were dead. Unable to express her pain and constantly told to move on, the only thing that seems appealing to her is a lifeless existence six feet underground. She whispers these words while walking home from a disastrous party. Moments after arriving, she’s dosed with hallucinogens and cowers on the floor as powerful visions flood her senses. Seeing her in distress, her lab partner “rescues” her, but this is only a ruse to get her alone and take advantage of her altered state. Clearly feeling as if she has no one left to turn to, Lisa visits her favorite grave and wishes for death. 

The Creature arrives like the answer to a prayer. His tears may be smelly, but Lisa hides him in her room and helps tend to his reanimated flesh. Unable to talk, he provides the non-judgmental company she needs and the traumatized girl begins to open up. She talks about her favorite music, characters on TV, kids at school, and eventually, her mother. As she helps the Creature put himself back together, it seems she’s actually healing herself. This undead boyfriend also proves to be a powerful protector. Anyone who threatens Lisa must deal with the Creature and Janet becomes the first to fall under his deadly hammer. Her death serves a practical purpose as well and the odd couple begin using the body parts of their victims to replace pieces of the Creature’s decaying form. At first shocked, Lisa begins to find empowerment with this arrangement and targets the boy who tried to assault her. Like Jennifer, she is using a body reborn to exact her rage on an uncaring world. 

Lisa Frankenstein opens with the titular seamstress looking in the mirror before going out for the night. Taffy tries to improve her style, but Lisa seems less than thrilled with the results. When she returns from the disastrous event, she punches her face in the mirror, fed up with having to pretend she’s okay. Jennifer is also tired of hiding her feelings. Before going to the dance, she smears foundation all over her sad and sallow face. The logical reason for her lackluster appearance is hunger – she’s reached the end of her feeding cycle and needs to eat another boy soon. But a deeper reading reveals exhaustion and depression. This is the true Jennifer, a weary girl who believes her worth is tied to her appearance. Tonight is merely one more night in which she has to paint on a gorgeous face to earn validation. 

Jennifer’s transformation is not visible to the naked eye. Only Needy sees the reanimated monster spewing black liquid all over the kitchen floor. The rest of the world sees the same beautiful girl with a newfound swagger. Never known to be shy, Jennifer now seems to be leaning into her seductive persona. With a fearless demon possessing her body, she’s lost the fear that she will never be enough. Lisa also finds confidence when she befriends the Creature. As they raid her closet for clothes to help him blend in, he suggests an old Halloween costume, a lacy black frock she calls a “skeezer pirate” dress. Lisa reluctantly tries it on and a new look is born. Combined with a hat and a bright red lip, Lisa seems to find confidence in the aesthetics of death. No longer hiding from her grief, she finds strength in wearing her pain like a badge of honor.

While Lisa’s murder spree brings her closer to the Creature, Jennifer’s ever-growing body count drives her best friend further away. Jennifer cannot target the guys who actually hurt her so she settles for any innocent boy to fall into her grasp. When Needy balks at her confession, Jennifer sets her sights on Chip, drawing a powerful line in the sand. Needy must now choose between trying to save her friend from a man-eating demon and saving the life of the boy she loves. Needy ultimately loses them both, but absorbs a bit of Jennifer’s power and sets out for revenge. She tracks down the boy band and slaughters them, exacting a steep price for what they did to her friend. Lisa’s murder spree ends in similar destruction. No longer able to cover up the Creature’s crimes, she plans her own death in the tanning bed that brought him back to life. A final scene shows the couple relaxing together as Lisa’s reanimated body heals. She has embraced death as a way to spend eternity with the man she loves. 

LISA FRANKENSTEIN

Though both stories end in the grave, they have decidedly different tones. Jennifer’s Body is ultimately a tragedy, while Lisa Frankenstien ends on a note of hope. Jennifer has been so mistreated by the world that she becomes a monster. The boys she devours may be part of a dehumanizing system, but individually they have done her no wrong. When Needy stabs her in the heart, it almost feels like a release. In death, Jennifer finds not only freedom from the demon possessing her body, but the weight of a world who only values her for her beauty. Lisa also finds freedom in death. With the Creature waiting on the other side, she leaves behind her life of grief and dies to be with the only one who truly accepts her.

Cody opens Jennifer’s Body with the line “hell is a teenage girl,” a statement she explores in both films. Both Jennifer and Lisa just want to be loved for who they are. They become monsters not because they are bad people but because of the hell thrust upon them by the rest of the world. Though Lisa has found a soulmate, her tragedy lies in the fact that she can only be with him in death. Jennifer has found unconditional love in Needy, but she’s been too damaged by the world to see it. Neither Jennifer nor Lisa survives her film, but each death seems to bring about a release from the hell of teenage girlhood. We can only hope that, like the Creature, Needy will be waiting for Jennifer on the other side of death.

Editorials

What’s Wrong with My Baby!? Larry Cohen’s ‘It’s Alive’ at 50

Published

on

Netflix It's Alive

Soon after the New Hollywood generation took over the entertainment industry, they started having children. And more than any filmmakers that came before—they were terrified. Rosemary’s Baby (1968), The Exorcist (1973), The Omen (1976), Eraserhead (1977), The Brood (1979), The Shining (1980), Possession (1981), and many others all deal, at least in part, with the fears of becoming or being a parent. What if my child turns out to be a monster? is corrupted by some evil force? or turns out to be the fucking Antichrist? What if I screw them up somehow, or can’t help them, or even go insane and try to kill them? Horror has always been at its best when exploring relatable fears through extreme circumstances. A prime example of this is Larry Cohen’s 1974 monster-baby movie It’s Alive, which explores the not only the rollercoaster of emotions that any parent experiences when confronted with the difficulties of raising a child, but long-standing questions of who or what is at fault when something goes horribly wrong.

Cohen begins making his underlying points early in the film as Frank Davis (John P. Ryan) discusses the state of the world with a group of expectant fathers in a hospital waiting room. They discuss the “overabundance of lead” in foods and the environment, smog, and pesticides that only serve to produce roaches that are “bigger, stronger, and harder to kill.” Frank comments that this is “quite a world to bring a kid into.” This has long been a discussion point among people when trying to decide whether to have kids or not. I’ve had many conversations with friends who have said they feel it’s irresponsible to bring children into such a violent, broken, and dangerous world, and I certainly don’t begrudge them this. My wife and I did decide to have children but that doesn’t mean that it’s been easy.

Immediately following this scene comes It’s Alive’s most famous sequence in which Frank’s wife Lenore (Sharon Farrell) is the only person left alive in her delivery room, the doctors clawed and bitten to death by her mutant baby, which has escaped. “What does my baby look like!? What’s wrong with my baby!?” she screams as nurses wheel her frantically into a recovery room. The evening that had begun with such joy and excitement at the birth of their second child turned into a nightmare. This is tough for me to write, but on some level, I can relate to this whiplash of emotion. When my second child was born, they came about five weeks early. I’ll use the pronouns “they/them” for privacy reasons when referring to my kids. Our oldest was still very young and went to stay with my parents and we sped off to the hospital where my wife was taken into an operating room for an emergency c-section. I was able to carry our newborn into the NICU (natal intensive care unit) where I was assured that this was routine for all premature births. The nurses assured me there was nothing to worry about and the baby looked big and healthy. I headed to where my wife was taken to recover to grab a few winks assuming that everything was fine. Well, when I awoke, I headed back over to the NICU to find that my child was not where I left them. The nurse found me and told me that the baby’s lungs were underdeveloped, and they had to put them in a special room connected to oxygen tubes and wires to monitor their vitals.

It’s difficult to express the fear that overwhelmed me in those moments. Everything turned out okay, but it took a while and I’m convinced to this day that their anxiety struggles spring from these first weeks of life. As our children grew, we learned that two of the three were on the spectrum and that anxiety, depression, ADHD, and OCD were also playing a part in their lives. Parents, at least speaking for myself, can’t help but blame themselves for the struggles their children face. The “if only” questions creep in and easily overcome the voices that assure us that it really has nothing to do with us. In the film, Lenore says, “maybe it’s all the pills I’ve been taking that brought this on.” Frank muses aloud about how he used to think that Frankenstein was the monster, but when he got older realized he was the one that made the monster. The aptly named Frank is wondering if his baby’s mutation is his fault, if he created the monster that is terrorizing Los Angeles. I have made plenty of “if only” statements about myself over the years. “If only I hadn’t had to work so much, if only I had been around more when they were little.” Mothers may ask themselves, “did I have a drink, too much coffee, or a cigarette before I knew I was pregnant? Was I too stressed out during the pregnancy?” In other words, most parents can’t help but wonder if it’s all their fault.

At one point in the film, Frank goes to the elementary school where his baby has been sighted and is escorted through the halls by police. He overhears someone comment about “screwed up genes,” which brings about age-old questions of nature vs. nurture. Despite the voices around him from doctors and detectives that say, “we know this isn’t your fault,” Frank can’t help but think it is, and that the people who try to tell him it isn’t really think it’s his fault too. There is no doubt that there is a hereditary element to the kinds of mental illness struggles that my children and I deal with. But, and it’s a bit but, good parenting goes a long way in helping children deal with these struggles. Kids need to know they’re not alone, a good parent can provide that, perhaps especially parents that can relate to the same kinds of struggles. The question of nature vs. nurture will likely never be entirely answered but I think there’s more than a good chance that “both/and” is the case. Around the midpoint of the film, Frank agrees to disown the child and sign it over for medical experimentation if caught or killed. Lenore and the older son Chris (Daniel Holzman) seek to nurture and teach the baby, feeling that it is not a monster, but a member of the family.

It’s Alive takes these ideas to an even greater degree in the fact that the Davis Baby really is a monster, a mutant with claws and fangs that murders and eats people. The late ’60s and early ’70s also saw the rise in mass murderers and serial killers which heightened the nature vs. nurture debate. Obviously, these people were not literal monsters but human beings that came from human parents, but something had gone horribly wrong. Often the upbringing of these killers clearly led in part to their antisocial behavior, but this isn’t always the case. It’s Alive asks “what if a ‘monster’ comes from a good home?” In this case is it society, environmental factors, or is it the lead, smog, and pesticides? It is almost impossible to know, but the ending of the film underscores an uncomfortable truth—even monsters have parents.

As the film enters its third act, Frank joins the hunt for his child through the Los Angeles sewers and into the L.A. River. He is armed with a rifle and ready to kill on sight, having divorced himself from any relationship to the child. Then Frank finds his baby crying in the sewers and his fatherly instincts take over. With tears in his eyes, he speaks words of comfort and wraps his son in his coat. He holds him close, pats and rocks him, and whispers that everything is going to be okay. People often wonder how the parents of those who perform heinous acts can sit in court, shed tears, and defend them. I think it’s a complex issue. I’m sure that these parents know that their child has done something evil, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still their baby. Your child is a piece of yourself formed into a whole new human being. Disowning them would be like cutting off a limb, no matter what they may have done. It doesn’t erase an evil act, far from it, but I can understand the pain of a parent in that situation. I think It’s Alive does an exceptional job placing its audience in that situation.

Despite the serious issues and ideas being examined in the film, It’s Alive is far from a dour affair. At heart, it is still a monster movie and filled with a sense of fun and a great deal of pitch-black humor. In one of its more memorable moments, a milkman is sucked into the rear compartment of his truck as red blood mingles with the white milk from smashed bottles leaking out the back of the truck and streaming down the street. Just after Frank agrees to join the hunt for his baby, the film cuts to the back of an ice cream truck with the words “STOP CHILDREN” emblazoned on it. It’s a movie filled with great kills, a mutant baby—created by make-up effects master Rick Baker early in his career, and plenty of action—and all in a PG rated movie! I’m telling you, the ’70s were wild. It just also happens to have some thoughtful ideas behind it as well.

Which was Larry Cohen’s specialty. Cohen made all kinds of movies, but his most enduring have been his horror films and all of them tackle the social issues and fears of the time they were made. God Told Me To (1976), Q: The Winged Serpent (1982), and The Stuff (1985) are all great examples of his socially aware, low-budget, exploitation filmmaking with a brain and It’s Alive certainly fits right in with that group. Cohen would go on to write and direct two sequels, It Lives Again (aka It’s Alive 2) in 1978 and It’s Alive III: Island of the Alive in 1987 and is credited as a co-writer on the 2008 remake. All these films explore the ideas of parental responsibility in light of the various concerns of the times they were made including abortion rights and AIDS.

Fifty years after It’s Alive was initially released, it has only become more relevant in the ensuing years. Fears surrounding parenthood have been with us since the beginning of time but as the years pass the reasons for these fears only seem to become more and more profound. In today’s world the conversation of the fathers in the waiting room could be expanded to hormones and genetic modifications in food, terrorism, climate change, school and other mass shootings, and other threats that were unknown or at least less of a concern fifty years ago. Perhaps the fearmongering conspiracy theories about chemtrails and vaccines would be mentioned as well, though in a more satirical fashion, as fears some expectant parents encounter while endlessly doomscrolling Facebook or Twitter. Speaking for myself, despite the struggles, the fears, and the sadness that sometimes comes with having children, it’s been worth it. The joys ultimately outweigh all of that, but I understand the terror too. Becoming a parent is no easy choice, nor should it be. But as I look back, I can say that I’m glad we made the choice we did.

I wonder if Frank and Lenore can say the same thing.

Continue Reading